| Page 11 of 35 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Parallax_
VIP Member
Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
|
 Posted: Fri, 25th Aug 2006 15:38 Post subject: |
|
|
 @ dvsone, just . Ain't you the expert. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Baleur
Posts: 2343
Location: South Sweden
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Aug 2006 15:44 Post subject: |
|
|
| Tr1ples1xer wrote: | | Dazz99 wrote: | | Tr1ples1xer wrote: | You guys should be ashamed !!! this is the PC GAMES forum on a very well known PC forum FFS everyone knows the PC has better graphics than the 360 (if your not a console fanboy) I can play this in 1600 * 1200 with 4XAA and 16 X ANISO try that with your little box it looks verry good here !!!!
Oh and BTW good luck playing this with a gamepad HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH !
Mouse + keyboard FTW !! |
Are you stupid? this game was designed for gamepad, lol. the xbox 360 looks better than the pc version...
THE END. |
NO! any game that has you aiming with your mouse IS better than any fucking gamepad you can imagine, EVERYONE knows that !! where are the PC guys ? has this place turned to shit !!
Gamepad vs mouse + Keyboard , I will own your ass in any FPS every single time EVERYONE knows that !!
damn console kiddise ! bring back the 133t gamers ! |
You fucking fucker-fuckface! I hope you die a horrible death very soon. You are the kind of people that makes ANY gamer look bad, a while ago your kind played ps2 all day long and used that very same reasoning skills (lol) to rack down on the PC games, now that counterstrike came you all switched sides and bash anything without a mouse.
I SUGGEST YOU HONESTLY GET A 360 + AN HDTV, or i can even fucking invite you to my house, and i'll fucking show you how wrong you are on both your remarks.
First of all, resolution is shit. 1280x1024 versus 1600x1200, doesnt make SHIT of a difference compared to next-gen shaders/shadows/effects versus NO next-gen shaders/shadows/effects.
And we all know that, most intelligent people anyway. If you use AA and AF, which both pc and 360 players have, its all down to what version has the most fancy new tech-talk effects. And in this game, the 360 version has that.
And dont fucking act like a MORON, how about you TRY a 360 game before you bash it huh? I have always been a diehard PC-fanboy, until my processor died on me due to insane overclocking, so i got a 360 in the meantime to entertain myself.
And i was so fucking surprised, i never liked ps2, never liked any console except the N64 with Goldeneye and shit like that.
But the 360 was and is fucking INCREDIBLE, both in gfx, sound, physics (aegia style), gameplay and CONTROL!
Ive had to completely re-evaluate the console market, i was like you, only much more intelligent and not a little brat, but i never liked any console.
Now, ive got the most kickass processor model thats out on the market, and i fucking enjoy every god damn sweet tasty-ass pc game i can get my filthy hands on, but i STILL love the 360.
Why? Because only children and brats pick sides. Why not try BOTH? Why not enjoy Both?
I suggest you try the 360 first, then i'll be there when you swear at your mommy because she cant afford one for you.
Bleh i dont give a shit, its your life, im happy that you wont get part of the 360 joy that is gaming.
Amen to that.
Piss out!
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 RAM: 4gb Kingmax DDR2 800mhz Video: Asus GeForce 250GTS 1gb Sound: Asus Xonar.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ady5
Posts: 263
Location: A planet near you
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Baleur
Posts: 2343
Location: South Sweden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Spun[k]
Posts: 1714
Location: SWEDEN
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Aug 2006 15:53 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Aug 2006 15:53 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CaptainCox
VIP Member
Posts: 6823
Location: A Swede in Germany (FaM)
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Aug 2006 15:53 Post subject: |
|
|
OHHHHHHH DEAR. Lung och fin föööör faaaan. No harm done or?. Just your typical NFOrce rap, nothing to get grumpy about man. Räkna till 10 nästa gang mannen, jag gör det hela tiden när man läser runt här 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Aug 2006 15:57 Post subject: |
|
|
Never owned a console since I have my PC, I have a pretty good rig and my card had shader model 3.0 way before the 360 came out all bought with my own money! Ive tried the 360 and wasnt impressed I thought my PC had better graphics on my monitor, HDTV is expensive too !
I have a gamepad for racing games and sports games that controls better for sure but when it comes down to FPS and aiming and firing NOTHING beats a mouse dude that is a fact, nothing you say can change that !
Now go back to the console forum this is PC FFS !!!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Aug 2006 16:00 Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry but this game isn't an FPS lol.
Also it was DESIGNED for consoles.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Aug 2006 16:01 Post subject: |
|
|
| Tr1ples1xer wrote: | Never owned a console since I have my PC, I have a pretty good rig and my card had shader model 3.0 way before the 360 came out all bought with my own money! Ive tried the 360 and wasnt impressed I thought my PC had better graphics on my monitor, HDTV is expensive too !
I have a gamepad for racing games and sports games that controls better for sure but when it comes down to FPS and aiming and firing NOTHING beats a mouse dude that is a fact, nothing you say can change that !
Now go back to the console forum this is PC FFS !!! |
this inst a fps and have you seen games like GoW and table tennis those games are truelly next gen no pc could run those
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Parallax_
VIP Member
Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Aug 2006 16:02 Post subject: |
|
|
ROFL, a PC can easily run GoW, it's running on UE3. Many such games are coming to the PC.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Aug 2006 16:05 Post subject: |
|
|
| Parallax_ wrote: | | ROFL, a PC can easily run GoW, it's running on UE3. Many such games are coming to the PC. |
do you think that you can run those UE3 games on their highest settings?
i cant so i bought a xbox360 so i can run those game un their highest settings
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Parallax_
VIP Member
Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Aug 2006 16:08 Post subject: |
|
|
| demonson360 wrote: | | do you think that you can run those UE3 games on their highest settings? i cant so i bought a xbox360 so i can run those game un their highest settings |
IF Gears Of Wars was coming to the PC, yes of course you could run it on the highest settings. Now if some people only use low- or med-specced computers, no wonder they live in the illusion that you can't.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Aug 2006 16:11 Post subject: |
|
|
| dvsone wrote: | | |IcedFreon| wrote: | | how is it easier to develop a game for a multitude of configurations first, and then have to redo everything so it can work on one specific configuration? its easier to make a game for consoles first, and then toss that same game onto pc with a few resolution improvements. heh not the other way around. now when ps3 arrives the whole console to pc porting issue will be alot less difficult. so pc fanboys can hate on consoles all they want, but the stronger the console the better the port will be for PC. |
ok read what you typed here..think about it..then come to the realisation that for starters the ps3 is in no way more powerful than the xbox360. Infact its prolly a little slower if anything due to bottlenecks. Then look again. ok now what you should be realising is the PS3 architecture and programming is so far removed from a windows PC it actually takes a lot longer to cross port from the ps3 to the PC. But dont take my word for it google and you'll find plenty of interviews with devs that have gone on the record about this.
So in summary the whole console porting issue (as far as the PS3 is concerned) will be MORE difficult..great logic there buddy |
you COMPLETELY fucked up and misinterpreted what i was saying. i didnt suggest it was easy to develop for the PS3 and then port those specific games to PC. im saying the more powerful the console, in terms of gfx capabilities etc, is a better thing for console to PC ports because you dont have to get things removed and such. Like you have to do with say a ps2/xbox console to pc port. so yes it IS good logic to state that the more powerful a console is, the better the results for the console to PC port will be. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Aug 2006 17:19 Post subject: |
|
|
However, the PS3 being the strongest Next-Gen console does remain a pain in the ass to work on.
Working on the dbox of the 360 has always been easy, last year it was a G5 and now its the full console with emulated drives yet this thing sticks to a PC.
With the PS3, it is quite far from a PC and usually the first "dbox" is just a set of regulations and it evolves as they develop it up until its release where we will probably get a fullscale ps3 with emulated drives. Its architecture remains the most unique hence the hardest to work with.
On the other hand, the PS3 has two excellent advantage; an integrated hard drive and a blue ray drive meaning we don't have to worry when developing which is the opposite with the 360; no hd and no hard drive.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mYslead
Posts: 738
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Aug 2006 17:49 Post subject: |
|
|
i just noticed that the cars feels like in Godfather -_-
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Aug 2006 17:54 Post subject: |
|
|
driving=crap
gameplay=nice
If they fix the driving part then this game might me good ...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bigperm
Posts: 1908
Location: Alberta,Canada
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Aug 2006 19:25 Post subject: |
|
|
| Tr1ples1xer wrote: | Never owned a console since I have my PC, I have a pretty good rig and my card had shader model 3.0 way before the 360 came out all bought with my own money! Ive tried the 360 and wasnt impressed I thought my PC had better graphics on my monitor, HDTV is expensive too !
I have a gamepad for racing games and sports games that controls better for sure but when it comes down to FPS and aiming and firing NOTHING beats a mouse dude that is a fact, nothing you say can change that !
Now go back to the console forum this is PC FFS !!! |
Oh, can it you PC fanboy. FFS i have a killer gaming rig, and a 360. And this plays and looks way better on the 360. How fucking hard is that to understand. And yes a mouse and keyboard are good for "Certain games" , but if you bothered to even try the demo before spouting all this fanboy bullshit (That has been argued to death over the past, what 5 years) you would realize that this game was designed with a gamepad in mind. And who cares what forum this is; if im was talking about it in consoles i would expect people to say how the Pc version compares. FFS, are you new to gaming forums or something. Using arguments that have been done to death, in every gaming forum on the net.
@Parallax - you realize you are just reinforcing how much of a biased fanboy you are.
This game rocks, i will definitly be purchasing it.
It so fucking funny that people think that a console with the same specs of hardware as highend pcs would run games worse. Use some logic people its not rocket science. A console has one purpose, and it tailored for that purpose. Unlike a PC. So if you had a PC with the exact same specs as the 360; the 360 would blow it out of the water. Look what the xbox did with what, a 733 celeron.
Last edited by Bigperm on Fri, 25th Aug 2006 19:33; edited 2 times in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Aug 2006 19:48 Post subject: |
|
|
Bigperm, Parallax_ is right. You can run GoW on PC and you can easily achieve 360's visuals.
You are also right that consoles are specifically made to play games hence why you need less top end hardware to achieve the great results yet the PC is an open market and developing a game on it is quite limitless. It is up to the developers to decide if they want their game to be high-end machine oriented or more into the mass market computer while on the 360 you are stuck with what you have. The xbox360 will do similar thing DirectX10 will be able to achieve yet it will never support DirectX10 while on the PC it will and you can rest assured developers will use DirectX10's capabilities.
Bottom line is, the PC is a developer's wet dream because it evolves with time while consoles are stuck at their base form and never evolve. Their only "evolution" is when the maker releases a new console Xbox -> Xbox360 -> no evolution just a new product which means that not everyone will want to buy it.
That's exactly why PC are superior within the gaming world; because while developing your game, you can up it with the hardware market; PhysX is cool, we'll add support for PhysX cards to our current game. While on the Xbox team; PhysX is cool, well we can't do shit.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Aug 2006 19:50 Post subject: |
|
|
PhysX is shit. i wish it werent but it is. waste of 300 bux that was....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Aug 2006 19:56 Post subject: |
|
|
| Parallax_ wrote: | | JiGSaW wrote: | | Ofcourse the 360 looks better because the pc version is a freaking port! |
Uh, yeaaaahhh, because when you port things from console to PC you have to cut textures in half and remove bump mapping. Yeah sure dude, what the fuck have you been smoking? |
If they port it well, why do you want to buy a xbox360 when you have a high end PC? Im sure MS forcing developers to limit their games. Plus to that the 360 ports needs high end systems to run properly and even if you have one you see meaningless slow-downs, low frames, lots of bugs. (example TR:Legends with next-gen option) Then you think "why i spend hundreds of dollars just for a new graphic card, i can buy a xbox360 for that price"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dzhedaj
Posts: 88
Location: Lithuania
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Aug 2006 20:04 Post subject: |
|
|
I especially liked the big explosions when flying with the chopper and with the boat... Game looks ok but I wished there was an option to turn off shadows as it's killing my fps...
Gamplay is great, I liked Total Overdose and GTA and because this is like a mixture between the crazy action of ToD and the big world,etc. from GTA this is gonna be great. Can't wait for release.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Aug 2006 20:04 Post subject: |
|
|
then dont compare the damn thing to GTA. sheesh. GTA is tired anyway. unless 4 does something new imo its gonna be a pretty shit game. im tired of the same GTA over and over and over then everyone saying its GOTY
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Aug 2006 20:26 Post subject: |
|
|
| |IcedFreon| wrote: | | then dont compare the damn thing to GTA. sheesh. GTA is tired anyway. unless 4 does something new imo its gonna be a pretty shit game. im tired of the same GTA over and over and over then everyone saying its GOTY |
I wasn't comparing it to GTA, merely saying it SHARES the same open world and some other features, but this one is more over-the-top and many more things so it's useless comparing it to GTA.Are you kidding me about 4? Has Rockstar ever produced a shitty game? 
I must admit that I expected more from GTA SA but it was still cool. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Aug 2006 20:33 Post subject: |
|
|
REMEBER psx 1 - had better graphic the pc 2 years later PC owned psx , the same will be with xbox360 when we get directx 10 and vista
anyway on topic :
nice game WOW graphics and world but WHY THE FUCK HE CANNOT CROUCH oR ROLL
Last edited by Hfric on Fri, 25th Aug 2006 20:34; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Baleur
Posts: 2343
Location: South Sweden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 11 of 35 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
