| Page 58 of 59 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DXWarlock
VIP Member
Posts: 12597
Location: Florida, USA
|
 Posted: Thu, 12th Nov 2026 16:22 Post subject: |
|
|
@Photish
I agree, a reactionary dip to a temporary situations is just how stocks work.
It can lead to a collapse, but it usually needs a core business centric scandal. Not a private lead/head scandal.
I suspect CEO will be replaced, Nvidia tries it best to 'Nothing to see here', news saturation over a few weeks makes people grow bored/tired/'old news' over it eventually. And stocks climb back up and only real effect is the wiki page for Him and Nvidia have a new entry in the timeline of stuff that happened in the past.
Ai and the RAM situation is bigger than lone Huang himself. Him leaving is just a pebble tossed in the pond to ripple the water. Not the drain plug at the bottom.
-We don't control what happens to us in life, but we control how we respond to what happens in life.
-Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times. -G. Michael Hopf
Disclaimer: Post made by me are of my own creation. A delusional mind relayed in text form.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 12th Nov 2026 16:29 Post subject: |
|
|
This was a hit song, and now is again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 75721
Location: Israel
|
| Posted: Thu, 12th Nov 2026 16:29 Post subject: |
|
|
Now is a good time to buy Nvidia stock.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 75721
Location: Israel
|
| Posted: Thu, 12th Nov 2026 16:30 Post subject: |
|
|
Huang resigned as CEO btw.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 12th Nov 2026 16:33 Post subject: |
|
|
| LeoNatan wrote: | | Huang resigned as CEO btw. |
| Photish wrote: | Jensen Huang resigns as Nvidia CEO after affairs scandal
| Quote: | Nvidia says Jensen Huang has resigned as president and CEO effective immediately
Chief Financial Officer Colette Kress has been appointed as interim CEO while keeping her existing roles
Huang, 63, stepped down following a board meeting amid reports of two extramarital affairs, one involving Alice Huang, a woman alleged to be a Chinese spy
Nvidia shares fell 10% in US premarket trading after the announcement, adding to a decline that has wiped out about $600 billion in market value this week
Huang owns about 3.6% of Nvidia's stock and has dozens of direct reports, underscoring the tight control he maintains over the company he co-founded
US President Donald Trump has called the Nvidia chief 'an honorable guy', while congressional leaders call for investigations into national security risks |
https://www.reuters.com/live/nvidia-live-board-meets-fate-ceo-jensen-huang-after-affair-reports-2026-11-12/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Slizza
Posts: 2435
Location: Bulgaria
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 75721
Location: Israel
|
| Posted: Thu, 12th Nov 2026 17:09 Post subject: |
|
|
In a few years 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Slizza
Posts: 2435
Location: Bulgaria
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tonizito
VIP Member
Posts: 52330
Location: Portugal, the shithole of Europe.
|
| Posted: Thu, 12th Nov 2026 21:24 Post subject: |
|
|
| Photish wrote: | | Frant wrote: | Nvidia (NVDA) shares plunged nearly 10–13% on Thursday, November 12, 2026, after CEO Jensen Huang announced his immediate resignation. The stock had already fallen roughly 30–32% from its October 6 record, wiping out approximately $1.8–2 trillion in market value.
This may be the moment that pops the AI bubble or at least the RAM/GPU bubble.
 |
It won't. |
Nice leosatan style post 
| boundle (thoughts on cracking AITD) wrote: | | i guess thouth if without a legit key the installation was rolling back we are all fucking then |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 75721
Location: Israel
|
| Posted: Thu, 12th Nov 2026 23:05 Post subject: |
|
|
| madmax17 wrote: | | Tim Apple should replace Huang |
He wont. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 75721
Location: Israel
|
| Posted: Fri, 13th Nov 2026 01:24 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 75721
Location: Israel
|
| Posted: Fri, 13th Nov 2026 01:25 Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, this witch hunt suddenly has me scared for his mental health and actions he might consider taking. 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 13th Nov 2026 05:15 Post subject: |
|
|
I wouldn't worry about him even if the world hates him for a whole 5 minutes and his wife takes half his shit he'd still be rich enough to buy a bunker island and wait it out playing with a bunch of chinese models
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 13th Nov 2026 11:13 Post subject: |
|
|
The U.S government runs nvidia now anyway so it doesn't really matter who's "in charge"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 75721
Location: Israel
|
| Posted: Fri, 13th Nov 2026 12:00 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 13th Nov 2026 12:04 Post subject: |
|
|
| LeoNatan wrote: | | Hundreds of employees demand that Huang be reinstated. |
Lmao. Next thing will be they donate money to him.
“The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion.”
- Albert Camus
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 75721
Location: Israel
|
| Posted: Fri, 13th Nov 2026 12:14 Post subject: |
|
|
It’s not about support. Every employee in a large company is invested in the company through RSUs, ESPPs, bonus programs, etc. If the employees believe Huang was instrumental in the company’s growth over the years, they’d obviously want him to remain at the helm. Most employees probably don’t care about a china hooker or extramarital affairs.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DXWarlock
VIP Member
Posts: 12597
Location: Florida, USA
|
| Posted: Fri, 13th Nov 2026 16:41 Post subject: |
|
|
| lametta wrote: | Why would u.s. int.. officials claim anything through the wsj before it's even 100% confirmed?
|
Officials didnt claim anything via newspaper. Newspaper got reports/info/tips on what officials knew and publish articles on that info.
There’s no public evidence that U.S. intelligence officials went to the WSJ to ask to make that claim public.
What evidence do you have that anyone involved was trying to install a replacement for him? Even if it was a deliberate leak, how do you get from that to either of those conclusions?
Everything big that happens doesnt have to have been planned. Entropy (complex but random strings of events) and stupidity often is enough of a cause.
And its not only Capitalism that lies, sabotages, and frames persons/entities of interest for self gain. Think of a country that starts with a letter between A and Z, they do it too.
-We don't control what happens to us in life, but we control how we respond to what happens in life.
-Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times. -G. Michael Hopf
Disclaimer: Post made by me are of my own creation. A delusional mind relayed in text form.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 13th Nov 2026 16:49 Post subject: |
|
|
| DXWarlock wrote: | | lametta wrote: | Why would u.s. int.. officials claim anything through the wsj before it's even 100% confirmed?
|
Officials didnt claim anything via newspaper. Newspaper got reports/info/tips on what officials knew and publish articles on that info.
There’s no public evidence that U.S. intelligence officials went to the WSJ to ask to make that claim public.
And its not only Capitalism that lies, sabotages, and frames persons/entities of interest for self gain.
What evidence do you have that they knew she was/wasn’t a spy, or that anyone involved was trying to install a replacement for him? Even if it was a deliberate leak, how do you get from that to either of those conclusions? |
So its not a security risk for the u.s. that newspapers can put out statements in their name possibly leading to a possible spy fleeing from the u.s.?
If this wasnt planned the u.s. gov should get to it and charge the wsj for leaking intelligence.
What a charade.
"Not only the u.s." U.s. has enough boogeyman with which they justify all the bs they are doing for decades now spare all that bs. They have the biggest boogeymen but are the biggest aggressor/violator.
Last edited by lametta on Fri, 13th Nov 2026 16:52; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DXWarlock
VIP Member
Posts: 12597
Location: Florida, USA
|
| Posted: Fri, 13th Nov 2026 16:51 Post subject: |
|
|
I didnt say it wasnt a security risk.
I said there is no evidence that they didnt do that on thier own, regardless of the security risk. Newspapers often publish scoops on info that is a national security risk to be the first to 'uncover it'.
Go look up how many Freedom of the press vs. so and so cases, are on the court dockets over stuff like that.
Pointing out it was foolish to, doesnt confirm it must have been requested.
-We don't control what happens to us in life, but we control how we respond to what happens in life.
-Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times. -G. Michael Hopf
Disclaimer: Post made by me are of my own creation. A delusional mind relayed in text form.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 13th Nov 2026 16:53 Post subject: |
|
|
| DXWarlock wrote: | I didnt say it wasnt a security risk.
I said there is no evidence that they didnt do that on thier own, regardless of the security risk. Newspapers often publish scoops on info that is a national security risk.
Pointing out it was foolish to, doesnt confirm it must have been requested. |
oh yeah they do? give me at least 5 exanples that concern national security and foreign intervention where the news could ahhave preemptively trigged the foreign actors. You may even use a.i. You ll have a hard time.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DXWarlock
VIP Member
Posts: 12597
Location: Florida, USA
|
| Posted: Fri, 13th Nov 2026 17:03 Post subject: |
|
|
I worked in newspaper publishing for 19 years, no need for AI.
New York Times: tracking terrorist money through SWIFT
Washington Post: CIA black sites in foreign lands
New York Times: NSA illegal wiretapping both domestic and foreign
The Guardian: spying on foreign G20 delegates
Associated Press: foiled/bumbled al-Qaeda bomb plot
Washington Post: NSA surveillance in Hong Kong.
a BIG famous one:
Chicago Tribune: Japanese naval codes After Midway
want more?
-We don't control what happens to us in life, but we control how we respond to what happens in life.
-Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times. -G. Michael Hopf
Disclaimer: Post made by me are of my own creation. A delusional mind relayed in text form.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 13th Nov 2026 17:56 Post subject: |
|
|
| DXWarlock wrote: | I worked in newspaper publishing for 19 years, no need for AI.
New York Times: tracking terrorist money through SWIFT
Washington Post: CIA black sites in foreign lands
New York Times: NSA illegal wiretapping both domestic and foreign
The Guardian: spying on foreign G20 delegates
Associated Press: foiled/bumbled al-Qaeda bomb plot
Washington Post: NSA surveillance in Hong Kong.
a BIG famous one:
Chicago Tribune: Japanese naval codes After Midway
want more? |
In almost all cases you named the leaker got negative consequences out of it.
If we look at the DOjs comment they never admit they leaked it but they never say that a leaker inside their agencies is a security risk and that there will for sure be consequences. reall convenient. You can try to ignore all the points im putting out but that's because you want to.
Clown show:
Rich guy who has affair vs intelligence services that have leaks
Ofc everyone focuses on the affair
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DXWarlock
VIP Member
Posts: 12597
Location: Florida, USA
|
| Posted: Fri, 13th Nov 2026 18:01 Post subject: |
|
|
You didnt qualify that the leaker didnt get in trouble. You asked for examples where the press independently released info that could cause an international issue.
Also, for example in some of those it was a month or more before leaker got negative consequences. So we cannot compare as equal or not, as it's not been long enough to tell if these people will (and then that only covers your new second addition stipulation.)
Also 'In almost all cases'. So...how does it compare to the ones not in that almost? You want a new 3rd qualifier to sift them out too?
“Almost all” also needs a count. Snowden and Teixeira are examples of sources who faced charges. In the Midway case, the DOJ held a grand jury, which declined to indict the reporter. You need to go case by case to support “almost all.”
You said they’d charge the WSJ if the story wasn’t planned. Now you’re talking about what happened to the leakers. Those are two different people/entities. And there is no evidence that media leaks always lead to being charged. A non-trivial percentage was leaked by media, and no charges/indictment followed through.
So it cannot be used as a metric to speculate 'who and why' wanted it published.
Soon your question will be: Show me example of media leaks, where the paper did not get charged, the leaker didnt not face indictment, and it was a Monday with a date that ends in an odd month number and the leaker had brown hair.
Put down the goalpost, you have carried them far enough.
Your trying to argue a point about newspapers, with a guy that worked in paper publishing for nearly all major newspapers, for nearly 1/2 his life...And was direct sole production support contact for WSJ (the one in question) for 12 of those 19 years.
-We don't control what happens to us in life, but we control how we respond to what happens in life.
-Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times. -G. Michael Hopf
Disclaimer: Post made by me are of my own creation. A delusional mind relayed in text form.
Last edited by DXWarlock on Fri, 13th Nov 2026 18:11; edited 2 times in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 58 of 59 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
