I thought it was the fault of the younger generations (ztards) and not fags? Wait..they are one and the same now right? or at least what I hear.
Damn youth these days, with thier non-closeted homosexuallity, confusing music, and movies that are not like the ones I remember 30 year ago..
The most useful source to study wifebeating is responsa literature, which includese a variety of attitudes towards the phenomenon. While some sources declare wifebeating unlawful, others justify it under certain circumstances. Some Ashkenazi rabbis considered battering as grounds for forcing a man to give a get. In fifteenth-century Europe, more rabbis approved of wifebeating for the purpose of education. Some rabbis unconditionally condemn wifebeaters and force them to divorce their wives, but they are a minority. Most are intimidated by the halakhic problems of mamzerut. Contemporarily, almost no rabbinic authorities justify wifebeating for the purpose of education, but many still do not allow a forced divorce to free the victim.
...
Contemporarily, almost no rabbinic authorities justify wifebeating for the purpose of education, but many still do not allow a forced divorce to free the victim.
Good thing Israel is a nation of laws, and women have recourse different than “rabbinical” whims. Unlike most arab or otherwise muslam shitholes.
But you go and dnurker your health away in Islamabad, let’s see how things turn out for you there.
Ah, the perennial conundrum that has perplexed minds throughout the ages, from the dusty halls of ancient philosophers to the bustling streets of modern society: Are we all indeed "fucking" then? To embark on this intellectual odyssey, we must first unfurl the tapestry of human interaction, weaving together strands of desire, intention, and the ever-elusive notion of consent.
Imagine, if you will, the intricate dance of social dynamics, a labyrinthine maze where each individual is a player in the grand symphony of existence. From chance encounters in crowded cafes to fleeting glances across dimly lit bars, every interaction holds within it the potential for connection, for intimacy, for... well, you get the gist. But let's not get ahead of ourselves just yet.
In the landscape of human relationships, the boundaries between platonic camaraderie and romantic entanglement often blur, creating a kaleidoscope of ambiguity that leaves even the most astute observer scratching their head in bewilderment. Are we all "fucking" then? It's a question that probes the depths of our understanding of intimacy, challenging us to redefine our notions of love, lust, and everything in between.
Yet, amidst the sea of uncertainty, there lies a glimmer of hope, a beacon of possibility that illuminates the path forward. For in the tapestry of human experience, every thread, no matter how tangled, contributes to the rich tapestry of life. So, are we all "fucking" then? Perhaps not in the literal sense, but in the cosmic ballet of existence, where each interaction is a step towards self-discovery, who's to say where the boundaries truly lie?
As we navigate the labyrinth of human connection, let us not forget the importance of consent, communication, and mutual respect. For in the end, it is not the destination that matters, but the journey itself. So, my friend, let us raise our glasses to the absurdity of it all, and embrace the beautiful mess that is human existence. And as for the logistics of such an endeavor... well, let's just say it's a logistical nightmare worthy of its own reality show.
The Ship of Theseus: A Philosophical Conundrum on Identity and Change
By Vellichoria
13th January 2020
In the realm of philosophical inquiry, where the deepest riddles of existence reside, there exists a timeless enigma that has captivated the hearts and minds of thinkers throughout the ages. Prepare to embark on a journey of intellectual turbulence as we delve into the mystical paradox of the Ship of Theseus, a haunting tale of identity and metamorphosis that will leave you questioning the very fabric of reality.
Imagine a grand vessel, the Ship of Theseus, renowned for its illustrious voyages across the open seas. Over time, the ship’s wooden planks wear down and require replacement. Diligent craftsmen, committed to preserving the ship’s integrity, steadily replace the decaying parts until every single plank has been exchanged.
Herein lies the paradox: If all the components of the ship have been replaced, can it still be considered the same Ship of Theseus? Does the ship retain its original identity, or has it undergone a fundamental transformation?
Proponents of continuity argue that despite the replacement of its individual parts, the ship maintains its identity. They emphasize that the ship’s form, purpose, and historical significance endure, connecting it to its original conception. They contend that the unbroken chain of craftsmanship and the ship’s unyielding link to its original design solidify its claim to being the Ship of Theseus.
However, dissenting voices question this perspective. They argue that the complete substitution of every component alters the ship’s essence. According to this view, the ship is no longer the same entity since its physical composition has entirely changed. They propose that identity depends on the material makeup of the ship, suggesting it has become an entirely new vessel.
Philosophers have offered various solutions to this intricate puzzle. Some suggest that identity resides in psychological continuity, wherein memories and experiences are crucial factors. They argue that as long as the ship retains a narrative sense of its past and its connection to its voyages, it can still be considered the Ship of Theseus.
Others adopt a contextual approach, positing that identity is subjective and dependent on the observer’s perspective. They contend that the ship’s identity may differ depending on whether one considers its outward appearance alone or delves into its historical significance and the process of replacement.
The Ship of Theseus paradox delves into profound questions surrounding the nature of identity and the interplay between continuity and change. It challenges our intuitive understanding of what constitutes an object’s identity over time and invites us to reflect on the complexities of personal identity, the persistence of objects, and the essence of existence itself.
While the paradox does not offer a definitive resolution, it stimulates intellectual discourse and invites us to contemplate the enigmatic nature of identity and transformation. By engaging with this ancient puzzle, we navigate the depths of philosophical inquiry and gain insights into the mysteries of the human experience.
In the end, the Ship of Theseus remains an enduring symbol, challenging us to question our own sense of self and grapple with the ever-changing nature of the world around us. It encourages us to embrace the philosophical puzzles that enrich our understanding of the profound complexities that shape our existence.
LeoGPT seems to have mysteriously vanished from our spirited troll-off. It appears Leo's three tools of troll tactics, might have finally run dry—either that or he's taken the old playground strategy to heart: "If you can't win, retreat to the ignore button and just quit."
So, as the dust settles on this keyboard clashing, we're left wondering if Leo's silence is a tactical retreat, or his ammo clip loaded with bullocks has been emptied and he shelters in the foxhole scrambling to improvising and learning new, more sophisticated troll tools than he is accustom to wielding over and over for these long years.
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
