Despite none of the scenario makes sense in practice or explanation of why, beyond the first step. (It works long as you don't extrapolate out the reasonings given and it being done that way.)
The same way/thing that was said about printing presses then about books, radio, televised media, the internet when it started, the internet when it change (2.0..something something early 2000s)...New shit is scary, and hypotheticals on a thing you dont know how it works, used in other areas you dont know how they work either, makes scary hypotheticals, since you have no realistic bounds of knowledge of either to gate keep reasonable speculations
-We don't control what happens to us in life, but we control how we respond to what happens in life.
-Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times. -G. Michael Hopf
Disclaimer: Post made by me are of my own creation. A delusional mind relayed in text form.
"Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-imposed nonage. Nonage is the inability to use one's own understanding without another's guidance. This nonage is self-imposed if its cause lies not in lack of understanding but in indecision and lack of courage to use one's own mind without another's guidance. Dare to know! (Sapere aude.) "Have the courage to use your own understanding," is therefore the motto of the enlightenment."
@couleur
Absolutely. "Anything made by man, can be countered by man" I dont think will ever not be true.
the AI is only as 'smart' as the people coding it can code the neutral networks. So counter-AI only needs to be that smart, and it's made by the same level of people (if one gets smarter, the other does too).
The three lines (of many) that made no sense to me:
-We released to the public the tools...(later) we will control all of it.
Which is it? You released it to the public, or your control it. They contradict each other. If everyone has the source code, you no longer can take control of it back.
-"It will allow us to trace sources of misinformation, disinformation, and propaganda to its source".
..I dont even use twitter or such. But finding out who 95% of the people repeating it is, is trivial. Most the time look at the profile. They just SAY who and where they are, if not just ask twitter if your a govt the IP, and the ISP who had that IP assigned to what mac address of nic at that time (you know...like a digital signature that 99% of people dont cover)...so that's not a thing that needs effort to find out now.
This one feels like my friend that gets foaming at the mouth mad at: I don't want the Govt having a photo database of every person with address and weight/height info, hair color, and such to it. That's 1984! (Ummm..should we remind him...he has a drivers licence...)
-Would banks risk working with AI vs a real human? (Not even sure what that has to do with the argument other "OH NOES MY MONEY!" fear).
Yes..they would. They have been for decades working with autonomous transaction computer controlled accounts. Nearly every big Stock Market account, as well as most off arbitrage accounts do 1000's of transactions a day with the bank, totally devoid of human input.
The VAST majority of daily transactions worldwide have nothing to do with a human triggering them. Long as it makes the bank money, they do not care if a person sent the transaction request.
-We don't control what happens to us in life, but we control how we respond to what happens in life.
-Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times. -G. Michael Hopf
Disclaimer: Post made by me are of my own creation. A delusional mind relayed in text form.
But even weak AI could massively alter society as we know it, even though it is theoretically counter-able.
It could take 100 more years to achieve AGI but by then society would look completely different because most people underestimate the transformative power of weak AI alone.
True, but in turn wouldn't those working as it grows with the same set of tools make something that grows equally to it to curtail it? if you get what I am saying.
The rate at which one grows, will be shared by the growth of the other as they build on the same foundational trade of technology between each other.
I happens every time. For example photo editing 'smart' software that people cannot tell was edited, had detection software to spot it keeping pace with the advancements in doing it.
Fake AI chat that people cannot tell is fake. Has a counterpart being able to detect if it is, even as it gets better at doing it..so does its detector.
To me it doesn't matter if 99% of the population doesn't know how it works, when it will work, or at what level of power (or even need to understand those implications). Long as those 1% left, that are the ones actually making that thing itself, are. And they have to be by the nature of the expertise required in making it incrementally more capable of doing that to start with.
-We don't control what happens to us in life, but we control how we respond to what happens in life.
-Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times. -G. Michael Hopf
Disclaimer: Post made by me are of my own creation. A delusional mind relayed in text form.
@tonizito
Guess it takes all types of humor
I couldn't listen to gameplay chat like this of real people, much less AI created ones
I guess because I watch AI gen news/tutorial/etc videos on youtube, I've had like 100 random channels like this sprinkled in my recommended over the last week of 'popular person doing X with them as AI voiceover'. So many channels to right click->Don't recommend channel.
(Not downing it for who likes it, just a tangent comment of you posting that and just an hour ago me going 'why is it recommending all this stuff to me?')
-We don't control what happens to us in life, but we control how we respond to what happens in life.
-Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times. -G. Michael Hopf
Disclaimer: Post made by me are of my own creation. A delusional mind relayed in text form.
@tonizito
Haha for some reason reminded me of joking conversation with a big swole tank of a bouncer I knew at a club. Out of context of how we got to this part, but the segment it reminded me of.
Me: If I was gay, I wouldn't let you bang me. I'd be gay, not desperate.
Him: Trust me, If I was a gay, you wouldn't have a choice.
-We don't control what happens to us in life, but we control how we respond to what happens in life.
-Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times. -G. Michael Hopf
Disclaimer: Post made by me are of my own creation. A delusional mind relayed in text form.
I had no idea who this guy was, but 5 seconds in (literally) I thought it's got to be a pseudoscience guy when he said "Its based on very solid science."
Didn't need to watch the rest. Just skimmed it to see if that hunch was right
If you hear someone use that phrase, they are trying to sell you shit on a TV infomercial for some plug in gadget that cures pain, or loses weight or something...or talking about some made up bullshit on a show they are trying to convince you 'science' backs it without showing what science.
-We don't control what happens to us in life, but we control how we respond to what happens in life.
-Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times. -G. Michael Hopf
Disclaimer: Post made by me are of my own creation. A delusional mind relayed in text form.
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum