They built upon her struggle beeing a woman, which is ok I guess, much has happened on that front since the 90ies, but they completely fail to give the character any other emotional or motivational ties, that would give us an opportunity for empathy.

Major: She's a woman. Woman struggle. She stand up. She strong.
Minor: She was manipulated. Thats dealt with in two minutes. (Remember when we were best friends etc.) It doesnt touch her, not really. She strong.

But it should have been the other way around. I mean the realisation of the manipulation could have led to some berserking on her side at least.

What about some family? What was that story about her father? There seems to be something to give her an innnver motivation. Yet we get almost 0 info.

Thats all. For the rest, she seems completely uninvolving. Like her ass.

Feminists cannot write female characters.

They dont treat women as human beeings! They are so hellbent on their femnist agenda that everything they touch becomes Onedimensional crap. Like her ass.

Would you also imply that every well written female charachter was written by someone who is not a feminist? You do know that feminists are not a homogenous entity and that for many feminists, their feminist ideals are not the only thing important in their lifes.

Not necessarily. That may have been a bit too large. It depends on whether you write the character with feminism as your agenda or not. If you specifically chose to write female characters for the feminist cause you often end up with these one dimensional characters or plotlines. I‘m not saying there was/is no struggle specific to women and that it should be ignored. I‘m just saying that if you focus solely or almost solely on that you ignore human reality, reducing women to this one thing. In a way you perpetuate the very prejudice you want to expose.