New NAS (DS1019+)
Page 1 of 1
Przepraszam
VIP Member



Posts: 14690
Location: Poland. New York.
PostPosted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 00:09    Post subject: New NAS (DS1019+)
So, I finally decided to get get rid of my Buffalo 441 with 4TB x4
to
Synology DS1019+
Upgrade to 16GB of RAM.
AND
5 x 10TB WD RED PRO DRIVES!!!

Gonna put everything in SHR that should leave me with 40TB of space.
Everything should be here on Saturday!

Good times ahead of me and setting everything up!


Back to top
Mister_s




Posts: 19863

PostPosted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 00:37    Post subject:
I'm so happy Pffchh

Keep us updated

Here's a donkley for your effort

Back to top
PumpAction
[Schmadmin]



Posts: 26759

PostPosted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 01:20    Post subject:
Enjoy your slow drives men

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/wd-fesses-up-some-red-hdds-use-slow-smr-tech


=> NFOrce GIF plugin <= - Ryzen 3800X, 16GB DDR4-3200, Sapphire 5700XT Pulse
Back to top
Przepraszam
VIP Member



Posts: 14690
Location: Poland. New York.
PostPosted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 02:15    Post subject:
Well. Shit. Bought premium drives.
Feels bad man


Back to top
PickupArtist




Posts: 10177

PostPosted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 02:17    Post subject:
today i spun up my 5 200gig maxtor drives from around 2005 to see what was still on them lol Very Happy 480p-720p lan leech

guess i should get me one of them multi terra drive soon and try and see if i can still flip old IDE drives
Back to top
Przepraszam
VIP Member



Posts: 14690
Location: Poland. New York.
PostPosted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 04:56    Post subject:
PumpAction wrote:
Enjoy your slow drives men

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/wd-fesses-up-some-red-hdds-use-slow-smr-tech


According to the article..

"Currently, Western Digital’s WD Red 2TB-6TB drives are device-managed SMR (DMSMR). WD Red 8TB-14TB are CMR-based.""

So, WD Reds should still be good? And there is no mention of the PRO line...


Back to top
AmpegV4




Posts: 6248

PostPosted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 05:05    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by AmpegV4 on Mon, 23rd Feb 2026 09:13; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Przepraszam
VIP Member



Posts: 14690
Location: Poland. New York.
PostPosted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 05:13    Post subject:
@AmpegV4 I have also got newer generation I think?

WD101KFBX VS WD102KFBX

I wasn't really able to find any information what is the difference..


Back to top
AmpegV4




Posts: 6248

PostPosted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 06:05    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by AmpegV4 on Mon, 23rd Feb 2026 09:13; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 74357
Location: Israel
PostPosted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 09:37    Post subject:
Redundancy in a NAS is much more important than speed.

SHR is definitely closer to RAID 5 than 4. Parity is distributed between the disks.


My IMDb Ratings | Fix NFOHump Cookies | Hide Users / Threads | Embedded Content (Videos/GIFs/Twitter/Reddit) | The Derps Collection

“Don't cry because it's over. Smile because it happened.”
Back to top
AmpegV4




Posts: 6248

PostPosted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 09:54    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by AmpegV4 on Mon, 23rd Feb 2026 09:13; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Nui
VIP Member



Posts: 5720
Location: in a place with fluffy towels
PostPosted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 10:06    Post subject:
I am interested in a NAS (or something similar) but also wish to have performance if its not entirely unpractical.

Looking at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_RAID_levels I don't understand the advantage of RAID-4 vs 5. The only difference I understand is the dedicated vs distributed parity information? This means writing is a slow as one disk.


kogel mogel
Back to top
Nui
VIP Member



Posts: 5720
Location: in a place with fluffy towels
PostPosted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 11:13    Post subject:
Oh and congrats on the new hardware. Enjoy Very Happy


kogel mogel
Back to top
PumpAction
[Schmadmin]



Posts: 26759

PostPosted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 14:23    Post subject:
Przepraszam wrote:
PumpAction wrote:
Enjoy your slow drives men

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/wd-fesses-up-some-red-hdds-use-slow-smr-tech


According to the article..

"Currently, Western Digital’s WD Red 2TB-6TB drives are device-managed SMR (DMSMR). WD Red 8TB-14TB are CMR-based.""

So, WD Reds should still be good? And there is no mention of the PRO line...

You are in the green Very Happy


=> NFOrce GIF plugin <= - Ryzen 3800X, 16GB DDR4-3200, Sapphire 5700XT Pulse
Back to top
paxsali
Banned



Posts: 18338

PostPosted: Thu, 16th Apr 2020 18:17    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by paxsali on Thu, 4th Jul 2024 23:15; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
Przepraszam
VIP Member



Posts: 14690
Location: Poland. New York.
PostPosted: Sun, 19th Apr 2020 08:16    Post subject:
Everything was delivered today. Ram and Drives

Started the initial setup. Decided to do SHR1 with btrsf. Seems like logical thing to do. SHR2 would take 20TB away vs 10TB for SHR1.

What I didn't know that it takes about 14 hours to initialize 1 10TB disk...for 5 drives it will be around 2-3 days before I can do anything haha


Back to top
Przepraszam
VIP Member



Posts: 14690
Location: Poland. New York.
PostPosted: Tue, 21st Apr 2020 13:46    Post subject:
So..I just setup Sonarr/Radarr with torrent/Usenet and VPN integration..

I had no idea how much automation Sonarr provides . And Usenet is pretty great once you do...
Overall 10/10 purchase on everything.


Back to top
AmpegV4




Posts: 6248

PostPosted: Tue, 21st Apr 2020 13:52    Post subject:
⁢⁢
Back to top
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Hardware Zone
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group