Battlefield V
Page 17 of 55 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18 ... 53, 54, 55  Next
Bob Barnsen




Posts: 31974
Location: Germoney
PostPosted: Sat, 9th Jun 2018 21:41    Post subject:
Ankh wrote:

Too bad fortifcations can only be built on predetermined locations.

I guess with BF6 they will allow free placement.


Enthoo Evolv ATX TG // Asus Prime x370 // Ryzen 1700 // Gainward GTX 1080 // 16GB DDR4-3200


Last edited by Bob Barnsen on Sat, 9th Jun 2018 21:41; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
escalibur




Posts: 12148

PostPosted: Sat, 9th Jun 2018 21:41    Post subject:
Looks just like BF1. What a levolution. Laughing


Ryzen 9800X3D CO ~-26/+200 | Freezer III 360 A-RGB & 3x Phanteks T30 | Strix X670E-F WiFi | MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Ventus OC | Fury Beast 64GB (2x 32GB) DDR5 5600MHz C40 @ 6000MHz C28 | 970 EVO Plus 2 TB | 38GN950-B | S.M.S.L RAW-MDA1 & HiFiMAN Arya Organic | Lancool III Snow White + 4x be quiet! Silent Wings Pro 4 140mm | RM1000x (2021) Gold | G Pro X SUPERLIGHT 2 & POWERPLAY | Win 11 Pro | Logitech MX MECHANICAL

Sometimes I publish YouTube videos: https://www.youtube.com/@RandomTechChannel
Back to top
Nodrim




Posts: 9586
Location: Romania
PostPosted: Sat, 9th Jun 2018 21:43    Post subject:
monk3ybusin3ss wrote:

I stand corrected, it looks exactly as BF1.
And those fortifications. Laughing


Looks like a reskin indeed. I can't say that I'm surprised.
Back to top
StEFaN7




Posts: 5862
Location: them swamps
PostPosted: Sat, 9th Jun 2018 22:47    Post subject:
from that first trailer it looked different but it looks exactly like bf1 with little things added....this could be what bf4 was to bf3

still fortifications look stupid


I can see your soul at the edges of your eyes..
Back to top
Tumitishdu




Posts: 1021

PostPosted: Sat, 9th Jun 2018 23:01    Post subject:
Bob Barnsen wrote:
Tumitishdu wrote:
Bob Barnsen wrote:

+1

They even mentioned it in some stream, i think it was for BF5, that they don't want the maps to get leveled by Levolution. Laughing Very Happy


That would be awesome, Red Faction style. I've never understood why FPS games have not taken that approach to be able to fully destroy the level.


I just answered it in the sentence you quoted grinhurt
-> People being people would just completely destroy a map. Which could result in a flat map. And that in return for example would be a wet dream of every sniper camper.


Yeah that's true. But atleast some form of destruction maybe not till its completely flat. I would like to see a game that is like that, maybe not BF.

Anyways gameplay looks good.
Back to top
monk3ybusin3ss




Posts: 11155

PostPosted: Sat, 9th Jun 2018 23:10    Post subject:
Back to top
WaldoJ
VIP Member



Posts: 32678

PostPosted: Sat, 9th Jun 2018 23:12    Post subject:
If it were an mmo and the destruction was forever yeah i get how thatd be stooopid. But at most a game 64v64 lasts an hour. If a map is huge you cant do a lot and if damage is realistic thered be shit all over the place. Would be perfect for a constantly changing battlefield.

Saying oh we dont want people to level the ground is idiotic. Cause youd have to have everyone destroying the stage and still would be a blast for people to play...

Even in red faction... that shit is hella fun.


Sin317 wrote:
I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself.
Back to top
Tumitishdu




Posts: 1021

PostPosted: Sun, 10th Jun 2018 00:01    Post subject:
WaldoJ wrote:
If it were an mmo and the destruction was forever yeah i get how thatd be stooopid. But at most a game 64v64 lasts an hour. If a map is huge you cant do a lot and if damage is realistic thered be shit all over the place. Would be perfect for a constantly changing battlefield.

Saying oh we dont want people to level the ground is idiotic. Cause youd have to have everyone destroying the stage and still would be a blast for people to play...

Even in red faction... that shit is hella fun.


Yes exactly! I think it would add tons of fun to the gameplay. It could also be a optional feature that servers can enable or disable.
Back to top
madness




Posts: 13318

PostPosted: Sun, 10th Jun 2018 08:42    Post subject:
escalibur wrote:
Looks just like BF1. What a levolution. Laughing


Have to agree. As much as I liked BF1942 back in the day, now I prefer modern combat actually. Couldn't get into BF1, probably because of the crappy weapons and vehicles. WW2 setting should be a bit better but doesn't really look like it is. Hard to tell from videos, though.

Will probably just stick to BF4 again..
Back to top
blackeyedboy




Posts: 10099
Location: Transylvania
PostPosted: Sun, 10th Jun 2018 08:57    Post subject:
escalibur wrote:
Looks just like BF1. What a levolution. Laughing


I think it even looks worse. That high color CONTRAST is hurting the eyes and makes everything harder to see.


You must preorder your party before venturing forth.™FOV CalculatorAre you mindful today?Women: Know Your Limits!
Back to top
pho08




Posts: 2668

PostPosted: Sun, 10th Jun 2018 09:54    Post subject:
meh.. is it just me or does the map design look pretty uninspired?


just with bf1 nothing shown so far made me think "i need to play this" Sad
Back to top
Clevesa




Posts: 3694

PostPosted: Sun, 10th Jun 2018 10:12    Post subject:
pho08 wrote:
meh.. is it just me or does the map design look pretty uninspired?


just with bf1 nothing shown so far made me think "i need to play this" Sad


Yeah, it is just the same over and over again. I'm watching the videos and there is nothing that compels me to play. Same hashed concept.
Back to top
TheZor
VIP Member



Posts: 5991

PostPosted: Sun, 10th Jun 2018 10:28    Post subject:
Fortifications... Royale...
Fort.. Battle...
Nite ? PUBG ?
Philosopheraptor


Those fuckers fear nothing and will steal whatever's trendy instead of building their own proper game, haha Very Happy
And yeah I was right about the grass' colour, the contrast is completely over the place.


Last edited by TheZor on Sun, 10th Jun 2018 10:38; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Ankh




Posts: 23342
Location: Trelleborg
PostPosted: Sun, 10th Jun 2018 10:35    Post subject:
I see no problems what so ever with giving us Battle Royal mode. Its just a mode like Deathmatch anyway so..
Also, BF5 might actually be the first BR mode I actually enjoy Razz


shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
Back to top
gemiko




Posts: 464
Location: Proland
PostPosted: Sun, 10th Jun 2018 11:20    Post subject:
I think that battle royale will be just a squad deathmatch with slighlt changed mechanics.
Back to top
Shinin




Posts: 1104
Location: The Netherlands
PostPosted: Sun, 10th Jun 2018 12:01    Post subject:
Yup looks pretty lame, this could have been a 30 euro expansion pack for BF1.

Shame on me for buying BF1, but i will not make the same mistake with BF5.


i9 7500K, GTX980 Quad Frozr VI, 24GB RAM
Back to top
Flagship




Posts: 333
Location: ... . -.-. .-. . -
PostPosted: Sun, 10th Jun 2018 18:00    Post subject:
Looks nice, but cant get into this ww2 setting. Not atm at least.

Only tried bf4 for the first time today, i might buy it.
Too bad they didnt go for new Bad Company game instead Sad


▌▌▌▌★
Back to top
Ankh




Posts: 23342
Location: Trelleborg
PostPosted: Sun, 10th Jun 2018 18:28    Post subject:
I will buy this one, this will probably be my cup of tea. I love WW2 games Smile


shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
Back to top
TheZor
VIP Member



Posts: 5991

PostPosted: Sun, 10th Jun 2018 19:36    Post subject:
I agree, BR in Battlefield is probably one of the most fun kind of base a BR game mode can get, and it should probably be a lot of fun to play.
It's just the utter lack of creativity or risk-taking that's disappointing - feels very similar to trying to cash in on the Clash-Royal-whatever games frenzy with that C&C abomination.
I can almost hear the men in suits yelling "Fortnite and PUBG made so much money, we need this Battle Royale thing !1!".

Also..

Laughing
Back to top
madness




Posts: 13318

PostPosted: Mon, 11th Jun 2018 13:10    Post subject:
Back to top
Nodrim




Posts: 9586
Location: Romania
PostPosted: Mon, 11th Jun 2018 13:17    Post subject:
TheZor wrote:


Laughing


Laughing Laughing
Back to top
Areius




Posts: 14854

PostPosted: Mon, 11th Jun 2018 13:44    Post subject:
TheZor wrote:
I agree, BR in Battlefield is probably one of the most fun kind of base a BR game mode can get, and it should probably be a lot of fun to play.
It's just the utter lack of creativity or risk-taking that's disappointing - feels very similar to trying to cash in on the Clash-Royal-whatever games frenzy with that C&C abomination.
I can almost hear the men in suits yelling "Fortnite and PUBG made so much money, we need this Battle Royale thing !1!".

Also..

Laughing

Not trying to defend BF5, but that doesn't necessary mean it's a lootbox. It might be predetermined what's it it. Regardless, if it's just for different gun colors etc, and then keep the community whole, I can only applaud that. Really disliked the system in previous BFs where all DLC maps were empty Sad

Game itself looks somewhat interesting, but I'll await the reviews. Won't be buying full price, that's for sure.


PC: Yes. Console: No.
Back to top
wawrzul




Posts: 2336
Location: Cracow, Poland
PostPosted: Tue, 12th Jun 2018 07:41    Post subject:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Battlefield/comments/8qc2a3/battlefield_v_airlift_items_clarification/
Quote:
Airlift items in Battlefield V will be delivered to Deluxe Edition players and through some select partner offers. They will be cosmetic customization items only and will be predetermined by the DICE development team so will be the same for all recipients. No performance or gameplay advantage will be gained from these items.

So people pay so that the game looks and feels even less WWII-like
Back to top
Xalren




Posts: 92

PostPosted: Tue, 12th Jun 2018 15:43    Post subject:
Back to top
Areius




Posts: 14854

PostPosted: Tue, 12th Jun 2018 15:48    Post subject:
wawrzul wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Battlefield/comments/8qc2a3/battlefield_v_airlift_items_clarification/
Quote:
Airlift items in Battlefield V will be delivered to Deluxe Edition players and through some select partner offers. They will be cosmetic customization items only and will be predetermined by the DICE development team so will be the same for all recipients. No performance or gameplay advantage will be gained from these items.

So people pay so that the game looks and feels even less WWII-like

As I've expected it to be. Well, I think this is a fair way to get people to buy stuff (I never do). Much better then lootboxes at least.


PC: Yes. Console: No.
Back to top
garus
VIP Member



Posts: 34200

PostPosted: Tue, 12th Jun 2018 18:19    Post subject:
snip


Last edited by garus on Tue, 27th Aug 2024 21:31; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
sagboy5




Posts: 266

PostPosted: Tue, 12th Jun 2018 18:25    Post subject:
monk3ybusin3ss wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Tp6ZIPuJz8&t=1s&app=desktop



Chick doesnt even know what a flak gun is and these are the people they invite to showcase their game....
Back to top
madness




Posts: 13318

PostPosted: Tue, 12th Jun 2018 19:06    Post subject:
She has 39k subscribers! Big YT star
Back to top
StEFaN7




Posts: 5862
Location: them swamps
PostPosted: Wed, 13th Jun 2018 12:54    Post subject:


no wonder it sounded so epic


I can see your soul at the edges of your eyes..
Back to top
wawrzul




Posts: 2336
Location: Cracow, Poland
PostPosted: Thu, 14th Jun 2018 07:09    Post subject:
https://www.vg247.com/2018/06/13/ea-dont-like-women-battlefield-5-dont-buy/
So much wrong with Söderlund's statement, i don't even Confused
At least he admitted BF V is their Fornite. He even drags his 13-years old daughter (who apparently doesn't know that WWII was fought by men and only some women) into this.

Quote:
“This is something that the development team pushed,” Soderlund told Gamasutra during an E3 interview. “Battlefield 5 is a lot about the unseen, the untold, the unplayed … The common perception is that there were no women in World War II. There were a ton of women who both fought in World War II and partook in the war.”

After explaining the creative reasoning, Soderlund moved into personal examples. “I have a 13-year-old daughter that when the trailer came out and she saw all the flak, she asked me, ‘Dad, why’s this happening?'” he continued. “She plays Fortnite, and says, ‘I can be a girl in Fortnite. Why are people so upset about this?’ … I just said, ‘You know what? You’re right. This is not ok.’ These are people who are uneducated – they don’t understand that this is a plausible scenario.

“Listen: this is a game. And today gaming is gender-diverse, like it hasn’t been before. There are a lot of female people who want to play, and male players who want to play as a badass [woman]. And we don’t take any flak. We stand up for the cause, because I think those people who don’t understand it, well, you have two choices: either accept it or don’t buy the game. I’m fine with either or. It’s just not OK.”
Back to top
Page 17 of 55 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18 ... 53, 54, 55  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group