[OTHER] SoNy in deep shit ?? [PS3]
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous  1, 2
Supino




Posts: 699
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jan 2006 21:34    Post subject:
pallebrun wrote:
I'm wrong? Oh excuse me, I didn't know you could be wrong about believes. Wink
This is how I see Nintendo, take it or leave it, but dont tell me I'm wrong. I never said he was wrong, did I? Even though he is speculating just as I do.
No one knows what Nintendos TRUE intentions are, but I believe that they are what I wrote. Might be wrong, or might be right, but never tell someone they are wrong unless you know for a fact that they are, and this you dont know in this mather. Wink

I find it very easy to admit that I'm wrong, if I'm proven wrong. I have at many times admited that I was wrong about some things on this forum.
I even admited about the camera in my precious Metal gear solid, that the new camera was indeed better, something I said "NO WAY" to before. So give me facts that Nintendos intentions are world domination and I will gladly admit how wrong I was, but untill you do that, be a man and accept my opinion about it, I accept yours.

And of course Nintendo would gladly dominate the world, which company wouldn't? but I belive that it's not their ultimate goal in the gaming business, and not something they work towards. But it is Sonys and Microsofts.


Edit: Man, in MY opinion he is wrong since his believes aren't the same as mine. But when it comes to facts, neither is right, we are both equally wrong or right.
Dont just read the words as they are, use your head supino. :/


I should have quoted you when I read the first version of your reply. This is just packed with contradictions.

"Do not tell anyone that theyr believes are wrong! But I can say he is wrong becaus his believes are different then mine" HAHA!!

just slow down. you are making a fool of yourself this time..
Back to top
pallebrun




Posts: 2052

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jan 2006 21:39    Post subject:
How old are you supino?
My post makes perfect sense. Yes he is wrong in the way he sees nintendo VERSUS MY way of seeing them. He's not wrong when it comes to having an opinion, or facts or the way he on his own sees Nintendo. Wrong was just used to say "I do not agree with you".
So fine, sorry for not writing "I do not agree with you" instead, I will do that next time since this was obviously too much to handle. Wink

The world of forums, where you have to spell out everything in detail. Razz
Back to top
Supino




Posts: 699
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jan 2006 21:49    Post subject:
I'm 26 pallebrun.

I just want to point out another contradictions you are makeing here:

First you say:

"Of course they care about money, I'm not an idiot to not understand that, they are a company afterall. But being the world dominator is not their ultimate goal"

Then you say:

"And of course Nintendo would gladly dominate the world, which company wouldn't?"

Do you understand why I'm confused?
Back to top
pallebrun




Posts: 2052

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jan 2006 21:55    Post subject:
It's not a contradiction. Why wouldn't they? But it's not what they are working towards, and that's what I'm trying to say. World domination is not a "want" thing for Nintendo, it's more of a "oh, nice" thing, like a lottery win. Smile
While both Microsoft and Sony work towards that goal.
That's what I believe anyway, but who knows, maybe I'm completley wrong in my believes.
Back to top
TheBugulous




Posts: 683
Location: Gaia
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jan 2006 21:59    Post subject:
Pallebrun's explanations makes sense to me and I'm 39 Smile
Nintendo make games primarily out of an altruistic wish to create good games while Microsoft & to a lesser extent Sony create games foremost out of a wish to generate money. What's hard to understand about that Laughing


You wanted a Miracle, I give you the F. B. Eye !!
Back to top
StarShine




Posts: 782

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jan 2006 22:00    Post subject:
pallebrun's post seemed comprehensible enough to me I think the jist of what he was saying is neither his or your opinions are based on fact so both could be right or wrong either way - simple enough.

Personally im stuck in the middle of the arguement I have some mistrust of all of the larger console manufacturers, there all businesses and all out to make money that much is a fact. You only have to look at Sega's failure in the console manufacturing industry to know that excellent critically acclaimed games aren't enough to make a console or a company, hard nosed business ethics are a requirement nowadays. Majesco to a lesser extent with their "Psychonauts" game are another example, everyone loved it, nobody bought it and the company is all but finished - had that game been marketed and published by EA with their head for whoring out games and being a major marketing machine the game might have had some commercial success to add to the critical success.

I also see the point about Nintendo being more interested in the games, even though they use company figureheads like Mario/Zelda/Metroid/Donkey Kong etc and consistently bring out sequels of games for these long running characters they always suceed in doing something new and something special with the games where as other companies are only to happy to release quick money spinning sequels. As much as you want to hate the new Mario or Zelda game and rag on it for being another sequel when you pick them up its very hard not to be charmed and thats remained a constant trend from the Nes right through to the current system.

Just opinions though - you either agree or disagree.

Wheres this all coming from anyway fellas?, both of you guys are amongst the more level headed and mature posters in this section yet your bickering over such a trivial thing - Cmon Share the Love Razz
Back to top
pallebrun




Posts: 2052

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jan 2006 22:10    Post subject:
Still love here. Smile

No problem Supino.


Last edited by pallebrun on Sun, 22nd Jan 2006 22:12; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
Supino




Posts: 699
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jan 2006 22:10    Post subject:
agree with you StarShine. I went out too agressive in this arguement pallebrun, sorry about that..
Back to top
StarShine




Posts: 782

PostPosted: Sun, 22nd Jan 2006 22:12    Post subject:
nice one guys, theres too many trolls and forum idiots without the better posters joining in with them Wink
Back to top
D_A_Kuja
Banned



Posts: 1903

PostPosted: Mon, 23rd Jan 2006 02:42    Post subject:
IMO, nintendo turning away from the console department and working solely as a game developer for other systems would be one of the best things ever happening.
making great games with lots of innovation just isnt enough for one company to be a
console developer if they dont have adequate 3rd party support, but as a game developer
this would be completely different.
just imagine how many game units nintendo could sell if they concentrated on releasing multi-platform versions of all their new games, and besides they could also develop 3rd party periphery hardware for other consoles, like their revolution controller - same as namco with their lightgun.
so if nintendo really wants to be creative and bring new ideas, they dont have to necessarily bring out a new console, they can do this on other consoles as well.


Back to top
AnimalMother




Posts: 12390
Location: England
PostPosted: Mon, 23rd Jan 2006 03:03    Post subject:
Yeah, and concentrate on the handheld market too. Smile


"Techniclly speaking, Beta-Manboi didnt inject Burberry_Massi with Benz, he injected him with liquid that had air bubbles in it, which caused benz." - House M.D

"Faith without logic is the same as knowledge without understanding; meaningless"
Back to top
belajjal




Posts: 4

PostPosted: Mon, 23rd Jan 2006 08:48    Post subject:
I understand pallebrun's comments as well but I still think they are a little naive. I think you need a little insight in how modern companies are run. Nintendo have shareholders, these shareholders don't care for games as their goal is to make money and they believe that Nintendo's strategies will make the shares go up and thus generate money for the shareholders. If a board of a company would say "let's skip the money making bit and concentrate on the games" they would be kicked out and replaced with people more interested in making money. Please understand that this is common in all companies.
I'm not denying that Nintendo are pioneers in a lot of ways and they make good games and hardware (generally), but the reason for this is that it makes money. They "focus on the games, rather than the hardware" because they can't afford to use billions of dollars in R&D for a competitor in the same league as PS3 and X360. This is a way of surviving for them in a market where they were once the dominating force but have been pushed down by companies with far more money on their hands.
In closing comment I would say that I'm a Nintendo fan my self and I love they way Nintendo are handling the competition, but don't be fooled into thinking that they aren't in it for the money. This is just the strategy they have chosen.
Back to top
pallebrun




Posts: 2052

PostPosted: Mon, 23rd Jan 2006 15:25    Post subject:
Umm, I think you are completley missing the point.
Of course money is important, but world domination is not their goal. A goal is something you work towards, and Nintendo aint working towards that, and they never have in my opinion, like Sony & Microsoft.
If world domination was their main goal, then they wouldn't have screwed Sony in the first place. Going with Sony would have given them a shitload of cash. But instead they stabbed Sony in their back and went their own way, and in return earned less money.
It sounds to me that you seem to think I'm some idiot that dont think money is important for a company, but I assure you, I'm not. Smile
Back to top
Cheez-It




Posts: 1106
Location: Rochester, NY
PostPosted: Mon, 23rd Jan 2006 16:00    Post subject:
PALLEBRUN MAN WHAT AN IDIOT!!!!! WTTF11111LOL

jk

I completely see his point (I think)...

Wanting to make money and wanting to make excellent games are NOT the opposite ends of some spectrum.

PS: To go back to one of someone's posts, John Carmack... You do realize ... HE'S A PC PROGRAMMER. Which do you think he is going to "like" more? I found this quite entertaining.

Anyways. I can't wait until all 3 of these are out and we can have more objective comparisons than small fanboy flame wars. Personally I think I'm going to be going with a Revolution and PS3, I see no real reason to go with an xbox360 asides from the need for immediate gratification. Of course this could change, but...


Yes, I am this nerdy Stop by and say hello
Back to top
belajjal




Posts: 4

PostPosted: Mon, 23rd Jan 2006 16:18    Post subject:
Nintendo didn't go with Sony because of their love for the games, they chose the cartridge format for N64 because they didn't believe in the CD technology for games. At that time, the only games on CD were ones that used the space for FMV, look at MegaCD for example. They complained about the slow reading time compared to cartridge and stated that they didn't need the extra space to make a good game. If Nintendo knew at that time what a success Sony would turn the machine into, they would never had let them go.

If Nintendo had the chance to get world domination, they would take it. They had it in the NES and SNES era but lost it for the reason above.

What is the difference between Sony of today and Nintendo of the 80-90s?
Business 101, a company that stops to have goals of growth, is a company that will surely die. In the end, Nintendo's ultimate goal is world domination, just like Sony and Microsoft. Anything else would be business suicide.
Back to top
pallebrun




Posts: 2052

PostPosted: Mon, 23rd Jan 2006 18:04    Post subject:
Ehh, of course Nintendo and any company wants to grow.....
Tell you want, let's just end this because we are just repeating the same thing over and over again. I accept your opinion, and I wish you understood what I was saying, instead of taking me for some idiot that dont know squat. Smile


I agree with you Kuja btw about Nintendo going software only. That would really own.
They are easily one of the best developers in the business, so having their games on multiple platforms would be sweet as candy.
Back to top
fishslice




Posts: 580

PostPosted: Sat, 28th Jan 2006 10:39    Post subject:
XBox 360 is here now, and there some great games already available...

as a console developer (3D artist) I'm really impressed with the shear amount of stuff you can throw at 360, to the extent that it's very easy to not stress about optimising models, remove back faces and so on, you grow to be quite sloppy infact.

Environments can be very densly populated and a lot of resolutiom can be applied too everthing. The results I've seen so far look really amazing, it's a great time to be around doing this sort of thing for a living, and if Sony come along with something better then great, but for the time being enjoy what's already here! and support the industry... buy your games!
Back to top
kirkblitz
Banned



Posts: 1542

PostPosted: Sat, 28th Jan 2006 20:42    Post subject:
what if i rent them? Smile
Back to top
fishslice




Posts: 580

PostPosted: Sat, 28th Jan 2006 21:58    Post subject:
kirkblitz wrote:
what if i rent them? Smile


then great, the important thing is there's an industry out there that wouldn't survive unless you supported developers... if you want to download everything you've ever played, then good for you too, just don't get upset when you see inovation and a wonderfully emerging new form of media struggling to survive.

It's good that we get excited about this stuff. I was 14 when I had my first computer (ZX Spectrum) and I'm 38 now and still live, breath and rely on the industry for my very existance Cool it really is my life. Go crazy for PS3 or Nintendo or 360, who cares so long as the experience is fun and worth the effort.
Back to top
kirkblitz
Banned



Posts: 1542

PostPosted: Sat, 28th Jan 2006 22:11    Post subject:
Who do you work for Razz
Back to top
fishslice




Posts: 580

PostPosted: Sat, 28th Jan 2006 23:50    Post subject:
a UK developer in the West Midlands... does it matter?
Back to top
fishslice




Posts: 580

PostPosted: Sat, 28th Jan 2006 23:56    Post subject:
a developer in the UK... anonimity is probably a good thing on this board I'm sure you and many others who contribute to this community would agree
Back to top
kirkblitz
Banned



Posts: 1542

PostPosted: Sun, 29th Jan 2006 00:24    Post subject:
anonominity is key i agree. Thanks for your honesty Smile
Back to top
fishslice




Posts: 580

PostPosted: Sun, 29th Jan 2006 09:18    Post subject:
kirkblitz wrote:
anonominity is key i agree. Thanks for your honesty Smile


no problem
Back to top
Page 2 of 2 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Console Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group