display calibration standard
Page 1 of 1
Nui
VIP Member



Posts: 5720
Location: in a place with fluffy towels
PostPosted: Sat, 7th Oct 2017 15:36    Post subject: display calibration standard
For video I use bt.1886. Due to my displays low light output of 40 nits, I use an effective gamma of 2.1 (e.g. argyllcms collink -I b:2.1). Values aren't final as I'm still tuning the calibration process. It's a bit problematic because I seem to ask too much of my i1Display Pro, because my ~0.002 nits blacklevel plasma (Panasonic 50VTW60) is darkish and not too well behaved.

My actual question is though, should I use the same/similar standard for normal monitor use (same display)? However with even lower gamma, due to even lower light output (20 nits).

Or is sRGB still a thing and if so, how due do I really handle non 0 blacklevel? Since bt.1886 is the first standard that even deals with this issue. Amazing how long it took to standardize how non oleds should behave and how short it took for oleds to emerge since then Laughing
Back to top
Bob Barnsen




Posts: 31974
Location: Germoney
PostPosted: Sat, 7th Oct 2017 15:38    Post subject:
Wat the fuck did i just read men.


Enthoo Evolv ATX TG // Asus Prime x370 // Ryzen 1700 // Gainward GTX 1080 // 16GB DDR4-3200
Back to top
paxsali
Banned



Posts: 18352

PostPosted: Sat, 7th Oct 2017 15:42    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by paxsali on Thu, 4th Jul 2024 21:08; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Nui
VIP Member



Posts: 5720
Location: in a place with fluffy towels
PostPosted: Sat, 7th Oct 2017 15:51    Post subject:
Bob Barnsen wrote:
Wat the fuck did i just read men.

well, I need a technical answer, and I believe only one who can understand my text is able to help me. I hope I still made sense to someone in the know Laughing

Should you actually be interested, you can always ask more specifically than 'wtf'.

Also, Asshole.
Back to top
Shocktrooper




Posts: 4577

PostPosted: Sat, 7th Oct 2017 16:03    Post subject:
What display do you even have? 20 nits is like really low most monitors don't even reach that low. I have mine at 80-140 nits most of the time, except for games where I prefer higher brightness. SDR content is mastered for 100 nits. LCD Monitor calibration is usually to 120-140 nits. VA panels can take lower brightness better than TN/IPS since their black levels are closer to Plasma than the others.
BT.1886 is better than flat gamma function I agree. I have mine around 2.0 for shadows, 2.2 midtones and 2.35 highlights. Then fine-tune from there with madVR. There is no fixed setting for everything it depends on the source material. Some video looks better with BT.709 curve, some looks better with pure power.
Whatever you calibrate to, make sure that black levels 1-2 are visible but just barely distinguishable against 0 black and 254 white is distinguishable against 255 white.

http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/black.php
www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/white.php
Back to top
Bob Barnsen




Posts: 31974
Location: Germoney
PostPosted: Sat, 7th Oct 2017 16:34    Post subject:
Nui wrote:
Bob Barnsen wrote:
Wat the fuck did i just read men.

well, I need a technical answer, and I believe only one who can understand my text is able to help me. I hope I still made sense to someone in the know Laughing

Should you actually be interested, you can always ask more specifically than 'wtf'.

Also, Asshole.


I was just kidding. Sad

But seriously: I think such questions are better suited in more specialized forums.


Enthoo Evolv ATX TG // Asus Prime x370 // Ryzen 1700 // Gainward GTX 1080 // 16GB DDR4-3200
Back to top
Nui
VIP Member



Posts: 5720
Location: in a place with fluffy towels
PostPosted: Sat, 7th Oct 2017 16:39    Post subject:
@ Shocktrooper
I have a Panasonic 50VTW60 Plasma. And wrote so in paranthesis somewhere Razz. I use 40 nits because that is the limit for this model and size for fullscreen white luminance. Anything higher and anime and other high APL content looks offensive to me, due to ABL (aka dimming for large bright areas). For movies I could go higher, but I can't be bothered atm to have a third profile on the TV itself and 2 3D LUTs for madvr. Even though the difference between anime and movies, or high APL vs low APL content warrants it.
The 20 nits are for normal monitor use in the dark. I can't go much higher, without it being very fatiguing. The white links to lagom look plenty bright to me. In fact I think I need to reduce it a little Smile

Brighter room is not an option, because then everything looks boring.

BT.709 doesn't actually specify a curve though. Power gamma was always just an assumption. And even that leaves options for how to deal with non 0 blacklevels.

I gather from your response though that bt.1886 remains a good choice. Black crush is already what I paid most close attention to, and a major focus of the last days of calibration and what my colorimeter struggled most with Very Happy
Near black performance is so important, but sadly very hard to get right. And at some point 0.002 nits are just not dark enough, so hopefully I'll know when to give up.

Btw, its impossible to get white crush on this device. You can set it as bright as you want. Always wondered why some devices even allow that to happen. Though of course I could fuck it up during calibration, but in that luminance range I have no accuracy problem with measurements.


Thx btw, very appreciated Very Happy


Last edited by Nui on Sat, 7th Oct 2017 16:40; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Nui
VIP Member



Posts: 5720
Location: in a place with fluffy towels
PostPosted: Sat, 7th Oct 2017 16:40    Post subject:
Bob Barnsen wrote:
I was just kidding. Sad

But seriously: I think such questions are better suited in more specialized forums.

Haha, don't worry, me too Smile

Yeah, maybe, but I already gathered, that there are people on this forum who should know. As you can see from the newest posts Very Happy
Back to top
KillerCrocker




Posts: 20503

PostPosted: Sat, 7th Oct 2017 18:13    Post subject:
20 nits?

It's like being outside at night with sunglasses on Laughing


3080 | ps5 pro

Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
Back to top
Nui
VIP Member



Posts: 5720
Location: in a place with fluffy towels
PostPosted: Sat, 7th Oct 2017 18:30    Post subject:
Laughing

No its not. Unless you say the same about the darker half of this gradient on a more typical monitor and you need to see a doctor for your eyes. And lets be honest, we already have other good reasons to believe that your eyes are in need of treatment Cool Face



Though seriously, your eyes can adapt very strongly. Without a brighter reference next to it, I find 20 pretty decent in the dark. 40 can easily make me squint. I don't think I could handle 80 nits for high spl content for long.

Matt Dillahunty wrote:
hyperboly will kill us all
Back to top
KillerCrocker




Posts: 20503

PostPosted: Sat, 7th Oct 2017 18:33    Post subject:
I can't see the link but I can see the whole gradient on lagom if that's what You posted.
I am usually doing about 100-150 nits... but it's impossible to say without calibration hardware... i wish I had one Sad


3080 | ps5 pro

Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
Back to top
Nui
VIP Member



Posts: 5720
Location: in a place with fluffy towels
PostPosted: Sat, 7th Oct 2017 18:42    Post subject:
Yes its the gradient. Damn you hotlink prevention. Of course you can see the whole gradient. 20 nits on a display with 120 nits white luminance with gamma of 2.4 is about 47%, so about half the gradient would have to fit your description above Wink

Do you have a bias light or do you watch in complete darkness?

If you want to get one, the best option currently is what I have and it should be this thing
https://www.amazon.com/X-Rite-i1Display-Pro-Display-Calibration/dp/B0055MBQOW
The next better device, afaik, is more than 10 times as expensive. And below that you only have devices you can't trust. I think I about paid 160€ when I bought mine some years ago.
Back to top
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Hardware Zone
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group