|
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 Posted: Sun, 3rd Sep 2017 02:41 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 3rd Sep 2017 04:01 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 3rd Sep 2017 04:38 Post subject: |
|
|
I can't upload right now as I am at work but with Crystal software, I've got 2848 seq. read and at 4k I have 52.81 read and 244.9 write.
I also made 2 partitions. 180 for OS and the rest for games.
My options in bios are all fine. Everything setup to x4 gen 3 etc etc...
I'm really starting to think that it is just a question of chipsets updates or bios or both...I'll see in the coming weeks what gives.
Lian-Li XL Dynamic ROG Black - EVGA 1000w - Lian-li Galahad 360 AIO - MSI X570 Meg Ace - Rysen 5950x - G.Skill 4x16GB CL14 3600@3800(14-15-15-34) - Samsung 960 Pro 512 - Samsung 960 Pro 1TB - Kingston HyperX SSD 120gb SATA 3 (6gb/s) - WD Black Caviar 2x 2TB SATA 3 (6gb/s) Raid 0 - WD Black Caviar 2 TB SATA 3 (6gb/s) - EVGA 3090 FTW3 - LG C1 48" 4k120hrz
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 3rd Sep 2017 05:49 Post subject: |
|
|
| CaptnNemo wrote: | | scaramonga wrote: | | CaptnNemo wrote: | at 4k I have 52.81 read and 244.9 write.
|
Sounds about right buddy  |
Maybe but why the hell does it not show 3500 read sequential speeds like it normally should ? lolll!!
That way I would be 100% sure it's not the drive itself.
Anyways, it's all good. I'll keep an eye in the coming weeks.
Other then that, blazing fast nonetheless.
What about raid 0 with 2 of those, is there a true gain in performance or it's just not really worth it ? |
The specified speeds of a given drive are the 'manufacturer tested' speeds, and these are the 'top most' figures (seq) write/read, aka, the ones they quote for packaging (on the box), but one is very lucky if they are even close to this quote in reality. Yours is actually pretty good, from what info you have given  , the 3500?, lol, forget that, it means nothing, believe me, likewise, nor does my 2222 in testing. A good drive these days, does over 50 in the 4K range, and yours does this no problem.
As for Raiding the drives, yes, it will improve, but not to the point that you will notice anything. I had 2 of these 950's in RAID0 (stupidly) in the beginning, and yes, the figures looked great  , but could I tell the difference between one or two?, nope, and wanna know why?
Each is fast enough on it's own, so it goes past the point of seeing very little difference in real usage terms, including Gaming, that the extra cost and little benefit that RAID0 brings to these drives, is just not worth it. You will not load anything faster (to the eye) with a pair, against one. I got rid of the other 950, as (apart from space) it just wasn't worth it.
My 2c.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 3rd Sep 2017 07:06 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 8th Sep 2017 23:52 Post subject: |
|
|
I also got the same disk and holy balls it is awesome! Loving it!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 9th Sep 2017 05:51 Post subject: |
|
|
yeah fucking awesome and overpriced compared to normal sata ssds cause you fucking dont have any differences if you dont have two of them and transferring very big data constantly to each other
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 9th Sep 2017 06:23 Post subject: |
|
|
It's Win10 that slows these drives down, I tell ya.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|
|
 |
|
