| Page 3 of 31 |
|
|
 Posted: Wed, 14th Dec 2016 00:24 Post subject: |
|
 |
Last edited by paxsali on Thu, 4th Jul 2024 21:19; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 14th Dec 2016 00:36 Post subject: |
|
|
IF its true that it is faster than 6900K in all fronts, prepare for high price, they are not going to undercut its price like half.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65078
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Wed, 14th Dec 2016 00:43 Post subject: |
|
|
Ryzen sounds like the name for a medicine 
Maybe it will really heal the market from its chronic monopoly disease, it would be refreshing if it doesn't get withdrawn as per tradition.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 14th Dec 2016 00:54 Post subject: |
|
|
guuuuuuuuuuuuys and gaaaaaaays plz its not faster than the 6900k, otherwise they would have shown the ingame fps for battlefield or different stuff besides "oooh look its 2 secs faster encoding some shit with one encoder"
yes it would be nice if amd is able to pull something out of their pocket which can compete with intel. buuuuuuuut first look at what i wrote above, and second -> wait for the price. and wait for first real tests next year. no need to get too much excited now
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 14th Dec 2016 01:01 Post subject: |
|
|
Last edited by Interinactive on Mon, 4th Oct 2021 10:13; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Przepraszam
VIP Member
Posts: 14489
Location: Poland. New York.
|
| Posted: Wed, 14th Dec 2016 01:16 Post subject: |
|
|
| Interinactive wrote: |  This happens every time |
People thinking they are going to get 6950X performance for $300. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 14th Dec 2016 01:36 Post subject: |
|
|
Last edited by paxsali on Thu, 4th Jul 2024 21:19; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 14th Dec 2016 03:04 Post subject: I have left. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 14th Dec 2016 07:35 Post subject: |
|
|
Isnt 6600k or 6500k a sweetspot for games performance anyway?
3080 | ps5 pro
Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
russ80
Posts: 4679
Location: Romania
|
| Posted: Wed, 14th Dec 2016 08:20 Post subject: |
|
|
| KillerCrocker wrote: | | Isnt 6600k or 6500k a sweetspot for games performance anyway? |
Not in cpu-bound games no they aren't. 6700k more like it, the others can choke in certain scenarios, well "choke" you know... as in bottleneck some.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 14th Dec 2016 11:48 Post subject: |
|
|
Ryzen performing similar/better than the intel CPU when both are not boosted is quite great, but I really have to see their boosted (and overclocked) performance before I make a choice. A lot of what they've shown is very interesting, but I personally don't buy an intel CPU for the stock performance.
Next time I upgrade my PC, it'll most likely be a complete overhaul, so I could easily go with Ryzen IF it competes with an overclocked Intel CPU. I'm looking forward to finding out more about "SenseMI", could be an additional great perk.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 14th Dec 2016 13:30 Post subject: |
|
|
About the bf1 fps, was it stream fuck up(some fps programs use some api hooking shit and sometimes don't show up on stream) or did they not show fps even for audience there?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 14th Dec 2016 13:32 Post subject: |
|
|
they havent shown any ingame fps
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
russ80
Posts: 4679
Location: Romania
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 14th Dec 2016 22:33 Post subject: |
|
|
dota2... WHO THE FUCK CARES?!?!?!?!?!?!?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 14th Dec 2016 22:42 Post subject: |
|
|
Those who want a stable FPS in dota2?
Also, go to 2 minutes into the vid to see the difference between AMD and INTEL.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 14th Dec 2016 22:53 Post subject: |
|
|
Last edited by paxsali on Thu, 4th Jul 2024 21:19; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 14th Dec 2016 23:05 Post subject: |
|
|
@Bob Barnsen
You didn't even watch the video. The performance difference was very clear in that, it was a slide-show on the intel CPU while it was crispy smooth on AMD.
HOWEVER, let's wait for some real world tests.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 14th Dec 2016 23:26 Post subject: |
|
|
The comparison to the 6700K could be an indicator for the price point they target.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 14th Dec 2016 23:37 Post subject: |
|
|
@Mr.Tinkles @Kanint
My bad then, sorry.
I was just expecting a simple fps-benchmark.
Enthoo Evolv ATX TG // Asus Prime x370 // Ryzen 1700 // Gainward GTX 1080 // 16GB DDR4-3200
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 14th Dec 2016 23:43 Post subject: |
|
|
@Bob Barnsen
It's K!
I do understand all the criticism though as AMD haven't been on top for ages (not saying they're shit, just not as good as Intel).
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 15th Dec 2016 00:06 Post subject: |
|
|
Edit: I was wrong about both CPUs being benchmarked with Boost disabled. Ryzen had boost disabled, the 6900k didn't. It was a stock configuration, meaning it should boost to 3.5ghz under load (especially encoding, which people have tested at home).
Means their test was Ryzen at 3.4ghz VS 6900k at 3.5ghz instead of 3.2ghz like I thought.
---
The performance of a 6900k for the price of a 6700k would be an absolute steal. In no way do I believe they'll sell it that cheap.
In Canada it's 460$ CDN for the 6700k and 1400$ CDN for the 6900k.
I WISH this was an indicator of the price point they targeted.
Last edited by Kanint on Thu, 15th Dec 2016 00:48; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 15th Dec 2016 00:40 Post subject: |
|
|
There is no indication that the performance matches the 6900K. We only know that both CPUs can handle the load of game and encode combined without framerate drops. It is possible that the Zen does so with 95% utilization while the 6900K only uses 70% of its capabilities. The whole benchmark setup is misleading. Framerates at lowest graphics settings or x264 speeds would tell more.
It also doesn't prove that the Zen is faster that a 6700K for pure gaming. The encode in the background smothers the 4-core 6700K and lets the 8-core Zen win without a fight. It is still possible that the 6700K could provide higher framerates due to faster single threaded performance under realistic gaming conditions. The shady test setup makes me suspect the worst.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 15th Dec 2016 01:37 Post subject: I have left. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 3 of 31 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
