| Page 42 of 103 |
thudo
Posts: 6309
Location: Mellonville North, Canada
|
 Posted: Thu, 1st Sep 2016 18:57 Post subject: |
|
 |
In 2016 after how many game launches (countless) they have had experiences with they never ever can anticipate server demand at the outset?   What are they, NEW?!? A small indie-pendant fledgling company? 
MSI GT72S 6QF Dominator Pro S 29th Anniversary Intel i7 6820HK @ 4.0Ghz, 32GB DDR4-2133 RAM, 2x256GB Raid0 Toshiba NVMe 2.5 inch PCIe SSD, Nvidia Geforce GTX 980 OC'ed 200+ Core / 200+ Mem, 17.3 inch LG IPS HD Display @ 75Hz, Intel 7265AC Wifi, Windows 10 Pro BIOS version: .112 EC Firmware version: .105
Current Broadband speed record: 329.1 Mb/sec down // 21.73 Mb/sec up
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/3933292.png
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 1st Sep 2016 19:03 Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, it's pretty dumb of them not to see it coming. They should consider stress testing their servers before doing something like this. Best way to do it would be to have an open beta.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nodrim
Posts: 9598
Location: Romania
|
| Posted: Thu, 1st Sep 2016 20:07 Post subject: |
|
|
| Bob Barnsen wrote: | | Nodrim wrote: | | https://gfycat.com/PolishedFittingFlatfish |
So are riding horses worth it? |
The horse is fun and overpowered. You one-shot infantry with the sword and the skill cap isn't too high as the horse is pretty easy to control. Using the rifle properly requires some practice, but doesn't take long to get used with it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aeon
Posts: 8700
Location: Netherlands
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 1st Sep 2016 20:20 Post subject: |
|
|
Love this game!
Aeon, your Origin ID?
@Nodrim
Horses = YOLO mode. 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 1st Sep 2016 21:14 Post subject: |
|
|
After 6-7 hours of playtime i think i will buy it.
Looks nice, runs good and sound is absolutely impressive. It doesn't feel like a true BF game, but it's still fun. Tanks are OP and there is not enough ways to destroy them, map choice for beta is awful and there are some problems with HUD (indication for wounded teammates, etc.), but it's something which isn't hard to fix.
Gigabyte X570 Aorus Pro | AMD Ryzen 5800X3D + be quiet! Dark Rock 4 | KFA2 RTX 4080 | 32GB G.Skill Trident Z RGB DDR4 @3600MHz | Samsung 860 Evo 500GB + 1TB + 10TB WD Blue | Corsair RM750x | LG 27GL83A + LG 27GL850 | Fractal Define R6 | Razer BlackWidow Ultimate Stealth | DeathAdder Chroma
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 1st Sep 2016 21:56 Post subject: |
|
|
| 4treyu wrote: |
A thing I've noticed, I don't think the 42% scale resolution is the default, looks very odd using that one. When I increased it to 50 ithen it the image became crisp like when you play at native resolution. My guess is they knew native resolution was still too heavy in the current optimization pass so they made 42% the default for the beta, but I'm sure they'll sort that out in time for release day (if it isn't already). Same situation with the CPU usage which seems excessive just like it happened with the BF4 beta, but that was also fixed before release day. |
You can use the drawscreeninfo command to see internal resolution - 42% is the native one as long as you don't touch it. It will be a little off if you mess with it. You can reset to defaults to fix it.
Also, increasing rendering scale makes the game more detailed, always was that way with Frostbite, that is why it can look crisper.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 1st Sep 2016 22:20 Post subject: |
|
|
How is it possible that half the team is assault yet no one uses the fucking AT gun to take out the goddamn tanks? Unbelievable.
In 12 hours of gameplay, I saw ONE person attempt to take out a tank, the rest pretend it's not there thinking maybe it'll go away.
"I think Call of Duty resonates because it's believable and relatable," Sledgehammer Games cofounder Michael Condrey says.
Believable and relatable...Yep, sounds like Call of Duty
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65085
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Thu, 1st Sep 2016 22:37 Post subject: |
|
|
| Nodrim wrote: | | Bob Barnsen wrote: | | Nodrim wrote: | | https://gfycat.com/PolishedFittingFlatfish |
So are riding horses worth it? |
The horse is fun and overpowered. You one-shot infantry with the sword and the skill cap isn't too high as the horse is pretty easy to control. Using the rifle properly requires some practice, but doesn't take long to get used with it. |
Haha, it reminds me of Dragon Age Inquisition's amazing horse, the one that could climb up steep mountains like a panda 4x4, and freefall from insane heights without feeling anything at all. A rubber tank  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aeon
Posts: 8700
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Thu, 1st Sep 2016 22:50 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
3E74
Posts: 2559
Location: feels wrong
|
| Posted: Thu, 1st Sep 2016 22:53 Post subject: |
|
|
i dont want to upgrade 
well, i tested it a bit and rush is the only one really working for me, when i test 64 player server its not really playable anymore..
so no 64 maps for me, maybe 32 or 48 player will work also for me..
but hey, my old turd did it longer then i expected, haha...
good oll Q9550  But now it hits the limit.. constantly 99% on each core (64 player map)..
And theres an memory leak somewhere, yesterday that game used all of my 8gb ram AND 20GB of pagefile... WTF???
After restarting the game its all fine again and you can play 3 or 4 rounds till you have to restart the game so its not going to turn into a stutter fest...
..:: Life - A sexually transmitted disease which always ends in death. There is currently no known cure::.. 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 1st Sep 2016 23:44 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 1st Sep 2016 23:52 Post subject: |
|
|
http://i.imgur.com/HNfYrDk.gifv
"I think Call of Duty resonates because it's believable and relatable," Sledgehammer Games cofounder Michael Condrey says.
Believable and relatable...Yep, sounds like Call of Duty
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Sep 2016 00:38 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Sep 2016 00:50 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Sep 2016 00:52 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Badrien
Posts: 2118
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Sep 2016 07:40 Post subject: |
|
|
| EyePatchLives wrote: | How is it possible that half the team is assault yet no one uses the fucking AT gun to take out the goddamn tanks? Unbelievable.
In 12 hours of gameplay, I saw ONE person attempt to take out a tank, the rest pretend it's not there thinking maybe it'll go away. |
Been having alot of fun trying to take out tanks with AT mines and AT nades as ive noticed the same thing, people just ignore them. Tank drivers in turn seem to react alot less to me too, making the at mines alot of fun xD
Maybe people arent using the AT gun much becuase it requires more then warbonds to unlock, after a few hours of play I havent unlocked it so far.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Sep 2016 08:01 Post subject: |
|
|
| EyePatchLives wrote: | | Maybe people arent using the AT gun much becuase it requires more then warbonds to unlock, after a few hours of play I havent unlocked it so far. |
I got it unlocked, but rarely use it because it does so little damage to the tanks. Only like 12 if I remember correct and you only have three/four shots.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DimasL
Posts: 1766
Location: Spain
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Sep 2016 13:57 Post subject: |
|
|
| YuckFou wrote: | | EyePatchLives wrote: | | Maybe people arent using the AT gun much becuase it requires more then warbonds to unlock, after a few hours of play I havent unlocked it so far. |
I got it unlocked, but rarely use it because it does so little damage to the tanks. Only like 12 if I remember correct and you only have three/four shots. |
Also you have to get prone or be infront a wall or something to deploy it. It does a bit more than 12, like 20.
MSI MEG X570 UNIFY / A.D2 (AGESA 1.2.0.7) / AMD Ryzen 9 3950X @ 4.70 GHz / Noctua NH-D15 / EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 FTW3 ULTRA / 32GB Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro 3200Mhz CL16 / Corsair AX750w / SilverStone Fortress FT02B-W (Black)
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB SSD NVMe M.2 / Samsung 850 Evo 500gb / Samsung F3 1TB 7200.11rpm / Samsung F4 2TB 5400rpm / Seagate 3TB 7200.14rpm / Seagate 8 TB Expansion Edición Especial USB 3.0
Logitech G502 Lightspeed / Logitech G640 / Logitech G915 Lightspeed / DROP Sennheiser + EPOS PC38X / Xbox360 Pad / Logitech G27 / Logitech X56 HOTAS / Logitech StreamCam
ASUS ROG SWIFT OLED PF27AQDM / BenQ XL2730Z 1ms 144Hz 1440p / HP 27q 1440p 60Hz
Internet Connection: 1Gb/1Gb Fiber
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Sep 2016 14:03 Post subject: |
|
|
My opinion so far:
Pro:
- Graphics, atmosphere, sounds!
- Destruction
- Optimalisation (for older hardware)
Contra:
- Just 'another' BF game with the known popular ingredients. Why not add an extra mode or something really new?
- No VR. 2016 was going to be THE year for VR-helmets, right... . If the big developers don't release new games with this support, VR will stay a gimmick.
- Gameplay is too fast. This is supposed to be a WWI game? Please let them add an option to slow down the gameplay in hardcore mode.
- Too many automatic rifles.
- No teamplay, but that's normal when something new is released.
At this moment a no buy for me.
Maybe they can surprise us in the final release, but at this moment it feels exactly like COD in a bigger (and nicer!) environment.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aeon
Posts: 8700
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Sep 2016 14:12 Post subject: |
|
|
They might introduce a new mode, but they haven't said anything about it, yet.
Intel i7 6700K, RTX470 Super, Kingston HyperX Fury 32GB
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thudo
Posts: 6309
Location: Mellonville North, Canada
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Sep 2016 15:45 Post subject: |
|
|
| Kanint wrote: | | Yeah, it's pretty dumb of them not to see it coming. They should consider stress testing their servers before doing something like this. Best way to do it would be to have an open beta. |
Except this isn't their first open beta for this kind of Massive MP Game: they've been publishing this for decade+ so it isn't like they are new to it at each stage of dev. Weak argument unless they were an indie house but even then you ALWAYS build more than you need in IT as its much harder to build up then back down.
MSI GT72S 6QF Dominator Pro S 29th Anniversary Intel i7 6820HK @ 4.0Ghz, 32GB DDR4-2133 RAM, 2x256GB Raid0 Toshiba NVMe 2.5 inch PCIe SSD, Nvidia Geforce GTX 980 OC'ed 200+ Core / 200+ Mem, 17.3 inch LG IPS HD Display @ 75Hz, Intel 7265AC Wifi, Windows 10 Pro BIOS version: .112 EC Firmware version: .105
Current Broadband speed record: 329.1 Mb/sec down // 21.73 Mb/sec up
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/3933292.png |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Stige
Posts: 3545
Location: Finland
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Sep 2016 16:18 Post subject: |
|
|
Cod lacks all of those Pros? COD doesn't really have shit.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 42 of 103 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
fatty rollover light tanks fit there and perfect spot if you are on attacking team on rush
