| Page 58 of 65 |
Nodrim
Posts: 9598
Location: Romania
|
 Posted: Tue, 12th Jul 2016 16:28 Post subject: |
|
 |
Let's see a video with constant 60fps.
I don't remember seeing in a game to date such horrible pop-ups. The grass in the forest spawns at 1 meter in front of me.
Last edited by Nodrim on Tue, 12th Jul 2016 16:30; edited 2 times in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 12th Jul 2016 16:28 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 12th Jul 2016 16:31 Post subject: |
|
|
much easier to just run "yet another arma benchmark" at ultra preset so we can all compare, like AmpegV4 and myself did.
random screenshots are not exactly great ways to show your game performance.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 12th Jul 2016 16:44 Post subject: |
|
|
| Lopin18 wrote: | | moosenoodles wrote: | | Lopin18 wrote: | Join Tanoa, Wasteland mod. 30 fucking fps  |
Well we all know about wasteland and its various releases right? Some are fantasticly smooth and others are a pile of crap right? Anyhow moving along, try exile mod on tanoa, 50-110 fps on that one. YMMV btw on the MGT server it is of course always full of shit head subbers that like to fuck around. Never had good time on their servers but others seem to flock to it with no performance issues. |
Ive never understood why server performance affects your fps. I mean.... Its fucking ridiculous. Why.
Anyways, yea, exile mod, ironically, is heavier and yet its smoother. Wtf |
its something to do with loading and data keeping of all the players positions running about and changing items/kit etc all the time. BI do a shit job at container items always have. For some freaky deaky reason it affects people differently. You would think as long as you have solid threads and cores the game would manage.
Roll on Arma 4 - 64 bit game engine so we can still come back to this thread and see people complain  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 12th Jul 2016 16:56 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 12th Jul 2016 18:04 Post subject: |
|
|
They've been using this engine since OFP. It's heavily modified. I really hope they have something new ready for ARMA4.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 12th Jul 2016 18:21 Post subject: |
|
|
Unity ?
Serious Rig: CPU : Ryzen7 9800X3D | GC : NVIDIA RTX 5080 FE | Mobo : MSI MPG Carbon X870E | RAM : 64GB DDR5 TridentZ5 Neo 6000 | Case : Fractal Define 7 XL | Cooler : Fractal Celcius S28 Prisma | PSU : Corsair RX1000 Shift | Monitor : LG Oled C2 42" 4K/G-Sync
Mobile Rig : Asus ROG751 JT | i7-4720HQ | GTX 970m | 16GB DDR3 \ G-Sync
Just for the LUL: PS4 Pro / Nintendo Switch / Wii U
$team, Orishit, Upay, PSN : Athlonic
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 12th Jul 2016 18:27 Post subject: |
|
|
CryEngine.
Enthoo Evolv ATX TG // Asus Prime x370 // Ryzen 1700 // Gainward GTX 1080 // 16GB DDR4-3200
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 12th Jul 2016 19:30 Post subject: |
|
|
Use the fucking gta v engine and be done with it
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 12th Jul 2016 20:24 Post subject: |
|
|
| deadpoetic wrote: | | so the campaing is only 7 short coop missions? |
I wish I knew this before buying this crap. Being a huge OFP SP fan, I was already tired of previous ArmA games, this Arma 3 crappy futuristic setting, invented vehicles and weapons and their ever so blander campaigns, but this Apex excuse for a campaign is just too much.
Oh, wait. Wasn't there some Steam refund option? I see it's possible if you keep the gameplay time under 2 hours. Great. I'm not buying their crap anymore until they go back to realistic sides, weapons and vehicles (preferably Cold War, but at this point anything will do but this CSAT nonsense). Refund requested.
Apologies for the rant..
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 12th Jul 2016 23:51 Post subject: |
|
|
Loving it, my 1070 though is not getting steady 60FPS on Ultra.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tonizito
VIP Member
Posts: 51412
Location: Portugal, the shithole of Europe.
|
| Posted: Tue, 12th Jul 2016 23:55 Post subject: |
|
|
| Tumitishdu wrote: | | Loving it, my 1070 though is not getting steady 60FPS on Ultra. |
OC your CPU to 8GHz, might break 30 fps in optimal conditions 
| boundle (thoughts on cracking AITD) wrote: | | i guess thouth if without a legit key the installation was rolling back we are all fucking then |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 13th Jul 2016 00:22 Post subject: |
|
|
@Drowning_witch
Do an i7 or Xeon actually make a difference in this game with more cores and threads?
Enthoo Evolv ATX TG // Asus Prime x370 // Ryzen 1700 // Gainward GTX 1080 // 16GB DDR4-3200
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 13th Jul 2016 00:35 Post subject: |
|
|
http://prntscr.com/bs5kt5
just logged in exile, seems version 1.0 has done wonders eh. 86fps nice.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 13th Jul 2016 00:36 Post subject: |
|
|
Last edited by Interinactive on Mon, 4th Oct 2021 23:08; edited 2 times in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 13th Jul 2016 00:37 Post subject: |
|
|
| Bob Barnsen wrote: | @Drowning_witch
Do an i7 or Xeon actually make a difference in this game with more cores and threads? |
well according to the bench ampegv4 and myself did, not really, unless he has slower ram than me. we'd need more people to use the same bench to know better. i'd say maybe 1-2 fps maybe and a bit better frame times in most demanding scenes.
| Interinactive wrote: |
I'm going to run that benchmark tonight with similiar settings and see what happens |
you can just select the ultra preset in the options, it will use the same exact settings i've used. just don't use 4k res unless the 1080 can fully feed it and never be at full usage.
hilarity of arma 3 performance. took these today.
giant forest
3 objects in narrow fov 
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 13th Jul 2016 00:49 Post subject: |
|
|
Just updated, running it at 1440p on a stock i5 3750k and a 980 using auto detect which is mostly ultra/high gives me 40 - 60 in single player. If I drop the view distance a bit I can get constantly > 60. I've also got an i7 6700k and 1070 which I'll try tonight on same monitor.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 13th Jul 2016 00:59 Post subject: |
|
|
I have i5 4670k 16GB DDR3 1600 MHz and GTX 1070 Im not getting steady 60fps around 50 - 58 fps. Running 1080p
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 13th Jul 2016 01:05 Post subject: |
|
|
Last edited by Interinactive on Mon, 4th Oct 2021 23:08; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 13th Jul 2016 01:18 Post subject: |
|
|
I am loving apex though even if I aint getting better performance then this. The new vehicles and stuff are great. Loving the forest combat.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 13th Jul 2016 01:23 Post subject: |
|
|
Last edited by Interinactive on Mon, 4th Oct 2021 23:08; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tonizito
VIP Member
Posts: 51412
Location: Portugal, the shithole of Europe.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 58 of 65 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
But I loved it. nice and long mission with varied encounters and complete freedom of approach.
