Call of Duty: Black Ops 3
Page 18 of 27 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 17, 18, 19 ... 25, 26, 27  Next
pwr




Posts: 204

PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 11:18    Post subject:
Immunity wrote:
Trash game, trash port. My poor 770 kept dipping into the 45's at 1920x1080 - taking the mouse control with it. Uninstalled in disgust after the first "real" mission, where it asks you to unload about 15 rockets on one enemy who continues to pummel you, completely unphased. Laughing


I religiously bought all the previous COD's, but after the failure of Ghosts and AW - not this one! The new engine they made fucks up so many things. One of the most important things it fucks up is mouse input. Since it is deveoped directly for derpsole - the mouse input is simply an emulation (the mouse emulates a derpsole derptroller). That's why the mouse control has been absolutely horrible since Ghosts (I know this how?: I read it somewhere, and it makes sense). The issue is moslty that no matter how much you turn off mouse acceleration, there is still mouse acceleration in small bursts, out of nowhere, throwing off your aim (you'll be moving your aim slightly to the side, but instead you are now aiming at the ceiling or something). Was like that in Ghosts, AW, not in BO2, but in BO3. Something in this mouse-emulation module that they put on top for the pc version, is fucked up. I also seem to mostly affect people with certain setups (I have an i7-950 and a gtx 770), but i've read the same report from other people with newer i5's/i7's.

Maybe it could be because the "mouse" now uses more cycles than previously, since it is emulating a controller, and has second priority to rendering the game or some shit, so the input gets fucked up sometimes on systems with an older cpu?

I think it was in a reddit post on the bo3 beta, I read about the suspicion that it is a mouse emulation.

There is a little guessing here: https://www.reddit.com/r/blackops3/comments/3iix1g/things_to_know_about_black_ops_3_beta_pc/


Last edited by pwr on Fri, 6th Nov 2015 11:45; edited 11 times in total
Back to top
Interinactive
VIP Member



Posts: 29448

PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 11:20    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by Interinactive on Mon, 4th Oct 2021 23:26; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
shimec




Posts: 1214
Location: Serbia
PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 11:55    Post subject:
Back to top
Meridius55




Posts: 166

PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 12:02    Post subject:
neeger93 wrote:
Meridius55 wrote:
can't even get past the menu, CPU runs at 100% and the whole thing is like a powerpoint presentation.

is this a really sophisticated anti-piracy measure, or the game is simply optimized like a horrendous piece of shit?


Change WorkerThreads in config.ini to 2. It's in the game directory in the players folder. Fixed that issue for me.
yeah, that fixed it, still runs like poop though.

As opposed to earlier Treyarch titles even the story is bad.
Back to top
neeger93




Posts: 917

PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 12:03    Post subject:
I like the campaign so far personally. Smile Anyway you can also enable triple buffering from the ini if you so desire.
Back to top
zellar




Posts: 1553

PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 12:38    Post subject:
Runs pretty good.....surprised after all the problems people were having. I haven't tried higher settings.....most on high....medium shadows, turn off motion blur and ambient occlusion. Installed game on my Game Hard Drive....not on the OS hard drive might help?


Gigabyte Z590 UD AC Motherboard - Intel i5-11600k 3.90 GHZ - 32 GB DDR 4 Corsair Vengeance LPX 3600MHz- GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Windforce OC 12GB (Driver 566.03) Corsair GOLD 80 Plus RM750x PSU Gigabyte QS32Q 32" flat screen Gaming Monitor
Back to top
lolozaur




Posts: 26310

PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 13:37    Post subject:
got 60 fps in the menu Cool Face
Back to top
harry_theone




Posts: 11210
Location: The Land of Thread Reports
PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 13:40    Post subject:
shimec wrote:
http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/call-of-duty-black-ops-iii-review/1900-6416302/

Shots fired!! Shocked


No, they finally realized that shit has been recieving scores beyond reality.
Back to top
Bob Barnsen




Posts: 31974
Location: Germoney
PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 14:33    Post subject:
Or EA doesn't have enough money anymore to buy reviews. Laughing


Enthoo Evolv ATX TG // Asus Prime x370 // Ryzen 1700 // Gainward GTX 1080 // 16GB DDR4-3200
Back to top
Janz




Posts: 14000

PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 14:40    Post subject:
why should ea pay magazines to rate games from activision higher? Razz
Back to top
Mas3ter




Posts: 1941

PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 14:46    Post subject:
Found fix for 100% processor usage but don't test it

open the config.ini file
scroll down a little to :

//Thread count for handling the job queue
WorkerThreads = "4" // 2 to 4

and change the "4" to a "2"


confirmed game works fine Very Happy


Last edited by Mas3ter on Fri, 6th Nov 2015 14:57; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
tolanri




Posts: 3589

PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 14:48    Post subject:
Janz wrote:
why should ea pay magazines to rate games from activision higher? Razz


Which reminds me I haven't read any news about Mr. Bobby Cocktick for a long time. Is he still at Acti?
Back to top
difm




Posts: 6618

PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 15:06    Post subject:
tolanri wrote:
Janz wrote:
why should ea pay magazines to rate games from activision higher? Razz


Which reminds me I haven't read any news about Mr. Bobby Cocktick for a long time. Is he still at Acti?


Bob shelled out a lot of money for Candy Crush developers just a few days ago Smile


i5 6600k @ 4.3 GHz | MSI z170 Gaming M7 | 32GB Kingston HyperX Fury | 850 Evo 500GB | EVGA 1070 SC | Seasonic X-660 | CM Storm Stryker
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 15:19    Post subject:
Another "glorious" Treyarch botch job PC version. Lousy visuals, terrible performance, input tied to framerate so that if you deviate a single frame below 60 the mouse instantly turns to sludge, constant hitching and framedrops. Must be a console port or a day ending in Y.

Only way to get anywhere near 60, and it's far from "sustained" by any stretch of the imagination, is to disable half the visual effects.

Dynamic shadows? Gone.
Subsurface Scattering? Gone.
Order Independent Transparency? Gone.
Volumetric Lighting? Gone.
AA? FXAA.
AO? High.

Everything else is on high because out of sheer blind principle I refuse to play any game on "low" or "medium" like a PS3 pleb, yet it still fills VRAM and uses 100% GPU and CPU most of the time - and yes, I did the config.ini fix to change worker threads. I'd have taken more shots but I got so disgusted with how it runs, I just shut it down and walked away.

http://postimg.org/gallery/2cnvjc6gq/b33dff10/

It's not a good looking game, it's not a good *feeling* game because of the god awful mouse control, and the system rape is utterly unwarranted.
Back to top
neeger93




Posts: 917

PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 15:28    Post subject:
sabin1981 wrote:
Another "glorious" Treyarch botch job PC version. Lousy visuals, terrible performance, input tied to framerate so that if you deviate a single frame below 60 the mouse instantly turns to sludge, constant hitching and framedrops. Must be a console port or a day ending in Y.

Only way to get anywhere near 60, and it's far from "sustained" by any stretch of the imagination, is to disable half the visual effects.

Dynamic shadows? Gone.
Subsurface Scattering? Gone.
Order Independent Transparency? Gone.
Volumetric Lighting? Gone.
AA? FXAA.
AO? High.

Everything else is on high because out of sheer blind principle I refuse to play any game on "low" or "medium" like a PS3 pleb, yet it still fills VRAM and uses 100% GPU and CPU most of the time - and yes, I did the config.ini fix to change worker threads. I'd have taken more shots but I got so disgusted with how it runs, I just shut it down and walked away.

http://postimg.org/gallery/2cnvjc6gq/b33dff10/

It's not a good looking game, it's not a good *feeling* game because of the god awful mouse control, and the system rape is utterly unwarranted.

Sheesh, guess they really gimped the Kepler cards again. With a 970 I get significantly better results. It's a horrible port but a really fun game so far. Gameplay is way better than in BLOPS2 IMO.
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 15:30    Post subject:
It's always down to nVidia fucking <Maxwell users. Fallout 4 will be the same, I'll put money on it.
Back to top
Pey




Posts: 5597
Location: Argentina
PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 15:41    Post subject:
4k screenshots @ maxed out details

Some pics:

 Spoiler:
 


Full gallery on the link: http://www.pcmrace.com/2015/11/06/epic-shots-call-of-duty-black-ops-3/


Seasonic 1000w Planitum - TT Level 10 GT - ASUS M5E - i7 2600k @ 5.0ghz - 16GB Patriot Viper 3 - Dell u3011 - EVGA GTX 980 @ SLI - SSD Samsung EVO 250GB - 16TB W.D. - G19/G13 @ Roccat Kone XTD - Razer Vespula - Xonar Phoebus @ Vulcan ANC/Corsair 2100 Vengeance - Logitech G51
Back to top
4treyu




Posts: 23125

PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 15:44    Post subject:
Wow, that looks pretty bad.
Back to top
Janz




Posts: 14000

PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 15:46    Post subject:
looks like shit with everything on high, and runs like shit on my 770. gpu usage always at 95-99%, fps ditching to 35 when not looking at a wall even if there isnt much on the screen (and it looks like shit). great work craparch, great work

hope fallout works fine on my card, i see no reason to upgrade cause it still handles everything else fine so far


Last edited by Janz on Fri, 6th Nov 2015 15:50; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Ankh




Posts: 23342
Location: Trelleborg
PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 15:49    Post subject:
6 dvds lol Very Happy


shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
Back to top
Janz




Posts: 14000

PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 15:50    Post subject:
you can strip about 10gb if you delete anything mp related... movies are "only" 1gb
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 15:51    Post subject:
Janz wrote:
hope fallout works fine on my card, i see no reason to upgrade cause it still handles everything else fine so far


I'm legitimately scared about Fallout 4, to be honest. They're outright recommending a 780 for high details - and it's not even as if the game looks all that impressive right now. I think we're in for a bad time Sad
Back to top
harry_theone




Posts: 11210
Location: The Land of Thread Reports
PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 16:03    Post subject:
@sabin1981 Don't worry about it and wait for hype to kick in for Fallout 4 working well Cute Pom Pom's Awesome
Back to top
h0rnyfavn
Serial Humper



Posts: 13880

PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 16:11    Post subject:
Hmm I can't even run this pos..

Quote:
BlackOps3 has stopped working


PS Bah..After I closed afterburner\riva tuner it started just fine..


1) Lenovo Legion 7 (AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, RTX 3080 16Gb, 32Gb DDR4, SSD 1TB +2TB

2) SFFPC (streaming via Moonlight+ Sunshine)
Back to top
Shawn_Hunter




Posts: 2752
Location: Bombay, India
PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 16:25    Post subject:
This year should really go down in history for being the year of bad PC ports. Sad
Back to top
JBeckman
VIP Member



Posts: 34976
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 16:27    Post subject:
Afterburner / RivaTuner works here but I'm using the separately released updated 6.4.0 release of RT with some new fixes and enhancements, should be part of Afterburner 4.2.0 when it launches, no idea if there's a set date for that though.

http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=403556
Back to top
harry_theone




Posts: 11210
Location: The Land of Thread Reports
PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 16:28    Post subject:
@Shawn_Hunter COD doesn't exist to me, there's been only Arkham Knight so far then Cool Face
Back to top
Immunity




Posts: 5626

PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 16:32    Post subject:
Janz wrote:
looks like shit with everything on high, and runs like shit on my 770. gpu usage always at 95-99%, fps ditching to 35 when not looking at a wall even if there isnt much on the screen.

hope fallout works fine on my card, i see no reason to upgrade cause it still handles everything else fine so far


Yep - that's what I don't understand. The visuals simply don't necessitate anything major GPU wise. Must be down to a shit port port/optimization job, although we've been getting a downright alarming number of those lately, haven't we? Sad

Pisses me off, built this new system but swapped my old card because I didn't feel a 9xx was warranted (wanted to skip a gen!), and all these crap ports are really hampering that "new system high". Evil or Very Mad

Here's to hoping Fallout's OK. I have a feeling it will be once all those worthless Gameworks settings are disabled, but it seems like nothing's certain anymore in this day and age.


I can never be free, because the shackles I wear can't be touched or be seen.
i9-9900k, MSI MPG-Z390 Gaming Pro Carbon, 32GB DDR4 @ 3000, eVGA GTX 1080 DT, Samsung 970 EVO Plus nVME 1TB
Back to top
Shawn_Hunter




Posts: 2752
Location: Bombay, India
PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 16:49    Post subject:
harry_theone wrote:
@Shawn_Hunter COD doesn't exist to me, there's been only Arkham Knight so far then Cool Face


We still have Fallout 4 and Ass Creed. Wink

I pray none of them have these issues, especially stuttering, which annoys the fuck out of anyone.
Back to top
mcmanic




Posts: 1440

PostPosted: Fri, 6th Nov 2015 16:50    Post subject:
all good here on normal gtx980, at 1080p, using i7 9770k, everything on high except shadows which is on medium.
Back to top
Page 18 of 27 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 17, 18, 19 ... 25, 26, 27  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group