Design flaw in Intel processors opens door to rootkits
Page 1 of 1
Invasor
Moderator



Posts: 7638
Location: On the road
PostPosted: Wed, 12th Aug 2015 21:55    Post subject: Design flaw in Intel processors opens door to rootkits
Quote:
A design flaw in the x86 processor architecture dating back almost two decades could allow attackers to install a rootkit in the low-level firmware of computers, a security researcher said Thursday. Such malware could be undetectable by security products.

The vulnerability stems from a feature first added to the x86 architecture in 1997. It was disclosed Thursday at the Black Hat security conference by Christopher Domas, a security researcher with the Battelle Memorial Institute.

By leveraging the flaw, attackers could install a rootkit in the processors System Management Mode (SMM), a protected region of code that underpins all the firmware security features in modern computers.
Once installed, the rootkit could be used for destructive attacks like wiping the UEFI (Unified Extensible Firmware Interface) the modern BIOS or even to re-infect the OS after a clean install. Protection features like Secure Boot wouldnt help, because they too rely on the SMM to be secure.

The attack essentially breaks the hardware roots of trust, Domas said.

Intel did not immediately respond to a request for comment. According to Domas, the chip maker is aware of the issue and has mitigated it in its latest CPUs. The company is also rolling out firmware updates for older processors, but not all of them can be patched, he said.

To exploit the vulnerability and install the rootkit, attackers would need to already have kernel or system privileges on a computer. That means the flaw cant be used by itself to compromise a system, but could make an existing malware infection highly persistent and completely invisible.

Domas only tested the exploit successfully on Intel processors, but noted that x86 processors made by AMD should in theory be vulnerable as well.

Even if BIOS/UEFI updates are made available by computer manufacturers, their rate of adoption is likely to be very low, especially among consumers.

Unfortunately theres not much users can do, except try not to become infected by malware in the first place that could gain kernel privileges to deploy such a rootkit.

http://www.itworld.com/article/2965875/security/design-flaw-in-intel-processors-opens-door-to-rootkits-researcher-says.html
Back to top
Invasor
Moderator



Posts: 7638
Location: On the road
PostPosted: Wed, 12th Aug 2015 21:56    Post subject:
I wonder if this is a flaw or a government requirement...
Back to top
paxsali
Banned



Posts: 18352

PostPosted: Wed, 12th Aug 2015 22:25    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by paxsali on Thu, 4th Jul 2024 21:42; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Janz




Posts: 14000

PostPosted: Wed, 12th Aug 2015 22:34    Post subject:
read about it earlier this week. think they clearly stated (the guys who found that) that it was build into cpus TILL 2010. so all newer cpus dont have that issue. stay calm and get your panties up again
Back to top
Guy_Incognito




Posts: 3436

PostPosted: Wed, 12th Aug 2015 23:31    Post subject:
New conspiracy theory: They want to make everyone upgrade and shell out money for new hardware!
Back to top
Nalo
nothing



Posts: 13516

PostPosted: Wed, 12th Aug 2015 23:56    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by Nalo on Wed, 3rd Jul 2024 06:08; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
freiwald




Posts: 6968

PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2015 00:06    Post subject:
Janz wrote:
read about it earlier this week. think they clearly stated (the guys who found that) that it was build into cpus TILL 2010. so all newer cpus dont have that issue. stay calm and get your panties up again


but i got a i5 750 Sad should i keep my panties down then?
Back to top
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere



Posts: 65081
Location: Italy
PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2015 00:14    Post subject:
Nalo wrote:
It's not a flaw, it's a feature

Hahah Very Happy

I see you, nsa!



Random creations of an insane mind / Screens from Bulgaria [Early Access]


Last edited by ixigia on Thu, 13th Aug 2015 03:17; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Janz




Posts: 14000

PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2015 00:51    Post subject:
freiwald wrote:
Janz wrote:
read about it earlier this week. think they clearly stated (the guys who found that) that it was build into cpus TILL 2010. so all newer cpus dont have that issue. stay calm and get your panties up again


but i got a i5 750 Sad should i keep my panties down then?



keep them down, bend forward and just relax Twisted Evil
Back to top
Epsilon
Dr. Strangelove



Posts: 9240
Location: War Room
PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2015 12:08    Post subject:
Janz wrote:
freiwald wrote:
Janz wrote:
read about it earlier this week. think they clearly stated (the guys who found that) that it was build into cpus TILL 2010. so all newer cpus dont have that issue. stay calm and get your panties up again


but i got a i5 750 Sad should i keep my panties down then?



keep them down, bend forward and just relax Twisted Evil

The pain will only be passing, you should survive the process.
Back to top
Frant
King's Bounty



Posts: 24640
Location: Your Mom
PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2015 13:37    Post subject:
A very very similar article about a "flaw" in the SMM in most x86-CPU's was released at Black Hat 2009.

http://theinvisiblethings.blogspot.se/2009/03/attacking-smm-memory-via-intel-cpu.html

If I put my tinfoil hat on I'd guess that we're talking about an NSA-demand. NSA, Israel and other countries/agencies close to NSA/USA won't let people and organisations worldwide have anonymity. They want to have as many "panic buttons" as possible to shut down whatever they feel is necessary.... Like the Iranian nuclear power plant computers.

Intel can fix those issues with Microcode updates (either by patching or disabling some aspects of those functions). Won't happen though unless there are several other hardware backdoors that NSA and their "fellowship secret organisations" can use instead.


Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!

"The sky was the color of a TV tuned to a dead station" - Neuromancer
Back to top
Janz




Posts: 14000

PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2015 13:45    Post subject:
dont think thats related to any nsa stuff or similar. that "flaw" comes from an era where the "internet" (lets put it in " " cause back in the days it wasnt even comparable to what we got in the beginning of the 90s) wasnt even accessable for anyone except the military
Back to top
Invasor
Moderator



Posts: 7638
Location: On the road
PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2015 14:45    Post subject:
Janz wrote:
dont think thats related to any nsa stuff or similar. that "flaw" comes from an era where the "internet" (lets put it in " " cause back in the days it wasnt even comparable to what we got in the beginning of the 90s) wasnt even accessable for anyone except the military

That's a strong argument. Doesn't mean they never used such "flaw" though...
Back to top
Janz




Posts: 14000

PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2015 15:40    Post subject:
and to be more concrete i think access to that security hole isnt even possible via a virus or anything else internet related. you need direct low level access on that device, so no need to worry for normal users. unless you expect some security agencies to break into your home when you are away and install that shit
Back to top
StrEagle




Posts: 14059
Location: Balkans
PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2015 16:46    Post subject:
CPU firmware updates Confused


Lutzifer wrote:
and yes, mine is only average
Back to top
Janz




Posts: 14000

PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2015 16:57    Post subject:
microcode updates, can be applied either via bios updates or via system updates for the os (which are ofc only temporary active while the os is running)
Back to top
thudo




Posts: 6309
Location: Mellonville North, Canada
PostPosted: Thu, 13th Aug 2015 17:09    Post subject:
Yeah 20 year old exploit, many systems built and deployed later, where is my exploit? Mad Come on! I'm right here!


MSI GT72S 6QF Dominator Pro S 29th Anniversary Intel i7 6820HK @ 4.0Ghz, 32GB DDR4-2133 RAM, 2x256GB Raid0 Toshiba NVMe 2.5 inch PCIe SSD, Nvidia Geforce GTX 980 OC'ed 200+ Core / 200+ Mem, 17.3 inch LG IPS HD Display @ 75Hz, Intel 7265AC Wifi, Windows 10 Pro BIOS version: .112 EC Firmware version: .105

Current Broadband speed record: 329.1 Mb/sec down // 21.73 Mb/sec up
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/3933292.png
Back to top
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Hardware Zone
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group