Grand Theft Auto V
Page 415 of 708 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 414, 415, 416 ... 706, 707, 708  Next
trollpower




Posts: 2314

PostPosted: Fri, 27th Mar 2015 18:19    Post subject:
omfg it looks so outdated.... if this wont run 60FPS I dont know what will...


Ryzen 7 7800X3D, Noctua NH D15 Chromax, GIGABYTE RTX 5070 Ti Windforce, GIGABYTE X670 AORUS ELITE AX, Corsair 2x16GB DDR5 CL30
Back to top
briangw




Posts: 1754
Location: Warren, MN
PostPosted: Fri, 27th Mar 2015 18:24    Post subject:
Looks like concept art! Troll Face
Back to top
4treyu




Posts: 23141

PostPosted: Fri, 27th Mar 2015 18:37    Post subject:
trollpower wrote:
omfg it looks so outdated.... if this wont run 60FPS I dont know what will...


Doing honor to his forum name Cool Face
Back to top
harry_theone




Posts: 11227
Location: The Land of Thread Reports
PostPosted: Fri, 27th Mar 2015 18:41    Post subject:
trollpower wrote:
omfg it looks so outdated.... if this wont run 60FPS I dont know what will...


Witcher 3, with it's outdated graphics will Laughing
Back to top
tw1st




Posts: 6112
Location: New Jersey
PostPosted: Fri, 27th Mar 2015 18:54    Post subject:
The PC version requires Windows 8.1? wat.... it won't run on windows 7 64 bit?

*edit*

nevermind lol


| BenQ XL2420T 24" 120Hz | Ducky Shine III 9008 White LED - Brown MX | Logitech G9x |
| Corsair Carbide 400R | Asus Sabertooth z77 | i7 3770K @ 4.3Ghz - 1.200v | CM Hyper 212 Evo - Push/Pull |
| SLI eVGA 4GB GTX980 ACX SC | Vengeance 16GB RAM 1600 DDR3 | AX850w PSU | Samsung 840Pro 128GB SSD | WD Black 1TB HD |
Back to top
Supermax2004
Banned



Posts: 2407

PostPosted: Fri, 27th Mar 2015 19:29    Post subject:
Let me put it this way. There are very good looking areas....it's a great sightseeing tour. But the second pic for example is a typical 4k super smooth example of how we won't see it at all. At least not with 40fps+! And the first pic looks good but also flat.....many many people hated that about Watch Dicks (where is the depth wtf happened....) same shit here! Nothing special but also not ugly Smile

BUT as I said that is some smooth 4k shit we won't be able to fuck I guess.
Back to top
polosistealth




Posts: 3447

PostPosted: Fri, 27th Mar 2015 20:03    Post subject:


Intel i7 14700K | Gainward RTX4090 Phantom GS 24GB | 32GB DDR5 Corsair Vengeance RGB 6000mhz | SSD nvme Samsung 970EVO 500GB | SSD 2TB Sandisk Ultra 3D | SSD 2TB NVME Crucial P5 Plus |
Creative Sound BlasterX G6 | Fractal Meshify 2 XL | Logitech G703 | Corsair RM850x White | HyperX Cloud | DELL S2721DGF 27" 165hz Gsync + Sony 55XH9077 4K @ 120hz + VRR
Back to top
escalibur




Posts: 12150

PostPosted: Fri, 27th Mar 2015 20:06    Post subject:
polosistealth wrote:
http://imgur.com/gallery/xWruDVC



Balotelli?
Back to top
Subject16




Posts: 625
Location: Bulgaria
PostPosted: Fri, 27th Mar 2015 20:43    Post subject:
Now let's hope, all these delays were actually worth it. According to Rockstar.



Ryzen 5 1600, MSI GTX 1060 6GB, 16GB DDR4 2400
Back to top
(Nexus)




Posts: 2807
Location: 192.168.1.72
PostPosted: Fri, 27th Mar 2015 20:49    Post subject:
escalibur wrote:
polosistealth wrote:
http://imgur.com/gallery/xWruDVC



Balotelli?


I don't see any similarities

Back to top
escalibur




Posts: 12150

PostPosted: Fri, 27th Mar 2015 21:02    Post subject:
It's him definitely! Laughing






Last edited by escalibur on Fri, 27th Mar 2015 21:03; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
warriormax
Banned



Posts: 3644

PostPosted: Fri, 27th Mar 2015 21:02    Post subject:
Subject16 you are missing the whole point. It says " GTAV for PC is fully optimized to support all the latest and greatest hardware" which translates to "you need 4x980 to maintain 30fps".
Back to top
Subject16




Posts: 625
Location: Bulgaria
PostPosted: Fri, 27th Mar 2015 21:04    Post subject:
warriormax wrote:
Subject16 you are missing the whole point. It says " GTAV for PC is fully optimized to support all the latest and greatest hardware" which translates to "you need 4x980 to maintain 30fps".
Okay


Ryzen 5 1600, MSI GTX 1060 6GB, 16GB DDR4 2400
Back to top
LMLM




Posts: 825
Location: Meta Cortechs
PostPosted: Sat, 28th Mar 2015 02:56    Post subject:
warriormax wrote:
Subject16 you are missing the whole point. It says " GTAV for PC is fully optimized to support all the latest and greatest hardware" which translates to "you need 4x980 to maintain 30fps".


I wouldn't interpret it that way. To get the most out of modern GPU's and DX11 certain optimizations and techniques are needed. They are saying that it's a modern game, graphically, on PC. It should also perform well enough on older hardware considering the modest specs they released.
Back to top
scaramonga




Posts: 9800

PostPosted: Sat, 28th Mar 2015 03:06    Post subject:
polosistealth wrote:


I really hope that is not from the game?

1994 graphics shit.


escalibur wrote:
It's him definitely! Laughing


Yup, its him Smile













Cool Face
Back to top
Interinactive
VIP Member



Posts: 29461

PostPosted: Sat, 28th Mar 2015 05:04    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by Interinactive on Tue, 5th Oct 2021 01:05; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
(Nexus)




Posts: 2807
Location: 192.168.1.72
PostPosted: Sat, 28th Mar 2015 08:58    Post subject:
scaramonga wrote:
1994 graphics shit.


Guess you never played a game from that time Laughing
Back to top
trollpower




Posts: 2314

PostPosted: Sat, 28th Mar 2015 09:00    Post subject:
those hires textures... and I paid 60 bucks for this

60fps or gtfo


Ryzen 7 7800X3D, Noctua NH D15 Chromax, GIGABYTE RTX 5070 Ti Windforce, GIGABYTE X670 AORUS ELITE AX, Corsair 2x16GB DDR5 CL30
Back to top
(Nexus)




Posts: 2807
Location: 192.168.1.72
PostPosted: Sat, 28th Mar 2015 09:26    Post subject:
trollpower wrote:
60fps or gtfo


Will be locked @30 Laughing
Back to top
warriormax
Banned



Posts: 3644

PostPosted: Sat, 28th Mar 2015 10:48    Post subject:
It doesn't matter, 'cuz we will be lucky if even 5% of all PCs reach 30 fps.
Back to top
SteamDRM




Posts: 2832

PostPosted: Sat, 28th Mar 2015 11:28    Post subject:
warriormax wrote:
It doesn't matter, 'cuz we will be lucky if even 5% of all PCs reach 30 fps.


Max Payne 3... Embarassed
Back to top
Interinactive
VIP Member



Posts: 29461

PostPosted: Sat, 28th Mar 2015 11:35    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by Interinactive on Tue, 5th Oct 2021 01:05; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73213
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Sat, 28th Mar 2015 12:48    Post subject:
Interinactive wrote:
Yeah, because Max Payne covers the scope of GTAV

You keep saying that, but it's a nonsense argument. If done right, there is no reason why GTA would run worse. Max Payne 3 had sections where a distant city was seen, with buildings and driving vehicles. There is no reason why a distant scene in GTA should be more demanding than this distant scene in Max Payne. The only difference would be the streaming in and out of assets, but wasn't the problem of GTA4.

I am not saying that this will be the case of good coding, but the potential is there.
Back to top
harry_theone




Posts: 11227
Location: The Land of Thread Reports
PostPosted: Sat, 28th Mar 2015 12:59    Post subject:
Looking at how close some LODs are triggered/seen on the screens, it should run nearly as good. To run better than IV is no miracle. Max ofc means all 5% of AMDs could reach 30 fps Laughing
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73213
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Sat, 28th Mar 2015 13:02    Post subject:
BTW PC bullshots here: http://www.gamespot.com/articles/new-gta-5-pc-4k-images-are-totally-gorgeous/1100-6426213/

Surprise, they have parallax mapping. Cool Face Laughing
Back to top
Drowning_witch




Posts: 10818
Location: Strawberry fields
PostPosted: Sat, 28th Mar 2015 13:21    Post subject:
LeoNatan wrote:
Max Payne 3 had sections where a distant city was seen, with buildings and driving vehicles. There is no reason why a distant scene in GTA should be more demanding than this distant scene in Max Payne.


lol wut
Back to top
Interinactive
VIP Member



Posts: 29461

PostPosted: Sat, 28th Mar 2015 13:23    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by Interinactive on Tue, 5th Oct 2021 01:05; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73213
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Sat, 28th Mar 2015 13:31    Post subject:
Where the fuck did I say you should trust them? Don't act like an idiot. I don't think the things you mention would contribute to severe performance degradation. You have scenes in Max Payne with large crowds; not the same, but then again, how much AI do you think is in the pedestrians or traffic? This argument did not hold in GTA4, and does not hold here. Support from this you have from old generation of consoles running Max Payne 3 and GTA5 at a similar framerate and having similar slowdowns from time to time. So either developers had a 90 fps Max Payne 3 running on PS3 but gimped it on purpose to 23-30 fps so it runs the same as GTA5, or GTA5 is not as demanding as you make it sound, compared to Max Payne 3. You are basing your prediction on GTA4, but remember it ran like horseshit on old generation consoles, while both RDR and GTA5 looked much superior and ran a lot better.
Back to top
Interinactive
VIP Member



Posts: 29461

PostPosted: Sat, 28th Mar 2015 13:58    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by Interinactive on Tue, 5th Oct 2021 01:05; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73213
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Sat, 28th Mar 2015 14:09    Post subject:
When you are dealing with <30 fps, 28-30 is much better than 23-26 Laughing They did run a lot better, even on PS3, because in addition to the "couple of" frames, they ran a lot smoother, so much less frame fluctuations, which is important and points to some stability.

Interinactive wrote:
...is this supposed to be proof of anything? Everything ran and looked like shit on old gen consoles.

You being spoiled is beside the point. They ran and looked equally "shit" on old gen consoles, which is my point, while GTA4 looked and ran a lot shittier (23 fps is considerably more shit than 28 ).

BTW, that "shit" you say, still looks better than 95% of open world games, including GTA4 with all the retarded bullshit "enhancers".

Anyway, this discussion is pointless, a few more weeks and we'll see.
Back to top
Page 415 of 708 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 414, 415, 416 ... 706, 707, 708  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group