Camera advice
Page 1 of 1
Reg67




Posts: 5432

PostPosted: Sat, 14th Mar 2015 21:42    Post subject: Camera advice
I have been toying with the idea of buying a camera for a long time, but I am unsure where to start. I want an all round camera to get me going, something I can add lenses etc, to relatively cheaply.

I see little point in going for the cheap alternative, however, I am overwhelmed,and confused by the choice in DSLR cameras.

I thought I might get this; as a 'beginners' camera

http://www.argos.co.uk/static/Product/partNumber/2598077.htm

I can afford something better, but I have bills to pay, so I really have to limit my unnecessary spending to a minimum, therefore, I want something that;

1. will last me a while

2.I can add lenses, tripods etc; relatively cheaply

So, to sum up I really can't see me spending more than £3-400. Please bear in mind we pay way over the odds in then UK, and far more than most European countries (apart from possibly Norway & Sweden). Therefore, what may be relatively cheap in your neck of the woods is not cheap in rip off Britain.

I want to use the camera for wildlife shots, both ranged, and macro. Hence the reason I want an all rounder.

I really am a beginner so am open to suggestions. Thanks for any advice
Back to top
KillerCrocker




Posts: 20503

PostPosted: Sat, 14th Mar 2015 22:16    Post subject:
d3200 is kinda limited. d3300 is the LOWEST I would go. Then D5xxx or canon X00D series
You want to use live view or not? If You do want to use onscreen live view, then go canon. Nikon dont have live preview when changing settings. That is, on nikon, screen preview is not getting brighter/darker when changing shutter speed etc. On canon it does. Very usefull for learning

I was thinking about that and got canon 700d and it turns out I am not using live view at all. only viewfinder Laughing
But that aint the only reason I went for canon 700d. I did made a huge research and D3200 is really out of the question if You want to stick with it's stock lens. Its an older, bigger nikon lens that got replaced by pretty decent stock in d3300. faster, quieter and better focusing. d3200/d3300 also have not the best auto focus but its better in d3300 than 3200...
But its not bad anyway. 18-55 is most versitale option imo. Light is pretty standard for stock lenses, so You could have some trouble with indoor photos.

I got my camera also because, canon got better stock stock lens in 700d than any in nikons. focuses realyl quiet and very fast. I love the camera.

Also, Don;t want to do canon/nikon but I prefer the settings wheel to be in front, rather than on back. Easier to change iso on the fly (which You cant do on low nikon models).

obviously 700d is too expensive for You. Not sure how canon 1200d fares to say the truth... d3200 is too lacking. same with d3300. D5200 have a good price tho. So does Pentax K-50 which I would go for but it wasnt available in my region.

edit: Here are kind of photos You can expect from stock 18-55 canon lens. I guess its the same on canon 1200d... You have to research that
http://www.nfohump.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9334&start=2340
You should get that d3200 in Your hands and see if You can change iso with the wheel on the back, on the fly. if yes, then it should be mostly ok

edit2: Also, something than nikon don't have, is cheapest 50mm lens on the planet. Canon 50mm. It is very fast lens 1.8 great for night shooting. But as it is, 50mm, it would be too zoomed on aps-c cameras like 1200d or 700d like mine. Thats why I am still thinking is it worth getting it


3080 | ps5 pro

Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
Back to top
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member



Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
PostPosted: Sun, 15th Mar 2015 05:26    Post subject:
tbh you'll probably be happy with that one, lots of websites on spending the extra hundred pounds on the d3300...
http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/2014/01/15/nikon-d3300-vs-d3200-vs-d3100-which-camera-should-you-choose

nothing wrong with sticking to your budget, especially for your first non point and shoot camera Smile


asus z170-A || core i5-6600K || geforce gtx 970 4gb || 16gb ddr4 ram || win10 || 1080p led samsung 27"
Back to top
scaramonga




Posts: 9800

PostPosted: Sun, 15th Mar 2015 08:17    Post subject:
Back to top
frogster




Posts: 2860

PostPosted: Sun, 15th Mar 2015 08:42    Post subject:
all new dlsr in that budget are kinda crap.
for that money i would by a better dslr sh from a trusty person (better if you have a knowledgeable friend which can check it for you). or a good dslr body, and buy lenses later.
anyway, remember that you need to buy at least one more lens, a cheap fixed 50mm 1:1.18 is the bare minimun. 18-55 stock on any body is kinda crap.
advantage of sh is that they come usually with other lenses to.
and you dont need the latest dslr with 100000000mpx.
for example i have a 450d canon and i took pictures from weddings to birds. lenses are all that matter if you have a decent enough body. in that light, stick to the usual canon/nikon choice. they have the largest options for lenses.

and dont think in terms of a beginner camera if you refer to dslr. if you get a good dlsr you can keep it for years. i think i got mine 6 years ago, and is still doing fine. like i said, lens matter most if you have a good body.


Last edited by frogster on Sun, 15th Mar 2015 10:57; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
Reg67




Posts: 5432

PostPosted: Sun, 15th Mar 2015 09:47    Post subject:
Thanks for the replies lads, if, as you say that budget is crap (although to me that's bloody expensive!) can you suggest alternatives, with links in the UK if possible? As I said above I really am at a loss and don't want to get ripped off.

Also, why exactly is that budget of camera crap? What is so bad about them?

Thanks
Back to top
frogster




Posts: 2860

PostPosted: Sun, 15th Mar 2015 10:47    Post subject:
well, from my pov, a good starting for beginers are mirrorless at this time.

dslr are another class of cameras, and there is no point to get a "beginner" dslr. and no, they are not dying any time soon.
yeah, 3300 is a good camera, but at this time i would get a nikon 5300 if i will ever get a nikon Smile.
on canon ... dont know, they were kinda shit lately for good entry cameras. maybe a rebel sl1.
aim to have in the body as many as possible of advanced features from professional counterparts. because that's why you get a dslr, not for set all on auto, shoot.
anyway, i hate curent dslr's with touch screen which only draws batery, movie recordings, live preview an so. i'm a dinosaur.
Back to top
KillerCrocker




Posts: 20503

PostPosted: Sun, 15th Mar 2015 14:07    Post subject:
Dont got for 50mm on aps-c sensor like some say. It will be too zoomed and equivalent to 85mm


3080 | ps5 pro

Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
Back to top
frogster




Posts: 2860

PostPosted: Sun, 15th Mar 2015 14:25    Post subject:
when i dont want to carry other lenses, i actually like the zoomed view of 50mm on my canon. good for vacation pics. best for portraits in different light (evening/morning) not bad for surroundings to.
http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/tutorials/crop_sensor_cameras_and_lenses.html
even with the zoom "issue" is one of the most used from the lenses i have.

the main advantage of fixed lens is that you get a great f number for a great price (usually).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-number
Back to top
Reg67




Posts: 5432

PostPosted: Tue, 17th Mar 2015 12:56    Post subject:
Guys I am a complete amateur, please stop with your nerdy phraseology Smile

If you would be so kind as to provide links in the UK (Amazon etc) of an all rounder that will get me started and that I can add to overtime.

I know you have mentioned cameras but you all seem to disagree with each other.

I want to mainly shoot wildlife both up close and distance. I realise I will of course need different lenses for this. and , Mirrorless??

Don't get me wrong I really appreciate the replies but I have noticed that Humpers tend to be rather obsessive when it comes to hobbies/pastimes Smile
Back to top
frogster




Posts: 2860

PostPosted: Tue, 17th Mar 2015 17:03    Post subject:
kinda hard in your budget.

i would not buy anything lower than :

dslr : body 5300 nikon or 700d /5ti canon. get a kit only if you find a great deal, but not with the classic 18-55 lens. you only get bad habbits from that one. eventually 18-140.

mirrorless : olympus om-d e-m10 (i hope i dint screw the name Smile).

you will find reviews (usually honest ones) on dpreview.

btw, for big distance wildlife you need lenses in range of 3k $. (for begining look for a 70-300 lens)

l.e.
nikon vs canon is a heated debate, and i will not going into. my main problems with nikon are in terms of ui usability. i have no issues navigating trough canon/olympus/sony/fuji/pentax or whatever camera menu after a short time, but on nikon i'm puzzled every time i touch one. takes a lot of time to get use to it (for me).


l.l.e.
for sh market i would look for canon 7d or nikon d7200. but those are to new to get a price in your budget.
Back to top
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Hardware Zone
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group