| Page 249 of 772 |
|
|
 Posted: Tue, 27th Jan 2015 23:22 Post subject: |
|
 |
can the disabled things get enabled?
| Lutzifer wrote: | | and yes, mine is only average |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 27th Jan 2015 23:38 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65085
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Tue, 27th Jan 2015 23:55 Post subject: |
|
|
| Morphineus wrote: | | So... now we can start talking of compensation. |
They'll give us another Ubisoft game, and will call it a day 
..to punish us even more! 
Unfortunately, their David Copperfield-powered marketing machine worked well, too well. It's too late now, once you get some buttsecs, you can't undo the buttsecs 
In all seriousness though, like many others have said, it's still a great investment and am happy with the purchase, though I can't deny that I feel betrayed a little inside.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 28th Jan 2015 03:03 Post subject: |
|
|
can one use DSR without the geforce experience crap installed?
i see you have to set it in global settings tab for control panel then go to geforce experience and select your game there and assign the dsr to the tool config there in that GFE application.
It does not allow you to do that in a seperate profile just using NVCP it seems.
I have not used NVInspector to add a new profile and try forcing it there due to there not being a profile in the list for the game, I suppose adding a profile/creating one is ok to try but was wondering if anyone here has that issue trying DSR?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65085
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Wed, 28th Jan 2015 03:18 Post subject: |
|
|
Of course you can 
Just select the DSR factors that you need/want from the general control panel (you can choose more than one), then once you start a specific game, you can directly set the desired resolution in-game (default or DSR'd).
Experience is just a malware, stay away from it 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 28th Jan 2015 10:30 Post subject: |
|
|
| ixigia wrote: | Of course you can
Just select the DSR factors that you need/want from the general control panel (you can choose more than one), then once you start a specific game, you can directly set the desired resolution in-game (default or DSR'd).
Experience is just a malware, stay away from it |
I will have to see if this works on the games I play thanks.
edit: ok it works but I dont understand how my res at 1920*1080 and usinge 2x native res option in dsr outputs the game option to 2715*1527, o_O its not even double my native. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Werelds
Special Little Man
Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 28th Jan 2015 13:52 Post subject: |
|
|
wow, do post an update
| Lutzifer wrote: | | and yes, mine is only average |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 28th Jan 2015 14:38 Post subject: |
|
|
Last edited by paxsali on Thu, 4th Jul 2024 21:53; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Werelds
Special Little Man
Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
|
| Posted: Wed, 28th Jan 2015 15:21 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 28th Jan 2015 19:50 Post subject: |
|
|
Last edited by paxsali on Thu, 4th Jul 2024 21:53; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 28th Jan 2015 20:13 Post subject: |
|
|
those fuckers,i want shitty games as compensation 
| paxsali wrote: |
Now, I don't know what hardware costs in Poland, I guess it's cheaper because everything is stolen from Germany and resold... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 28th Jan 2015 20:26 Post subject: |
|
|
Bought myself a new Dell Ultrasharp 2515 with 2560*1440 resolution and IPS display. New resolution for my fucking 970. It is time for the future ladies and tittymen!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 29th Jan 2015 09:45 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 29th Jan 2015 10:58 Post subject: |
|
|
4GB, but shitty driver support?
4GB, but shitty power consumption?
4GB, but necessity to update shitty gpu bios, just so it will work in windows?
4GB, but slow, annoying shitalist control center?
4GB, but <insert a reason why you didn't buy ATI card>?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sausje
Banned
Posts: 17716
Location: Limboland, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Thu, 29th Jan 2015 11:17 Post subject: |
|
|
Never had driver issues, compared to driver issues i have nonstop with nvidia.
Never had to update bios on all my AMD cards that i've had.
CCC is just as horrible as NVCP, they are both equally shitty and lastly.
blind fanboy is blind
Proud member of Frustrated Association of International Losers Failing Against the Gifted and Superior (F.A.I.L.F.A.G.S)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 29th Jan 2015 11:27 Post subject: |
|
|
Last edited by Interinactive on Tue, 5th Oct 2021 01:14; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tonizito
VIP Member
Posts: 51420
Location: Portugal, the shithole of Europe.
|
| Posted: Thu, 29th Jan 2015 11:42 Post subject: |
|
|
| termcan wrote: | | 4GB, but shitty driver support? |
right, nderpia grapic is flawless, clearly
| boundle (thoughts on cracking AITD) wrote: | | i guess thouth if without a legit key the installation was rolling back we are all fucking then |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Werelds
Special Little Man
Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
|
| Posted: Thu, 29th Jan 2015 12:05 Post subject: |
|
|
| termcan wrote: | | 4GB, but shitty power consumption? |
I love this argument so much :joy:
Nvidia's shit consumes anywhere from 20% to 100% more than the equivalent counterpart for a good 5 years -> "who cares about power consumption, Nvidia r 5% faster and bestestest!1!1!!"
AMD consumes 10% more than Nvidia's equivalent at most* -> "OMG LOL AMD POWER CONSUMPTION HAHAHAHA"
* not counting Maxwell, AMD has not released an answer to that. That's R9 290(X) vs 780 Ti, which are almost dead even in both consumption and performance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 29th Jan 2015 12:11 Post subject: |
|
|
i love your "facts" that you just pulled out of your ass. 20% to 100% more than the equivalent counterpart? which equivalent counterpart has 100% difference in power consumption, i'd like to see.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 29th Jan 2015 12:44 Post subject: |
|
|
Last edited by paxsali on Thu, 4th Jul 2024 21:53; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
garus
VIP Member
Posts: 34200
|
| Posted: Thu, 29th Jan 2015 13:08 Post subject: |
|
|
snip
Last edited by garus on Tue, 27th Aug 2024 21:43; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 29th Jan 2015 13:11 Post subject: |
|
|
Heard about it. Well if it works then Nvidia is fucked. These bitches wanted to sell Gsync monitors. That wouldnt be necessary anymore....can this be true? I thought it is hardware monitor based shit not software shit....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 29th Jan 2015 13:29 Post subject: |
|
|
Last edited by paxsali on Thu, 4th Jul 2024 21:53; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 29th Jan 2015 14:10 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Werelds
Special Little Man
Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
|
| Posted: Thu, 29th Jan 2015 14:54 Post subject: |
|
|
| rgb#000 wrote: | | i love your "facts" that you just pulled out of your ass. 20% to 100% more than the equivalent counterpart? which equivalent counterpart has 100% difference in power consumption, i'd like to see. |
Don't need to go that far back. Go look up the 480. Between 250-270W in games (with Furmark uncapped it was capable of pulling 320 or so). Meanwhile the 5870 sat at 130-145W (Furmark was around 190, 200 IIRC). The 480 drew as much power as a 5970, that's how bad it was.
The 480 is an easily forgotten failure by many, but yes, it was that bad. The 580 still drew more power than a 6970, with the 680 they got back on par. Before the 480, the 280 also drew a good 20% more than a 4870.
Edit: image for you, from TPU. Remember, TPU measure at the PCI-e slot + connectors, so their readings are about as accurate as it gets. And yes, boo fucking hoo, in this image it's 144 vs 257, which is "only" 178.5% (or 56.3% if you look at it from the 5870's PoV). But no, let's shit all over the R9 290 for consuming 280W instead of the 780 Ti's 270W. Totally the same thing, absolutely.
| garus wrote: |
Soooo, bullshit or not? |
Only one person reported getting it to work so far, on an eDP laptop screen. Seems bullshit 
| termcan wrote: | | How about 99C° temp. on mid range card under full load? |
What mid range card would that be? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 249 of 772 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
