Assassin's Creed: Unity, set in Paris
Page 50 of 133 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 49, 50, 51 ... 131, 132, 133  Next
7thunders




Posts: 1480

PostPosted: Fri, 7th Nov 2014 20:55    Post subject:
Back to top
Raccoon




Posts: 3160
Location: Poland
PostPosted: Fri, 7th Nov 2014 22:36    Post subject:
raven_g20 wrote:
Quick question: I have a GTX660 OC 2GBRAM. Will i be able to even start the game? Or does it mean that i will be able to play but on low quality? Thnx.

Ha! I have the very same dilemma. (And the very same GPU. Laughing)

They surely went full retard with these:
    System Requirements

    Minimum:

  • OS: Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8/8.1 (64-bit operating system required)
  • Processor: Intel Core i5-2500K @ 3.3 GHz or AMD FX-8350 @ 4.0 GHz
  • Memory: 6 GB RAM
  • Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 or AMD Radeon HD 7970 (2 GB VRAM) <-- the fuck?! Laughing
  • Hard Drive: 50 GB available space
  • Sound Card: DirectX 9.0c compatible sound card with latest drivers
  • Additional Notes: Windows-compatible keyboard and mouse required, optional controller

    Recommended:

  • OS: Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8/8.1 (64-bit operating system required)
  • Processor: Intel Core i7-3770 @ 3.4 GHz or AMD FX-8350 @ 4.0 GHz or better
  • Memory: 8 GB RAM
  • Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 or AMD Radeon R9 290X (3 GB VRAM)
  • Hard Drive: 50 GB available space
  • Sound Card: DirectX 9.0c compatible sound card with latest drivers
  • Additional Notes: Supported video cards at the time of release: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 or better, GeForce GTX 700 series; AMD Radeon HD7970 or better, Radeon R9 200 series Note: Laptop versions of these cards may work but are NOT officially supported.
Having GTX 680 in minimum requirements is IMO ludicrous. And the game doesn't even look that good to begin with. Laughing

Ubi-optimisation®


"Anatidaephobia is the fear that somewhere in the world there is a duck watching you."

Fuck Polish government for oppressing women!

"People are such awful conversationalists that they’ll interrupt you when you’re answering a question they asked."
Back to top
Kaltern




Posts: 5859
Location: Lockerbie, Scotland
PostPosted: Fri, 7th Nov 2014 22:46    Post subject:
Utterly ridiculous - clearly not bothered to optimize for PC, just dumped the XBONE code into a DX11 compatible port and fuck the rest.

No game should require what's basically a R9 280X as standard.... and 6Gb RAM? Thats becoming quite the standard suddenly; is there something in nexgen consoles that have odd memory mapping or something?

Fucking ridiculous.


Playing Valheim every weekday at 10pm GMT - twitch.tv/kaltern

Follow me on Twitter if you feel like it... @kaltern

My system: Ryzen 7 3700x|Gigabyte RTX 2080 Super Windforce OC|Vengeance 3000Mz 16Gb RAM|2x 500Gb Samsung EVO 970 M.2 SSD |SanDisk SSD PLUS 240 GB + OCZ Vertex 2 60Gb SSD|EVA Supernova 650W PSU|Logitech G27 Wheel|Logitech G19 Gaming Pad|SteelSeries Arctis 7|Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum Mouse + Logitech MX Master Mouse|Razer Blackwidow Chroma X Keyboard|Oculus Quest 2 + Link|Pixio PX7 Prime 165hz HDR & 1x Samsung 24FG70FQUEN 144Hz curved monitor

-= Word to the wise: Having a higher forum post does not mean you are right. =-
Back to top
KillerCrocker




Posts: 20503

PostPosted: Fri, 7th Nov 2014 22:53    Post subject:
290x ?! That card is more expensive than my whole pc


3080 | ps5 pro

Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
Back to top
Raccoon




Posts: 3160
Location: Poland
PostPosted: Fri, 7th Nov 2014 23:00    Post subject:
@Kaltern At least you meet the recommended "minimum" with you GPU. (Looking at the signature your PC is only slightly above the minimum. Laughing)

According to these requirements - me and KC won't be even given the privilege to start this Holy Grail piece of coding.


"Anatidaephobia is the fear that somewhere in the world there is a duck watching you."

Fuck Polish government for oppressing women!

"People are such awful conversationalists that they’ll interrupt you when you’re answering a question they asked."


Last edited by Raccoon on Fri, 7th Nov 2014 23:02; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
EyePatchLives




Posts: 5710
Location: Israel.
PostPosted: Fri, 7th Nov 2014 23:00    Post subject:
Ubisoft Kiev. Laughing


"I think Call of Duty resonates because it's believable and relatable," Sledgehammer Games cofounder Michael Condrey says.

Believable and relatable...Yep, sounds like Call of Duty
Back to top
rgb#000
Banned



Posts: 5118

PostPosted: Fri, 7th Nov 2014 23:06    Post subject:
Kaltern wrote:
Utterly ridiculous - clearly not bothered to optimize for PC, just dumped the XBONE code into a DX11 compatible port and fuck the rest.

No game should require what's basically a R9 280X as standard.... and 6Gb RAM? Thats becoming quite the standard suddenly; is there something in nexgen consoles that have odd memory mapping or something?

Fucking ridiculous.

what is fucking ridiculous is people who haven't upgraded PCs since ps3/360 era expecting to play new games smooth and problem free.

this wouldn't be such a problem if ps3/360 didn't last such a loooong time, making people forget that PCs need constant upgrade to be relevant in gaming.

well i'll stop wasting my time responding to someone who thinks 6GB ram is a lot nowadays, when every fucking laptop and office PC now has 8GB at the minimum.
Back to top
Kaltern




Posts: 5859
Location: Lockerbie, Scotland
PostPosted: Fri, 7th Nov 2014 23:14    Post subject:
Mind Is Full Of Fuck

So because we have glorious NextGen consoles, that means that PC owners must suddenly upgrade to something new, when the current hardware in my sig, for example, ALREADY outclasses PS4/XBONE?

and I have 8Gb in my system, yet NO GAME has yet to use half of it (well, apart from maybe SC). The specs are there purely because the developers can't be bothered to optimize the code for PC, no other reason.

I guarantee you Unity will not use even half of that 6Gb.


Playing Valheim every weekday at 10pm GMT - twitch.tv/kaltern

Follow me on Twitter if you feel like it... @kaltern

My system: Ryzen 7 3700x|Gigabyte RTX 2080 Super Windforce OC|Vengeance 3000Mz 16Gb RAM|2x 500Gb Samsung EVO 970 M.2 SSD |SanDisk SSD PLUS 240 GB + OCZ Vertex 2 60Gb SSD|EVA Supernova 650W PSU|Logitech G27 Wheel|Logitech G19 Gaming Pad|SteelSeries Arctis 7|Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum Mouse + Logitech MX Master Mouse|Razer Blackwidow Chroma X Keyboard|Oculus Quest 2 + Link|Pixio PX7 Prime 165hz HDR & 1x Samsung 24FG70FQUEN 144Hz curved monitor

-= Word to the wise: Having a higher forum post does not mean you are right. =-
Back to top
Mortibus




Posts: 18053
Location: .NL
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 00:12    Post subject:
rgb#000 wrote:
Kaltern wrote:
Utterly ridiculous - clearly not bothered to optimize for PC, just dumped the XBONE code into a DX11 compatible port and fuck the rest.

No game should require what's basically a R9 280X as standard.... and 6Gb RAM? Thats becoming quite the standard suddenly; is there something in nexgen consoles that have odd memory mapping or something?

Fucking ridiculous.

what is fucking ridiculous is people who haven't upgraded PCs since ps3/360 era expecting to play new games smooth and problem free.

this wouldn't be such a problem if ps3/360 didn't last such a loooong time, making people forget that PCs need constant upgrade to be relevant in gaming.

well i'll stop wasting my time responding to someone who thinks 6GB ram is a lot nowadays, when every fucking laptop and office PC now has 8GB at the minimum.


considering x1ps4 have something equvalent to i3 4130 660-7850 8gb ram, i'd say pc with this specs should be able to handle anything that can run on them consoles, gtx 680 4gb would be recommended not minimum
unoptimized shit is unoptimised
Back to top
harry_theone




Posts: 11228
Location: The Land of Thread Reports
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 00:15    Post subject:
rgb#000 wrote:

what is fucking ridiculous is people who haven't upgraded PCs since ps3/360 era expecting to play new games smooth and problem free.

this wouldn't be such a problem if ps3/360 didn't last such a loooong time, making people forget that PCs need constant upgrade to be relevant in gaming.

well i'll stop wasting my time responding to someone who thinks 6GB ram is a lot nowadays, when every fucking laptop and office PC now has 8GB at the minimum.


Oh yeah, very good. You think like the lazy developers/publishers. It's not a bad port, it's us not having state-of-the-art technology to run it.

Maybe not repeating every shit others spill, is a good start Laughing
Back to top
Mortibus




Posts: 18053
Location: .NL
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 00:16    Post subject:
oh yeah, i was being generous when it comes to cpu, i'd say amd x2 would be closer, i3 is overkill
Back to top
Przepraszam
VIP Member



Posts: 14502
Location: Poland. New York.
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 00:17    Post subject:
harry_theone wrote:
rgb#000 wrote:

what is fucking ridiculous is people who haven't upgraded PCs since ps3/360 era expecting to play new games smooth and problem free.

this wouldn't be such a problem if ps3/360 didn't last such a loooong time, making people forget that PCs need constant upgrade to be relevant in gaming.

well i'll stop wasting my time responding to someone who thinks 6GB ram is a lot nowadays, when every fucking laptop and office PC now has 8GB at the minimum.


Oh yeah, very good. You think like the lazy developers/publishers. It's not a bad port, it's us not having state-of-the-art technology to run it.

Maybe not repeating every shit others spill, is a good start Laughing


why even argue with him?

It's coming from a guy who has 32gb of RAM. Laughing Laughing Laughing


Back to top
Bob Barnsen




Posts: 31974
Location: Germoney
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 00:18    Post subject:
I like the small gap of required hardware between Minimum and Recommended requirements Reaction


Enthoo Evolv ATX TG // Asus Prime x370 // Ryzen 1700 // Gainward GTX 1080 // 16GB DDR4-3200
Back to top
Mortibus




Posts: 18053
Location: .NL
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 00:20    Post subject:
Bob Barnsen wrote:
I like the small gap of required hardware between Minimum and Recommended requirements Reaction


yeah there is like 20fps difference between 680 and 780 Laughing

so if 680 is minimum that would be everything on minimum and 800x600 maybe 20-30 fps and 780 would be high@1080p 30 fps

at the end it will be 680 high@1080p -30-40 fps and 780 ultra@1080p 45-50 fps

nice try ubilolz

i don't know what people expect from them after W_D fiasco
Back to top
rgb#000
Banned



Posts: 5118

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 00:25    Post subject:
Przepraszam wrote:
It's coming from a guy who has 32gb of RAM. Laughing Laughing Laughing

what? who does, me? the fuck are you blabbering? i most certainly don't have that much ram, stop doing drugs or whatever. Scratch Head

all i was saying is requiring 2.5 year old gpu and recommending 1.5 year old gpu to play AAA game is certainly not unreasonable.

i just wonder how long are people gonna bitch and whine, these requirements aren't going down. it's been like 5 or 6 recent games and counting showing the same trend. i mean just how many more games do you need to see that it's either time to upgrade, or go to play F2P junk games like dota, or play on a console if this PC stuff isn't for you.
Back to top
Mortibus




Posts: 18053
Location: .NL
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 00:31    Post subject:
7850 been here with us since January 2012
so yeah i'd say ps4 is outdated
Back to top
dannofdawn




Posts: 2227

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 00:31    Post subject:
I think it makes sense that the requirements are going up recently. This is suppose to be the "next-gen" for console / AAA games. Of course it will take better hardware to run them. As to whether the requirements are justified, well no one can actually prove it. People like to talk about Crysis 1 being hard to run just for the sake of it, its like they somehow have the mental capacity to dissect visual render into numbers and figure out how less optimized than it could be.


Last edited by dannofdawn on Sat, 8th Nov 2014 00:34; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Mortibus




Posts: 18053
Location: .NL
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 00:32    Post subject:
the only reason why specs are so high is simple
we are basically running ps4 emulator, which does require more power, naturally
Back to top
Mr.Tinkles




Posts: 12378
Location: Reino de Suecia
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 00:42    Post subject:
rgb#000 wrote:
Kaltern wrote:
Utterly ridiculous - clearly not bothered to optimize for PC, just dumped the XBONE code into a DX11 compatible port and fuck the rest.

No game should require what's basically a R9 280X as standard.... and 6Gb RAM? Thats becoming quite the standard suddenly; is there something in nexgen consoles that have odd memory mapping or something?

Fucking ridiculous.

what is fucking ridiculous is people who haven't upgraded PCs since ps3/360 era expecting to play new games smooth and problem free.

this wouldn't be such a problem if ps3/360 didn't last such a loooong time, making people forget that PCs need constant upgrade to be relevant in gaming.

well i'll stop wasting my time responding to someone who thinks 6GB ram is a lot nowadays, when every fucking laptop and office PC now has 8GB at the minimum.


Yeah, wanna bet that it'll run like ass even with the recommended settings they're putting there.
I've got just above of what they're recommending and I can take a wild guess that I won't be getting 60FPS @ 1080p.


Back to top
human_steel




Posts: 33269

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 01:05    Post subject:
Prefetian wrote:
...and I can take a wild guess that I won't be getting 60FPS @ 1080p.

Of course, you'll be playing it at 60fps...
 Spoiler:
 
Back to top
Mr.Tinkles




Posts: 12378
Location: Reino de Suecia
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 01:10    Post subject:
human_steel wrote:
Prefetian wrote:
...and I can take a wild guess that I won't be getting 60FPS @ 1080p.

Of course, you'll be playing it at 60fps...
 Spoiler:
 


If I'm lucky, a more real scenario is a mix of low and medium. Razz


Back to top
Raccoon




Posts: 3160
Location: Poland
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 01:52    Post subject:
I presume the system requirements shouldn't be taken too seriously since there's the same AMD CPU in both recommended and minimum, whereas Intel CPU's are rather distinct regarding speed and features.

They probably didn't even bother to do any proper testing and just slapped the most powerful PC parts on.

Final optimization is a total mystery though.


"Anatidaephobia is the fear that somewhere in the world there is a duck watching you."

Fuck Polish government for oppressing women!

"People are such awful conversationalists that they’ll interrupt you when you’re answering a question they asked."
Back to top
ace2kx




Posts: 1992

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 01:57    Post subject:
Anyone got this running on a gaming laptop men?
Back to top
Raccoon




Posts: 3160
Location: Poland
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 02:06    Post subject:
Laughing Laughing


"Anatidaephobia is the fear that somewhere in the world there is a duck watching you."

Fuck Polish government for oppressing women!

"People are such awful conversationalists that they’ll interrupt you when you’re answering a question they asked."
Back to top
guvna




Posts: 814

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 09:36    Post subject:
Watched a chunk of raw gameplay and came away with these thoughts.

The clipping issues in the game are absolutely atrocious. I'm amazed it's being released in that state. You basically go through almost everyone no matter what you are doing. Surely they will day 1 patch it because it's the worst clipping I've ever seen.

The combat looks dull. Basically nothing changed. Dumb as nails ai reluctant to attack and instead of a 1 button counter kill it's now separated into 2 buttons. Some guys require dodging as per usual. What a revolution!

Nice animations and parkour though.


Last edited by guvna on Sat, 8th Nov 2014 10:37; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
LMLM




Posts: 825
Location: Meta Cortechs
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 10:03    Post subject:
Kaltern wrote:
Mind Is Full Of Fuck

So because we have glorious NextGen consoles, that means that PC owners must suddenly upgrade to something new,


No one's required to upgrade or buy the game. Both are optional. There are many thousands of other PC games to play.

That said it sure is in their own interest to optimize the game for PC and the minimum reqs sure do raise several red flags as to the quality of the experience on PC.
Back to top
Yuri




Posts: 11000

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 10:44    Post subject:
Basically the combat has gone back to how it was in AC1. Fighting will be a pita if there are more than 3 enemies. But then atleast it won't be automatic like it was from Brotherhood to AC4. Although remember that second last mission in AC1 where you fought the tall bald boss as well as 9-10 of his minions together? Crying or Very sad



1 and 2 are still amazing.
Back to top
Interinactive
VIP Member



Posts: 29461

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 10:51    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by Interinactive on Tue, 5th Oct 2021 01:34; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Kaltern




Posts: 5859
Location: Lockerbie, Scotland
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 10:57    Post subject:
LMLM wrote:
Kaltern wrote:
Mind Is Full Of Fuck

So because we have glorious NextGen consoles, that means that PC owners must suddenly upgrade to something new,


No one's required to upgrade or buy the game. Both are optional. There are many thousands of other PC games to play.

That said it sure is in their own interest to optimize the game for PC and the minimum reqs sure do raise several red flags as to the quality of the experience on PC.


Nice out-of-context quote and reply Rolling Eyes
Back to top
Breezer_




Posts: 10815
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 10:59    Post subject:
rgb#000 wrote:
Przepraszam wrote:
It's coming from a guy who has 32gb of RAM. Laughing Laughing Laughing

what? who does, me? the fuck are you blabbering? i most certainly don't have that much ram, stop doing drugs or whatever. Scratch Head

all i was saying is requiring 2.5 year old gpu and recommending 1.5 year old gpu to play AAA game is certainly not unreasonable.

i just wonder how long are people gonna bitch and whine, these requirements aren't going down. it's been like 5 or 6 recent games and counting showing the same trend. i mean just how many more games do you need to see that it's either time to upgrade, or go to play F2P junk games like dota, or play on a console if this PC stuff isn't for you.


Hmm lets see again the minimum requirements... 2500k, that is like atleast 5 times faster than the calculator AMD CPU in consoles, GTX 680, that is like half more faster than the APU GPU... Considering this is what we need as minimum on PC port, its not really acceptable, no matter how you twist it Laughing ofc this is "old ass" hardware these days, but still has shitloads of muscle in it. This is even more absurd than previous gen, since now we share pretty much the same architechture between PC´s and consoles.
Back to top
Page 50 of 133 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 49, 50, 51 ... 131, 132, 133  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group