X3 - reunion
Page 5 of 9 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
javlar




Posts: 1921
Location: Kalmar, Sweden
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2005 02:00    Post subject:
B&W2 was sooo shallow. It just faked to have some depth.



Gaming - Intel Quad Q9450 @ 3.2GHZ | Radeon HD 4870 X2 2GB | SB X-Fi | PC6400 8GB | 300GB Velociraptor
HTPC - Antec Fusion Remote | AMD Athlon 7850 X2 | PC6400 2GB | 74GB Raptor
Server - Athlon 64 X2 4200+ | Radeon HD 3450 | SB X-Fi | PC5300 2GB | 4TB+ total space
XBOX360 Gamertag: javlarmate
Back to top
nightlith




Posts: 744
Location: Land of Bagged Milk
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2005 05:16    Post subject:
eeaaugh starforce huh? Well looks like I won't be buying this after all. Ah well, saves me money for Civ4 and some hardware upgrades.


i can has computar?!
Back to top
Parallax_
VIP Member



Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2005 10:23    Post subject:
Peter Molleneux is the king of overhyping his own games. B&W2 was like a movie without a script. Yes, you got the content, the actors, and of course the cheating AI, but where is the story, what moves the game forward? Nothing.

Anyway, back on topic. I think that X3 might look great without cockpits, less shit obstructing your screen, in my opinion. Plus, if you think about it, there were around 60-70 ships in X2 and you had only like 5-6 different cockpits for them. That made a lot of the cockpit not fit the ships they were on, which in turn looked pretty ugly. I'm positive to see X3 without cockpits.

Oh, and I guess if the game is not listed here at nforce within the next couple of days or so, it means that it has indeed Starforce.
Back to top
Gregor26




Posts: 31

PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2005 20:35    Post subject:
Back to top
JediBob




Posts: 84
Location: Here
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2005 21:20    Post subject:
A shame they're not playing on high settings...
Back to top
Phluxed
VIP Member



Posts: 4911
Location: Oakville, Ontario, Canada
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2005 21:24    Post subject:
AGREED. Some of those pics were painfully hideous. Must max..all...games..if...screenshotting...unless..otherwise...mentionned.


Back to top
jOnTe




Posts: 45
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2005 21:41    Post subject:
I just bought X2-the threat, installed it, dl the new patch 1.4 and then tried to launch, now i have wrong key..grr well so i dl the Vengeance crack and it worked perfect, its so funny that when U buy a game u need the cracked exe files to play the game:P


If you're going through hell, keep going.
Back to top
Clevesa




Posts: 3694

PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2005 21:47    Post subject:
damn, this screenshots look not so good. Actually, it looks ugly. I think I'm smelling dissapointment in the air....
Back to top
Parallax_
VIP Member



Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Oct 2005 22:26    Post subject:
The screenshots look ugly? Man, you should really get a new set of glasses.
Back to top
TheNerd




Posts: 1025
Location: Israel
PostPosted: Tue, 25th Oct 2005 00:38    Post subject:
Clevesa wrote:
damn, this screenshots look not so good. Actually, it looks ugly. I think I'm smelling dissapointment in the air....



wtf?!?! Shocked


My System:
CPU : AMD "Barton" 2500+.
Memory : 768MB DDR PC2100.
GFX : Nvidia 6600GT DDR3 128MB , AGPx8
M\B: Gigabyte GA-7VT600P-RZ MotherBoard
Sound: AC97 Realteck 5.1 ALC655 - Audio.
Back to top
BKarza




Posts: 536
Location: /lazurus mode 1
PostPosted: Tue, 25th Oct 2005 00:55    Post subject:
Clevesa wrote:
damn, this screenshots look not so good. Actually, it looks ugly. I think I'm smelling dissapointment in the air....

Please link us to save yourself from the flames Wink
Back to top
mrn




Posts: 63

PostPosted: Tue, 25th Oct 2005 01:25    Post subject:
he's talking about the ones from the german thread, look at the "real" screenshots, not some made by some fan in low quality settings Wink, the high quality screenshots are simply amazing.
Back to top
Ronhrin
Banned



Posts: 6428
Location: Paradigms are changeable, reality is absolute.
PostPosted: Tue, 25th Oct 2005 01:33    Post subject:
ugly?...put your glasses on!...that's the same that saying Duke Nuken 3D and Quake 4 have the same GFX!


He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither
- Benjamin Franklin - 1759

Back to top
Gregor26




Posts: 31

PostPosted: Tue, 25th Oct 2005 06:31    Post subject:
According to the people behing those screens they were made in high detail. Check the new screen at egosoft http://www.egosoft.com/games/x3/screenshots/x3_screen_110.jpg the ship doesnt look very good.
Back to top
Jenni
Banned



Posts: 9526
Location: England.
PostPosted: Tue, 25th Oct 2005 06:36    Post subject:
Doesn't look good?!
My god! Do you have your monitor switched on?


Back to top
Gregor26




Posts: 31

PostPosted: Tue, 25th Oct 2005 06:43    Post subject:
It looks great but its nothing compare to earlier screenshots.
Back to top
Narog




Posts: 108
Location: 2nd Ring of the 7th Circle
PostPosted: Tue, 25th Oct 2005 08:53    Post subject:
I wonder if this game will be as unoptimized as X2? They should have named that one X2: The Slideshow Threat.
Back to top
Shado2k




Posts: 144

PostPosted: Tue, 25th Oct 2005 09:14    Post subject:
Quote:
damn, this screenshots look not so good. Actually, it looks ugly. I think I'm smelling dissapointment in the air....


You shoulda gone to specsavers Very Happy
Back to top
Parallax_
VIP Member



Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Tue, 25th Oct 2005 10:04    Post subject:
Narog wrote:
I wonder if this game will be as unoptimized as X2? They should have named that one X2: The Slideshow Threat.


It ran fine on my computer. In fact, anybody who is running a game like a slideshow on their computer should either upgrade or put their graphics detail down.
Back to top
slak




Posts: 248
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Tue, 25th Oct 2005 10:56    Post subject:
Narog wrote:
I wonder if this game will be as unoptimized as X2? They should have named that one X2: The Slideshow Threat.


Maybe you should just upgrade your computer then. It ran flawlessly on my computer.


"Why not just shut up and have people only think you are a moron instead of opening your mouth and removing all doubt." -Mark Twain
Back to top
Clevesa




Posts: 3694

PostPosted: Tue, 25th Oct 2005 11:02    Post subject:
Relax guys, no need to flame my ass cause I gave my personal opinion. I think it's ugly, atleast what that german dude showed. It's my personal opinion, you can belive what you want.
Back to top
Gregor26




Posts: 31

PostPosted: Tue, 25th Oct 2005 11:49    Post subject:
The release date has been changed to 26th on gamespot.
Back to top
Narog




Posts: 108
Location: 2nd Ring of the 7th Circle
PostPosted: Tue, 25th Oct 2005 11:50    Post subject:
Parallax_ wrote:
Narog wrote:
I wonder if this game will be as unoptimized as X2? They should have named that one X2: The Slideshow Threat.


It ran fine on my computer. In fact, anybody who is running a game like a slideshow on their computer should either upgrade or put their graphics detail down.

I can run Quake 4 just fine so it had nothing to do with graphics detail. The problem was the badly written AI which took way, waaaay to much processing power (I'm guessing you never did one of the "Xenon invasion" missions..?).
Back to top
Parallax_
VIP Member



Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Tue, 25th Oct 2005 12:08    Post subject:
I finished the entire game, took me many times the amount I would spend on any normal game. If you can run Quake4 fine then you should have no problem running X2.
Back to top
Baleur




Posts: 2343
Location: South Sweden
PostPosted: Tue, 25th Oct 2005 14:59    Post subject:
Clevesa wrote:
Relax guys, no need to flame my ass cause I gave my personal opinion. I think it's ugly, atleast what that german dude showed. It's my personal opinion, you can belive what you want.

The guy already said that he was running it on minimum settings, look at the Boron ship screenshots, there are no pixel shading or even specular highlights, also the textures are on low.
Thats why its ugly on those particular screenshots.
And the last screen that another dude said it was ugly in, thats because that was taken in a lower res without AA.
You can see every reflection and bumpmapping on the station and the ship, not to mention reflecting the planet above, the thing making it "ugly" it the jaggyness, not many screenshots are taken with AA, which is a shame, then you get discussions like this.

http://www.egosoft.com/games/x3/screenshots_en.php
Thats how the game looks Smile


CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 RAM: 4gb Kingmax DDR2 800mhz Video: Asus GeForce 250GTS 1gb Sound: Asus Xonar.
Back to top
SycoShaman
VIP Master Jedi



Posts: 24468
Location: Toronto, Canada
PostPosted: Tue, 25th Oct 2005 15:53    Post subject:
Nice link Baleur...those screens just got me all hyped up to play this..Smile

U can make ur own textures and ships and shit with 3D Max?


Back to top
Jenni
Banned



Posts: 9526
Location: England.
PostPosted: Tue, 25th Oct 2005 16:12    Post subject:
Not texture no, at least not with 3d max. Very Happy


Back to top
Baleur




Posts: 2343
Location: South Sweden
PostPosted: Tue, 25th Oct 2005 16:45    Post subject:
Well its supposed to be modfriendly Razz
Wish i could install 3dsmax8 lol.


CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 RAM: 4gb Kingmax DDR2 800mhz Video: Asus GeForce 250GTS 1gb Sound: Asus Xonar.
Back to top
SycoShaman
VIP Master Jedi



Posts: 24468
Location: Toronto, Canada
PostPosted: Tue, 25th Oct 2005 16:48    Post subject:
Well, this sounds really fun now...I had a different impression of this game for some odd reason...gunna dig out my 3d max later on and see if i can remember how to do some basic stuff...prolly not but i have a buncha books, somewhere Very Happy

I take it the game comes with a standalone editor?

When's this slated for release?


Back to top
javlar




Posts: 1921
Location: Kalmar, Sweden
PostPosted: Tue, 25th Oct 2005 17:18    Post subject:
Some people need to know how to enable FSAA.. the screenshots look ok but with FSAA they would look ten times better.



Gaming - Intel Quad Q9450 @ 3.2GHZ | Radeon HD 4870 X2 2GB | SB X-Fi | PC6400 8GB | 300GB Velociraptor
HTPC - Antec Fusion Remote | AMD Athlon 7850 X2 | PC6400 2GB | 74GB Raptor
Server - Athlon 64 X2 4200+ | Radeon HD 3450 | SB X-Fi | PC5300 2GB | 4TB+ total space
XBOX360 Gamertag: javlarmate
Back to top
Page 5 of 9 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group