| Page 129 of 236 |
Werelds
Special Little Man
Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
|
 Posted: Wed, 21st May 2014 00:03 Post subject: |
|
 |
| Keit wrote: | | escalibur wrote: | | Neon wrote: | 
i5 4670K, running on stock speeds.
Just a month after buying the PC I already have to OC it?  |
Good luck with Haswell overclocking. |
Getting it to 4.4ghz is no problem at least. Can probably go higher with a bit better cooling as well. |
No no, us Haswell owners are wrong. Haswell can't be overclocked 
And for the rest: ignore this useless piece of crap benchmark. The results are complete nonsense. The scores include things which some CPUs are exceptionally good at due to short circuiting certain operations, which instantly skews all the results. But the actual tests themselves are very superficial and don't represent any real world application. Furthermore, all the results in the charts are an average of all the samples they've collected; where it says "3770K @ 3.5" what it really means is "3770K @ whateverclockspeedtheuserrunningthebenchmarkhadatthetime". There's a reason you don't see Passmark used in any reviews (I think only TweakTown uses it).
I don't know why they'd say something as dumb as "any CPU that scores over 9000" as out of the 9 tests PT runs, 6 are absolutely irrelevant, 2 are irrelevant because how it tests is nonsense. It's just not a realistic representation of what the game will actually do on the CPU. Especially since PT runs these tests separately, in sequence, using all cores for each test on its own whereas the game will have bits running in parallel. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 21st May 2014 00:46 Post subject: |
|
|
Benchmark gives much higher scores for HT enabled processors too, my 2600k @ 4.6 scores 10697. HT doesn't do much for most games so don't feel bad if your newer non HT processor scores less.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 21st May 2014 01:23 Post subject: |
|
|
edit2: without vsync 4106 and 30% slower than 680 (my GPU scores 2776 in that, 680 supposedly 92% better  )
Anyways parts that worked CPU 10371 Memory 2567 Disk 3168
Also on Single threaded test I lose 26% to 3770K that runs single core @3.9GHz (with turbo), yeah sure. Overall score is identical, so either that test is useless or that 3770k is OCd to 4GHz+. edit: ah so it seems, doubt that many run K prosessor stock, so 4GHz+ avarage sample it is.
| Werelds wrote: | | Furthermore, all the results in the charts are an average of all the samples they've collected; where it says "3770K @ 3.5" what it really means is "3770K @ whateverclockspeedtheuserrunningthebenchmarkhadatthetime". |
So I'm supposedly good for Ultra then, I highly doubt I get the FPS on ultra I'd want  But bring on high, those PS4 footages already look sweet.
LG 27UD58 27" 4K IPS | ASRock Z87M Extreme4 | i7-4770K @4.2GHz delid/reseal | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Palit GTX 1070 Super JetStream coming! - Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 | 16GB G.Skill Sniper 1866Mhz | Samsung 850 EVO 250GB + Kingston UV400 480 GB | 2TB HDD | Fractal Design Newton R3 600W Platinum | Aerocool DS Window White | Logitech G9x | Corsair K70 Cherry MX Brown (MX Clear spacebar mod) | W10 Pro x64
Last edited by OnBoard on Wed, 21st May 2014 01:37; edited 2 times in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 21st May 2014 01:26 Post subject: |
|
|
Also, if you check 'monitor refresh rate' in options it enables vsync and thus invalidates all of your GPU tests.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 21st May 2014 04:11 Post subject: |
|
|
I don't understand the last 3 pages of this thread
So this thread is now about bacon
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 21st May 2014 06:34 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 21st May 2014 10:26 Post subject: |
|
|
I'm tempted to take a photo of my dick and post it here too. 
I mean we all have started "epeening" here so one would think it's time to get a proper party started, yeah? 
1) Lenovo Legion 7 (AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, RTX 3080 16Gb, 32Gb DDR4, SSD 1TB +2TB
2) SFFPC (streaming via Moonlight+ Sunshine)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 21st May 2014 10:30 Post subject: |
|
|
only big penises
Enthoo Evolv ATX TG // Asus Prime x370 // Ryzen 1700 // Gainward GTX 1080 // 16GB DDR4-3200
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Werelds
Special Little Man
Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
|
| Posted: Wed, 21st May 2014 11:11 Post subject: |
|
|
| escalibur wrote: | | Werelds wrote: | | Keit wrote: |
Getting it to 4.4ghz is no problem at least. Can probably go higher with a bit better cooling as well. |
No no, us Haswell owners are wrong. Haswell can't be overclocked |
You definitely know what I've meant. |
Of course I do, but the way you and others put it is....I don't even have words for how dumb it is.
"Good luck with overclocking" would indicate that it is next to impossible and it simply isn't. I had mine fully stable at 4.6 within an hour. Topped out just over 60 degrees (H100i) at 1.28v, not delidded or anything; ambient temperature is generally 23-24 degrees. I don't know what universe you live in, but that's far from horrible in mine. The reason Haswell is said to be "bad" at overclocking is because of how the voltage goes up faster than SB/IB between 4.5 and 5.0 and as a result it doesn't clock *higher* than its predecessors. It can also take more though, due to the split voltages. If you check the various threads on forums, people are happily running 4.5 on air without any special tricks just like they were with SB/IB. The enthusiasts are happily running 5.0 with a loop and/or delidding. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Horrordee
Soderator
Posts: 8867
Location: England
|
| Posted: Wed, 21st May 2014 12:19 Post subject: |
|
|
Difference between console thread and PC thread:
Console thread:
- Here's some new game footage
- Here's some leaked news
- Here's the first review
PC thread:
- Here are my spec's
- Here are MY spec's
- Here is a picture of my e-penis
- Here is a picture of my e-penis erect
- Here is a graph
=D
Space for rent. Contact me for rates!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 21st May 2014 12:30 Post subject: |
|
|
yea thats why:
pre-release till 2 days after release: console thread
past 2 days after release: pc thread
after 2 days the last fool has managed to get his settings right and people start to discuss the actual game
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 21st May 2014 12:43 Post subject: |
|
|
Shit games will be tossed away, as they should.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 21st May 2014 12:52 Post subject: |
|
|
| sabin1981 wrote: | | Shit games will be tossed away, as they should. |
+1
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 21st May 2014 13:13 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 129 of 236 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
