[Next Gen] The Next Generation Discussion Thread!
Page 118 of 158 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 117, 118, 119 ... 156, 157, 158  Next
BOOMDOOM




Posts: 544

PostPosted: Mon, 21st Apr 2014 14:36    Post subject:
Grale wrote:
azzman wrote:
Hfric wrote:
suddenly that 900p 30fps max console looks so sexy ... Laughing


So true Laughing



Really? That was my initial thought. Then I thought mmm.. do I have room in my tv stand for that large underpowered monstrosity? No. I think right now I'd rather pay money for the better performing PS4 games.

However hell yeah I'll hack a bargain one Twisted Evil


Why just not get the Steam box? I don't get console gamers bashing one or the other console about graphics. They both suck and are both underpowered.
Back to top
headshot
VIP Member



Posts: 36392
Location: UK
PostPosted: Mon, 21st Apr 2014 15:37    Post subject:
Back to top
Grale
Banned



Posts: 3321
Location: Invert
PostPosted: Mon, 21st Apr 2014 15:40    Post subject:
BOOMDOOM wrote:
Grale wrote:
azzman wrote:


So true Laughing



Really? That was my initial thought. Then I thought mmm.. do I have room in my tv stand for that large underpowered monstrosity? No. I think right now I'd rather pay money for the better performing PS4 games.

However hell yeah I'll hack a bargain one Twisted Evil


Why just not get the Steam box? I don't get console gamers bashing one or the other console about graphics. They both suck and are both underpowered.


Not bashing, iv'e never slated the xbone. I pre ordered the PS4 because i thought it would be the best of the two with the information i had at the time.

Underpowered compared to what? if you mean a PC hardware then yes. But the games look pretty impressive so far to say they suck and are underpowered. But they do the job they are intended for. Anything else i have my PC for that.... with a Gcard that cost me more than the PS4 did alone!
Back to top
rgb#000
Banned



Posts: 5118

PostPosted: Mon, 21st Apr 2014 17:28    Post subject:
BOOMDOOM wrote:
Why just not get the Steam box? I don't get console gamers bashing one or the other console about graphics. They both suck and are both underpowered.

it's funny PS4 sucks yet infamous second son is probably the best looking game i've ever seen. enjoy your DOTA2 on medium gfx settings with your amazing 400$ steambox Laughing

oh and btw when is steambox launching, around the time of PS5 release?
Back to top
highstuff




Posts: 1976
Location: Netherlands
PostPosted: Mon, 21st Apr 2014 17:32    Post subject:
rgb#000 wrote:
Xbox One Hacking Story was FALSE

http://www.maxconsole.com/maxcon_forums/threads/282583-Xbox-One-Hacking-Story-was-FALSE


The guy doesn't want to get law suit.. so he suddenly denies everything. Laughing

and now about xbox 360 team xecuter is about to release the last chip for the xbox 360 the coolrunner 4 with has an completly new and much better method of glitching. after this they focus completely on xbox one.
Back to top
Hfric




Posts: 12017

PostPosted: Mon, 21st Apr 2014 17:39    Post subject:
the question is here , Why do you buy a console ?
the answer is simple , to be able to play a game that will not be compatible with the next iteration of a OS in 6 years or more !

heck games from 2003 are now not compatible with win7 or win8 no more , DX 11 made sure of that ! i have to emulate window 98 or XP, to be able to play games from 2004 !!! thats ridiculous and still you cant play some games, even if they would be compatible with the new memory format... thanks to not compatible DRM on the PC or thanks to not working Graphics acceleration on emulation software


Back to top
Werelds
Special Little Man



Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
PostPosted: Mon, 21st Apr 2014 18:04    Post subject:
Hfric wrote:
the question is here , Why do you buy a console ?
the answer is simple , to be able to play a game that will not be compatible with the next iteration of a OS in 6 years or more !

heck games from 2003 are now not compatible with win7 or win8 no more , DX 11 made sure of that ! i have to emulate window 98 or XP, to be able to play games from 2004 !!! thats ridiculous and still you cant play some games, even if they would be compatible with the new memory format... thanks to not compatible DRM on the PC or thanks to not working Graphics acceleration on emulation software

My troll-sense is tingling Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing
Back to top
KillerCrocker




Posts: 20503

PostPosted: Mon, 21st Apr 2014 20:23    Post subject:
There is some true that old console games are always hassle free and old pc games might require some tweaks but cmon


3080 | ps5 pro

Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
Back to top
Werelds
Special Little Man



Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
PostPosted: Mon, 21st Apr 2014 20:28    Post subject:
Yeah, because playing a PS2 game on the PS3 is so hassle free
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Mon, 21st Apr 2014 20:42    Post subject:
Werelds wrote:
Yeah, because playing a PS2 game on the PS3 is so hassle free


Yup, even on my old UK launch machine; the PS2 support was poor and had quite a few games with enormous visual/performance issues, due to the removal of the Emotion Engine CPU. Only the American launch machines have perfect PS2 support since only the NA launch machines had both the GS and Emotion Engine CPU.
Back to top
Hfric




Posts: 12017

PostPosted: Mon, 21st Apr 2014 21:15    Post subject:
Werelds wrote:
Hfric wrote:
the question is here , Why do you buy a console ?
the answer is simple , to be able to play a game that will not be compatible with the next iteration of a OS in 6 years or more !

heck games from 2003 are now not compatible with win7 or win8 no more , DX 11 made sure of that ! i have to emulate window 98 or XP, to be able to play games from 2004 !!! thats ridiculous and still you cant play some games, even if they would be compatible with the new memory format... thanks to not compatible DRM on the PC or thanks to not working Graphics acceleration on emulation software

My troll-sense is tingling Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing
and why is this so funny you ? maybe your one of those people that say " would you still play Snes or PS2 games in 2030, i would NOT and neither should you"

and whats with our example "because playing a PS2 game on the PS3 is so hassle free" ?
why would i play a ps2 game on a ps3 when its was meant for a ps2 ?
your derailing the example , its like someone would say "because playing XBOX 1 games on the XBOX360 is so hassle free" , when its obvious your the one that tires to mock me , with a troll example , anyone knows emulation is not perfect so why not play it on the right console to begin with...

ok then , then try to play games you liked on your new os :
starforce protected games are not compatible no more
renderware engine games will not start on multicore machines
Tages protected game have problems
Safedisck protected game the same
Have you tried to play Farcry 2 on windows 7 , good luck with that

those are few examples and there are many many more ...

people buy a console to have a hassle free experience that will always be the same no matter the year !


Back to top
rgb#000
Banned



Posts: 5118

PostPosted: Mon, 21st Apr 2014 21:51    Post subject:
Werelds wrote:
Yeah, because playing a PS2 game on the PS3 is so hassle free

playing PS2 game on PS2 is hassle free in 2014 like it was in 2000. not sure why did you put PS3 in there, i guess you just needed to troll as always.
Back to top
The_Zeel




Posts: 14922

PostPosted: Mon, 21st Apr 2014 22:19    Post subject:
the one and only reason i always bought consoles is for the games that wont come out on pc, simple. i need my variety in gaming, so i m forced to buy all this hardware to play all the gems i woukd otherwise miss out on.
Back to top
Werelds
Special Little Man



Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
PostPosted: Mon, 21st Apr 2014 22:28    Post subject:
Hfric wrote:
and why is this so funny you ? maybe your one of those people that say " would you still play Snes or PS2 games in 2030, i would NOT and neither should you"

and whats with our example "because playing a PS2 game on the PS3 is so hassle free" ?
why would i play a ps2 game on a ps3 when its was meant for a ps2 ?
your derailing the example , its like someone would say "because playing XBOX 1 games on the XBOX360 is so hassle free" , when its obvious your the one that tires to mock me , with a troll example , anyone knows emulation is not perfect so why not play it on the right console to begin with...


rgb#000 wrote:
playing PS2 game on PS2 is hassle free in 2014 like it was in 2000. not sure why did you put PS3 in there, i guess you just needed to troll as always.


Why do I pull the PS3 in there?

Because you are both being hypocritical.

Want to make it a fair comparison? Then talk about keeping an old PC around for those older games. Anything else and you're full of shit. The comparison the two of you are attempting to draw (and failing at it) is of running a decade old game on a state of the art machine and operating system, versus running it on the decade old system it came out on. Oh gee, what a surprise, that's a little problematic. Did not see that one coming

And if you really want me to get picky, a VM takes anywhere from 30 to 60 minutes to set up depending on the OS. Unlike hfric's claim, 2D+3D acceleration DOES work (both in VMWare and VirtualBox) and for those older games it often is enough. DOS games require 0 effort other than downloading DOSBOX. The majority of Windows XP games do work just fine as long as you set compatibility mode to Windows XP - it's when games support Win95/98 that it gets annoying.


So no, I'm not the one trolling. I'm just drawing a fair fucking comparison, unlike the two of you.


But as a bonus, let me throw in what I would've said if I had been trolling: I didn't keep my NES, SNES, N64, PS1, Mega Drive, PS2 or any of my Game Boys (or any of the machines I forgot about now) around to play those games though. As I can emulate them on my PC.
Back to top
rgb#000
Banned



Posts: 5118

PostPosted: Tue, 22nd Apr 2014 09:11    Post subject:
no, you are the one who is hypocritical. it's very normal to keep old consoles for gaming enthusiasts, keeping pc from 2000 just to play games from that era... no one really does it.

bottom line, pc vs console arguing is unwinnable and single system devotees are most annoying gamers.
Back to top
Werelds
Special Little Man



Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
PostPosted: Tue, 22nd Apr 2014 10:19    Post subject:
rgb#000 wrote:
no, you are the one who is hypocritical. it's very normal to keep old consoles for gaming enthusiasts, keeping pc from 2000 just to play games from that era... no one really does it.

Yeah, so then why even bother to draw the comparison Hfric is trying to draw? It just doesn't work. Might as well go "lulz xbox 360 so bad, PS4 looks much better", that makes just as much sense. And no, that's not a typo, that's the point Wink

I'm not trying to make a point for/against console/pc (pick any combination that fits your current mood, it all applies), I'm just pointing out the ludicrous bullshit in his post. I'm not the one trolling or being hypocritical.


Join in on the war on LeoSatan


Last edited by Werelds on Tue, 22nd Apr 2014 10:23; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
warriormax
Banned



Posts: 3644

PostPosted: Tue, 22nd Apr 2014 10:22    Post subject:
Hfric wrote:

Have you tried to play Farcry 2 on windows 7 , good luck with that



The GoG version works perfectly fine. I played it recently Rolling Eyes
Back to top
S.S.S




Posts: 1489

PostPosted: Tue, 22nd Apr 2014 23:45    Post subject:
sabin1981 wrote:
Werelds wrote:
Yeah, because playing a PS2 game on the PS3 is so hassle free


Yup, even on my old UK launch machine; the PS2 support was poor and had quite a few games with enormous visual/performance issues, due to the removal of the Emotion Engine CPU. Only the American launch machines have perfect PS2 support since only the NA launch machines had both the GS and Emotion Engine CPU.


My 60 gigs launch fatty has full PS2 hardware support and it's still working perfectly. Anyone knows if those are in demand by collectors or something ? Because if i could get decent $$$ i would probably sell it but i never really looked into it.

And full PS2 support is cool but....games really look like shit on a 1089p native 40" HDTV Laughing . PSCX2 emulator actually does a better job than the PS3 integrated Emotion chipset
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Wed, 23rd Apr 2014 02:02    Post subject:
@S.S.S

Yeah, PS1/PS2 games look like ASS on the PS3 on large HDTVs. You can enable the "smoothing" option all you want, it almost never improved anything - most of the time it either didn't work or caused massive glitches and the rest of the time it just blurred everything. The PSP used to make PS1 games look nice though, or at least better than the aliased mess they were. I'm a huge fan of PCSX2 though, the internal upscale from native to uber res look incredible Very Happy

Oh and as for the value? I wouldn't know, I'm not familiar with the market values in America. I know the BC machines used to have a premium to them in England a while back but I don't know if that still applies.
Back to top
Werelds
Special Little Man



Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
PostPosted: Wed, 23rd Apr 2014 10:52    Post subject:
That premium still exists, although it's much less than it used to be Smile
Back to top
cyclonefr




Posts: 7018

PostPosted: Wed, 23rd Apr 2014 12:53    Post subject:
Premium for a YLOD PS3 edition ? Laughing


Back to top
Werelds
Special Little Man



Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
PostPosted: Wed, 23rd Apr 2014 14:40    Post subject:
Yep, the backwards compatibility made them a lot more expensive for a long time Smile
Back to top
the_legend2k7




Posts: 327
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Wed, 23rd Apr 2014 16:59    Post subject:
Hey guys, since it was brought up, any idea on the best way to sell a BC phat ps3? I'm curious what the selling price would look like as mine is still in mint condition and barely been used. Thoughts? Very Happy
Back to top
KillerCrocker




Posts: 20503

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Apr 2014 00:19    Post subject:
Yay friend will lend me his ps3. Finally will pay gow and uncharted games to get ready for next green. Only had 360 last green so i missed some titles


3080 | ps5 pro

Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
Back to top
cyclonefr




Posts: 7018

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Apr 2014 00:43    Post subject:
KillerCrocker wrote:
Yay friend will lend me his ps3. Finally will pay gow and uncharted games to get ready for next green. Only had 360 last green so i missed some titles


Is next/last green basically next/last gen with motion blur ?
Back to top
KillerCrocker




Posts: 20503

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Apr 2014 02:18    Post subject:
Its called fast message with auto correct from work


3080 | ps5 pro

Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
Back to top
Hfric




Posts: 12017

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Apr 2014 04:27    Post subject:
warriormax wrote:
Hfric wrote:

Have you tried to play Farcry 2 on windows 7 , good luck with that



The GoG version works perfectly fine. I played it recently Rolling Eyes
if you set the virtual memory size to 10gb and not play in dx10 but in dx9c ... and set the compatibility mode to windows xp sp3 but then be ready for slow downs do to emulation of directx

all this is done only to go around the not compatibility of this game with the new windows memory management ... if you play it normally without any of those memory tweaks it will crash after 10 to 20 min when it will hit a wall do to a memory leak that will not be fixed ...
you can only slow it down so those crashes will happen every 2h then 10 min ... on win7 or win 8

does it work : yes
is it playable : uhem for 2h it is but you cant go ultra on windows xp compatibility settings and have reasonable speeds and no crashes at the same time

if this game would be classified on a emulation table, i would have given it a status of : In-game , playable to a certain point

this thing with werelds is , he mocks me like a idiot ,because i enjoy gaming as a experience and he enjoys new technology ... and he likes putting words in peoples mouths , you make a statement and then he is fishing ...

his conclusion , have dedicated PCs from every system you had, so you could enjoy your games , and every one should have a sticker on it ,so you will know, that this will run this and the other that... if your not ok with that go play with emulation , buying old consoles to play old games is not worth it

i am ok with that, but he should wrote this himself , not fishing with flame baits like he always does to mock others , yeah lets be a big important dick

and tell me , what comparison i was drawing ? to you with your words...


Back to top
Werelds
Special Little Man



Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
PostPosted: Thu, 24th Apr 2014 13:00    Post subject:
Hfric wrote:
this thing with werelds is , he mocks me like a idiot ,because i enjoy gaming as a experience and he enjoys new technology ... and he likes putting words in peoples mouths , you make a statement and then he is fishing ...

Excuse me?

I don't enjoy gaming as an experience just because I call you on your crooked comparison? I've probably owned more gaming platforms than you have, but please, tell me more about how I don't "enjoy gaming as an experience". In fact, I probably still do own more right now than you think I do. Just because I don't consider consoles to be superior for gaming just because you don't install drivers on them yourself, doesn't mean I don't own them or use them.

I'm not the one who keeps pointing to consoles (or PC's) as "the" platform for gaming - or like you, who keeps pointing to the PC as inferior because it's not 100% plug 'n play.

Quote:
his conclusion , have dedicated PCs from every system you had, so you could enjoy your games , and every one should have a sticker on it ,so you will know, that this will run this and the other that... if your not ok with that go play with emulation , buying old consoles to play old games is not worth it

i am ok with that, but he should wrote this himself , not fishing with flame baits like he always does to mock others , yeah lets be a big important dick

and tell me , what comparison i was drawing ? to you with your words...

Your comparison was that of running PS2 games on a PS2 versus running Windows 95/98/XP games on Windows 7. That's just a bullshit comparison.

Realistically, all you need is a Windows XP machine or VM to run the older games that won't run now. You don't need X machines for it. Your point was that consoles are easier than PC's. On one machine + one VM or on two machines you can play any PC game that came out in the last 30 years, with DOSBOX on one of them for the DOS games. Sure, you'll spend 30-60 minutes installing Windows and such, but after that you're done. How is that any more or less complicated than keeping a PS2+PS3+PS4 around for all PlayStation games, a NES+SNES+N64+Wii+Wii U for all Nintendo games, <I can't be fucked to type out the rest now but you get the point>? Because some of those consoles will require good old SCART inputs, which not all new TVs have.

I never tried to make the point that keeping older consoles isn't worth it. You're the one who tried to make the point that keeping ONE older PC or a VM around isn't worth it.

I'm putting words in your mouth and flame baiting? It's the other way around mate.
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Apr 2014 13:12    Post subject:
Far Cry 2 works perfectly on Windows 7 x64. I know because I have the Steam version and run it 1080 with Ultra High settings and 4xMSAA on my twin 570s. No issues at all.
Back to top
headshot
VIP Member



Posts: 36392
Location: UK
PostPosted: Fri, 25th Apr 2014 03:49    Post subject:
Back to top
Page 118 of 158 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Console Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 117, 118, 119 ... 156, 157, 158  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group