Titanfall (by Respawn - ex-IW)
Page 14 of 92 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 13, 14, 15 ... 90, 91, 92  Next
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Mon, 20th Jan 2014 20:58    Post subject:
readonly wrote:
LeoNatan wrote:
Laughing

Why the fuck would they release with .5 size textures? It actually takes more work, so why would they? Anyone believing this is deluding themselves. Laughing


to "alpha" test the game, most games get a bunch of performance increase in the last couple months of development so they must have decided to decrease the textures to up the performance to what it will more than likely resemble come launch because they don't need that aspect tested by players and just need the actual gameplay etc tested. Or they don't need anything tested and its just to keep peoples attention on the game but letting them play at ~30fps or whatever would be craptacular.

Laughing

That be true, back in the 90s, when texture size actually crippled your FPS because the video card had the fill-rate of pre-pubescent boy's balls. Nowadays, texture size only influences loading time (from 15 seconds to 35 seconds).

Stop deluding yourself.
Back to top
Pey




Posts: 5597
Location: Argentina
PostPosted: Mon, 20th Jan 2014 21:11    Post subject:
escalibur wrote:
Any confirmation about the release date of PC version?


Still March 11.


Seasonic 1000w Planitum - TT Level 10 GT - ASUS M5E - i7 2600k @ 5.0ghz - 16GB Patriot Viper 3 - Dell u3011 - EVGA GTX 980 @ SLI - SSD Samsung EVO 250GB - 16TB W.D. - G19/G13 @ Roccat Kone XTD - Razer Vespula - Xonar Phoebus @ Vulcan ANC/Corsair 2100 Vengeance - Logitech G51
Back to top
readonly




Posts: 269

PostPosted: Mon, 20th Jan 2014 21:32    Post subject:
LeoNatan wrote:
readonly wrote:
LeoNatan wrote:
Laughing

Why the fuck would they release with .5 size textures? It actually takes more work, so why would they? Anyone believing this is deluding themselves. Laughing


to "alpha" test the game, most games get a bunch of performance increase in the last couple months of development so they must have decided to decrease the textures to up the performance to what it will more than likely resemble come launch because they don't need that aspect tested by players and just need the actual gameplay etc tested. Or they don't need anything tested and its just to keep peoples attention on the game but letting them play at ~30fps or whatever would be craptacular.

Laughing

That be true, back in the 90s, when texture size actually crippled your FPS because the video card had the fill-rate of pre-pubescent boy's balls. Nowadays, texture size only influences loading time (from 15 seconds to 35 seconds).

Stop deluding yourself.


and if and when you see that the textures were in fact 1/2 the resolution. What will your excuse be about people deluding themselves?
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Mon, 20th Jan 2014 21:39    Post subject:
readonly wrote:
LeoNatan wrote:
readonly wrote:


to "alpha" test the game, most games get a bunch of performance increase in the last couple months of development so they must have decided to decrease the textures to up the performance to what it will more than likely resemble come launch because they don't need that aspect tested by players and just need the actual gameplay etc tested. Or they don't need anything tested and its just to keep peoples attention on the game but letting them play at ~30fps or whatever would be craptacular.

Laughing

That be true, back in the 90s, when texture size actually crippled your FPS because the video card had the fill-rate of pre-pubescent boy's balls. Nowadays, texture size only influences loading time (from 15 seconds to 35 seconds).

Stop deluding yourself.


and if and when you see that the textures were in fact 1/2 the resolution. What will your excuse be about people deluding themselves?

Being correct 99.999% about "alphas" and "betas" looking the same as release. Good luck to the both of us. Laughing

Someone's been sniffing ass too much.
Back to top
readonly




Posts: 269

PostPosted: Mon, 20th Jan 2014 23:28    Post subject:
lol I think the game is way overhyped and was really disappointed in the alpha footage (not even considering visuals) I just do not think its way out there that an NDA'd alpha is not representative of the final game.
Back to top
Interinactive
VIP Member



Posts: 29446

PostPosted: Mon, 20th Jan 2014 23:31    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by Interinactive on Tue, 5th Oct 2021 02:36; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
readonly




Posts: 269

PostPosted: Mon, 20th Jan 2014 23:35    Post subject:
Like look at this screenshot, there is no way that is the final texturing. If so they are releasing this on OG Xbox.

http://www.6aming.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/12002519083_054c4eaf72_b.jpg
Back to top
Royalgamer06
Banned



Posts: 2317

PostPosted: Tue, 21st Jan 2014 00:00    Post subject:


Last edited by Royalgamer06 on Wed, 30th Nov 2016 21:41; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Interinactive
VIP Member



Posts: 29446

PostPosted: Tue, 21st Jan 2014 00:15    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by Interinactive on Tue, 5th Oct 2021 02:36; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Tue, 21st Jan 2014 00:16    Post subject:
readonly wrote:
lol I think the game is way overhyped and was really disappointed in the alpha footage (not even considering visuals) I just do not think its way out there that an NDA'd alpha is not representative of the final game.

No one loves surprises more than me, just saying - don't get your hopes up. Smile
Back to top
readonly




Posts: 269

PostPosted: Tue, 21st Jan 2014 00:25    Post subject:
LeoNatan wrote:
readonly wrote:
lol I think the game is way overhyped and was really disappointed in the alpha footage (not even considering visuals) I just do not think its way out there that an NDA'd alpha is not representative of the final game.

No one loves surprises more than me, just saying - don't get your hopes up. Smile


I've pretty much packed my bags on this game after seeing the alpha footage, looks decently fast paced but doesn't look terribly fun to me and like I said before the idea of AI enemies ruins it for me.
Back to top
escalibur




Posts: 12148

PostPosted: Tue, 21st Jan 2014 06:51    Post subject:
readonly wrote:
Like look at this screenshot, there is no way that is the final texturing. If so they are releasing this on OG Xbox.

http://www.6aming.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/12002519083_054c4eaf72_b.jpg


Is that screenshot from RAGE?
Back to top
4treyu




Posts: 23125

PostPosted: Tue, 21st Jan 2014 06:54    Post subject:
From Titanfall Alpha.
Back to top
VonMisk




Posts: 9467
Location: Hatredland
PostPosted: Tue, 21st Jan 2014 08:31    Post subject:
I predict some crunch time for the texture graphic designers.


sar·​casm | \ ˈsär-ˌka-zəm \
1: a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain
2a: a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual
b: the use or language of sarcasm
Back to top
JBeckman
VIP Member



Posts: 34976
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Tue, 21st Jan 2014 09:45    Post subject:
Interinactive wrote:
readonly wrote:
Like look at this screenshot, there is no way that is the final texturing. If so they are releasing this on OG Xbox.

http://www.6aming.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/12002519083_054c4eaf72_b.jpg


It still seems like an odd way to work, and if it is 25% of the final textures, it makes you wonder if 100% will be very decent either (on PC anyway)


The way they said it on Twitter, like posted, the textures are 25% of the final ones but it means that a 512x512 texture in the beta will be 1024x1024 in the final version since 4x 512x512 textures fit in a 1024x1024 texture.

Texture resolution will thus be 2x and not 4x or how to explain. Smile
(I suck at math really.)

EDIT: Didn't I post that already? I forgot.

EDIT: Yeah I did, in reply to another post.
http://www.nfohump.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2399369#2399369
Back to top
ZezoS




Posts: 1937

PostPosted: Tue, 21st Jan 2014 15:20    Post subject:
escalibur wrote:
readonly wrote:
Like look at this screenshot, there is no way that is the final texturing. If so they are releasing this on OG Xbox.

http://www.6aming.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/12002519083_054c4eaf72_b.jpg


Is that screenshot from RAGE?

I would say borderlands Laughing
Back to top
garus
VIP Member



Posts: 34200

PostPosted: Tue, 21st Jan 2014 15:21    Post subject:
snip


Last edited by garus on Tue, 27th Aug 2024 21:51; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
H4wkeye




Posts: 4699
Location: CTU
PostPosted: Tue, 21st Jan 2014 15:57    Post subject:
Alpha footage. Looks kinda lame. It just seems like another online shooter in a sea of shooters.

http://www.joystiq.com/2014/01/21/strap-yourself-in-and-watch-10-minutes-of-titanfall-alpha-footag/
Back to top
EyePatchLives




Posts: 5708
Location: Israel.
PostPosted: Tue, 21st Jan 2014 16:21    Post subject:
God, the comment section is full of retards. The game isn't out yet and some are calling it "the king of FPS", while some compare it to Unreal Tournament.

Just another overhyped shooter for casual gamers. I doubt it will have much of a community on PC, a year from now it'll be a forgotten title and everyone will be hyped about Battlefield 5, while on XBOX One it might happen sooner if Halo 5 comes out this year.


"I think Call of Duty resonates because it's believable and relatable," Sledgehammer Games cofounder Michael Condrey says.

Believable and relatable...Yep, sounds like Call of Duty
Back to top
Kurosaki




Posts: 5673
Location: germany
PostPosted: Tue, 21st Jan 2014 16:35    Post subject:
H4wkeye wrote:
Alpha footage. Looks kinda lame. It just seems like another online shooter in a sea of shooters.

http://www.joystiq.com/2014/01/21/strap-yourself-in-and-watch-10-minutes-of-titanfall-alpha-footag/


so many similarities to MW2, even the connection problems (matchmaking)
Back to top
deelix
PDIP Member



Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Tue, 21st Jan 2014 22:27    Post subject:
I get a serious blacklight retribution feeling... in other words, without the Titans it would be a 6/10 online game. And TBH, unless there are some unique and awesome modes it probably would end up being just that...
Back to top
dodger2020




Posts: 3537

PostPosted: Wed, 22nd Jan 2014 03:14    Post subject:
This game makes my balls tingle. Or, at least it would if I stuck my dick in a light socket. Which, for me, would be more fun than playing it. Very Happy

I'm sure this will be popular with the cod type twitch crowd. It's not single player so I'm not interested.

Forever Alone
Back to top
deadpoetic




Posts: 2686
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Wed, 22nd Jan 2014 03:52    Post subject:
Wow...

Capture the point with bots

This is the same shit as CoD but with mech
Back to top
WaldoJ
VIP Member



Posts: 32678

PostPosted: Wed, 22nd Jan 2014 03:56    Post subject:
EyePatchLives wrote:
God, the comment section is full of retards. The game isn't out yet and some are calling it "the king of FPS", while some compare it to Unreal Tournament.

Just another overhyped shooter for casual gamers. I doubt it will have much of a community on PC, a year from now it'll be a forgotten title and everyone will be hyped about Battlefield 5, while on XBOX One it might happen sooner if Halo 5 comes out this year.


well ms and ea are paying regular people to promote their products Very Happy so ummm of course those comments are gonna be there.

the game will sell a bit and then it'll drop. it's a console exclusive. pc doesn't really matter. low player count per map. it's using a modified source engine so i hope they at least fixed the hitbox and netcode issue in every online source game Laughing

there is no single player. it's online only. it's gonna be hard to market. it;s going to cost 60... Laughing it's going to get returned faster than sim city did. if the online doesn't click in instantly there'll be no replay value.

a lot of the bs that plagued cod games are still here but 'not really here because you can parkour and do all sorts of stuff so quick scoping really isn't an issue' etc...

i do hope that the next titan fall will have a campaign... i'd love to play some story mission in that setting.

and of course the hype for the game has ea behind it... so much marketing money already spent... so many fake users ejaculating over the game so many up votes so of course the hardcore casuals will accept it as the truth. Laughing

it's going to be fun to watch it fall months after


Sin317 wrote:
I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself.
Back to top
Kurosaki




Posts: 5673
Location: germany
PostPosted: Wed, 22nd Jan 2014 04:02    Post subject:
deadpoetic wrote:

This is the same shit as CoD but with mech


that's why it'll sell very well.

Only by watching the video that H4wkeye posted I get the CoD-feeling in this game.

- Fast paced
- + numbers + numbers + WHOA!!! MOAR NUUUUMBAAAAAARRRRSS!!!!
- same game mod
- announcer has british accent
- even the sound when hitting the enemy is the same.
- Killstreaks
etc.

^they will make a fuckton of money with this game.

I expect to see a new Titanfall game in November...something like:

"Titanfall: REDEMPTION"
"Titanfall: ARENA"
"Titanfall: WAR OF THE TITANS"

Cool Face


...and yes, I'll buy it too.
Back to top
Interinactive
VIP Member



Posts: 29446

PostPosted: Wed, 22nd Jan 2014 04:03    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by Interinactive on Tue, 5th Oct 2021 02:35; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
WaldoJ
VIP Member



Posts: 32678

PostPosted: Wed, 22nd Jan 2014 04:13    Post subject:
cod is more fast paced and more twitchy than battlefield... so no Very Happy
there are very few fps that are twitch/fast paced nowadays.
even cs:go got slowed down for the idiot market.

kurwasaki... cod sells cause of campagins... you should see all the little fuck jobs out there who have like close relationships to their cod characters... like it's lol Laughing mp takes over an it's awesome and your friends love it and you're in this constant state of adrenaline. it works.

this will work. but without a campaign it'll have a hard time getting the cod numbers...


Sin317 wrote:
I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself.
Back to top
WaldoJ
VIP Member



Posts: 32678

PostPosted: Wed, 22nd Jan 2014 04:16    Post subject:
i love how 'jump kick' is more effective than bullets lol


Sin317 wrote:
I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself.
Back to top
Interinactive
VIP Member



Posts: 29446

PostPosted: Wed, 22nd Jan 2014 04:19    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by Interinactive on Tue, 5th Oct 2021 02:35; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
WaldoJ
VIP Member



Posts: 32678

PostPosted: Wed, 22nd Jan 2014 04:30    Post subject:
yes, UT. Yes Q3. No warsow.

those games are dated. no hd graphics. even the recent awesome HD graphics UTs weren't as fast paced. And now only gfx count. You know that. You're part of elite pc race. 1080p only game. 60 fps. or 72 Laughing otherwise the game is inferior.

And there's no room for games like UT/Quake/Doom/etc in the market today. So yes, nowadays cod is the staple of first person shooters. If you give a cod master a game like UT99 to play. They'll suck dick, then they'll complain about the shitty graphics, then about mouse and keyboard not being accurate enough and then will complain about the level design... Neutral But even now if you take any 'hardcore' gamer to play a game like mario on snes, or any action game on snes/sega it'll be too difficult for them. Laughing didn't ducktales have to be dumbed down for the remake? Laughing

gamers nowadays are such puny idiots... if you haven't played games before psx/n64 then you should shut your mouth and call yourself a filthy casual because you haven't experience true greatness. Sad


Sin317 wrote:
I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself.
Back to top
Page 14 of 92 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 13, 14, 15 ... 90, 91, 92  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group