Call of Duty: Ghosts - The Phantom Ram
Page 59 of 86 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 58, 59, 60 ... 84, 85, 86  Next
warriormax
Banned



Posts: 3644

PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 19:50    Post subject:
LittleBigProblem wrote:
Guys, what's happening?! Scratch Head





I am in the same boat as you mate. For BO1 at least. I bought, I was not able to even run it with more than 10fps, I recommended it as DO NOT BUY THIS PIECE OF SHIT! Laughing Crying or Very sad Sad
Back to top
SteamDRM




Posts: 2832

PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 20:11    Post subject:
+

- Shooting is always fun
- Cute puppy
- It's Call of Duty...

-
- ...hmm, not sure if it is...
- Ridiculous system requirements
- Doesn't look any better than Black Ops II, and even MW2.
- Ugly
- Boring campaign (for first time in Call of Duty game)
- Lazy IW, lack of FoV slider, lean, proper dedicated servers
- Unstable
- Broken

4/10


Last edited by SteamDRM on Sat, 18th Oct 2014 18:08; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Vikerness




Posts: 3616
Location: Brasov
PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 20:18    Post subject:
Oo
OOOoooOOOoooOooOoo
+ Campaign intro movie
- Everything else


ASUS TUF B550M-PLUS | RYZEN 5600x | RTX 3060TI | 16GB DDR4
Back to top
Mr.Tinkles




Posts: 12378
Location: Reino de Suecia
PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 20:18    Post subject:
SteamDRM wrote:
+

- Shooting is always fun
- Cute puppy
- It's Call of Duty...

-
- ...hmm, not sure if it is...
- Ridiculous system requirements
- Doesn't look any better than Black Ops II, and even MW2.
- Ugly
- Boring campaign (for first time in Call of Duty game)
- Lazy IW, lack of FoV slider, lean, proper dedicated servers and connection with the community
- Unstable
- Broken

4/10





Back to top
EyePatchLives




Posts: 5710
Location: Israel.
PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 20:30    Post subject:
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL


"I think Call of Duty resonates because it's believable and relatable," Sledgehammer Games cofounder Michael Condrey says.

Believable and relatable...Yep, sounds like Call of Duty
Back to top
4treyu




Posts: 23141

PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 20:34    Post subject:
End of an era.
Back to top
Divvy




Posts: 1458

PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 20:38    Post subject:
I have some mild stuttering during gameplay, otherwise it's 60fps locked with all max settings on 2500k @ 5ghz, GTX 780 OC, 8gb RAM. Looking at MSI afterburner, the game maxes out my 3gb VRAM on max settings and thus stutters a bit. If I drop textures to high, it seems to be eating ~2.6gigs of VRAM and the stutters disappear as you'd expect.

The textures really don't look THAT good, but they're certainly not as bad as in some screenshots posted here. Those have something funky going on.
Back to top
lolozaur




Posts: 26310

PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 20:39    Post subject:
Back to top
SteamDRM




Posts: 2832

PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 20:41    Post subject:
lolozaur wrote:
http://www.incgamers.com/2013/11/call-duty-ghosts-pc-fov-fix-taken-following-activision-threats Reaction Reaction


People are asking for FoV slider since 2009 (MW2).
When you lazy faggots will start to listen the community? Mad


Last edited by SteamDRM on Tue, 5th Nov 2013 20:43; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
murgo




Posts: 1928
Location: Brezelcountry
PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 20:42    Post subject:
this piece of junk just froze on me twice.. what a fucking joke. haven't even played for 5 minutes and i'm ready to shift-delete this crap Laughing


i5 3570k @ 3.4GHz | ASRock Z77 Extreme4 | Scythe Mugen 2 Rev. B | 8GB G.Skill DDR3-1333 | Sapphire Radeon HD 7970 OC 3GB | 64GB Crucial M4 SSD | Dell U2312HM
Back to top
Radicalus




Posts: 6422

PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 20:55    Post subject:
I honestly think, that anyone and everyone is at fault, who ever bought a COD game in the past couple of years for this atrocity (I mean PC only, I couldn't give less of a fuck about derpsoles).

I mean this FOV ... anyone, who supports these companies with moneyz is a moron. Period.

I mean, we've been asking for YEARS: 1. FOV slider 2. stable ports 3. good mouse input. Not that hard. And to think, that only Steam alone has 65 million active users ... soon enough, PC SHOULD be prime platform again, if not already, and we get second hand junk.

Fuck you Infinity Ward and all the rest. Fuck you.
Back to top
mcerikson




Posts: 381

PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 21:01    Post subject:
On Windows 8.1 i am experiencing movement stuttering, is this because of graphical settings or mouse raw input, is there any fix for this tweaking config or should i lower video settings.


Back to top
KillerCrocker




Posts: 20503

PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 21:02    Post subject:
what is wrong with people saying this game is demanding ?!!!

it is less demanding than crysis3, metro, far cry and so on. even hitman absolution is more demanding.

Just disable msaa and check smaa or fxaa. everything else maxed out. barely going below 60.
There is something broken with msaa implementation in this game. the performance hit is too big


3080 | ps5 pro

Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
Back to top
moosenoodles




Posts: 18411

PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 21:02    Post subject:
Back to top
KaSssss




Posts: 2136

PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 21:04    Post subject:
mcerikson wrote:
On Windows 8.1 i am experiencing movement stuttering, is this because of graphical settings or mouse raw input, is there any fix for this tweaking config or should i lower video settings.


i got this too, lots of stuttering
Back to top
Predator_Soul




Posts: 680

PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 21:09    Post subject:
KaSssss wrote:
mcerikson wrote:
On Windows 8.1 i am experiencing movement stuttering, is this because of graphical settings or mouse raw input, is there any fix for this tweaking config or should i lower video settings.


i got this too, lots of stuttering


That + crashed twice on my PC. Nice job and optimization right there...
Back to top
Ampee




Posts: 1986

PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 21:09    Post subject:
KillerCrocker wrote:
what is wrong with people saying this game is demanding ?!!!

it is less demanding than crysis3, metro, far cry and so on. even hitman absolution is more demanding.

Just disable msaa and check smaa or fxaa. everything else maxed out. barely going below 60.
There is something broken with msaa implementation in this game. the performance hit is too big


It stuters for me as hell, even on SSD. 8 gig ram, and 4 cores with GTX Geforce 4GB.

OS: Win7
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 21:11    Post subject:
Quote:
ust disable msaa and check smaa or fxaa. everything else maxed out. barely going below 60.


So you admit that even with deferred AA disabled, you still drop below 60 sometimes? On a 7870? A 4.2Ghz i5-2500k? And yet you wonder why people say this is pointlessly demanding?

You make me sad, KC Sad
Back to top
donka




Posts: 197

PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 21:12    Post subject:
First buggy, unstable piece of shit that is Battlefield 4 , now Call of Duty Ghosts... Next gen "PC gaming" sure is looking very promising
Back to top
KillerCrocker




Posts: 20503

PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 21:12    Post subject:
hmmm. win764 here. Installed on my system ssd aswell. no stuttering outside loading screen. Gameplay performance is fluid with no hitches.

Loading screens are a mess tho. They stutter and audio in those skips if vsync is enabled


3080 | ps5 pro

Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
Back to top
Radicalus




Posts: 6422

PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 21:12    Post subject:
KillerCrocker wrote:
what is wrong with people saying this game is demanding ?!!!

it is less demanding than crysis3, metro, far cry and so on. even hitman absolution is more demanding.

Just disable msaa and check smaa or fxaa. everything else maxed out. barely going below 60.
There is something broken with msaa implementation in this game. the performance hit is too big


Less demanding than those games? True. But graphics wise it doesn't even come close to those games. Not even in the same league, in fact. And Hitman looks bloody awesome, if you ask me. Also, all of those games work without stuttering.

Mouse input if fucked up in this one. So this port fucks up 3/3. If you payed for it, I am sorry ...
Back to top
Radicalus




Posts: 6422

PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 21:14    Post subject:
donka wrote:
First buggy, unstable piece of shit that is Battlefield 4 , now Call of Duty Ghosts... Next gen "PC gaming" sure is looking very promising


Battlefield 4 is a lot better optimized, better/more modern engine, good input control and stellar graphics, compared to this shit of an excuse for a game.
Back to top
Radicalus




Posts: 6422

PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 21:15    Post subject:
KillerCrocker wrote:
hmmm. win764 here. Installed on my system ssd aswell. no stuttering outside loading screen. Gameplay performance is fluid with no hitches.

Loading screens are a mess tho. They stutter and audio in those skips if vsync is enabled


You're one of those guys, who doesn't notice the difference between 60 and 30 fps. No wonder you don't notice the general bad performance, mouse skipping stuff in this. No offence, but it's true.
Back to top
KillerCrocker




Posts: 20503

PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 21:15    Post subject:
sabin1981 wrote:
Quote:
ust disable msaa and check smaa or fxaa. everything else maxed out. barely going below 60.


So you admit that even with deferred AA disabled, you still drop below 60 sometimes? On a 7870? A 4.2Ghz i5-2500k? And yet you wonder why people say this is pointlessly demanding?

You make me sad, KC Sad

I play with everything maxed and smaa. my 2500k is at 4.5. my 7870 is also overclocked (1175 and 1450 on memory).
It very rarely goes down to ~50fps. mostly 60 and higher (when I checked with vsync off)

My pc is nowhere near a beast so I think performance is okish. sure, msaa would help a lot.


Tho - battlefield 4 I played with msaa of x2 and ultra settings and it worked only little bit worse while looking better


3080 | ps5 pro

Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
Back to top
Ampee




Posts: 1986

PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 21:16    Post subject:
KillerCrocker wrote:
hmmm. win764 here. Installed on my system ssd aswell. no stuttering outside loading screen. Gameplay performance is fluid with no hitches.

Loading screens are a mess tho. They stutter and audio in those skips if vsync is enabled


Not here, I even have some kind of mouse acceleration problem. Very weird.

(Not that I'm so eager to play it , but I played through the campaing's of prev. cod games and they were okay)
Back to top
Werelds
Special Little Man



Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 21:17    Post subject:
KillerCrocker wrote:
My pc is nowhere near a beast so I think performance is okish. sure, msaa would help a lot.

For how the game looks?

No.
Back to top
Breezer_




Posts: 10815
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 21:17    Post subject:
Divvy wrote:
I have some mild stuttering during gameplay, otherwise it's 60fps locked with all max settings on 2500k @ 5ghz, GTX 780 OC, 8gb RAM. Looking at MSI afterburner, the game maxes out my 3gb VRAM on max settings and thus stutters a bit. If I drop textures to high, it seems to be eating ~2.6gigs of VRAM and the stutters disappear as you'd expect.

The textures really don't look THAT good, but they're certainly not as bad as in some screenshots posted here. Those have something funky going on.


What the hell @ 1080p or? Very Happy Are you using 4x/8xMSAA? Laughing Damn this is so next-gen Reaction
Back to top
murgo




Posts: 1928
Location: Brezelcountry
PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 21:17    Post subject:
let's go logan. let's keep moving. let's go logan. i hate this game already Very Happy the curtain the dude cut through is a fucking invisible wall you can just walk through, no physics or anything.

why the fuck did i even download this?


i5 3570k @ 3.4GHz | ASRock Z77 Extreme4 | Scythe Mugen 2 Rev. B | 8GB G.Skill DDR3-1333 | Sapphire Radeon HD 7970 OC 3GB | 64GB Crucial M4 SSD | Dell U2312HM
Back to top
KillerCrocker




Posts: 20503

PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 21:17    Post subject:
Radicalus wrote:
KillerCrocker wrote:
hmmm. win764 here. Installed on my system ssd aswell. no stuttering outside loading screen. Gameplay performance is fluid with no hitches.

Loading screens are a mess tho. They stutter and audio in those skips if vsync is enabled


You're one of those guys, who doesn't notice the difference between 60 and 30 fps. No wonder you don't notice the general bad performance, mouse skipping stuff in this. No offence, but it's true.

well fuck You. I notice everything. I am always playing with fraps/radeonpro 59fps cap and triple buffering and so on. And if possible I am packing ssaa and so on. Its a shame that performance doesnt allow ghost to pack proper aa and I hate not having aa, but its a 5h game so fuck it and blaze thru it

in ghost radeonpro is not working for some reason so I am using fraps to determine framerate. I was always saying that it IS possible to get acustomed to 30fps but I notice every difference of singe fps in games. You ignorant asshole... I am a pc gamer since 1997. I proboably know more about games and pc gaming than you ever will. Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes
I was always very very focused about performance and gfx. And I know my stuff. if everyone else feels that I am a stupid console asshole because I ENJOYED gaming on 360 for couple of years, feel free - ignore button - press it
edit (multiple edits)


3080 | ps5 pro

Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"


Last edited by KillerCrocker on Tue, 5th Nov 2013 21:21; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
Ampee




Posts: 1986

PostPosted: Tue, 5th Nov 2013 21:19    Post subject:
KillerCrocker wrote:
Radicalus wrote:
KillerCrocker wrote:
hmmm. win764 here. Installed on my system ssd aswell. no stuttering outside loading screen. Gameplay performance is fluid with no hitches.

Loading screens are a mess tho. They stutter and audio in those skips if vsync is enabled


You're one of those guys, who doesn't notice the difference between 60 and 30 fps. No wonder you don't notice the general bad performance, mouse skipping stuff in this. No offence, but it's true.

well fuck You. I notice everything. I am always playing with fraps/radeonpro 59fps cap and triple buffering and so on. And if possible I am packing ssaa and so on.

in ghost radeonpro is not working for some reason so I am using fraps to determine framerate. I was always saying that it IS possible to get acustomed to 30fps but I notice every difference of singe fps in games. You ignorant asshole... I am a pc gamer since 1997. I proboably know more about games and pc gaming than you ever will. Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes


Well I think its a lot better when You don't notice the 30 - 60 FPS difference, you will spend money much later on upgrading the rig.
Back to top
Page 59 of 86 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 58, 59, 60 ... 84, 85, 86  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group