Page 7 of 24 |
TheNerd
Posts: 1025
Location: Israel
|
Posted: Tue, 27th Sep 2005 19:15 Post subject: |
|
 |
hmm... what is call of duty 2???
My System:
CPU : AMD "Barton" 2500+.
Memory : 768MB DDR PC2100.
GFX : Nvidia 6600GT DDR3 128MB , AGPx8
M\B: Gigabyte GA-7VT600P-RZ MotherBoard
Sound: AC97 Realteck 5.1 ALC655 - Audio.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Tue, 27th Sep 2005 20:26 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Tue, 27th Sep 2005 20:37 Post subject: |
|
 |
coooooooooooool

|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Tue, 27th Sep 2005 21:04 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Weedo
Posts: 1506
Location: Japan
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ispep
VIP Member
Posts: 4117
|
Posted: Tue, 27th Sep 2005 22:47 Post subject: |
|
 |
It's nothing to do with disliking scripted sequences. Operation Flashpoint had scripted sequences. It's how the scripted sequences are embedded into the game that matters and as far as the likes of MOH and all of it's clones goes they do it in such a mediocre manner which is entirely linear.
I've said it before - but when you land on Omaha beach your not participating in the war you're making your way up to the bunkers by breaking a puzzle (which is very quickly realised to be; see that cover, run to it, hide, wait for scripted gun shooting to stop and find next cover. Rinse, and repeat).
The games are built around this kind of forced gameplay which while satisfying to some leaves others left thinking, well... thinking why they can't think for themselves.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Tue, 27th Sep 2005 23:34 Post subject: |
|
 |
Ispep wrote: | It's nothing to do with disliking scripted sequences. Operation Flashpoint had scripted sequences. It's how the scripted sequences are embedded into the game that matters and as far as the likes of MOH and all of it's clones goes they do it in such a mediocre manner which is entirely linear.
I've said it before - but when you land on Omaha beach your not participating in the war you're making your way up to the bunkers by breaking a puzzle (which is very quickly realised to be; see that cover, run to it, hide, wait for scripted gun shooting to stop and find next cover. Rinse, and repeat).
The games are built around this kind of forced gameplay which while satisfying to some leaves others left thinking, well... thinking why they can't think for themselves. |
Well said, especially the last sentence, very well said.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 28th Sep 2005 00:21 Post subject: |
|
 |
really nice demo. short but nice!
in my opinion the most relevant part in Call of Duty is the MultiPlayer.
i still play CoD UO MP and CoD2 will just make it more sweet. new maps, new mods, new gfx, same cool feeling!
i think this game goes out to all CoD gamers, and there are alot of them out there, as it is one of the most played MP Games on the web.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Weedo
Posts: 1506
Location: Japan
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ispep
VIP Member
Posts: 4117
|
Posted: Wed, 28th Sep 2005 02:14 Post subject: |
|
 |
The fact it is so scripted takes away the amazement as far as I'm concerned. If they actually did something that in the world of videogames wasn't cliche or monotonous then fair enough - but they rarely, if ever, do.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 28th Sep 2005 03:31 Post subject: |
|
 |
Having been spoilt by games that actually move the fps genre forward like opf, bf42, bf2 the CoD2 demo was godawful in terms of "next gen". I actually enjoyed Mohaa very much (made by these same chaps) but ever since then other games have moved forward while Infinity Ward stays still.
Even games like Halo2 that have some next gen elements like vehicles, pushable physics objects etc make CoD2 feel so six years ago.. and I make the comparison not only cause both are FPS, but cause CoD2 is an X360 launch title and as such is in many places more last gen than the last gen! And I didnt like Halo1 for the same reason, only the driving parts were next gen.
Funnily CoD fans often dismiss games like BF42 or OPF, but it is infact CoD who TRIED to emulate vehicular MP combat in CoD:UO, doing so without proper physics and ending up being not much fun (the vehicle part).
My rig is A643200+, 6800GT and 2GB RAM.
Last edited by Subander on Wed, 28th Sep 2005 03:36; edited 1 time in total
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Phluxed
VIP Member
Posts: 4911
Location: Oakville, Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Wed, 28th Sep 2005 03:35 Post subject: |
|
 |
Those DOD source screenshots look retarded. WAY too much bloom in the HDR. That game eats dick.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hahe
Posts: 1685
Location: US
|
Posted: Wed, 28th Sep 2005 03:42 Post subject: |
|
 |
Phluxed wrote: | Those DOD source screenshots look retarded. WAY too much bloom in the HDR. That game eats dick. |
I'm guessing you haven't even played the game. When you're in a building and then you go outside it's bright like that for a second and then the blooming dims down. Like your eyes are adjusting to the brightness. DOD is a great game. Such a fun multiplayer game.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 28th Sep 2005 04:31 Post subject: |
|
 |
same boring crap as COD 1. How do you guys get shadows enabled? The shadows are crappy looking for me, and there's no option for better shadows.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
-=Cartoon=-
VIP Member
Posts: 8823
Location: South Pacific Ocean
|
Posted: Wed, 28th Sep 2005 05:18 Post subject: |
|
 |
why are u people complaining its like COD1.. just look at the name ffs
COD 2!
of course its gonna be like COD
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 28th Sep 2005 06:17 Post subject: |
|
 |
i loved cod ... and cod2 has some new features but i really hoped they'll add in real physics
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 28th Sep 2005 09:48 Post subject: |
|
 |
Quick question , will it be playable on P4 3.0 Northwood , 1024 DDR RAM ,9600 XT on 1024x768
without AA & AF?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SycoShaman
VIP Master Jedi
Posts: 24468
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Posted: Wed, 28th Sep 2005 10:20 Post subject: |
|
 |
Looks a lil sharper than the original...I'm a fan of the COD series so imo, its awesome 
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 28th Sep 2005 17:34 Post subject: |
|
 |
Uhm, ya, but you wont get the nice effects due to the 9600. I think it gets stuck in dx7 mode with 9600
For the Motherland!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 28th Sep 2005 17:41 Post subject: |
|
 |
Kinda shitty. They could atleast have used dx8 for people that dont have a dx9 card.
Maybe there already is a dx8 mode that automaticly kicks in if you have a dx8 card? If there are any shaders on a 9600pro it does run in dx8, if not it's dx7. So it shuld be easy to tell.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 29th Sep 2005 13:54 Post subject: |
|
 |
runs like crap on my 9800xt, 3.0ghz intel, 2 gig ram, etc, etc. even in 1028x768, no AA, low/med settings, latest drivers.
shame, cause i loved COD, even though it was mindless.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 1st Oct 2005 01:29 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SycoShaman
VIP Master Jedi
Posts: 24468
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Posted: Sat, 1st Oct 2005 02:20 Post subject: |
|
 |
i got an ati x850 256mb card, runs perfectly for me, all graphics at high and i run on 1280 too
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 1st Oct 2005 02:21 Post subject: |
|
 |
Ive never seen such amazing smoke effect, I mean I actually think my monitor is on fire.
I cant wait to buy this fucker just for the multiplayer experience.
And I also have zero problems with this game, it runs amazingly well at 1280x1024x32 everything set as high as possible, 4xaa 4xaf, get avg of 50's (firefights) 65-80's (running around).
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Page 7 of 24 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |