Paparazzi and the star's patience
Page 1 of 1
Lopin18




Posts: 3373
Location: US
PostPosted: Fri, 5th Apr 2013 22:55    Post subject: Paparazzi and the star's patience
Wow hahah , how the hell can people live under this pressure. WOOOW....

Im surprised there isnt a law or something to actually protect people from this kind of annoying behaviour.

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/gossip/la-et-mg-halle-berry-olivier-martinez-airport-photographer-20130403,0,7260775.story

Theres another video from TMZ that shows where it starts, wow and to think that they have to actually suck it up because if not you get sued.

http://www.tmz.com/2013/04/02/halle-berry-restrains-olivier-during-explosive-altercation-with-paps/
Back to top
tainted4ever
VIP Member



Posts: 11336

PostPosted: Fri, 5th Apr 2013 23:08    Post subject:
They're thinking of implementing laws requiring paparazzi to keep a distance. But it's a tricky subject.


Sense Amid Madness, Wit Amidst Folly
Back to top
zipfero




Posts: 8938
Location: White Shaft
PostPosted: Fri, 5th Apr 2013 23:52    Post subject:
Just heard zach galifianakis tell a funny story about i..how he's on a plane to vancouver and on it is a pro soccer player who tweets that Zach is on the plane. The paparazzi follow this soccer dude on twitter or sees the tweet get passed around and go to the airport and then stalk him through several hotels and shit Very Happy

He wasnt like being a bitch or anything they were just sharing stories..its on Jeff Garlin's podcast By The Way


Last edited by zipfero on Sat, 6th Apr 2013 00:26; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Fri, 5th Apr 2013 23:56    Post subject:
paparazzi are the scum of the earth. period. Almost as bad as the people who read the articles they write ...
Back to top
monk3ybusin3ss




Posts: 11155

PostPosted: Sat, 6th Apr 2013 00:31    Post subject:
Sin317 wrote:
paparazzi are the scum of the earth. period. Almost as bad as the people who read the articles they write ...


Paparazzi take photos, they don't write articles. Nevertheless, I agree, SCUM.
Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Sat, 6th Apr 2013 00:35    Post subject:
ok, they take the pics that someone buys for insane cash, because there is a market for it, of stupid housewives etc who read that garbage that gets spun around those pictures Smile

Its not the best part of humanity lol.
Back to top
Mortibus




Posts: 18053
Location: .NL
PostPosted: Sat, 6th Apr 2013 00:49    Post subject:
HB have been attention whore for a while now, guess her rating is going down cause she is rubbish, never liked her anyway
Back to top
PumpAction
[Schmadmin]



Posts: 26759

PostPosted: Sat, 6th Apr 2013 00:54    Post subject:
Yeah, fuck that cunt.


=> NFOrce GIF plugin <= - Ryzen 3800X, 16GB DDR4-3200, Sapphire 5700XT Pulse
Back to top
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere



Posts: 65093
Location: Italy
PostPosted: Sat, 6th Apr 2013 03:24    Post subject:
They're like the human vultures xD, some of them even stalk and capture celebrities in unflattering moments just to blackmail them later..
Back to top
trucane




Posts: 1300

PostPosted: Sat, 6th Apr 2013 05:16    Post subject:
Because being a celebrity should have no cons Rolling Eyes

You made a choice when you tried to get famous, paparazzies and stalkers is a part of the deal
Back to top
Guy_Incognito




Posts: 3436

PostPosted: Sat, 6th Apr 2013 09:47    Post subject:
I'm sure they have hard time wiping their tears with all them dollars when they get back home.
Back to top
Reg67




Posts: 5432

PostPosted: Sat, 6th Apr 2013 10:10    Post subject:
Guy_Incognito wrote:
I'm sure they have hard time wiping their tears with all them dollars when they get back home.


I think they have a man that wipes things for them.
Back to top
xxax
Banned



Posts: 2610

PostPosted: Sat, 6th Apr 2013 11:17    Post subject:
Let's get real, a lot of celebrities like it. Never saw Daniel Day Lewis or Gary Oldman etc. much in these kind of papers...

I hate the paparazzi but they are only a byproduct of a society that worships celebrities and everything they do.
Back to top
zipfero




Posts: 8938
Location: White Shaft
PostPosted: Sat, 6th Apr 2013 16:13    Post subject:
xxax wrote:
Let's get real, a lot of celebrities like it. Never saw Daniel Day Lewis or Gary Oldman etc. much in these kind of papers...

I hate the paparazzi but they are only a byproduct of a society that worships celebrities and everything they do.


"real".
Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Sat, 6th Apr 2013 16:36    Post subject:
the only "real" "celebrities" that love this kinda attention, are the ones that NEED that kind of attention, to remain a celebrity. Those untalented fucks like Paris Hilton or all those bleach blonde b, nay , C actors like lindsay lohan etc etc. They need to be in the spotlight, because honestly, otherwise you would forget them in no time.
Back to top
flipp




Posts: 1972

PostPosted: Sun, 7th Apr 2013 00:55    Post subject:
trucane wrote:
Because being a celebrity should have no cons Rolling Eyes

You made a choice when you tried to get famous, paparazzies and stalkers is a part of the deal


Everybody should have some privacy. There are enough events where people can take photos of them. Also these paparazzi should leave them alone if they are asked to do so.
Back to top
zipfero




Posts: 8938
Location: White Shaft
PostPosted: Sun, 7th Apr 2013 01:00    Post subject:
flipp wrote:
trucane wrote:
Because being a celebrity should have no cons Rolling Eyes

You made a choice when you tried to get famous, paparazzies and stalkers is a part of the deal


Everybody should have some privacy. There are enough events where people can take photos of them. Also these paparazzi should leave them alone if they are asked to do so.


Since when should doing entertainment be followed by massive invasion of privacy?
Back to top
Mortibus




Posts: 18053
Location: .NL
PostPosted: Sun, 7th Apr 2013 01:49    Post subject:
since they asking for it
this reminds me

 Spoiler:
 
Back to top
trucane




Posts: 1300

PostPosted: Mon, 8th Apr 2013 16:15    Post subject:
zipfero wrote:
flipp wrote:
trucane wrote:
Because being a celebrity should have no cons Rolling Eyes

You made a choice when you tried to get famous, paparazzies and stalkers is a part of the deal


Everybody should have some privacy. There are enough events where people can take photos of them. Also these paparazzi should leave them alone if they are asked to do so.


Since when should doing entertainment be followed by massive invasion of privacy?


Since entertainment was "invented"? If privacy is so important to you then maybe being a celebrity shouldn't be your line of work. Or are you implying these guys had no clue at all to what would happen when they became famous?
Back to top
zipfero




Posts: 8938
Location: White Shaft
PostPosted: Mon, 8th Apr 2013 16:30    Post subject:
trucane wrote:
zipfero wrote:
flipp wrote:


Everybody should have some privacy. There are enough events where people can take photos of them. Also these paparazzi should leave them alone if they are asked to do so.


Since when should doing entertainment be followed by massive invasion of privacy?


Since entertainment was "invented"? If privacy is so important to you then maybe being a celebrity shouldn't be your line of work. Or are you implying these guys had no clue at all to what would happen when they became famous?


I dont understand why those two have to go hand in hand. And no not since entertainment was invented have we been so frivolous with others personal space.
Back to top
Mchart




Posts: 7314

PostPosted: Mon, 8th Apr 2013 16:36    Post subject:
Personally I don't think these public personalities should be complaining. This is how they make their livelihood after all. So fuck their privacy in public places. They are worth tens of millions of dollars simply due to their looks. So fuck 'em if they can't handle swarms of people that are really just lining their pockets with cash anyways.
Back to top
Morphineus
VIP Member



Posts: 24883
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Mon, 8th Apr 2013 17:28    Post subject:
I think both sides are valid. But in my opinion press should back off on personal matters.

If they are on PR, Gala's fundraisers or whatever that has to do with their career I think press should have access.

But seeing garbage magazines sell quite well to the masses we won't see that happening. I think it is rather sad that people are that much into gossip.


Back to top
Double-=V=-




Posts: 308

PostPosted: Wed, 10th Apr 2013 16:38    Post subject:
Some people choose to be celebrities, however i think most celebrities just happen to get famous. An actor like to play roles, but doesn't necessarily want to appear on talk shows and be famous. Saying an actor loses his right to privacy because he happen to be cast in a big movie that the big public likes is an invalid argument. Should he refuse the role because he might get famous?
Back to top
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - General chatter
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group