| Page 857 of 1492 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 Posted: Wed, 6th Mar 2013 11:28 Post subject: |
|
|
I always avoided speed racer but I guess I didn't put much thought into watching it at the time but these interviews got me interested a lot  Now I just need internet access at home again. DAMN!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
deelix
PDIP Member
Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WaldoJ
VIP Member
Posts: 32678
|
| Posted: Wed, 6th Mar 2013 17:51 Post subject: |
|
|
| PumpAction wrote: | | I always avoided speed racer but I guess I didn't put much thought into watching it at the time but these interviews got me interested a lot Now I just need internet access at home again. DAMN! |
speed racer is fucking brilliant. both visually and the way it's edited.
movies of that scope rarely get that awesome editing feel.
speed racer is a 10/10 in my book.
well 9/10 cause of the monkey.
but 10/10. DAT TRIP.
| Sin317 wrote: | | I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 6th Mar 2013 19:54 Post subject: |
|
|
Yup.
There is no clearer sign of Academy corruption than Joaquin not getting an Oscar for that performance.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 6th Mar 2013 21:53 Post subject: |
|
|
Side Effects - 9/10, one of those movies u gotta watch atleast twice to get everything, LOVED the twist, was caught completly off guard. saw it in the theaters cant wait to see it again
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chiv
Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
|
| Posted: Wed, 6th Mar 2013 22:28 Post subject: |
|
|
| WaldoJ wrote: | | PumpAction wrote: | | I always avoided speed racer but I guess I didn't put much thought into watching it at the time but these interviews got me interested a lot Now I just need internet access at home again. DAMN! |
speed racer is fucking brilliant. both visually and the way it's edited.
movies of that scope rarely get that awesome editing feel.
speed racer is a 10/10 in my book.
well 9/10 cause of the monkey.
but 10/10. DAT TRIP. |
very rare to see some people here with so much class and good taste  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WaldoJ
VIP Member
Posts: 32678
|
| Posted: Thu, 7th Mar 2013 02:21 Post subject: |
|
|
DAS HOBBIT - 8/10
i hate these sort of movies so i'm just scoring based on acting and visual orgasm.
10 minutes to the end of the movie and i look to my gf and i go... TO BE CONTINUED X MAS 2013
she goes what what what... i lolled. some shots were epic.
| Sin317 wrote: | | I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 7th Mar 2013 03:33 Post subject: |
|
|
Hobbit ● 5/10
Zero Dark Thirty ● 5.5/10
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WaldoJ
VIP Member
Posts: 32678
|
| Posted: Thu, 7th Mar 2013 04:20 Post subject: |
|
|
what are people comparing hobbit to?
lotr trilogy? Cause it surpasses the lotr trilogy in quality/vfx/shots/tone
Cause i really don't see how this movie is worth a score lower than 7.
| Sin317 wrote: | | I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 7th Mar 2013 07:19 Post subject: |
|
|
| WaldoJ wrote: | what are people comparing hobbit to?
lotr trilogy? Cause it surpasses the lotr trilogy in quality/vfx/shots/tone
Cause i really don't see how this movie is worth a score lower than 7. |
True.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon
VIP Member
Posts: 18935
Location: Poland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
deelix
PDIP Member
Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Thu, 7th Mar 2013 08:12 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73214
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Thu, 7th Mar 2013 08:36 Post subject: |
|
|
| Neon wrote: | I don't see how LOTR trilogy or the Hobbit can be worth a score of more than 2/10  |
Yeah but you a nubcake who likes AC. Your opinion is worth 1/10 at most. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon
VIP Member
Posts: 18935
Location: Poland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sin317
Banned
Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
deelix
PDIP Member
Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
garus
VIP Member
Posts: 34200
|
| Posted: Thu, 7th Mar 2013 11:51 Post subject: |
|
|
snip
Last edited by garus on Tue, 27th Aug 2024 22:01; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheSaint
Dalai Lama
Posts: 6586
Location: Cook Islands
|
| Posted: Thu, 7th Mar 2013 12:16 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 7th Mar 2013 12:25 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
couleur
[Moderator] Janitor
Posts: 14361
|
| Posted: Thu, 7th Mar 2013 13:16 Post subject: |
|
|
| Casus wrote: | | The Hobbit turned a lighthearted book into a farce. |
+1
the movie is not so bad per se. But it distorts the source material too much just to please the mainstreamed audience. I do not even feel like rewatching it again.
"Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-imposed nonage. Nonage is the inability to use one's own understanding without another's guidance. This nonage is self-imposed if its cause lies not in lack of understanding but in indecision and lack of courage to use one's own mind without another's guidance. Dare to know! (Sapere aude.) "Have the courage to use your own understanding," is therefore the motto of the enlightenment."
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 7th Mar 2013 14:25 Post subject: |
|
|
| Neon wrote: | | LeoNatan wrote: | | Neon wrote: | | I don't see how LOTR trilogy or the Hobbit can be worth a score of more than 2/10 |
Yeah but you a nubcake who likes AC. Your opinion is worth 1/10 at most. |
says a macfag.  |
TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"
~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sin317
Banned
Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
|
| Posted: Thu, 7th Mar 2013 14:54 Post subject: |
|
|
thanks for the heads up, never seen it and its indeed awesome. I give it a 8.5/10
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WaldoJ
VIP Member
Posts: 32678
|
| Posted: Thu, 7th Mar 2013 17:14 Post subject: |
|
|
| Casus wrote: | The Hobbit turned a lighthearted book into a farce.
Considering the budget and talent involved, that's not impressive.
But I guess burping dwarves and gleefully suicidal trolls are what the kids want |
ummmm.... so? There were so many derp moments in the LOTR as well. Jackson isn't a perfect director or his crew of writers aren't perfect either. Like, lotr's aren't 10/10 movies. If you're derphead and you're all YISSS YISSS PURRFECT MOVIES!!! MY LOTRS THEY IS! then you can go fuck yourself. Lotrs never should've won that many oscars. But who cares.
Considering the budget and the talent... the hobbit is fucking magnificent to look at. Locations / set design / make up / vfx etc etc. The script is ok. Moves the story along. Have some decent lines, decent progression. It doesn't fumble. Acting is decent as well.
People are hung up on something that wasn't perfect in the first place. Considering the talent and the budget, the hobbit is a HUGE improvement over the LOTR trilogy.
And I agree with neon.... that sort of bull shit fairy tale faggotry isn't up my alley...
| Sin317 wrote: | | I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 7th Mar 2013 18:01 Post subject: |
|
|
| WaldoJ wrote: | | ummmm.... so? There were so many derp moments in the LOTR as well. Jackson isn't a perfect director or his crew of writers aren't perfect either. Like, lotr's aren't 10/10 movies. If you're derphead and you're all YISSS YISSS PURRFECT MOVIES!!! MY LOTRS THEY IS! then you can go fuck yourself. Lotrs never should've won that many oscars. But who cares. |
Ummm, so? Did I say LotR was perfect?
FotR was great, TT was good, and RotK was OK.
As for telling me to go fuck myself because I happen to disagree with you, that's just pathetic.
I assume that's part of your Hump "charm", right? I've noticed it's very important to insult people and use the word derp as much as possible.
Wonderful.
| Quote: | Considering the budget and the talent... the hobbit is fucking magnificent to look at. Locations / set design / make up / vfx etc etc. The script is ok. Moves the story along. Have some decent lines, decent progression. It doesn't fumble. Acting is decent as well.
People are hung up on something that wasn't perfect in the first place. Considering the talent and the budget, the hobbit is a HUGE improvement over the LOTR trilogy.
And I agree with neon.... that sort of bull shit fairy tale faggotry isn't up my alley... |
Yes, yes - it's so beautiful to look at - and that's basically what matters to you. You like CGI and you're impressed by the spectacle.
Good for you.
As for me, I don't expect perfection. I don't expect anything, really. I just respond to what's there.
What's there is a farce - and the book was lighthearted. That's all there is to it.
HERPY DERPY EDITED BY SLURPY!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WaldoJ
VIP Member
Posts: 32678
|
| Posted: Thu, 7th Mar 2013 19:08 Post subject: |
|
|
ah yes... the director and his writers took their own vision of the book and put it on film.
yes... a farce. 
how do adaptations work?
and i'm not telling you to go fuck yourself, i'm saying if you were a derphead who is dick riding lotr trilogy. Which you obviously aren't. But there are plenty of people who sucked jacksons dick over the lotr trilogy... which is stooopid.
| Sin317 wrote: | | I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Saner
Posts: 6877
Location: Uk
|
| Posted: Thu, 7th Mar 2013 19:55 Post subject: |
|
|
I thought I was the only person who thought the LOTR films were vastly overrated.
I liked the hobbit though, didn't expect to, but I did.
| ragnarus wrote: |
I saw things like that in here and in other "woman problems" topics so...... Am I the only one that thinks some authorities needs to be alerted about Saner and him possibly being a rapist and/or kidnapper ? |
Saner is not being serious. Unless its the subject of Santa!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chiv
Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
|
| Posted: Thu, 7th Mar 2013 21:21 Post subject: |
|
|
finally got around to watching drive
it was ok.. i was entertained, but i swear that film is seriously overrated.
also im NOT complaining about a lack of driving scenes - this is just an observation - but why did some of the 'professional' reviews i saw praise the driving sequences? there was 1 and a half in the film, and the only 'real' driving scene ill give the movie credit for, wasnt anything all that special anyway.
also watched something called tactical force, and i couldnt figure out what kind of tone that film was going for. it was undeniably low-budget feeling, and silly as fuck, but it could have been thats what they were aiming for - a kinda 'hurr hurr hurr' harmless dumb action 'bro-team' kinda fun film, kinda like the fast and furious films... but then one of the main characters brutally got a bullet through the head at the start of the movie, so it seemed a bit tonally uncertain.
but it wasnt bad... dumb as fuck, but i liked the actors and they had some fun with it, so it was pretty enjoyable to watch.
soooo... drive... 6/10, tactical force 5.5/10
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 857 of 1492 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
Stupid bitch...
, so awesome...everyone was really great , but Joaquin was just superb..the way he looks , walks and talks , stands..awesome 
and wtf , fy academy !!
