Page 1 of 1 |
Ankh
Posts: 23349
Location: Trelleborg
|
Posted: Fri, 1st Feb 2013 19:45 Post subject: LGA1155 or LGA2011 |
|
 |
So I was thinking of upgrading my pc once again. Ive got quite good stuff, but I'd like to get a new motherboard and cpu. I need a motherboard that supports my Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866MHz 32GB CL10 and tripple sli.
So I was looking at various things and found this cpu interesting:
IntelĀ® Core i7-3930K Processor
Socket-LGA2011, 6-Core, 3.2GHz, 12MB, 130W, Boxed, no fan included
The thing is - I was hoping to buy a new motherboard first and then the cpu abit laters...but my current cpu (i7-2600k) use LGA1155 while the one I just mentioned use LGA2011.
So my question is should I wait and buy the cpu at the same time as I buy a new motherboard or get a new LGA1155 and some other cpu later on that use LGA1155?
I've heard that using 3-way or 4-way sli its better to use LGA2011..is this true?
shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 1st Feb 2013 19:50 Post subject: |
|
 |
i would advice against such "sidegrade", because your CPU is already very good, and new intel CPUs are coming later this year. but based on your post money is no problem for you so go nuts
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 1st Feb 2013 19:55 Post subject: |
|
 |
three 680?
go LGA2011 for sure
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 1st Feb 2013 20:08 Post subject: |
|
 |
Imo not worth to "upgrade" to 3930K, good mobo and that costs fortune (no performance increase in games).
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JBeckman
VIP Member
Posts: 34996
Location: Sweden
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ankh
Posts: 23349
Location: Trelleborg
|
Posted: Fri, 1st Feb 2013 21:45 Post subject: |
|
 |
KaSssss wrote: | three 680?
go LGA2011 for sure |
Nah 3xEvga GeForce GTX 570 Superclocked.
shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ankh
Posts: 23349
Location: Trelleborg
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Frant
King's Bounty
Posts: 24645
Location: Your Mom
|
Posted: Fri, 1st Feb 2013 23:50 Post subject: |
|
 |
From what I've read Haswell is more about replacing ATOM by lowering power consumption etc..
Quote: | With its long term viability threatened, Haswell is the first step of a long term solution to the ARM problem. While Atom was the first "fast-enough" x86 micro-architecture from Intel, Haswell takes a different approach to the problem. Rather than working from the bottom up, Haswell is Intel's attempt to take its best micro-architecture and drive power as low as possible. |
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!
"The sky was the color of a TV tuned to a dead station" - Neuromancer
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ankh
Posts: 23349
Location: Trelleborg
|
Posted: Thu, 7th Feb 2013 20:33 Post subject: |
|
 |
My motherboard broke , so I ordered this:
EVGA Z68 FTW E-ATX
Intel Core i7 3770K 3,5Ghz
shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Frant
King's Bounty
Posts: 24645
Location: Your Mom
|
Posted: Thu, 7th Feb 2013 20:44 Post subject: |
|
 |
What socket are the Ivy's? No difference between i5's or i7's? Are Ivy i7's compatible with 1155? or is Z68 a 2011 socket?
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!
"The sky was the color of a TV tuned to a dead station" - Neuromancer
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ankh
Posts: 23349
Location: Trelleborg
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ankh
Posts: 23349
Location: Trelleborg
|
Posted: Thu, 7th Feb 2013 21:09 Post subject: |
|
 |
Not sure if it matters - but its nice that both my gfx cards and my motherboard are from the same manufacturer (evga)
shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 8th Feb 2013 12:59 Post subject: |
|
 |
You should have bought Z77 board for that 3770K :/
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ankh
Posts: 23349
Location: Trelleborg
|
Posted: Fri, 8th Feb 2013 14:29 Post subject: |
|
 |
Breezer_ wrote: | You should have bought Z77 board for that 3770K :/ |
maybe - but this mb seem to be really good and its nice with
the multiple x16 pci-e
Edit: Ah yes, and it has less heat.
shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ankh
Posts: 23349
Location: Trelleborg
|
Posted: Mon, 11th Feb 2013 23:29 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ankh
Posts: 23349
Location: Trelleborg
|
Posted: Tue, 12th Feb 2013 09:29 Post subject: |
|
 |
I've got nice watercooling so the heat should be no problem - ill give it a go later tonight. I got pretty good OC with the 26ook and expect to reach atleast something similar with this one.
The Z68 is supposedly better than the z77 when it comes to heat and OC according to evga's forums.
shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Stige
Posts: 3545
Location: Finland
|
Posted: Tue, 12th Feb 2013 10:36 Post subject: |
|
 |
If you delid your Ivy then IMO you should put the cooler in direct contact to the CPU itself and remove the IHS completely, this will give you insanely good temperatures compared to running with the IHS, even if you do change the paste on it.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Frant
King's Bounty
Posts: 24645
Location: Your Mom
|
Posted: Tue, 12th Feb 2013 13:05 Post subject: |
|
 |
Stige wrote: | If you delid your Ivy then IMO you should put the cooler in direct contact to the CPU itself and remove the IHS completely, this will give you insanely good temperatures compared to running with the IHS, even if you do change the paste on it. |
Which is a rather dangerous thing to do. I've been slightly clumsy way back in the past when the silicon lay bare and put on a heat sink the tiniest slight bit off and broke off 1/10th of a millimetre of a corner of the silicon (nearly impossible to see except under a lens). Dead CPU.
I really don't get what Intel was thinking of when they cheaped out on the IHS/Silicon bonding paste, something that worked fine with the Sandys. Saving money? I wonder how many Ivy's that have been sent back due to that paticular serious flaw.
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!
"The sky was the color of a TV tuned to a dead station" - Neuromancer
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thudo
Posts: 6309
Location: Mellonville North, Canada
|
Posted: Tue, 12th Feb 2013 14:23 Post subject: |
|
 |
Another reason to wait for Haswell in May-June..
MSI GT72S 6QF Dominator Pro S 29th Anniversary Intel i7 6820HK @ 4.0Ghz, 32GB DDR4-2133 RAM, 2x256GB Raid0 Toshiba NVMe 2.5 inch PCIe SSD, Nvidia Geforce GTX 980 OC'ed 200+ Core / 200+ Mem, 17.3 inch LG IPS HD Display @ 75Hz, Intel 7265AC Wifi, Windows 10 Pro BIOS version: .112 EC Firmware version: .105
Current Broadband speed record: 329.1 Mb/sec down // 21.73 Mb/sec up
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/3933292.png
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Frant
King's Bounty
Posts: 24645
Location: Your Mom
|
Posted: Tue, 12th Feb 2013 15:00 Post subject: |
|
 |
thudo wrote: | Another reason to wait for Haswell in May-June.. |
I have no higher expecations from Haswell since it's all about low power with a plan to be a better choice than ATOM for powerful smartphones and tablets, ie. they're focusing on bringing more performance for as little power as possible.
In fact, it feels like the tick-tock development schedule has introduced a tack to the development cycle, ie. tick (new architecture)-tock (shrink and some optimization)-tack (new low power x86 for portable devices).
I may be wrong but that's what I've found so far when I've researched what's out there about Haswell..
Quote: | With Haswell, Intel will introduce a new low-power processor designed for convertible or 'hybrid' Ultrabooks, having the Y suffix. Intel demonstrated a working Haswell chip at the 2011 Intel Developer Forum. |
Quote: | The Performance version,
Compared to Ivy Bridge (expected):
At least 10% sequential CPU performance increase (8 execution ports per core versus 6).
Up to double the performance of the integrated GPU. (Haswell GT3 vs Ivy Bridge HD4000) |
10% sequential performance increase? That's barely worth mentioning. Double performance integrated GPU? Well, I guess it's good news for note- and ultra books. Anyone interested in performance on a PC would run a discrete GPU at any rate so I wonder why they don't just release their highest performing chips with no GPU and replace the empty surface with more L1/L2/L3 cache and a tweaked fetcher. GPU-on-CPU.. such a waste of silicon space for performance parts.
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!
"The sky was the color of a TV tuned to a dead station" - Neuromancer
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thudo
Posts: 6309
Location: Mellonville North, Canada
|
Posted: Wed, 13th Feb 2013 01:35 Post subject: |
|
 |
I suppose but when moving from a Conroe E6700 from '06.. Yeah.. Ancient Alien tech.. 
MSI GT72S 6QF Dominator Pro S 29th Anniversary Intel i7 6820HK @ 4.0Ghz, 32GB DDR4-2133 RAM, 2x256GB Raid0 Toshiba NVMe 2.5 inch PCIe SSD, Nvidia Geforce GTX 980 OC'ed 200+ Core / 200+ Mem, 17.3 inch LG IPS HD Display @ 75Hz, Intel 7265AC Wifi, Windows 10 Pro BIOS version: .112 EC Firmware version: .105
Current Broadband speed record: 329.1 Mb/sec down // 21.73 Mb/sec up
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/3933292.png
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 13th Feb 2013 09:52 Post subject: |
|
 |
Tho if you already have Sandy Bridge, there is no reason to upgrade for anything, unless you want couple seconds faster to encode videos. And overclocking is never guaranteed, every chip is different. Gonna skip haswell completely, waiting for upgrade which is similar when i upgraded from 4.2Ghz Phenom II x6 to 2500K.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ankh
Posts: 23349
Location: Trelleborg
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Page 1 of 1 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |