BD remus vs, (proper) 1080p MKV
Page 1 of 1
Mister_s




Posts: 19863

PostPosted: Tue, 20th Nov 2012 20:19    Post subject: BD remus vs, (proper) 1080p MKV
I have no idea where to put this, but I was wondering how big a difference a BD remux (~25GB) would show compared to a good 1080p rip (let's say 15GB) on a highend LED TV. I don't mind the download (fast enough), but I was wondering if it was worth the redownload (I have a couple of movies I store).
So is a BD remux worth the extra (at average) 10 gig download?
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Tue, 20th Nov 2012 20:25    Post subject:
Proper encodes often go beyond the limit of the now aging Bluray standard, so the encodes are more efficient. There are differences, of course, but they are negligible and in motion unnoticeable. When comparing still to still, you can see missing details, blurring etc.
Back to top
tonizito
VIP Member



Posts: 51410
Location: Portugal, the shithole of Europe.
PostPosted: Tue, 20th Nov 2012 21:30    Post subject:
Remus ofc, he has the good stuff! Surprised



boundle (thoughts on cracking AITD) wrote:
i guess thouth if without a legit key the installation was rolling back we are all fucking then
Back to top
inz




Posts: 11914

PostPosted: Tue, 20th Nov 2012 21:46    Post subject:
tonizito wrote:
Remus ofc, he has the good stuff! Surprised



Remus is very pleased by this message.
Back to top
Mister_s




Posts: 19863

PostPosted: Wed, 21st Nov 2012 12:01    Post subject:
LeoNatan wrote:
Proper encodes often go beyond the limit of the now aging Bluray standard, so the encodes are more efficient. There are differences, of course, but they are negligible and in motion unnoticeable. When comparing still to still, you can see missing details, blurring etc.

That's what I thought thanks. I'll just get the quality rips in the future too.
Back to top
HubU
VIP Member



Posts: 11361

PostPosted: Wed, 21st Nov 2012 17:08    Post subject:
Remus can go fuck himself!


"Music washes away from the soul the dust of everyday life." ~Berthold Auerbach
Back to top
nouseforaname
รœber-VIP Member



Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
PostPosted: Thu, 22nd Nov 2012 02:30    Post subject:
LeoNatan wrote:
Proper encodes often go beyond the limit of the now aging Bluray standard, so the encodes are more efficient. There are differences, of course, but they are negligible and in motion unnoticeable. When comparing still to still, you can see missing details, blurring etc.


you make it sound like rips are better than the actual BR.

how many physical BRs do you own Leo? because I notice a difference in a quality...even in the best non-scene release I still will see some blocking in high detail/high motion scenes

"proper" BR rip and space isn't always ideal for hording 100s of movies like we do Wink


asus z170-A || core i5-6600K || geforce gtx 970 4gb || 16gb ddr4 ram || win10 || 1080p led samsung 27"
Back to top
TSR69
Banned



Posts: 14962
Location: Republic of the Seven United Provinces
PostPosted: Thu, 22nd Nov 2012 02:42    Post subject:
HubU wrote:
Remus can go fuck himself!

What about Romulus?
Back to top
HubU
VIP Member



Posts: 11361

PostPosted: Thu, 22nd Nov 2012 07:02    Post subject:
TSR69 wrote:
HubU wrote:
Remus can go fuck himself!

What about Romulus?




"Music washes away from the soul the dust of everyday life." ~Berthold Auerbach
Back to top
Mister_s




Posts: 19863

PostPosted: Thu, 22nd Nov 2012 16:42    Post subject:
nouseforaname wrote:
LeoNatan wrote:
Proper encodes often go beyond the limit of the now aging Bluray standard, so the encodes are more efficient. There are differences, of course, but they are negligible and in motion unnoticeable. When comparing still to still, you can see missing details, blurring etc.


you make it sound like rips are better than the actual BR.

how many physical BRs do you own Leo? because I notice a difference in a quality...even in the best non-scene release I still will see some blocking in high detail/high motion scenes

"proper" BR rip and space isn't always ideal for hording 100s of movies like we do Wink

I think he meant rips can be much smaller with comparable quality since the techniques are better.
Back to top
Paintface




Posts: 6877

PostPosted: Thu, 22nd Nov 2012 16:46    Post subject:
but it still adds a generation to it, i say if bandwidth isnt an issue , can only improve using remuxes and compare it yourself if the difference is worth another 10gb.
Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Thu, 22nd Nov 2012 17:28    Post subject:
If you want to directly compare then you might be able to see a slight difference. If you don't compare them, you'll probably won't be able to tell it has degraded, if it's a good quality non-scene rip.


TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"

~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ
PostPosted: Thu, 22nd Nov 2012 18:41    Post subject:
Mister_s wrote:
nouseforaname wrote:
LeoNatan wrote:
Proper encodes often go beyond the limit of the now aging Bluray standard, so the encodes are more efficient. There are differences, of course, but they are negligible and in motion unnoticeable. When comparing still to still, you can see missing details, blurring etc.


you make it sound like rips are better than the actual BR.

how many physical BRs do you own Leo? because I notice a difference in a quality...even in the best non-scene release I still will see some blocking in high detail/high motion scenes

"proper" BR rip and space isn't always ideal for hording 100s of movies like we do Wink

I think he meant rips can be much smaller with comparable quality since the techniques are better.

Yes. Of course, there is still the step of encoding an encode, which is always a degradation of quality, even if slightest. But it is slight enough that people can enjoy the good 1080p rips.

@nouse I do not have optical drives. It is an outdated format which I do not wish to support. Smile But I do download remuxes occasionally.
Back to top
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - The Useless Void
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group