|
|
| Page 1 of 2 |
|
|
 Posted: Fri, 29th Jul 2005 15:40 Post subject: Best insult wins a teddybear with NFORCE mods signatures! |
|
 |
As a no good copycat that I am, I often find good ideas on the interweb and put a somewhat hellish spin on them. This time, however, it's a natural deviation - no only I'll get fisk all jumping out of his bowl (closet?), but also I get my point across.
I by no means am an animal hater; or lover. But what I hate the most (today), is when some rabid dog decides that this random kid is way bigger lunch than that POS Kit-e-kat his apparently incompetent owners purchase every other week - and goes "a little funny in his head" snapping someone's something into an unnatural amount of lessers.
There are countless examples of dogs attacking without provocation, and the limited provocation kids provide shouldn't hold them responsible for the dogs actions. Kids plain don't know any better, because their parents smoke pot all day and play "tekken 3", thought that's a totally different rant.
Course of action : banning big dogs, and all kinds of fish.
Last edited by PoorLeno on Sun, 7th Aug 2005 13:11; edited 2 times in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 29th Jul 2005 15:45 Post subject: |
|
|
Keep kids on a leash, ask MJ about good ones-
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 29th Jul 2005 16:02 Post subject: |
|
|
| rockma wrote: | | Keep kids on a leash, ask MJ about good ones- |
haha  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MAD_MAX333
Moderator
Posts: 7020
Location: Toronto, Canada...eh
|
| Posted: Fri, 29th Jul 2005 22:01 Post subject: |
|
|
what did the little fish do?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lutzifer
Modzilla
Posts: 12740
Location: ____________________ **** vegan zombie **** GRRAAIIINNSS _______
|
| Posted: Fri, 29th Jul 2005 22:05 Post subject: |
|
|
| MAD_MAX333 wrote: | | what did the little fish do? |
watch "meet the feebles" at least three times and ask the question again |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fisk
Posts: 9145
Location: Von Oben
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 29th Jul 2005 22:41 Post subject: |
|
|
After returning to live in the Uk after many years in Germany Im alarmed to see that every common Chav in England has a pitbull.
There is no license law in UK for Dog owners which I also find wrong.
In Germany after a serious of savage attacks on kids over years they have a law that all dogs over a certain height have to wear a muzzle (maulkorb) in public.
Also certain breeds like Pitbulls arent allowed to bred or imported anymore in Germany . That also means that when the current generation of these dogs die then there wont be any more in Germany.
It makes my blood boil to see history repeating itself now Ive moved back to the UK . Stories like this should be a thing of the past :
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/4639517.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/kent/4079594.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/west_yorkshire/4674685.stm
When Im walking around bootfairs on sundays I dont want to be dodging pitbulls being led around by Chavs as pathetic status symbols.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MAD_MAX333
Moderator
Posts: 7020
Location: Toronto, Canada...eh
|
| Posted: Sat, 30th Jul 2005 02:59 Post subject: |
|
|
toronto just banned pitbulls and bulldogs (is going to soon or something) and i hear all of those kind of dogs will get banned soon... and i can't be happier... we also need jail time for the owners.
who agrees with me?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fisk
Posts: 9145
Location: Von Oben
|
| Posted: Sat, 30th Jul 2005 04:27 Post subject: |
|
|
These types of dogs have been bred by man to satisfy mans lust for blood. There are so many deficiencies on bulldogs it's just sad. Any species that barely can uphold a functional respiratory system due to physical built has to give in to evolution.
Pitbulls, and especially Pitbull Terriers are much the same, the difference is that they have mental issues.
In both cases, where these dogs are used for combat - it's the owners fault. The dogs do what they're trained to do by their masters. I've met pitbull terriers that are as friendly to "unknown people" as any Golden Retriever.
You know a person is a fucking dipshit (or not) after how the animal under his/her protection behaves. Some people shouldn't have animals... and even more so, some people should never have kids... because if animals can be badly shaped [ie. turned into crazy killing machines], children can be turned into fucking psycho's.
Yes, yes I'm back.
Somewhat.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 30th Jul 2005 18:52 Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I expected much more hostility from dog owners, but apparently they haven’t found this jewel yet.
I think that it's very hard to determine who is allowed and who should not even come close to an animal. I say - ban ‘em all, and the problem will go away. 4me2 has posted some links saturating the matter, and somehow the discussion shifted to the outmost aggressive breads of dogs. While, perhaps, these do top some hellish ladder it's important to note that even smaller dogs attack children fairly often.
I've personally talked to a dog owner once, who let his GIANT dog ( I'm not a breed expert, but it was reaaaly big and reaaaly hairy) loose on the street. I've pointed out how there's a potential risk for a child (this was after all a residential area, where I assume kids are numerous) to get hurt, and the dog owner assured me that this dog would never do anything. What's that? How can any person vouch for a being in such a manner? Suppose the child wants to pet him and the dog takes that as aggression? So I do agree with Max, that either people should go through some kind of "Dog, streets and you" - school, before they are eligible to even purchase a mutt, either they should bare full responsibility for the actions of the animal. But the best solution would be just to banish this obsession with companionship. Perhaps starting with the biggest dogs, but in my personal opinion all dogs should be banned, for where there's no reason for a risk - why keep it running around shitting on everyone's backyard?
PS. When I say fish, in any case until stated otherwise I mean ‘fisk’ – our beloved boardmember with a keyboard, attitude and free time to express his possession of both.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fisk
Posts: 9145
Location: Von Oben
|
| Posted: Sat, 30th Jul 2005 18:59 Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, you're afraid of dogs. Doesn't mean they all need to be banned, ^.o
People are more unpredictable than dogs, should we ban people too?
LOL, nm, I just remembered that the only opinion that counts is yours.
Yes, yes I'm back.
Somewhat.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SycoShaman
VIP Master Jedi
Posts: 24468
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Sun, 31st Jul 2005 00:12 Post subject: |
|
|
lol I agree with fisk
Its how u raise a dog that determines its behaviour and attitude.
My uncle has a pitbull and its one of the nicest dogs u'll meet, he's a suck 
and my half wolf, half husky is a really really nice dog. He hasnt bit anyone...well, anyone that didnt deserve it - had a guy try to break in when he was like 4 years old, bit him on the leg
But no one else has been attacked.
I think a bigger issue, in the US anyway, would be cutting someone off on the highway and gettin shot for it than not having a dog its leash or whatever
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 31st Jul 2005 01:10 Post subject: |
|
|
| fisk wrote: | Ok, you're afraid of dogs. Doesn't mean they all need to be banned, ^.o
People are more unpredictable than dogs, should we ban people too?
LOL, nm, I just remembered that the only opinion that counts is yours. |
What kind of a half-baked counterargument is that? We need people. We need cars to get to work on time. There are benefits that outweigh risks, or at least offer an argument. With dogs, cats and you - there are no benefits. That's why I am suggesting getting rid of all these things!
And fisk, play nice, don't say "lol" like an ubernoob. 
Aaaand, I'm not afraid of dogs. Cats maybe, but not dogs. Why cats? Well, I had a cat when I was... littler, and it jumped on me and scratched the hell of my face so now I look like Freddy Kruger. Well, actually it was my hands, but it still hurt, though nobody was scared of me. This cat also attacked my grandmother and her sister, landing them both in a hospital with infected wounds. Neither could walk for a month. Also, cats can be way cute - and I've long been striving for "shoot on cute" policy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 31st Jul 2005 01:12 Post subject: |
|
|
| SycoShaman wrote: | lol I agree with fisk
|
lollololoroflofltoflbbq!
| SycoShaman wrote: |
Its how u raise a dog that determines its behaviour and attitude.
|
"u" tell that to the mother of this kid:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/kent/4079594.stm
*link stolezed from 4me2 abovez0r!!!* |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SycoShaman
VIP Master Jedi
Posts: 24468
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Sun, 31st Jul 2005 02:01 Post subject: |
|
|
| PoorLeno wrote: | | SycoShaman wrote: | lol I agree with fisk
|
lollololoroflofltoflbbq!
| SycoShaman wrote: |
Its how u raise a dog that determines its behaviour and attitude.
|
"u" tell that to the mother of this kid:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/kent/4079594.stm
*link stolezed from 4me2 abovez0r!!!* |
And so her daughter was attacked, sad and tragic but obviously the dog wasn't rasied properly, thus proving my point...just because some kid gets attacked means I should have to put my non-violent dog down? fuck that |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 31st Jul 2005 02:07 Post subject: |
|
|
dog lover!
And who are you to make judgement calls about other peoples security? I don't want to be exposed to your dog, and you want me to trust you - some random guy - with a claim that your dog is safe. Well guess what - I do trust you, because I happen to think that statistically there are more benign dogs than murderous ones. That doesn't matter to me, though. If we were to remove all dogs, there would be no problem.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SycoShaman
VIP Master Jedi
Posts: 24468
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
| Posted: Sun, 31st Jul 2005 03:16 Post subject: |
|
|
| PoorLeno wrote: | dog lover!
And who are you to make judgement calls about other peoples security? I don't want to be exposed to your dog, and you want me to trust you - some random guy - with a claim that your dog is safe. Well guess what - I do trust you, because I happen to think that statistically there are more benign dogs than murderous ones. That doesn't matter to me, though. If we were to remove all dogs, there would be no problem. |
well, whatever man, ur fucked straight goods
im not continuing this discussion with u
reply if u will but im not |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kosmiq
Posts: 2304
Location: Somewhere
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fisk
Posts: 9145
Location: Von Oben
|
| Posted: Sun, 31st Jul 2005 23:09 Post subject: |
|
|
| PoorLeno wrote: |
What kind of a half-baked counterargument is that?
|
You're saying people aren't unpredictable?
Let me see, how many times do dogs attack people vs. how many times people attack people? Let's start with murders in countries, or wars? How many times do you see dogs wage war? Or produce chemical, nuclear or biological weapons of mass destruction... ?
When was last you saw a dog rape an old lady? Or beat it's children to death because it wanted drugs?
Do I need to go on?
Humans are the fucking scum of this earth, and you attack the dogs that have been ruined, by whom? By man - how's that for a counter argument?
| PoorLeno wrote: |
We need people. We need cars to get to work on time.
|
You need cars to work on time? Wow man, such depth of thought. I mean, now when I look at it, my argument looks so weak compared to yours... oh and:
| fisk wrote: | | LOL, nm, I just remembered that the only opinion that counts is yours. |
| PoorLeno wrote: |
There are benefits that outweigh risks, or at least offer an argument. With dogs, cats and you - there are no benefits. That's why I am suggesting getting rid of all these things!
|
You're no benefit either (not to me) - using your well-formed argument, why not just get rid of you?
Animals obviously benefit most of their owners.
| PoorLeno wrote: |
And fisk, play nice, don't say "lol" like an ubernoob.
|
Yes, writing the two letters 'L' and 'O' truly dictates how much of a "noob" someone is. Great! Man... again, I must humbly bow down to your superior induction.
| Quote: |
Aaaand, I'm not afraid of dogs. Cats maybe, but not dogs. Why cats? Well, I had a cat when I was... [...] (continuous irrelevant rant) |
I don't give a shit.
Yes, yes I'm back.
Somewhat.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 1st Aug 2005 23:32 Post subject: |
|
|
LoL. yea.. the only good dog is one used for a little saturday afternoon bbgun practice, after seeing he's dump attacked your yard. those little buggers can move after being pelted on the keister, I tell you
piracy isn't a hobby, it's a way of life
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fisk
Posts: 9145
Location: Von Oben
|
| Posted: Mon, 1st Aug 2005 23:42 Post subject: |
|
|
| Smurf Stomper wrote: | | [Stupid gun-ho, let's shoot'em rant] |
| Quote: |
Smurf Stomper
Location: Texas
|
I rest my case.
You stupid fucking gun-ho americans and your bam-bam penis replacements.
Yes, yes I'm back.
Somewhat.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 2nd Aug 2005 00:37 Post subject: |
|
|
hmm.. and yet, you fall prey to the trappings of a stereotype. Ever been to texas?
piracy isn't a hobby, it's a way of life
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fisk
Posts: 9145
Location: Von Oben
|
| Posted: Tue, 2nd Aug 2005 01:16 Post subject: |
|
|
I'm afraid you condemned yourself with your awestriking "the only good dog is one used for a little saturday afternoon bbgun practice,".
Why would I ever want to go to Texas? What's relevant here is that it lies in USA. And there's no stereotype that americans in general have a liberal view towards the posession and usage of firearms.
Yes, yes I'm back.
Somewhat.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 2nd Aug 2005 20:04 Post subject: |
|
|
unfortunately I was telling a well known fact with the dog comment. And even if it was not a fact, stereotyping is connoted in the human context.
You would want to go to texas to flush your head of foolish thinking and hopefully develop a better attitude about the state that the currently one of the world's most powerful men is from.
Whatever the case, your immature use of language is going to prevent me from engaging in further debate, seeing an old tactic is being employed on your behalf.
piracy isn't a hobby, it's a way of life
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fisk
Posts: 9145
Location: Von Oben
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 2nd Aug 2005 21:30 Post subject: |
|
|
Ah, it's hilarious watching Smurf Stomper's attempts at being appearing intelligent.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 5th Aug 2005 15:38 Post subject: |
|
|
wow fisk, you need to lighten up a bit. I hate you too, but c'mon, don't waste so much energy on someone you've never even met. ^_^
To clarify my, abundantly over clarified, point: I think that people are useful for people, and that risk associated with having people around outweigh the potential harm they[people] may cause. And if they do not, well, there's your argument - mine's that dogs don't have any use at all, apart from companionship which is quite a bad use of a perfectly able war machine, if you ask me, which you obviously don't.
Also stop trying to shut me up with "the only opinion that matters is yours" bullshit line. I could spam that line in EVERY thread you EVER made, and would probobly be right on the money. As for not giving in to your mindless rant about how humans are even more dangerous and how we(who's this we?) should get in on them - I don't even consider that to be a point of view. Some dog lover above attempted to argument for his cause, but finding my counterarguments much too hard to comprehend, since they were written with symbols and not cartoonish animation - he (going with the odds here) surrendered, calling me a "u" a couple of times. Pfft.
I get it, you are against it - but why? Do you think that dogs (apart from the ones used in medicinal practices, military applications and perhaps hunting) have any sugnificant use, that warrants their misconduct or misconduct that has somehow resulted from improper education - end result being the same, however, I fail to see how this is relevant. Perhaps you see it as a personal freedom to have a dog, and see limit to this freedom infringing your rights, or deem a riskless / dogless scociety to be monotone and inhuman. There are a lot of perfectly valid arguments any of you could make, instead even people who side with me chose jokes about bb-guns and people who don't attempt to insult my intelligence to score some points with the other mindless inhabitants of this here board.
Oh, and a very nice "I don't care" reply fisk. When your grandfather dies, it's apparently important, but my grandmother landing in a hospital, is not at all importanté.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 5th Aug 2005 16:14 Post subject: |
|
|
You're all right, but....
Don't forget dogs are and stay animals.
They have an instinct, and who's touching it in a bad way...can have some bad luck.
Lot of accidents happen caused by aggressive dogs.
Here in Belgium they want to make a law to prohibite having an 'aggressive' dog, they've made a list of aggressive races. There is a lot of protest against it.
Personally I like dogs very much, I like animals in common.
They can save lives, they can make life much easier (blind/handicapped people) etc... . The same dogs (same race) can also be very aggressive, and it's not always caused by nature. No problem having/breeding pitbulls for dog shows, as a 'pet'. But please, stop breeding those dogs who are used as fighting machines. Problem is, you cannot know how the dog will be teached things when you sell him to a person who 'likes' the dog.
It's giving these nice creatures a bad name.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fisk
Posts: 9145
Location: Von Oben
|
| Posted: Fri, 5th Aug 2005 21:02 Post subject: |
|
|
PoorLeno: It's ok, no need to compliment me for making you look like a tosser.
Yes, yes I'm back.
Somewhat.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 5th Aug 2005 22:03 Post subject: |
|
|
| fisk wrote: | | PoorLeno: It's ok, no need to compliment me for making you look like a tosser. |
I don't undestand what you mean by a 'tosser', however, knowing you it's again an inslut. Where's the ignore button when you need it the most?
And fisk, fuck you, you are too dumb to waste time on. Sug kuk, go to hell, etc, etc. You'll never get it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 1 of 2 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|
|
 |
|
