Page 166 of 512 |
Nui
VIP Member
Posts: 5720
Location: in a place with fluffy towels
|
Posted: Sun, 22nd Apr 2012 15:42 Post subject: |
|
 |
Pl@tinum wrote: | Only the 1st time you kill one of those quest bosses will he drop good items. After that he will drop worse items, so you won't be able to farm him. The real good items will be on random world bosses on all the acts of the last two difficulty levels. | I see. But other quest rewards will still be given? Gold and EXP. At least it seemed so when i killed the king again.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 22nd Apr 2012 15:45 Post subject: |
|
 |
Nui wrote: | Pl@tinum wrote: | Only the 1st time you kill one of those quest bosses will he drop good items. After that he will drop worse items, so you won't be able to farm him. The real good items will be on random world bosses on all the acts of the last two difficulty levels. | I see. But other quest rewards will still be given? Gold and EXP. At least it seemed so when i killed the king again. |
I can only speak for the beta, so yes.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 22nd Apr 2012 15:46 Post subject: |
|
 |
cant play this weekend but i can tomotrrow, are the servers and log-ins fine now? so u can access the game al time? or lots of overloadings?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nui
VIP Member
Posts: 5720
Location: in a place with fluffy towels
|
Posted: Sun, 22nd Apr 2012 15:46 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 22nd Apr 2012 15:57 Post subject: |
|
 |
Finished the beta as a Witch Doctor with 3 randoms.
It's Diablo alright. And it's fun. But it's not "enough" fun for me to warrant a pre-order / release day buy. Then again I never quite understood the appeal of multiplayer in Diablo 2 either.
I enjoyed it but not as much as people made it out to be.
And I had some really weird fps drops at times. Nothing on screen and all of a sudden I'm creeping along at 10fps O.o
sabin1981 wrote: | Now you're just arguing semantics. Getting fucked in the ass with a broom stale is an "improvement" over getting stabbed in the eye with a fork  |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
russ80
Posts: 4679
Location: Romania
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 22nd Apr 2012 16:32 Post subject: |
|
 |
Online SP isn't SP.
I'm not only comparing D3 to WoW : StarCraft 2 isn't an MMO and yet it gets at least 2 expansions, with the game divided into 3 pieces, something that old Blizzard would never do.
Blizzard are just money whores nowadays like Activision and as long as it sells, it's good enough for them... And imagine this, this is coming from a Blizzard fanboy that bought all their games (but stopped after WoW vanilla)....
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
russ80
Posts: 4679
Location: Romania
|
Posted: Sun, 22nd Apr 2012 17:02 Post subject: |
|
 |
cyclonefr wrote: | Online SP isn't SP.
I'm not only comparing D3 to WoW : StarCraft 2 isn't an MMO and yet it gets at least 2 expansions, with the game divided into 3 pieces, something that old Blizzard would never do.
Blizzard are just money whores nowadays like Activision and as long as it sells, it's good enough for them... And imagine this, this is coming from a Blizzard fanboy that bought all their games (but stopped after WoW vanilla).... |
Clearly money whores like Activision, after all they keep releasing a new diablo every single year instead of polishing it for 11 years...wait what?
DERP.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 22nd Apr 2012 17:08 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JackQ
Non-expret in Derps lagunge
Posts: 14179
Location: Kibbutznik, Israel
|
Posted: Sun, 22nd Apr 2012 17:20 Post subject: |
|
 |
I'm still hoping it will be cracked and be moded as much as possible,I'm buying it,but even blizz/Diablo team deserve some "slap",I really don't like that close as possible approach,this is Apple way.
"Fuck Denuvo"
Your personal opinions != the rest of the forum
Last edited by JackQ on Sun, 22nd Apr 2012 17:59; edited 3 times in total
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 22nd Apr 2012 17:52 Post subject: |
|
 |
polishing it? 11 years? what's so polishy about it?
but yeah. it looks like its 11 years old.
>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ♪ Viva La Vida ♪ <<<<<< <<<<< <<<<<< <<<
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 22nd Apr 2012 17:53 Post subject: |
|
 |
Lol, engine has most prolly seen a few overhauls since the start of the development.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 22nd Apr 2012 18:05 Post subject: |
|
 |
yeah. MAJOR overhauls, right? with such a short development phase, what can we expect 
>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ♪ Viva La Vida ♪ <<<<<< <<<<< <<<<<< <<<
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sin317
Banned
Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
russ80
Posts: 4679
Location: Romania
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
locke89
Posts: 2812
Location: Poland
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 22nd Apr 2012 18:53 Post subject: |
|
 |
from memory : "please blizzard, work and make diablo 3 even if it looks the same like diablo 2, we are not crazy about gfx, gameplay matters"
few years later : "we waited 10 years, and it looks like this ? we are in 2012 ffs."
replace diablo with starcraft 2, fireaxis xcom, and other promising good old times remakes in work or released in the past or in the future.
and you wonder why developers works on dx999999 gfx instead of gameplay or story.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
X_Dror
Posts: 4957
Location: Jerusalem, Israel
|
Posted: Sun, 22nd Apr 2012 19:04 Post subject: |
|
 |
I played for a couple of hours on the beta and I'm a bit disappointed.
If you're talking about the looks then yes it doesn't look good enough. Not because of the GFX but because it lost its look. It looks too much like world of warcraft. It's definitively not grim enough. Even the music is too dim and not grim.
Diablo's 1 music still plays in my head and it's a lot better than this one's.
The game just lost its character.
The lags and the stupid network dependency is just making it a bit worse.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jundy
Posts: 267
Location: 3rd Floor in a Room 6mx5m
|
Posted: Sun, 22nd Apr 2012 19:04 Post subject: |
|
 |
Its a nice game, first in the Diablo universe.
I am going to buy it if I CAN find it under £20
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 22nd Apr 2012 19:07 Post subject: |
|
 |
It's the hump, people always bitch about something. Would be dull any other way.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 22nd Apr 2012 20:26 Post subject: |
|
 |
The graphic is not that important for most people. BUT it is worth mentioning that it doesn't look like a game from 2012. That is not bitching, its just stating fact, but won't really matter gameplay wise. So don't try to make a problem out of nothing.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spajdr
Posts: 1842
Location: Czechia
|
Posted: Sun, 22nd Apr 2012 20:35 Post subject: |
|
 |
Game looks fine, but from what i seen i dont see reason, why this shouldnt be released year or two ago. That happens when you have shitload of money and no pressure to finish game asap. I hope that microstuttering i experienced will be fixed in retail version.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 22nd Apr 2012 20:39 Post subject: |
|
 |
cyclonefr wrote: | Online SP isn't SP.
I'm not only comparing D3 to WoW : StarCraft 2 isn't an MMO and yet it gets at least 2 expansions, with the game divided into 3 pieces, something that old Blizzard would never do.
|
O rly?
Brood Wars.
Insurrection.
Retribution.
That's 3 add-ons, one more than SC2 has planned. Haven't heard of Insurrection and Retribution? That's because they sucked and were cash-in made by other developers, while allowed by Blizzard.
Now if you'll excuse me, I'll go back to playing Starcraft : Ghost on a console.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 22nd Apr 2012 20:40 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VonMises
Posts: 293
Location: Österreich
|
Posted: Sun, 22nd Apr 2012 21:03 Post subject: |
|
 |
The only downside of this game is the lack of Paladin and Druid as a playable classes.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Page 166 of 512 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |