|
Page 8 of 24 |
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 16:12 Post subject: |
|
 |
Man, I can change my MAC address in a second...
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 16:12 Post subject: |
|
 |
i have the stoned version... never a crash. used the reloaded crack on it and plaued without the cd... still never a single crash.
i think the game engine is just hardware dependant and some drivers or cards just make the game crash sometimes
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 16:12 Post subject: |
|
 |
DudeZ0rst wrote: |
Can I also use the image file that comes with the reloaded version to check this out? |
Not sure, I dont have the RELOADED Version, try and mount it on Daemon tools and load up the game without using the crack. If that dont work, you might aswell just download the clone version, better then waiting for proper cracks.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Baleur
Posts: 2343
Location: South Sweden
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 16:14 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 16:16 Post subject: |
|
 |
Selt wrote: | i have the stoned version... never a crash. used the reloaded crack on it and plaued without the cd... still never a single crash.
i think the game engine is just hardware dependant and some drivers or cards just make the game crash sometimes |
Selt did you make sure the image file from the Clone version was not mounted on D-Tools? You may have used RELOADED's crack but with the image file still mounted which is why it has not crashed for you. Unmount the image file and then use the crack.
I dont know, The game crashed on me 3 times while using the RELOADED crack, and not once did it crash on me using just the Clone image, so it cant be drivers or hardware like you are saying, it has to be the crack.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 16:17 Post subject: |
|
 |
-=Cartoon=- wrote: | The Wronged wrote: | Ladies and gentlemen, this crappy game has been (and is) way overhyped. Less fascinating than the first one, less enthralling, not to mention all the maps look the same.
To run this game smoothly and still have the eye-candy, you need an Uber machine, even more than 1gig of ram and a solid, last generation video card. Needless to say, if you don't have these pre-requisites, this game's visuals suck big time. Oh, and don't even try it on a "just decent" rig. Pac-man would look better.
On top of that, tasty crashes and audio stuttering on some audio cards.
I'm looking forward to see Call of Duty 2 beat the hell out out this overhyped shitbag. |
Sorry i think your computer just sucks |
Too bad for you I have a 2gig ram, cpu athlon 64 3500+ and an ati x850 xt. Great visuals, crappy game. I just had the awful luck of seeing it run on my brother's rig (3000+, 1gig, ati 9800 xt) and was about to vomit. These little smartasses want us to buy better hardware as soon as possible.
This game and the whole conception behind programming a game like this are pure robbery.
Thanks god Cod2 is imminent.
Being a lamer is a skill
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 16:22 Post subject: |
|
 |
The Wronged wrote: |
Too bad for you I have a 2gig ram, cpu athlon 64 3500+ and an ati x850 xt. Great visuals, crappy game. I just had the awful luck of seeing it run on my brother's rig (3000+, 1gig, ati 9800 xt) and was about to vomit. These little smartasses want us to buy better hardware as soon as possible.
This game and the whole conception behind programming a game like this are pure robbery.
Thanks god Cod2 is imminent. |
Nice troll but a lot of people are enjoying this game. Keep your COD2 bullshit to COD2 threads.
Im a cockfag
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 16:23 Post subject: |
|
 |
The Wronged wrote: |
Too bad for you I have a 2gig ram, cpu athlon 64 3500+ and an ati x850 xt. Great visuals, crappy game. I just had the awful luck of seeing it run on my brother's rig (3000+, 1gig, ati 9800 xt) and was about to vomit. These little smartasses want us to buy better hardware as soon as possible.
This game and the whole conception behind programming a game like this are pure robbery.
Thanks god Cod2 is imminent. |
Dude, go play your COD game than. With all it's lamers and spray babies.
This is next generation FPS with teamplaying elements that will blow COD2 away without problem. Maybe you are just not ready for it yet.
I'm Big in the Scene, Or Da Scenez0rs like us scene people call it.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 16:24 Post subject: |
|
 |
Who-CareZ wrote: |
I dont know, The game crashed on me 3 times while using the RELOADED crack, and not once did it crash on me using just the Clone image, so it cant be drivers or hardware like you are saying, it has to be the crack. |
the crack is indeed bad i have dozen trigger function offsets where it crashes as the value is not correct
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 16:26 Post subject: |
|
 |
ms_bug wrote: | Man, I can change my MAC address in a second... |
punkbuster collects info of 3 hardware parts. you could buy the game twice or more with that money
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 16:29 Post subject: |
|
 |
DudeZ0rst wrote: | Dude, go play your COD game than. With all it's lamers and spray babies.
This is next generation FPS with teamplaying elements that will blow COD2 away without problem. Maybe you are just not ready for it yet. |
Thats interesting, since CoD 2 won't be out until fall, so I'm curious to know how can you spit such prophetic sentences. Oh well, maybe you just replied for the sake of it.
Anyway, no, I'm not trolling, I'm just pissed off with this disgusting under-the-table agreement between some software houses and hardware developers. This game is a resource hog and looks awaful if you don't have a state of the art machine. This is how they make fun of people.
When Half-life 2 was out, the visuals were impressive even on medium settings. Try this on BF2, and say hello to Pacman.
Being a lamer is a skill
Last edited by The Wronged on Mon, 20th Jun 2005 16:30; edited 3 times in total
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
-=Cartoon=-
VIP Member
Posts: 8823
Location: South Pacific Ocean
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 16:30 Post subject: |
|
 |
Who-CareZ wrote: | Selt wrote: | i have the stoned version... never a crash. used the reloaded crack on it and plaued without the cd... still never a single crash.
i think the game engine is just hardware dependant and some drivers or cards just make the game crash sometimes |
Selt did you make sure the image file from the Clone version was not mounted on D-Tools? You may have used RELOADED's crack but with the image file still mounted which is why it has not crashed for you. Unmount the image file and then use the crack.
I dont know, The game crashed on me 3 times while using the RELOADED crack, and not once did it crash on me using just the Clone image, so it cant be drivers or hardware like you are saying, it has to be the crack. |
sure, i made this test with and without the cd to be sure i was using both the releases...
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 16:33 Post subject: |
|
 |
The Wronged wrote: |
Thats interesting, since CoD 2 won't be out until fall, so I'm curious to know how can you spit such prophetic sentences. Oh well, maybe you just replied for the sake of it.
Anyway, no, I'm not trolling, I'm just pissed off with this disgusting under-the-table agreement between some software houses and hardware developers. This game is a resource hog and looks awaful if you don't have a state of the art machine. This is how they make fun of people.
When Half-life 2 was out, the visuals were impressive even on medium settings. Try this on BF2, and say hello to Pacman. |
Why are your crying when you say you have a state of the art computer. You can play it without problem so what's the big deal?
And let me explain to you why it requires a good computer. It's because this game will be played YEARS from now and still will look awesome. That's why.
I played bf 1942 untill a few months ago, sure the graphics weren't state of the art, but do I care? No, because I love the gameplay. That's what BF2 games are all about. Gameplay/teamplay.
I'm Big in the Scene, Or Da Scenez0rs like us scene people call it.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 16:35 Post subject: |
|
 |
kerteds wrote: | ms_bug wrote: | Man, I can change my MAC address in a second... |
punkbuster collects info of 3 hardware parts. you could buy the game twice or more with that money |
It's not about the money, I preordered the game already. Just trying to say they can stick those three hardware parts up their ass..
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ainatar
Banned
Posts: 35
Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 16:45 Post subject: |
|
 |
I know why the game crashes now, it is punkbuster. Every time that I play on a punkbuster server the game crashes after each round, but when I play on a server without punkbuster the game never crashes. This will probably be no problem with an authentic cd-key.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 16:46 Post subject: |
|
 |
DudeZ0rst wrote: | The Wronged wrote: |
Thats interesting, since CoD 2 won't be out until fall, so I'm curious to know how can you spit such prophetic sentences. Oh well, maybe you just replied for the sake of it.
Anyway, no, I'm not trolling, I'm just pissed off with this disgusting under-the-table agreement between some software houses and hardware developers. This game is a resource hog and looks awaful if you don't have a state of the art machine. This is how they make fun of people.
When Half-life 2 was out, the visuals were impressive even on medium settings. Try this on BF2, and say hello to Pacman. |
Why are your crying when you say you have a state of the art computer. You can play it without problem so what's the big deal?
And let me explain to you why it requires a good computer. It's because this game will be played YEARS from now and still will look awesome. That's why.
I played bf 1942 untill a few months ago, sure the graphics weren't state of the art, but do I care? No, because I love the gameplay. That's what BF2 games are all about. Gameplay/teamplay. |
So you're assuming its smart to make the visuals look like crap for a good 80% of the people. Oh and customers surely will be happy in knowing that they will enjoy this game at its best in the years to come, when more graphically impressive games will be out. This way, most of the people won't enjoy it now and will perceive it as outdated in the future.
Good deal.
Being a lamer is a skill
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 16:48 Post subject: |
|
 |
The Wronged wrote: |
Thats interesting, since CoD 2 won't be out until fall, so I'm curious to know how can you spit such prophetic sentences. Oh well, maybe you just replied for the sake of it.
Anyway, no, I'm not trolling, I'm just pissed off with this disgusting under-the-table agreement between some software houses and hardware developers. This game is a resource hog and looks awaful if you don't have a state of the art machine. This is how they make fun of people.
When Half-life 2 was out, the visuals were impressive even on medium settings. Try this on BF2, and say hello to Pacman. |
You're right that the games requirements are a bit high but BF1942 and BFV never exactly ran great so it was expected. Also, take it account the fact that the game is an impressive technical feat with the large maps and the way it all seamlessly integrates together. When you're flying over the map looking down on guys fighting each other it doesn't take a genius to realise you cant expect to run this on a mediocre PC and get decent visuals.
Im a cockfag
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Baleur
Posts: 2343
Location: South Sweden
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 17:09 Post subject: |
|
 |
The Wronged wrote: | -=Cartoon=- wrote: | The Wronged wrote: | Ladies and gentlemen, this crappy game has been (and is) way overhyped. Less fascinating than the first one, less enthralling, not to mention all the maps look the same.
To run this game smoothly and still have the eye-candy, you need an Uber machine, even more than 1gig of ram and a solid, last generation video card. Needless to say, if you don't have these pre-requisites, this game's visuals suck big time. Oh, and don't even try it on a "just decent" rig. Pac-man would look better.
On top of that, tasty crashes and audio stuttering on some audio cards.
I'm looking forward to see Call of Duty 2 beat the hell out out this overhyped shitbag. |
Sorry i think your computer just sucks |
Too bad for you I have a 2gig ram, cpu athlon 64 3500+ and an ati x850 xt. Great visuals, crappy game. I just had the awful luck of seeing it run on my brother's rig (3000+, 1gig, ati 9800 xt) and was about to vomit. These little smartasses want us to buy better hardware as soon as possible.
This game and the whole conception behind programming a game like this are pure robbery.
Thanks god Cod2 is imminent. |
Dont take this personal but are you an idiot?
Of course they want us to buy better hardware.. Because technology advances. Better graphics, better everything, requires better hardware. I really hope you understand that. So if you do understand that, what are you whining at?
Are you one of those people who are all "it was better before"?
Dont you want technology to advance?
I am married to technology, i cheat on my technology everytime new technology appears. And i fuckin love it! Hence i hate you, bye now littol smurf. 
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 RAM: 4gb Kingmax DDR2 800mhz Video: Asus GeForce 250GTS 1gb Sound: Asus Xonar.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cheez-It
Posts: 1106
Location: Rochester, NY
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 17:18 Post subject: |
|
 |
The Wronged wrote: | Ladies and gentlemen, this crappy game has been (and is) way overhyped. Less fascinating than the first one, less enthralling, not to mention all the maps look the same.
To run this game smoothly and still have the eye-candy, you need an Uber machine, even more than 1gig of ram and a solid, last generation video card. Needless to say, if you don't have these pre-requisites, this game's visuals suck big time. Oh, and don't even try it on a "just decent" rig. Pac-man would look better.
On top of that, tasty crashes and audio stuttering on some audio cards.
I'm looking forward to see Call of Duty 2 beat the hell out out this overhyped shitbag. |
Wow. Very tempting to flame you...
Anyways.
So I'm running an old p4 2800 1 gig 2700 ram and an ati 9700 (let's see... how old is this? almost 3 years old?) and the game looks great, and plays great.
You are obviously letting your incompetence get the best of you when trying to run it on your brothers machine. Please stop trolling.... calling bf2 overhyped and then professing your interest in a game that will be even more hyped shows off your intelligence
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 17:18 Post subject: |
|
 |
Baleur wrote: | Dont take this personal but are you an idiot?
Of course they want us to buy better hardware.. Because technology advances. Better graphics, better everything, requires better hardware. I really hope you understand that. So if you do understand that, what are you whining at?
Are you one of those people who are all "it was better before"?
Dont you want technology to advance?
I am married to technology, i cheat on my technology everytime new technology appears. And i fuckin love it! Hence i hate you, bye now littol smurf.  |
Half-way. Not really a flame, not a clever reply, nor a convincing one. I think your post speaks by itself.
Besides, all your argument about technology is just pointless. I'm writing on a public forum discussing on a game and you play the smarty one blaming me and accusing me of being retro? That's grotesque. I know technology advances, but I already wrote that Half-life 2 was a great achievement in graphics without cutting out 80% of the customers. Did you even notice that?
I will reply you when your posts make sense.
Reading comprehension is your friend.
Being a lamer is a skill
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 17:25 Post subject: |
|
 |
Allright I don't have crashes anymore.
I forgot to copy the core.dll file form the crack and overwrite the one in the game directory. I just copied the .exe file.
So try it, it works for me.
I'm Big in the Scene, Or Da Scenez0rs like us scene people call it.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 17:28 Post subject: |
|
 |
im running it on a fx5200 and its great online
Much better than the first which was a bit overrated imo
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 17:33 Post subject: |
|
 |
Man, why are you all complaining about the hardware requirements? It was clear to everyone that you would need a state-of-the-art pc to run this game with best settings... i run the game with everything medium at 1024x768 and it just looks great... and once i can afford one more gig of ram i can set everything to high! And then its one of the best looking games up to now!
And why are you comparing to HL2? Hl2 doesn't have either the map size, nor the ammount of people on screen at the same time, nor the view distance!
Besides... this is Battlefield! It isn't about the best visuals... it's about the best gameplay... and it HAS the best gameplay of any online shooter!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 17:58 Post subject: |
|
 |
Who-CareZ wrote: | DJSatane wrote: | Who-CareZ wrote: | **WARNING** Stay away from the Official EA Ranked servers if you are playing with a *Warez* copy of the game.
Why? EA is monitoring and logging Ip's, it's been reported they know who has the warez version of the game and they said "Action will be taken on the people playing with the warez version of the game on their servers"
Some people have seen EA admins post messages on their servers about this. And I have seen it aswell which is why I left the EA server quickly.
Looks like I wont be playing on EA server until I get a real key. |
I guess you shouldnt use cracked exe to play on them, and learn to use clone because PB can tell your difference in binaries. |
What the hell you talking about, I am using the clone version, Im not using a crack for the game. The crack that RELOADED came out with has nothing to do with EA knowing about people playing with WAREZ version, its the CD Key's, thats how they know. |
My point is that *IF* you do have valid cd-key(manage way to get it) you can use clone and you wont have any problems, however crack will not work as PB will not let it play on PB enabled servers. Further, reason why PB will not let you play even on cracked servers with PB enabled is because if people know anything about PB, it needs to create PB GUID specific for each account/cd-key and with cracked version this will be a problem with same cd keys or invalid cd keys. However, there are ways to disable GUID resolution for PB on server side, make it think its lan, and still have PB work on cracked server for private use, but thats about it.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 18:04 Post subject: |
|
 |
Anyone set up a LAN server with bots?
Creating a Coop Lan Server didn't work for me, saw no options what so ever.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Baleur
Posts: 2343
Location: South Sweden
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 18:08 Post subject: |
|
 |
The Wronged wrote: | Baleur wrote: | Dont take this personal but are you an idiot?
Of course they want us to buy better hardware.. Because technology advances. Better graphics, better everything, requires better hardware. I really hope you understand that. So if you do understand that, what are you whining at?
Are you one of those people who are all "it was better before"?
Dont you want technology to advance?
I am married to technology, i cheat on my technology everytime new technology appears. And i fuckin love it! Hence i hate you, bye now littol smurf.  |
Half-way. Not really a flame, not a clever reply, nor a convincing one. I think your post speaks by itself.
Besides, all your argument about technology is just pointless. I'm writing on a public forum discussing on a game and you play the smarty one blaming me and accusing me of being retro? That's grotesque. I know technology advances, but I already wrote that Half-life 2 was a great achievement in graphics without cutting out 80% of the customers. Did you even notice that?
I will reply you when your posts make sense.
Reading comprehension is your friend. |
Read real good now. Okay?
I'm gonna let you in on a secret..
Writing in proper grammar and in a calm orderly fashion does not make you intelligent. Stop calling my posts "grotesque", which i wont even go into, stop pretending that your own posts make any sense.
I am simply gonna write in your style as i am doing now, and allow the general public to view your posts and make up their own mind.
BF2 runs great. GTA SA runs better.
There are plenty of reasons for the difference, im going to make the assumption that you did not complain that GTA SA ran poorly, since you would really have to have a retro system in order to have that run poorly..
BF2 has a pretty complex engine, not only graphical but also physical/gameplay wise. You have 64 players to keep track of, you have bump mapping on all of those players, you have a map that is practically half visible at all time, you have a very cut back level of detail as you can see if you approach a tank, you can clearly see that the engine is very preformance optimized.
You should really try a game such as Boiling Point or perhaps Söldner. Then i can agree with your complaints, but not when they apply to this game, because they are simply wrong. No it is not your opinion (you stated it as a fact), but even if it was, your opinion would then be wrong.
There is such a thing as right and wrong opinions. But lets not get into that please, since i could so easily prove it that it would just make you look sillier.
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 RAM: 4gb Kingmax DDR2 800mhz Video: Asus GeForce 250GTS 1gb Sound: Asus Xonar.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 20th Jun 2005 18:09 Post subject: |
|
 |
BlueEye wrote: | Anyone set up a LAN server with bots?
Creating a Coop Lan Server didn't work for me, saw no options what so ever. |
The only way to play with bots is to use the single player menu option AFAIK.
BTW, did anyone else notice only 10 of the 12 maps are available with bots.
Im a cockfag
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Page 8 of 24 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|
|
 |
|