TIL Blizzard sued Valve over DOTA name
Page 1 of 5 Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Neon
VIP Member



Posts: 18935
Location: Poland
PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 16:49    Post subject: TIL Blizzard sued Valve over DOTA name
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 16:50    Post subject: Re: TIL Blizzard sued Valve over DOTA name
Neon wrote:
http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/v?pno=91202572&pty=OPP&eno=1



What's up with Blizzard nowadays? Neutral


Activision Blizzard, Inc.(NASDAQ:ATVI)

That's all that needs saying.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 16:50    Post subject: Re: TIL Blizzard sued Valve over DOTA name
Neon wrote:
What's up with Blizzard nowadays? Neutral

Activision Laughing
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 16:50    Post subject:
Fuuuu Laughing
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 16:51    Post subject:
Hahahaha!
Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 16:51    Post subject:
didnt know blizzard "owned" the rights to dota.

add : and i dont think there is a single mention of activision in the whole document (again for the slow, blizzard is self-ruling and independant from activision).


Last edited by Sin317 on Fri, 10th Feb 2012 16:53; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
tonizito
VIP Member



Posts: 51408
Location: Portugal, the shithole of Europe.
PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 16:52    Post subject: Re: TIL Blizzard sued Valve over DOTA name
Neon wrote:
http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/v?pno=91202572&pty=OPP&eno=1



What's up with Blizzard nowadays? Neutral
WHY DIDN'T YOU POST IT ON THE DOTA2 THREAD? Mad
 Spoiler:
 



Anyway, here's gabe's take on this:

Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 16:52    Post subject:
Sin317 wrote:
didnt know blizzard "owned" the rights to dota.


It was a free mod, but ActiBlizz are pulling the Russian* trick; "You did it using our assets on our game, therefore we own you.. erm.. it... yes... we own it"



*Alexei Pajitnov, developer of Tetris, lost the rights to his own game and never saw a single penny from the sales (of ANY version on ANY platform) because Communism YaY! he developed it using his work's computers and during work hours. It became their property and not his.


Last edited by sabin1981 on Fri, 10th Feb 2012 16:53; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
garus
VIP Member



Posts: 34200

PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 16:52    Post subject:
snip


Last edited by garus on Tue, 27th Aug 2024 21:22; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
sausje
Banned



Posts: 17716
Location: Limboland, Netherlands
PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 16:54    Post subject:
Wasn't this already last year an issue? I tought they solved it.


Proud member of Frustrated Association of International Losers Failing Against the Gifted and Superior (F.A.I.L.F.A.G.S)
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 16:54    Post subject:
Sin317 wrote:
(again for the slow, blizzard is self-ruling and independant from activision).


Sure they are, that's why they're called Activision Blizzard and not "Blizzard: an Activision Division" or just plain old "Blizzard"

Keep telling yourself that if it helps you sleep easier at night. So stick that "for the slow" bollocks right up your arse. They CLAIM to be self ruling, but they are hell aren't showing it -- and neither does any report regarding Blizzard, who are constantly titled Activision-Blizzard.


Last edited by sabin1981 on Fri, 10th Feb 2012 16:57; edited 3 times in total
Back to top
TheZor
VIP Member



Posts: 5991

PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 16:54    Post subject:
Blizzard are dicks and will never see a dime from me ever again
They assert that they "supported" the game in their suit.. What a joke. They didn't even consider us in the least for seven years.


R5 5600X - 3070FE - 16GB DDR4 3600 - Asus B550 TUF Gaming Plus - BeQuiet Straight Power 11 750W - Pure Base 500DX
Back to top
sausje
Banned



Posts: 17716
Location: Limboland, Netherlands
PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 16:57    Post subject:
sabin1981 wrote:
Sin317 wrote:
(again for the slow, blizzard is self-ruling and independant from activision).


Sure they are, that's why they're called Activision Blizzard and not "Blizzard: an Activision Division" or just plain old "Blizzard"

Keep telling yourself that if it helps you sleep easier at night. So stick that "for the slow" bollocks right up your arse.


He's right tho (how much i hate to admit it Razz), last time i read something about this there was something in there that they both are under the same name, but both work independent from eachother with their own IP's..
Ill do a search and see if i can dig up where this was.


Found it:

Quote:
Activision and Blizzard Entertainment still exist as separate entities.[9] The holding company does not publish games under its central name and instead uses its subsidiaries to publish games, similar to how Vivendi Games operated before the merger.[10] The merger makes Activision parent company of Vivendi Games' former divisions.


From wiki


Proud member of Frustrated Association of International Losers Failing Against the Gifted and Superior (F.A.I.L.F.A.G.S)


Last edited by sausje on Fri, 10th Feb 2012 16:59; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 16:58    Post subject:
Like I said; they CLAIM to be yet all the evidence indicates otherwise. Blizzard's entire MO stinks of Activision money grubbing - and, once again, everything relating to Blizzard is Activision-Blizzard. You can't deny that Blizzard have gotten far, far more monetary-oriented since their merger/acquisition (Laughing) with Activision. This lawsuit, which is frivolous at best and downright malicious at worst, is just yet another example of Activision's everlasting greed.

(sorry about all the edits, keep missing stuff or noticing dumbass typos)
Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 17:11    Post subject:
again people are guessing and speculating Smile

believe me, if activision controlled blizzard, you would know it lol.

we would have a diablo and a starcraft every yeah and wow had an expansion every 3 months Smile
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 17:12    Post subject:
You mean instead of a sequel being chopped into 3 parts and charged for all three? That kind of Activision behaviour? Or a flying mount being charged real money for? That kind of Activision behaviour? Or a lawsuit about an IP and product they do not own in order to generate more money from an established product? That kind of Activision behaviour?

Almost forget the icing on the cake; a real money fees-based auction house in Diablo Very Happy

Heh, I know you're a fan of Blizzard - but you're honestly starting to come off like Slizza lately Very Happy
Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 17:16    Post subject:
im not a "fan" of anything, but im against ignorance Smile
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 17:17    Post subject:
Well that's odd, considering you keep perpetuating it. At least ignorance of the "I'm going to bury my head in the sand, la la la" kind.
Back to top
Flagship




Posts: 333
Location: ... . -.-. .-. . -
PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 17:22    Post subject:
I agree with Sabin that it's naive to think there is no "connection" between Blizzard and Activision except name and stocks(?). But its also naive to think they are more greedy then the others, since they are all capitalist companies, which core philosophy is making more profit. I mean they are fighting over Dota because of profit, not because of some ideals or whatever.
If u want to classify companies more or less greedy its ok with me, to me they are all the same Smile


▌▌▌▌★
Back to top
JackQ
Non-expret in Derps lagunge



Posts: 14178
Location: Kibbutznik, Israel
PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 17:23    Post subject:
as far as I'm loving Valve, to be honest,I don't see the "DOTA" name belong to them,nor Blizzard(yes I know WC3 TOS said overwise),I'm not against DOTA 2 and I even want to get beta access,but maybe they should change the name,they were been criticized even by Riot games sometime a go.


"Fuck Denuvo"

Your personal opinions != the rest of the forum
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 17:27    Post subject:
@Flagship

Aye, don't get me wrong; they're all capitalists and all of them just want to make money - which is perfectly understandable - it just seems like Activision are by far the worst of the bunch, because even Kotick himself said he's only in it for the money and will do anything he can to make more of it.

@JackQ

Blizzard claiming ownership of the DOTA name would be like Valve claiming owneship of Natural Selection or Epic claiming ownership of Killing Floor. It's ridiculous of ATVI (Laughing) to assume they own the name and rights to a mod they had no hand in making. In my opinion at least, for what it's worth Very Happy
Back to top
JackQ
Non-expret in Derps lagunge



Posts: 14178
Location: Kibbutznik, Israel
PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 17:31    Post subject:
I didn't saw them suing Gas Powered games,Riot and S2 Games by basically,making the same game,but with Different name,I agree they should not own the name,(court can say overwise though), but nor Valve as well.


"Fuck Denuvo"

Your personal opinions != the rest of the forum
Back to top
De_TURK




Posts: 416

PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 17:32    Post subject:
TheZor wrote:
Blizzard are dicks and will never see a dime from me ever again
They assert that they "supported" the game in their suit.. What a joke. They didn't even consider us in the least for seven years.


Trust me, if Hitler made good games I would buy it. Who cares who made it. Now I am not saying the CoD good kind of games, but the games you think are good (not the general public kinds of good).
Back to top
TheZor
VIP Member



Posts: 5991

PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 17:34    Post subject:
JackQ:
Icefrog made Dota what it finally became, a competitive eSports. You must realize that aspect.. We owe a lot to Euls, to the various developers of his era, Guinsoo ( now working for Riot ) almost managed to completely ruin the concept by ruining balance with stupid-ass heroes, and Icefrog finally polished the game and made it a decent competitive game. Why did Dota only really flourish, invaded China, etc, when Icefrog took a hold on it ?

You can argue that Dota is the property of nobody, etc. but in the end the one who has any sort of right on it is the one which made it grow and made it what it is today, and what it is to become tomorrow - Icefrog, and Valve. The idea itself belongs to nobody, just like any idea, only the final product does. And that product "belongs" to them.


Last edited by TheZor on Fri, 10th Feb 2012 17:34; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 17:34    Post subject:
sabin, honestly, can you seriously say, that for example starcraft 2, the way it was released, wasnt enough ? You really think the content in it wasnt worth 1 game ?

people are pissed at blizzard for weird reasons.

There is the mandatory wow bashing, because blabla this blabla that (heck, its just cool to be on the wow hate wagon lol).

Then there is the blind hate and fury against them, because they take their time and dont rush releases (and rightfully so), but yet, people bash on them for that.

And even tho they take their god damn time to release new games (and several times scrapped games, because they didnt deem them worthy of their name), they STILL getting called "money hungry" and what not, despite their behavior being the OPPOSITE of that.

Lets face it, the main hate (wagon trend) comes from WoW.

But lets look into it a bit more. One major argument many used, was that WoW stole everything from other games (EQ, AC etc etc). Yet people keep bashing it for its game mechanics. The very same mechanics used in pretty much every mmorpg before and since then. Hypocrit much ?

I know, i must be the biggest fanboy and blabla, but you know, im rather a fanboy (whichi am not, believe me), than some dumb hater who hates for hate sake (and for the need top fit in).

Now go on everybody and call me a stupid fanboy again or whatever.


And for Flagship, of course there is a connection between activision and blizzard, but not when it comes to controlling or influencing their titles or its publishing.

But what do i even bother, guys like sabin blindly hate blizzard just for hate sake, yet buy all of their games anyway Smile

yeah, thats a hypocrit Smile
Back to top
farne




Posts: 3732

PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 17:34    Post subject:
Shouldn't Icefrog be the one suing blizzard for trying to make a profit on "his" mod?
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 17:37    Post subject:
Are you fucking kidding me!? Show me a single Blizzard game I have purchased since Diablo ONE back in nineteen fucking ninety six. Hardly hypocritical hating on Blizzard since their Activision merger by owning a solitary game made SIXTEEN YEARS ago.



As for SC2? Yes I most certainly can say it wasn't sufficient to warrant a €50 charge. One solitary campaign, from a prequel which had three, with the glorious "promise" of having to buy each further campaign separately -- several years apart. Epic stuff, thanks AVTI


Last edited by sabin1981 on Fri, 10th Feb 2012 17:39; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 17:37    Post subject:
wizarD. wrote:
Shouldn't Icefrog be the one suing blizzard for trying to make a profit on "his" mod?


well, dota was just another AOS clone at first ^^ (aeon of strife)
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 17:38    Post subject:




Back to top
De_TURK




Posts: 416

PostPosted: Fri, 10th Feb 2012 17:39    Post subject:
@ Sin317:

Agree.

For example KD of Amalur is an abomination, if WoWhaters like this game then they are hypocrites. I for one like KD of Amalur despite its shortcomings, every game have theirs, but blind hate is just being ignorant.
Back to top
Page 1 of 5 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group