| Page 145 of 190 |
Sin317
Banned
Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
|
 Posted: Tue, 17th Jan 2012 18:33 Post subject: |
|
 |
| friketje wrote: | | Sin317 wrote: | i found out one thing :
If you looking for people to do for example heroics and some guy wants in who is several levels ABOVE the planets level, its always a save bet NOT to invite.
People who are on a planet way above its level usually SUCK THE BIG ONE.
over and over i had to whitness, how someone 6 levels above the mobs level utterly sucked and got eaten by worms lol. Its pathetic.
So, if someone joins 6 levels above yours, either kick them or leave and save yourself a lot of troubles ^^ (goes for FP's too i guess, alltho there it can be just a guy wanting to complete it for completeness sake ^^). |
LOL, explain, reason?
Lowest level usually dies first in my experience, i've the healer or tank is lowest level, the whole groups dies fast. Succesfull groups in general have a high level tank/healer.
Most completionist are 4-6 levels over, just because gaining xp is to fast. Also an occaisional pvp boosts you're level. |
From the encounters i had, almost every "higher" level is usually a utter NOOB. Thats why. I am sick of seeing these guys 6 levels above an encounters level and not being able to do shit lol.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th Jan 2012 18:35 Post subject: |
|
|
| friketje wrote: | | Sin317 wrote: | i found out one thing :
If you looking for people to do for example heroics and some guy wants in who is several levels ABOVE the planets level, its always a save bet NOT to invite.
People who are on a planet way above its level usually SUCK THE BIG ONE.
over and over i had to whitness, how someone 6 levels above the mobs level utterly sucked and got eaten by worms lol. Its pathetic.
So, if someone joins 6 levels above yours, either kick them or leave and save yourself a lot of troubles ^^ (goes for FP's too i guess, alltho there it can be just a guy wanting to complete it for completeness sake ^^). |
LOL, explain, reason?
Lowest level usually dies first in my experience, i've the healer or tank is lowest level, the whole groups dies fast. Succesfull groups in general have a high level tank/healer.
Most completionist are 4-6 levels over, just because gaining xp is to fast. Also an occaisional pvp boosts you're level. |
The last day I logged in, it was exactly, what Sin said. Both tank and healer were high level - the tank played particularly bad, I was las to go down, even though I had a Sentinel.
A good idea at the time was to basically look at people's clothing, before deciding to play with the group or not. If they have level 31/33 at level 43 - stay away.
I always have the best possible mods in my slots - we craft them with our friends.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th Jan 2012 18:44 Post subject: |
|
|
| Radicalus wrote: | | friketje wrote: | | Sin317 wrote: | i found out one thing :
If you looking for people to do for example heroics and some guy wants in who is several levels ABOVE the planets level, its always a save bet NOT to invite.
People who are on a planet way above its level usually SUCK THE BIG ONE.
over and over i had to whitness, how someone 6 levels above the mobs level utterly sucked and got eaten by worms lol. Its pathetic.
So, if someone joins 6 levels above yours, either kick them or leave and save yourself a lot of troubles ^^ (goes for FP's too i guess, alltho there it can be just a guy wanting to complete it for completeness sake ^^). |
LOL, explain, reason?
Lowest level usually dies first in my experience, i've the healer or tank is lowest level, the whole groups dies fast. Succesfull groups in general have a high level tank/healer.
Most completionist are 4-6 levels over, just because gaining xp is to fast. Also an occaisional pvp boosts you're level. |
The last day I logged in, it was exactly, what Sin said. Both tank and healer were high level - the tank played particularly bad, I was las to go down, even though I had a Sentinel.
A good idea at the time was to basically look at people's clothing, before deciding to play with the group or not. If they have level 31/33 at level 43 - stay away.
I always have the best possible mods in my slots - we craft them with our friends. |
Perhaps it made an impression cause you were surprised that the high level groupmates sucked, i've he was low level you'd think "oh low level, that explains".
Most important succes factor for a group is that you dont have an idot that rushes before people aply cc, breaks CC or a terrible healer/tank, that breaks a group. I cant think of a reason why those people are more likely to have a higher level or are less bothered with crafting.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sin317
Banned
Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th Jan 2012 19:22 Post subject: |
|
|
you rarely have "low levels" on planets. But "level appropriate".
you hardly see a level 25 on a level 30 planet ^^.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th Jan 2012 19:48 Post subject: |
|
|
| Sin317 wrote: | | friketje wrote: | | Sin317 wrote: | i found out one thing :
If you looking for people to do for example heroics and some guy wants in who is several levels ABOVE the planets level, its always a save bet NOT to invite.
People who are on a planet way above its level usually SUCK THE BIG ONE.
over and over i had to whitness, how someone 6 levels above the mobs level utterly sucked and got eaten by worms lol. Its pathetic.
So, if someone joins 6 levels above yours, either kick them or leave and save yourself a lot of troubles ^^ (goes for FP's too i guess, alltho there it can be just a guy wanting to complete it for completeness sake ^^). |
LOL, explain, reason?
Lowest level usually dies first in my experience, i've the healer or tank is lowest level, the whole groups dies fast. Succesfull groups in general have a high level tank/healer.
Most completionist are 4-6 levels over, just because gaining xp is to fast. Also an occaisional pvp boosts you're level. |
From the encounters i had, almost every "higher" level is usually a utter NOOB. Thats why. I am sick of seeing these guys 6 levels above an encounters level and not being able to do shit lol. |
i always have been at least with 4 levels above the planet level requirement. because i completed all quests + bonuses at least until level 35+. when i got bored by "hey, loot a chest" and "ah, dont forget to search and kill 2000000000 mobs until you get to that chest."
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th Jan 2012 19:56 Post subject: |
|
|
can't play... fucking lag.
meh....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th Jan 2012 20:30 Post subject: |
|
|
| Kurosaki wrote: | can't play... fucking lag.
meh.... |
www.telekom.de
 Spoiler: | sorry  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2012 10:46 Post subject: |
|
|
Most of the Vodafone,1&1,T-Com guys (such as me) got problems playing around 6-7pm. Theres a 2 part thread about it on the swtor forums :/
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2012 12:20 Post subject: |
|
|
Sooooo where's the cheapest place to buy a cdkey? Still here?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
no9999
Posts: 3437
Location: Behind you...
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2012 12:50 Post subject: |
|
|
Any of you guys on the Frostclaw server ?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sin317
Banned
Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2012 15:09 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2012 16:02 Post subject: |
|
|
too bad my launcher is stuck installing at 10%
and still no FPS issue fix :S
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2012 16:29 Post subject: |
|
|
I doubt fps will be ever fixed, there hasnt been a single performance fix in a month, only 2 minor ones for specific planets. The engine is broken beyond repair.
PvE works fine for me (60 fps), warzone drops to 15, but is unplayable cause abilities dont fire, delay etc. Sometimes my character dies instantly, the attacks arn't even shown cause of the lag.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sin317
Banned
Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2012 16:39 Post subject: |
|
|
"the engine is broken beyond repair"
dude , please ...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sausje
Banned
Posts: 17716
Location: Limboland, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2012 16:40 Post subject: |
|
|
FPS problems in warzones? Didn't had them. The time when i played i didn't had a single drop under 60.
Proud member of Frustrated Association of International Losers Failing Against the Gifted and Superior (F.A.I.L.F.A.G.S)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2012 17:40 Post subject: |
|
|
It is not in the patch notes but I see an improvement in slicing gains from crew missions.
Excellent news.
Per Ardua Ad Astra
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2012 17:49 Post subject: |
|
|
| sausje wrote: | | FPS problems in warzones? Didn't had them. The time when i played i didn't had a single drop under 60. |
You shouldn't see problems with newer rigs of course, mine is 3 1/2 years old.
Still, i dont see why swtor needs a high end rig, graphics are 5 years dated at least, also, i dont have issues with any other games at all. Main problem seems to be the almost single threaded engine so i think my cpu is bottle neck (int quad q9450)
It just feels wrong to be able to play bf3 med-high setting, and warzone at swtor being unplayable.
It is possible that my fps issue is related to specific hardware that has issues with swtor though.
I must say though, after patch, the game feels smoother although fps is unchanged (30-100 pve in my case)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sausje
Banned
Posts: 17716
Location: Limboland, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2012 17:54 Post subject: |
|
|
| friketje wrote: | | Still, i dont see why swtor needs a high end rig, graphics are 5 years dated at least, also |
Welcome in the world of MMORPG's, guess this is your first one? 
Proud member of Frustrated Association of International Losers Failing Against the Gifted and Superior (F.A.I.L.F.A.G.S)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sin317
Banned
Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2012 18:07 Post subject: |
|
|
friketje stop making a fool out of yourself lol.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2012 18:43 Post subject: |
|
|
| Sin317 wrote: | | friketje stop making a fool out of yourself lol. |
is not making a fool from himself.
i had the same issue, i resolved by basically manually set the view distance in half in ini. (an option that was in the beta, mysteriously disapear in retail if i remeber right) witch screwed the whole game (gfx quality speaking), not only warzones, and in the end, i just quit playing in warzones.
and my system is q6600, 460 gtx, 8 gb ram. please tell me that my system is very old and have issue rendering their crap game in warzones. in any other area/flashpoints/operations i had 60+ fps, warzone instant drop to 20-30. and i dint even move from starting point.
i posted somewhere in the beginning this.
and talking about retarded stuff (witch will be the trademark of bioware), where the hell was the option to disable that damn autorotate camera ? another missing feauture that ruined pvp for me.
reading patch notes, and see how few of the problems were solved, i still cannot belive how shit and clueless bioware is.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sausje
Banned
Posts: 17716
Location: Limboland, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2012 19:07 Post subject: |
|
|
| frogster wrote: | | my system is q6600, 460 gtx, 8 gb ram. please tell me that my system is very old |
The Q6600 IS very old (5 years old), especially knowing that most MMORPG's are more CPU demanding then GPU, so in your case your processor is most likely the bottleneck causing these issues.
Proud member of Frustrated Association of International Losers Failing Against the Gifted and Superior (F.A.I.L.F.A.G.S)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2012 20:12 Post subject: |
|
|
| Sin317 wrote: | | friketje stop making a fool out of yourself lol. |
By saying that warzones are unplayable with older rig's and that swtor engine is not optimized? explain.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
(Nexus)
Posts: 2807
Location: 192.168.1.72
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sausje
Banned
Posts: 17716
Location: Limboland, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2012 20:40 Post subject: |
|
|
| frogster wrote: | yeh right.
my q6600 (i keep it at 3.2) is close to i5. if i put it to 3.4 is on par or slighty better vs a stock i5. |
Oh but ofc, Core 2 Quad =/= Sandybridge
And 3.4 GHz on your Q6600 =/= i5 @ 3.4 GHz 
I shall leave it here, seems you have 0 knowledge about this.
Proud member of Frustrated Association of International Losers Failing Against the Gifted and Superior (F.A.I.L.F.A.G.S)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Shinin
Posts: 1104
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2012 20:45 Post subject: |
|
|
just use SSD
i9 7500K, GTX980 Quad Frozr VI, 24GB RAM
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2012 20:49 Post subject: |
|
|
| frogster wrote: | yeh right.
my q6600 (i keep it at 3.2) is close to i5. if i put it to 3.4 is on par or slighty better vs a stock i5.
|
Bwuahahahahahahahahaha. No.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 145 of 190 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
