| Page 103 of 130 |
|
|
 Posted: Sun, 13th Nov 2011 14:14 Post subject: |
|
 |
Is it just me or this game looks worse then BO, MW2, MW1? :O Even freaking CoD2 has some textures sharper then this shit -.-
Gigabyte X570 Aorus Pro | AMD Ryzen 5800X3D + be quiet! Dark Rock 4 | KFA2 RTX 4080 | 32GB G.Skill Trident Z RGB DDR4 @3600MHz | Samsung 860 Evo 500GB + 1TB + 10TB WD Blue | Corsair RM750x | LG 27GL83A + LG 27GL850 | Fractal Define R6 | Razer BlackWidow Ultimate Stealth | DeathAdder Chroma
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Blazerr
Posts: 538
Location: MacLaren's Pub
|
| Posted: Sun, 13th Nov 2011 14:17 Post subject: |
|
|
Well after playing a while now i can give my opinion. The SP campaign is awesome and really good as always, just as i thought it will be, the characters are memorable.
I haven't played a lot of Spec Ops but from what i've seen the co-op mode is good and really upgraded, so just like the SP mode it's good as always, so people who enjoyed it before, should enjoy it now. 
And now the Multiplayer ... well it's fun, really is. The weapons and perks
are great, the upgrade and unlock system also. The Killstreaks aren't that IMBA as they were in MW2, so yes -> MW3 is ballanced in terms of Killstreaks. But ... the biggest "but" in that game is called .... maps !!!
The maps are just not what they should and what they have been in that francize. There is just lack of "classic" maps, there are just no remembering maps, that could make you want to play on them all the time (like Crash, Strike and etc. in CoD 4). Even MW2 maps after playing on MW3 ones, looks like a "Golden Globe" winners compared to the maps in MW3.
In previous CoD games the maps were like different segments in which different people from the two teams are fighting against each other, there were left and right flangs, central spots and etc., the segment character of the maps in previous CoD games was noticeable. But there is no such thing in MW3 - the maps are chaotic, u just run and shoot if u see an enemy, there is no such thing like different zones and segments, i haven't played a lot but i still can't say that there is a map that is worth of playing on it as a sniper ...
Both CoD 4 and MW2 had great maps, but from what i've seen so far the biggest problem of MW3 Multiplayer is the lack of great and classic maps ...
Which is sad, cuz they managed to ballance the game, to put some great weapons and stuff, but this time they shitit it up in the maps aspect of the game. So if the game got maps like MW2 ones and gameplay system like MW3 would be much, much better ...
I dont know how much this is beacause of the lack of Zampella and the other owners of the IW and that Sledghammer were involved in the MP, but back then when Zampella was in charge --> maps were one of the best things in the MP part of that game.
Still i think that the MP is fun.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
garus
VIP Member
Posts: 34200
|
| Posted: Sun, 13th Nov 2011 14:24 Post subject: |
|
|
snip
Last edited by garus on Tue, 27th Aug 2024 21:35; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 13th Nov 2011 14:53 Post subject: |
|
|
@Blazerr : exactly what I was telling myself, the level design is really shitty, specially compared to Black Ops...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 13th Nov 2011 15:06 Post subject: |
|
|
Everything in the game is pretty shitty compared to Black Ops, actually.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65085
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Sun, 13th Nov 2011 15:07 Post subject: |
|
|
| xGAME007 wrote: | | Is it just me or this game looks worse then BO, MW2, MW1? :O Even freaking CoD2 has some textures sharper then this shit -.- |
It's the palette; in this game they're using a bland greenish 1337 tint that makes everything look flat and kinda "lifeless".
Textures/models are the same (I mean literally  ) but as Consolitis said some posts ago the lighting is indeed worse than the previous Modern Warfares. Oh well who cares, at least the game has awesome gameplay  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 13th Nov 2011 15:09 Post subject: |
|
|
Am I the only one getting incredible stuttering on MP sometimes (not all the time), on my E6600@3.5GHz ? 100% UC and everything.. If i quit it, then it's fine. Should I reduce Steam priority ? Didn't have this issue on MW2
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 13th Nov 2011 15:29 Post subject: |
|
|
| Soap2win wrote: | | Fliksan wrote: | | My RU key was disabled on steam within 24 hours. Now CJ's is making me contact steam to ask about it like I'm lying. -_- |
from where did you buy it? |
CJ's CD Keys
Do not recommend them. 2 Skyrim keys, 1 MW3 key. Yes they refunded the 2 Skyrim keys pretty quick, but I ended up paying 2.50 in transaction fee still for useless cd keys. 1 MW3 key, I never even downloaded, gone. Now I have to run through hoops with them, and if I even get a refund, will pay another 1.25 transaction fees. Basically spent 90 bucks, got jack shit. That's what I get for trying to be a cheap bastard I suppose.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
(Nexus)
Posts: 2807
Location: 192.168.1.72
|
| Posted: Sun, 13th Nov 2011 16:14 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 13th Nov 2011 17:58 Post subject: |
|
|
I wonder what the ex IW guys at Respawn Entertainment will do. Hopefully it will be a good addition to EA's portfolio, so that the competition of these 2 games will force innovation on both ends
For the Motherland!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 13th Nov 2011 18:57 Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, 60 people definitely isn't enough to make a game. You'd need at least a few thousand.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 13th Nov 2011 20:12 Post subject: |
|
|
Considering that the game that made them incredibly popular, MW1, was made by 100 people, nowadays with 60 they MIGHT have formed half of their team.
And isn't Frostbite only for EA's internal projects?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 13th Nov 2011 20:37 Post subject: |
|
|
It's getting stale, like they are running out of ideas.
They should hire Tom Clancy for some fresh ones
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 13th Nov 2011 20:38 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 13th Nov 2011 21:00 Post subject: |
|
|
| consolitis wrote: | Considering that the game that made them incredibly popular, MW1, was made by 100 people, nowadays with 60 they MIGHT have formed half of their team.
And isn't Frostbite only for EA's internal projects? |
Well Respawn is an EA studio..
And you don't need 500 people, unless you have a 2year dev cycle
For the Motherland!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 13th Nov 2011 21:28 Post subject: I have left. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 13th Nov 2011 21:37 Post subject: |
|
|
TBH I see only Valve and Blizzard as the only 2 companies that give a fuck about the pc.
While I've never been a real fan of Valve's work, except for the L4D series of games, I do recognize the quality they bring to the table.
And Blizzard - well it's blizzard. They haven't fucked up a single game until now and are really focused on selling stuff on the PC, rather using a clone machine.
And both of these companies can do whatever the fuck they want, since each has their milking cows. Blizzard has a gazzilion player still playing WOW, while valve has a strong IP portfolio and HalfLife that WILL sell like pancakes.
So whatever RESPAWN does under the flag of EA - it will be consolized derped shit. And that's a shame. EA needs a good cash cow IP like BattleField, but on a bigger scale. And that drive for corparate bonuses and profit will make the games worse in the end.
But I really hope that EA or Ubi or someone enters the fight with COD 1 ON 1 with a decent game and good marketing. The genre needs innovation, and not in graphics mostly, but rather in gameplay mechanics and whatnot.
For the Motherland!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 13th Nov 2011 22:18 Post subject: |
|
|
| TiTaN_KGB wrote: | | consolitis wrote: | Considering that the game that made them incredibly popular, MW1, was made by 100 people, nowadays with 60 they MIGHT have formed half of their team.
And isn't Frostbite only for EA's internal projects? |
Well Respawn is an EA studio..
And you don't need 500 people, unless you have a 2year dev cycle |
Respawn isn't an EA studio. They just have an "EA Partners" deal with them.
Respawn's game is no different than Crysis 2, Bulletstorm, DeathSpank, or even Portal 2, all developed by independent studios, under the EA Partners label.
This is the reason I am also telling you EA's response to CoD is going to be MoH and BF. Respawn's game isn't going to be pushed by EA any more than they pushed eg Crysis 2 or Bullestorm.
Neither are they going to give them access to Frostbite 2.
Nor are, let's say DICE or BioWare, going to provide assistance.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 13th Nov 2011 22:32 Post subject: |
|
|
| consolitis wrote: | | TiTaN_KGB wrote: | | consolitis wrote: | Considering that the game that made them incredibly popular, MW1, was made by 100 people, nowadays with 60 they MIGHT have formed half of their team.
And isn't Frostbite only for EA's internal projects? |
Well Respawn is an EA studio..
And you don't need 500 people, unless you have a 2year dev cycle |
Respawn isn't an EA studio. They just have an "EA Partners" deal with them.
Respawn's game is no different than Crysis 2, Bulletstorm, DeathSpank, or even Portal 2, all developed by independent studios, under the EA Partners label.
This is the reason I am also telling you EA's response to CoD is going to be MoH and BF. Respawn's game isn't going to be pushed by EA any more than they pushed eg Crysis 2 or Bullestorm.
Neither are they going to give them access to Frostbite 2.
Nor are, let's say DICE or BioWare, going to provide assistance. |
id Tech 3 it is then!
For the Motherland!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 14th Nov 2011 01:10 Post subject: |
|
|
For better textures set world detail on NATIVE and not on extra. The difference is huge, a lot more crisp and sharp textures.[/b]
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aeon
Posts: 8700
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Mon, 14th Nov 2011 01:12 Post subject: |
|
|
Right...
Intel i7 6700K, RTX470 Super, Kingston HyperX Fury 32GB
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 14th Nov 2011 01:15 Post subject: |
|
|
I am serious. Extra is 720p stretched to screen resolution. Looks ugly. Then changed to native and graphics are way better. Google it if you dont believe me. Or go to steam forums.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zipfero
Posts: 8938
Location: White Shaft
|
| Posted: Mon, 14th Nov 2011 01:47 Post subject: |
|
|
And then the game looks AWESomE? AwESoMe to tHe MaX?
8 out of 10 dentists prefer zipfero to competing brands(fraich3 and Mutantius)!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65085
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Mon, 14th Nov 2011 02:11 Post subject: |
|
|
Setting the Image Quality to Low (leaving everything else on Extra) gives you the genuine Nextgen experience!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 103 of 130 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
