| Page 109 of 674 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 00:25 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vurt
Posts: 13850
Location: Sweden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
couleur
[Moderator] Janitor
Posts: 14361
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NFOAC
Posts: 6015
Location: India
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 07:14 Post subject: |
|
|
Is there a prequel movie or comic which give some info about the game
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Freudian
Posts: 364
Location: Din mamma!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vurt
Posts: 13850
Location: Sweden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 18:23 Post subject: |
|
|
Cool. Now I doubt I could run Risen 2 on my 2600XT, but I hope Skyrim will.
-=the wandering pillow stuffer=-
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 18:42 Post subject: |
|
|
Quite low, to be honest. Even the required specs look incredibly decent. I presume, a card within the HD6000/GTX400 range will more than enough suffice for Hyper settings.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 18:43 Post subject: |
|
|
Aye, I agree. Those do look rather low and a 4890 for "High"? Sounds good to me!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 18:43 Post subject: |
|
|
i hate steam activation for sp games
Phenom II X4 965 @ 3.8 // 4GB DDR3 // GTX 285
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 18:48 Post subject: |
|
|
Well since Skyrim is using Steamworks, it makes sense that it would require Steam =)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 18:58 Post subject: |
|
|
Considering how the game looks the recommended should be more than enough for ultra.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 19:11 Post subject: |
|
|
wut, it uses steam ?
luzl, im so gonna enjoy pirating it :>
Per aspera ad astra
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65088
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 19:15 Post subject: |
|
|
I posted them yesterday  (but these are better since they don't contain typos from teh crappy Twitter  )
He also said this:
| Quote: | | DCDeacon Pete Hines@@bjohnblazkowicz We put tons of effort into PCs: we support PC mods like nobody's business, support our mod fans, and put out great PC games |
translation: "we put a lot of efforts into supporting mods so they can fix our broken games on PC" 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 19:26 Post subject: |
|
|
Well shit, if that's still their stance then fair play! We all know and expect Bethesda games to be buggy and missing tons of stuff... but as long as they KEEP supporting their modders, then that's fine by me =)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 19:53 Post subject: |
|
|
Pete Hines explains why the game is only 6GB;
http://twitter.com/#!/DCDeacon/status/129252912584073218
| Quote: |
6 gigs: New engine & we’re much better at compression (art/voice/data). It’s huge yet more optimized than we’ve had before. And faster.
|
Seems a lot of people really are pissing in their panties about Skyrim being "only" 6GB. Funny, because if it was 20GB, the same people would be whining it's TOO big.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 19:56 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 19:57 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tonizito
VIP Member
Posts: 51426
Location: Portugal, the shithole of Europe.
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 19:59 Post subject: |
|
|
"Fable 3 is therefore a much better game! Twice!"
| boundle (thoughts on cracking AITD) wrote: | | i guess thouth if without a legit key the installation was rolling back we are all fucking then |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 20:00 Post subject: |
|
|
I can't think of a single reason the game should be over 6GB. Do they think GB automatically = content/graphexx?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65088
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Wed, 26th Oct 2011 20:00 Post subject: |
|
|
| sabin1981 wrote: | | Seems a lot of people really are pissing in their panties about Skyrim being "only" 6GB. Funny, because if it was 20GB, the same people would be whining it's TOO big. |
Yeah, I really don't get these complaints..as long as there will be Quarl and NMC with their awesome (and huge) texture packs I don't see the problem  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
locke89
Posts: 2812
Location: Poland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 109 of 674 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
