Page 170 of 214 |
|
Posted: Sun, 9th Oct 2011 13:39 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sausje
Banned
Posts: 17716
Location: Limboland, Netherlands
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Neon
VIP Member
Posts: 18935
Location: Poland
|
Posted: Sun, 9th Oct 2011 13:44 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 9th Oct 2011 13:44 Post subject: |
|
 |
I dont care about OMG TEXTURES OMG OMG SO LOW REZ. Well sometimes i could swear i saw some Doom 3 textures (Keyboards). The fact that this game have shitty story and ends(Cuts) itself right in middle of game... Dunno where but im sure someone from ID was saying that this game will have more than 30 hours of gameplay (7:30 says HI).
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 9th Oct 2011 13:48 Post subject: |
|
 |
Thanks to custom config the game runs great on my GTS 450, i3 dual core 3.33GHZ and 4GB ram. Great visuals.
But the (lack of) story sucks.
TheBugulous wrote: | There is only 1 Mega Awesome title coming & that is Chris Taylor's latest opus ... <drum roll>
S U P R E M E C O M M A N D E R !!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Werelds
Special Little Man
Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 9th Oct 2011 13:55 Post subject: |
|
 |
But still done using the actual game. All real in game visuals.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 9th Oct 2011 13:55 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65085
Location: Italy
|
Posted: Sun, 9th Oct 2011 13:55 Post subject: |
|
 |
Brilliant 
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 9th Oct 2011 14:02 Post subject: |
|
 |
Is it safe to say ID Tech 5 is the best engin ever ?
Just look at those deatials in those scrennshots
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sausje
Banned
Posts: 17716
Location: Limboland, Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun, 9th Oct 2011 14:04 Post subject: |
|
 |
Shakabutt wrote: | Is it safe to say ID Tech 5 is the best engin ever ?
Just look at those deatials in those scrennshots |
Its not the best, it has some big flaws that could easy be fixed.
But i have to admit, its a little step forward (even if its babysteps, every little bit helps)
Proud member of Frustrated Association of International Losers Failing Against the Gifted and Superior (F.A.I.L.F.A.G.S)

|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
b0se
Banned
Posts: 5901
Location: Rapture
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Werelds
Special Little Man
Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
|
Posted: Sun, 9th Oct 2011 14:06 Post subject: |
|
 |
I'm not saying the game doesn't have its moments, but to say it ALWAYS looks as crisp in those shots is an outright lie - please do prove me wrong by providing your own shots Sabin/H_S/whoever else. I've not seen a pure 1080p shot looking that crisp yet.
I've only just started playing, but there's plenty of little things that annoy me. Not having raw mouse input is failure #1 (I have to set my sensitivity to 0.1, reduce pitch/yaw to 0.01 and then still have to switch my mouse 1 DPI setting down - I don't have to do that in D3/Q4 so they fucked that one up). Invisible walls don't bother me - except when they're in a place which looks like you can easily make it (like a platform that's not even as high as your knee - at least make it look like you're not supposed to get there ffs).
The shooting feels good other than the mouse issue (which is just me being spoiled probably) - it's responsive and accurate. Whether the story and rest of the gameplay are good I won't judge yet, as I've only just started. I quite like the shooting part, it just annoys me that this is an id game/engine that took 7 years to develop (and yes it did take that long, they didn't sit still after Doom 3 and Q4/ET:QW they didn't develop). Tech 4 took less time and was a bigger improvement in graphical quality than this is (this barely is, ET:QW isn't far off this). Granted, this has more in the gameplay department than D3 did, but not that many years. What cost all that time then? Consoles did.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 9th Oct 2011 14:09 Post subject: |
|
 |
I think the biggest problem is that the engine isn't scaling properly, so even a midrange PCs raw power isn't used properly. The engine is CPU heavy it seems, but it barely stresses my HD5850 and 4gigs of RAM. I'm still under the impression this is a really shitty port.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
b0se
Banned
Posts: 5901
Location: Rapture
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
garus
VIP Member
Posts: 34200
|
Posted: Sun, 9th Oct 2011 14:14 Post subject: |
|
 |
snip
Last edited by garus on Tue, 27th Aug 2024 21:43; edited 1 time in total
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
b0se
Banned
Posts: 5901
Location: Rapture
|
Posted: Sun, 9th Oct 2011 14:16 Post subject: |
|
 |
garus wrote: | Mister_s wrote: | The engine is CPU heavy it seems, but it barely stresses my HD5850 and 4gigs of RAM. |
Like in every poor Xbox port. |
Agreed, the coolers on my GTX 560 usually scream in games like "Dead Island' but not in RAGE.
[spoiler][quote="SteamDRM"]i've bought mohw :derp: / FPS of the year! [/quote]
[quote="SteamDRM"][quote="b0se"]BLACK OPS GOTY[/quote]
No.[/quote][/spoiler]
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
xExtreme
Posts: 5811
Location: 43 6C 75 6A 2D 4E 61 70 6F 63 61
|
Posted: Sun, 9th Oct 2011 14:19 Post subject: |
|
 |
Well the patch fucked up my game, stutters at each movement/turn, even if it's smooth, FPS down to 30 or even low -_-
FFS
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
prudislav
VIP Member
Posts: 29148
Location: The land of beer and porn
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BLaM!
VIP Member
Posts: 13818
Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sun, 9th Oct 2011 14:25 Post subject: |
|
 |
Someone with 4870 , is it working now ?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Werelds
Special Little Man
Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 9th Oct 2011 14:29 Post subject: |
|
 |
You're acting like those shots are doctored, in order to play up this fucking bullshit about the game being ugly, and they quite simply are not.
Last edited by sabin1981 on Sun, 9th Oct 2011 14:30; edited 1 time in total
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 9th Oct 2011 14:29 Post subject: |
|
 |
garus wrote: | Mister_s wrote: | The engine is CPU heavy it seems, but it barely stresses my HD5850 and 4gigs of RAM. |
Like in every poor Xbox port. |
ID (Carmack) is supposed to be some engine god, so I expect more from ID than from some third rate porting studio.
sabin1981 wrote: | You're acting like those shots are doctored, in order to play up this fucking bullshit about the game being ugly, and they quite simply are not. |
That's not exactly the point. I have seen on several forums people posting those screens, without mentioning what was done to get them. So it depicts a skewed view of ingame graphics.
Last edited by Mister_s on Sun, 9th Oct 2011 14:31; edited 1 time in total
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 9th Oct 2011 14:30 Post subject: |
|
 |
Guys this patch repaired texture popping:) Now all is oK without popping.And without messing on cfg file.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 9th Oct 2011 14:31 Post subject: |
|
 |
Well as for me....once i applied the patch, whenever I use the binoculars or zoom in to shoot, it stays in this weird zoomed in way and I cant get it back to normal mode unless I reload and sometimes it even loads zoomed in.... regret patching it!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JBeckman
VIP Member
Posts: 34994
Location: Sweden
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Werelds
Special Little Man
Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
|
Posted: Sun, 9th Oct 2011 14:36 Post subject: |
|
 |
sabin1981 wrote: | You're acting like those shots are doctored, in order to play up this fucking bullshit about the game being ugly, and they quite simply are not. |
Not my point. The shots are not doctored in the sense that they were retouched by Photoshop, never said that. I also never said the game looks shit, now did I?
My point is that those shots are not 1:1 representative of how your game will look. It'll be close, but these shots are a lot sharper than the actual game due to the supersampling. You'd be surprised how much different Doom 1 would look if you were to super sample it at 16x16.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Page 170 of 214 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |