Game is a bit simple but then I find stuff like this, a little role-playing after all, oh and a epic condom.
It is more or less a direct port with a additional hardcore option and some small DLC already part of the game, two larger quest DLC were omitted however and need separate downloads.
Ok, so basically the game doesn't run on Win7 on my PC, it just crashes at startup. I need to run it in compatibility mode and even so I can't make the game fully working, meaning that I just get a black screen with the cursor of the game on it when the game actually starts.
NZXTS340ELITE : EVGA Z370 FTW / [ Intel i7 8086k @4.0Ghz ][ ASUS TUF RTX 3060 Ti 8GB ][ 16GB G.Skill Trident Z @3200mhz CL16 ][ 128GB Intel760p Series + 1TB Crucial MX500 + 3TB WD RED ][ Thermaltake Toughpower PF1 650W ]
haha, nothing to play for several monthes and now so many games in both hands (Lego, Fable 3, TW2 and also New Vegas DLC2).
Good thing about this Fable 3 is you can almost save your game everywhere, which is not the case for most of...well...consolized games.
Asking me? I didn't say I liked DA2, I found only 1st act to be decent, the rest of the game was rubbish, especially as you visited the same old areas over and over.
I haven't played Fable 3 yet (only tried it once on 360), as I am playing Witcher 2 currently. I just wanted to hear what people on nfohump think is better - DA2 or Fable 3
^^ Man speaks truth -- though if absolutely pushed, I'd say Fable III -- if only because of the atmosphere, but like I said; only if absolutely pushed for an answer.
The whole game just FEELS bigger and better than DA2, though at least DA2 retained some semblance of an RPG-based system. DA2 could have, and should have, been brilliant .. but it wasn't. Fable III could have, and should have, been brilliant .. but it wasn't. Lesser of two evils, I suppose.
The whole game just FEELS bigger and better than DA2, though at least DA2 retained some semblance of an RPG-based system. DA2 could have, and should have, been brilliant .. but it wasn't. Fable III could have, and should have, been brilliant .. but it wasn't. Lesser of two evils, I suppose.
can i join your co-op game and impregnate your character
Visuals are pretty OK though some areas look a bit washed out (Bloom does not help and part of the DoF and Motion Blur effect are pretty ugly.) but performance is a bit erratic though it remained playable, no bugs or stability issues either so far.
I've tested the game only for some minutes, but it seems there are some performance issues with the algorithm that generates the shadows: i.e., with shadows disabled the framerate always stays above the 50fps, while enabling them (the quality doesn't matter, low or very high produces the same effect) suddenly brings the framerate down to 15-20fps.
The game itself looks very childish, a uber-extra-lite-RPG with elements borrowed from The Sims, all larded with a bucolic atmosphere and extravagant (cheesy) dialogues
Not extremely horrible though, it could be a decent timewaster... too bad that Geralt has always the precedence
(edit: Thanks with the great work that you're doing with your previews/reviews + screens/tweaks, always very appreciated )
The whole game just FEELS bigger and better than DA2, though at least DA2 retained some semblance of an RPG-based system. DA2 could have, and should have, been brilliant .. but it wasn't. Fable III could have, and should have, been brilliant .. but it wasn't. Lesser of two evils, I suppose.
I agree here, I mean I was VERY disappointed by Fable 3..but was even more disappointed by DA2. I give Fable 3 the edge, even if not by much. Both games are a downgrade from the games before them.
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
