| Page 31 of 432 |
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73656
Location: Israel
|
 Posted: Fri, 11th Feb 2011 16:02 Post subject: |
|
 |
No, my old 8800GTX could run Crysis on high (not "DX10" Highest  ) at 720p@30fps.
The absurd is, even in 2007 on a 8800GTX on not the highest settings, Crysis still looks far superior than the Crysis 2 turd.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 11th Feb 2011 16:02 Post subject: |
|
|
8800GT runs Crysis on high?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 11th Feb 2011 16:13 Post subject: |
|
|
snip
Last edited by beyond1 on Tue, 12th Aug 2025 05:32; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 11th Feb 2011 16:18 Post subject: |
|
|
Not in 1920x1080, of course. But we are talking about minimum requirements for different game.
That is supposed to mean almost choppy experience in 800x600 at low settings.
Yet, same card runs Crysis on high with 50+ fps on 1024x768, and Crysis on high is hardly outdated for today standards.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 11th Feb 2011 16:41 Post subject: |
|
|
| peter980 wrote: | Not in 1920x1080, of course. But we are talking about minimum requirements for different game.
That is supposed to mean almost choppy experience in 800x600 at low settings. |
Nah that was in the old days. Today minimum req is about the same as console expearience that means 720p with medium settings.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 11th Feb 2011 21:13 Post subject: |
|
|
| peter980 wrote: | Not in 1920x1080, of course. But we are talking about minimum requirements for different game.
That is supposed to mean almost choppy experience in 800x600 at low settings.
Yet, same card runs Crysis on high with 50+ fps on 1024x768, and Crysis on high is hardly outdated for today standards. |
'High' is not 'Very High' and 1024x768 is far from 'High'.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LuckyStrike
Posts: 1753
Location: Somewhere in the Portuguese Colonial Empire
|
| Posted: Fri, 11th Feb 2011 21:23 Post subject: |
|
|
Yep used to run crysis on high with some custom veryhigh i think on my old XFX 8800 GT Alpha Dog, and very, very fluid it was.
(On 1280x1024 cos were on an 19 monitor)
Whats the surprise on this, doc?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Feb 2011 21:45 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Feb 2011 22:00 Post subject: |
|
|
I like how every interview turns into "WEN CONZOLES?!"
| Quote: | | Any Witcher 2 console version will contain no “visually noticeable” difference over the PC SKU. |
Just like every other game: if you're stuck with a monitor from 98 or have no properly working eyes there will be no noticeable difference.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
xDBS
Posts: 1937
Location: USA / Japan
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Feb 2011 22:01 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | The producer wouldn’t confirm a recommended spec, however.
“With high-end machines? I don’t want to name detailed specs, but if you consider a high-end machine with at least one of the best, if not the best, graphics card or processor on the market, you will be able to play the game with full detail and full HD and is going to be smooth. At least, like, I don’t know that, 30fps." |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
proekaan
VIP Member
Posts: 3650
Location: Finland
|
| Posted: Tue, 15th Feb 2011 22:12 Post subject: |
|
|
| xDBS wrote: | | Quote: | The producer wouldn’t confirm a recommended spec, however.
“With high-end machines? I don’t want to name detailed specs, but if you consider a high-end machine with at least one of the best, if not the best, graphics card or processor on the market, you will be able to play the game with full detail and full HD and is going to be smooth. At least, like, I don’t know that, 30fps." |
|
Lol,that sounds GOOD! 
I mean wtf,why is everything "console" talk these days? Full HD(and what about beyond that,hmmm?),30 fps with high end machine(really?),no noticeable gfx difference...
I know it's all pr(for the console it seems),but still they could do better.
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X 4,7 GHz
Asrock X670E Steel Legend
G.Skill Trident Z5 32 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Asus TUF RTX 4090 24 GB GDDR6X
NZXT Kraken Z73 RGB
Corsair HX1500i Platinum
NZXT H7 Flow
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon
VIP Member
Posts: 18935
Location: Poland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65164
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011 14:04 Post subject: |
|
|
Looks like the two games are coming from different generations, with DA2 clearly being a PS2 port
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011 14:06 Post subject: |
|
|
Stunning visuals. I guess DA2 is going to pale not only gameplay-wise but also in comparison to the gorgeous graphics of The Witcher 2.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011 14:11 Post subject: |
|
|
The Witcher 2's cutscenes ARE IN-ENGINE. What is so monumentally brain-frying about that? Same as the first game, they're not CG/rendered. So comparing both TW2 and DA2 is valid.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dsergei
Posts: 4064
Location: Moscow, Russia
|
| Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011 14:17 Post subject: |
|
|
Well, DA2 is a multiplatform title and TW2 is a PC-exclusive. I recon all the screenshots are either from the console version or from the PC version run at medium settings - which is basically the same.
Nevertheless even if you just look at the art direction TW2 looks superior.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011 14:33 Post subject: |
|
|
| dsergei wrote: | Well, DA2 is a multiplatform title and TW2 is a PC-exclusive. I recon all the screenshots are either from the console version or from the PC version run at medium settings - which is basically the same.
Nevertheless even if you just look at the art direction TW2 looks superior. |
TW2 is not PC exclusive.
It's been made from the start with console version in mind. Whether they'll go through with the console version or not I dunno, but they've said it like 200 times.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73656
Location: Israel
|
| Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011 14:52 Post subject: |
|
|
| djaoni wrote: | TW2 is not PC exclusive.
It's been made from the start with console version in mind. Whether they'll go through with the console version or not I dunno, but they've said it like 200 times. |
Indeed. This is why there is only control scheme this time around. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011 14:56 Post subject: |
|
|
| djaoni wrote: | | TW2 is not PC exclusive. |
Actually, it is PC exclusive. Until made otherwise.
Note that while CD Project does like to do console version, it doesn't mean it will actually be done. Still, they took precautions, so that level design UI and other game elements don't impede progress on some future console port, when or if it's done.
Last edited by peter980 on Fri, 18th Feb 2011 14:59; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dsergei
Posts: 4064
Location: Moscow, Russia
|
| Posted: Fri, 18th Feb 2011 14:57 Post subject: |
|
|
| djaoni wrote: |
TW2 is not PC exclusive.
It's been made from the start with console version in mind. Whether they'll go through with the console version or not I dunno, but they've said it like 200 times. |
What they've said 200 times is that their "technology supports the current generation of consoles" and that they would love to make a console version. But their focus currently is the PC version and whether there will be a console version depends on how well it sells on the PC.
Whereas it is a completely different story for DA2 - their target customer base is on the consoles and that's what they are focusing on.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65164
Location: Italy
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 31 of 432 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
But fair enough, if you believe it then it must be true .. and I'm not being dragged into another "my comp can do this and this!" argument.
