[OTHER] The younger generation and video games expectations
Page 1 of 1
hitmanuk




Posts: 917

PostPosted: Wed, 8th Dec 2010 19:17    Post subject: [OTHER] The younger generation and video games expectations
Ok im in my early 30's and currently own an xbox 360 that I use as part of destressing after a hard days work. My first computer was a spectrum 48k with the rubber keys and then an c64, atari St before moving to a n64, ps1 etc etc

I mainly play sport games such as FIFA, PES and its this debate each year that got me thinking.

Games have developed unbelievabley over the past few years but it seems that the younger generation or the ones starting out in next gen era just dont appreciate how good these games are. They complain about the most trivia things such as dynamic weather, a stripe missing off messi's boot, the ripple of the net as the ball hits it..i mean some of it is stupid. Its as if they look for all the faults instead of just enjoying the game for what it is..a game

Im not defending game developers as some do over promise.

However quite frankly kids these days dont know how good they have it

Any thoughts?

/End rant
Back to top
Mortibus




Posts: 18053
Location: .NL
PostPosted: Wed, 8th Dec 2010 19:22    Post subject:
Back to top
me7




Posts: 3942

PostPosted: Wed, 8th Dec 2010 19:40    Post subject:
Even worse than the kids are the grown ups. Gameplay has evolved so far that developers have a difficult time to reinvent the wheel and push the boundaries even further so a lot of older gamers whine about the "death of gaming" because they're too busy to dream about perfect games to enjoy gaming. Their rants are usually welcome in this section, but yours apparently isn't. You are flagged a consoletard - FOR ETERNITY.
Back to top
hitmanuk




Posts: 917

PostPosted: Wed, 8th Dec 2010 20:04    Post subject:
well the above poster foes have a point. Ive come across a bit bitchy but what i really wanted was some kind of discussion. There has to be a point as we edge towards "realism" where you cant go any further. And it seems the current sports fan wants realism
Back to top
The_Leaf




Posts: 1542
Location: Italy
PostPosted: Wed, 8th Dec 2010 22:26    Post subject:
me7 wrote:
Even worse than the kids are the grown ups. Gameplay has evolved so far that developers have a difficult time to reinvent the wheel and push the boundaries even further so a lot of older gamers whine about the "death of gaming" because they're too busy to dream about perfect games to enjoy gaming.


This. To quote Yahtzee: "Nostalgia is like putting cocaine infused marbles into your mouth in that it makes you say stupid things". There's a whole generation of grumpy older gamers that grew up with c64s and NESes and that claim "games were much better back in the days". Truth is, they weren't. Actually in many cases they were more frustrating/repetitive/shallow thant nowaday games. It's just that nostalgia combined with "experience" (ie: having played A LOT of games in your life) makes gaming less appealing and more dull, thus many frustrated "old timers" vent their anger at newer games.

I will agree with them on one point tho: games aren't as CHALLENGING as they used to be. This is a simple fact. A lot of games nowadays are insultingly easy, even at higher difficulties. Guess it's the price to pay if you want to sell a lot of them, companies can't afford to loose customers because they find their games too hard. Which is a shame, but not a lot can be done about it at this point. Crying or Very sad
Back to top
KillerCrocker




Posts: 20503

PostPosted: Wed, 8th Dec 2010 22:29    Post subject:
FRUSTRATION MODE ON

I completly agree.I am 21yo and I began my gaming with Another World on uncles atari and my first game was Duke Nukem 3D in 1997 which I remember looking almost real back then. Then quake and offcourse incredible UNREAL with it well known waterfall, floor mirrors and all that...

Now games look incredible. (On all major platforms) Assassin creed games, Crysis, Gears of War, Bioshock

JUST MINDBLOWING! When I got my hands on GTAIV I couldnt stop blowing my mind on how it is possible?! I ve played first GTA mere 12 years ago Laughing

Really. Graphics and all the technology used in nowaday games is great. Attention to detail and such is also incredible.... Have You played New AC Brotherhood? Lighting and cloud shadows, animations... PERFECT

It makes me mad when after Jaw dropping Playthrought of Alan Wake I visit Gametrailer forums to share my feel of acomplishment...then 10yo kids are whinning HOW BAD IT LOOKS! "ITS SUB HD" ... and they don't even know I was running games in 1600x1200 In a fucking 2002 on a normal crt monitor. They seem not even to understand that HD is only a standardized name for certain res.
Back to Alan Wake. Yes its Sub"HD". And what? It is one of best looking games ive ever played.

They are complaining about things so weird that I cant comprehend their way of thinking.

Remember how it was waiting for Doom3 and Half-Life2?Times when every screenshot was mind blowing? Now we get things xxxxtimes better looking and people still arent happy.

FRUSTRATION MODE OFF


3080 | ps5 pro

Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
Back to top
Mortibus




Posts: 18053
Location: .NL
PostPosted: Wed, 8th Dec 2010 22:36    Post subject:
AW was repetitive pos imho, the only thing that was good in it was the storyline, dumbed down gfx just added oil to the fire, if game is great i don't care how low res it will look, i still play old games like sega games etc, but when game has way too many flaws especially gt5 that was developed for ages and came out half-ass i just can't be bothered with it, i actually was ready to update to new fw just to play it but after trying in friends ps3 i got one big disappoint

so yeah, considering that pc's atm 5x more powerful than consoles and we get shitty ports without aa or even worse looking games than on the consoles i can understand ppl's frustration

what i really don't understand is ppl who buy each year newly generated version of fifa's and other sport games, which i hate really

and for the record i'm over 30, so Razz


Last edited by Mortibus on Wed, 8th Dec 2010 22:54; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
The_Leaf




Posts: 1542
Location: Italy
PostPosted: Wed, 8th Dec 2010 22:53    Post subject:
Quote:
...I visit Gametrailer forums to share my feel of acomplishment...


well, that's your problem right there Cool Face
Back to top
killabyte




Posts: 1185

PostPosted: Wed, 8th Dec 2010 23:17    Post subject:
There's a lot of ignorance going around nowadays, like a fucking plague. Apparently the youth are most susceptible to it considering how absolutely fucking retarded and stupid most of them act. Maybe it's bad parenting, shitty schooling, too much exposure to it via the internet, etc. Who knows?

When I start reading those types of dumb ass comments or articles I just stop and skip to the next one. I'm 33 and I know what I grew up with. I remember looking at the box art for Intellivision and Atari games and always feeling ripped off after playing them. I would invite those people whining about stupid shit like net animations to play the 2600 version of "Basketball".

To sound like our parents, the truth is they really don't know how good they have it and the sad part is most of them are too stupid to ever realize it. There's nothing wrong with wanting something better. We should always strive for more and only settle when necessary, but to miss the whole experience over stupid minute details like bad shadows or a jagged edge or that animation isn't quite realistic enough or what the fuck ever... let them miss out on it. Ignore their stupid asses man. The only person they are depriving of anything is their own self.
Back to top
grimmmy




Posts: 1014
Location: London
PostPosted: Wed, 8th Dec 2010 23:46    Post subject:
I've mixed feelings on this subject.
I'm 30 and went through a similar route of gaming (i.e spectrum, nes, amiga, pc -> consoles)

I love the old games, but purely as they were my childhood. I play most old games now and realise how shit they really were. Have you played Dizzy recently? Don't bother. The only ones that stood the test of time are the ones that have been remade (i.e. Monkey Island, Afterburner, Alien Breed, Speed Ball 2, etc). Sure there's a few more ,I'd love to see chaos engine remade with co-op or Jet Set Willy in full HD.

The thing is, my tastes have changed and I know far more about software development than before (well, I'm a programmer so I should do). I moan my arse off when games aren't perfect. A 5 year development cycle on any software is huge especially when it's hanging off 2 to 3 engines. If something with a large team of people isn't perfect, or even close to (yes GT5 I'm glaring at you) then something went wrong, badly wrong. It might be tools, hardware limitations, experience, initial goals or general management but that length of time on 1 project is obscene especially when the companies PR/Marketting/hype machine has obviously worked overtime.

I wonder if the original question should actually be reversed. Do the older generation know how good stuff is because a) we're used to shit therefore we'll settle with shit rolled in glitter and b) we're easier to please because of point a.
Back to top
deelix
PDIP Member



Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Thu, 9th Dec 2010 09:53    Post subject:
First off, there is no need to take gaming so seriously. Its an experience FFS. Most of games are short, and repetetive. So in other words, you just play them once. Kinda like a lot of movies. But there is no need to complain, at least not when the game is "free".

Well, thats my philosophy
Back to top
grapper




Posts: 877
Location: Nuked
PostPosted: Thu, 9th Dec 2010 10:11    Post subject:
The_Leaf wrote:


This. To quote Yahtzee: "Nostalgia is like putting cocaine infused marbles into your mouth in that it makes you say stupid things". There's a whole generation of grumpy older gamers that grew up with c64s and NESes and that claim "games were much better back in the days". Truth is, they weren't. Actually in many cases they were more frustrating/repetitive/shallow thant nowaday games. It's just that nostalgia combined with "experience" (ie: having played A LOT of games in your life) makes gaming less appealing and more dull, thus many frustrated "old timers" vent their anger at newer games.

I will agree with them on one point tho: games aren't as CHALLENGING as they used to be. This is a simple fact. A lot of games nowadays are insultingly easy, even at higher difficulties. Guess it's the price to pay if you want to sell a lot of them, companies can't afford to loose customers because they find their games too hard. Which is a shame, but not a lot can be done about it at this point. Crying or Very sad


I agree with all of this being a 31 yo MF. Razz

Games were not better then but worse, I was just easier to please and it's easy to get all sentimental about some of these old games.
Back to top
Mantis2K9




Posts: 676
Location: London,England
PostPosted: Thu, 9th Dec 2010 11:18    Post subject:
I have been playing games since I could stand on a crate to reach the joystick and my first console was a binatone.

I think gamers should expect more from games.

I remember the old days of games, good back then, more nostalgia now.

I remember when arcade conversertions were poor in comparison to the actual product.

Now the games console killed the arcade off.
Back to top
killabyte




Posts: 1185

PostPosted: Thu, 9th Dec 2010 17:30    Post subject:
@grimmy

first off - shit rolled in glitter hahahahahah that's going in my book man. hilarious.

i think the younger generation whining about stupid details doesn't really make it shit rolled in glitter. there's a post on the xbox forums right now on the ACB section where some idiot is complaining about how the sky looks. i think we (older gamers) can be or are more appreciative of what's out there now thanks to our roots. no doubt most of the shit we came up playing is no where near as great as we remember it being, COMPARED to what's out there today. for instance i recall spending a lot of time playing the rocky horror picture show on my c64. at 8 or so yrs old it took me a while to beat that considering i didn't know what the hell the game was about. it was fun and challenging but if i went back and played it now it probably couldn't hold my attention for longer than a few minutes. in fact if i'm being honest i wouldn't even go to the trouble of trying to play it. it's better as a memory.

granted there is a lot of "shit rolled in glitter" out there. medal of honor comes to mind. and like you mentioned, if a game is in development for 5 years and has millions thrown at it then there really shouldn't be any bugs but i sometimes wonder how often the general public confuses a bug with limitations, be they hardware of software or just lack of experience, etc.
Back to top
grimmmy




Posts: 1014
Location: London
PostPosted: Sat, 11th Dec 2010 05:16    Post subject:
Nah, you're right. There are a ton of people that bitch about silly things. The thing is, so many publishers make claims to things that aren't being delivered.

I really don't want to pick on GT5 (as I think its an ok game) but it claimed so much and came away with so very little. For me, I want to see fundermentals in a game such as AI, realism (should the game call for it) or just out right fun. If they turn the sky purple and I can still have fun, then go for it Smile

I drill it into my project managers that we can't deliver what we can't do and if you've made a promise you can also unpromise things. The games industry apparently does the opposite.

@killabyte
I remember the rockie horror picture show. It was ace (or so I recall). I was also playing a load of Chuckie Egg at the time.


Intel Core i7-4790K 4.00GHz - 32GB Kingston HyperX - Gigabyte Z97X-Gaming 7 - EVGA GTX 980 TI SC 6GB - Asus ROG Swift PG278Q
Back to top
Mantis2K9




Posts: 676
Location: London,England
PostPosted: Sat, 11th Dec 2010 08:38    Post subject:
killabyte wrote:
@grimmy

first off - shit rolled in glitter hahahahahah that's going in my book man. hilarious.

i think the younger generation whining about stupid details doesn't really make it shit rolled in glitter. there's a post on the xbox forums right now on the ACB section where some idiot is complaining about how the sky looks. i think we (older gamers) can be or are more appreciative of what's out there now thanks to our roots. no doubt most of the shit we came up playing is no where near as great as we remember it being, COMPARED to what's out there today. for instance i recall spending a lot of time playing the rocky horror picture show on my c64. at 8 or so yrs old it took me a while to beat that considering i didn't know what the hell the game was about. it was fun and challenging but if i went back and played it now it probably couldn't hold my attention for longer than a few minutes. in fact if i'm being honest i wouldn't even go to the trouble of trying to play it. it's better as a memory.

granted there is a lot of "shit rolled in glitter" out there. medal of honor comes to mind. and like you mentioned, if a game is in development for 5 years and has millions thrown at it then there really shouldn't be any bugs but i sometimes wonder how often the general public confuses a bug with limitations, be they hardware of software or just lack of experience, etc.


Having worked on a couple of projects I know what its like.

Yes they should be bug free, but then that will never happen, even silly bugs slip the net.

The only thing I would say I notice more these days is how lazy the companies have gotten more in not fixing little bugs they know they can update 99% of users online.
Back to top
adaml75




Posts: 204
Location: Burkina Faso
PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2010 20:53    Post subject:
Well, I'm 35, started playing games on ZX Spectrum in 1983 (rubber keyboard, Hungry Horace games etc.). I don't miss "the old times" at all. Games were more difficult, but often in artificial way - to make simple gameplay last longer. Anyone tried to play Manic Miner lately? It's a sorry mess, and it used to be a cult hit game.
And if you want complexity, you can always play Europa Universalis or one of myriad "pro" wargames (I love strategy games) - they are 100x more complex than they used to be in the 90s. And I don't even talk about graphics...
Too bad I have so little time to play games. 30 min a day max. So I have a long, long list of very good RPG and strategy games I don't even started to play, because I know I can't possibly finish them. Heck, I try to finish latest Fire Emblem (on Wii emulator actually) for 5 or 6 months and I'm only in 3rd chapter Sad
Back to top
xyzg




Posts: 1835

PostPosted: Wed, 15th Dec 2010 19:29    Post subject:
I'm always wanting the next bigger and better game.
Recently i've been firing up some old games I used to play as a youngster, playing them now, I find them pretty bad or at best crude, both on the eye and in game mechanics. I can still appreciate them and remember how much fun I had playing them at the time but to do it again now?. No way. My expectations change as games evolve.
Back to top
Mantis2K9




Posts: 676
Location: London,England
PostPosted: Thu, 16th Dec 2010 02:10    Post subject:
adaml75 wrote:
Well, I'm 35, started playing games on ZX Spectrum in 1983 (rubber keyboard, Hungry Horace games etc.). I don't miss "the old times" at all. Games were more difficult, but often in artificial way - to make simple gameplay last longer. Anyone tried to play Manic Miner lately? It's a sorry mess, and it used to be a cult hit game.
And if you want complexity, you can always play Europa Universalis or one of myriad "pro" wargames (I love strategy games) - they are 100x more complex than they used to be in the 90s. And I don't even talk about graphics...
Too bad I have so little time to play games. 30 min a day max. So I have a long, long list of very good RPG and strategy games I don't even started to play, because I know I can't possibly finish them. Heck, I try to finish latest Fire Emblem (on Wii emulator actually) for 5 or 6 months and I'm only in 3rd chapter Sad


I had the one before that too, the ZX81 remember the 1K upgrade lol, some games were classice back in the speccy days like Head over heels and atic attack and gauntlet kept me going for many many hours.
Back to top
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Console Arena
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group