Mass Effect 2
Page 157 of 181 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 156, 157, 158 ... 179, 180, 181  Next
(Nexus)




Posts: 2807
Location: 192.168.1.72
PostPosted: Sat, 18th Sep 2010 23:20    Post subject:
sabin1981 wrote:
Lots of different names, one for each DLC pack. IE;

DLC_CER_02
DLC_EXP_Part01
DLC_PRE_Collectors


I already posted a screen of that what it means.



Last edited by (Nexus) on Sun, 19th Sep 2010 14:52; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Sat, 18th Sep 2010 23:21    Post subject:
I know mate, I was responding to this;

karak wrote:
Guys in the DLC folder what is the folder name.
Back to top
(Nexus)




Posts: 2807
Location: 192.168.1.72
PostPosted: Sat, 18th Sep 2010 23:22    Post subject:
Ah missed that post.
Back to top
karak




Posts: 145

PostPosted: Sun, 19th Sep 2010 09:22    Post subject:
sabin1981 wrote:
I know mate, I was responding to this;

karak wrote:
Guys in the DLC folder what is the folder name.


Thanks much. Having a weird install issue but I think I got it figured out. Appreciate it.
Back to top
Overlord123




Posts: 2335

PostPosted: Sun, 19th Sep 2010 11:50    Post subject:
Twinny wrote:
sabin1981 wrote:
Lots of different names, one for each DLC pack. IE;

DLC_CER_02
DLC_EXP_Part01
DLC_PRE_Collectors


I already posted a screen of that what it means.


Lea Natan Laughing
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73220
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Sun, 19th Sep 2010 11:58    Post subject:
Back to top
Mr.Tinkles




Posts: 12378
Location: Reino de Suecia
PostPosted: Sun, 19th Sep 2010 12:22    Post subject:
This Lea character, she needs to show us her bewbs! D:


Back to top
(Nexus)




Posts: 2807
Location: 192.168.1.72
PostPosted: Sun, 19th Sep 2010 14:50    Post subject:
iNatan wrote:
Laughing


Hey Lea, i fixed it Wink

Prefetian wrote:
This Lea character, she needs to show us her bewbs! D:


It's Liara Rolling Eyes
Back to top
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere



Posts: 65086
Location: Italy
PostPosted: Sun, 19th Sep 2010 15:06    Post subject:
Back to top
Sertorius




Posts: 1652

PostPosted: Sun, 26th Sep 2010 04:38    Post subject:
when will we see ME3 ?
Back to top
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere



Posts: 65086
Location: Italy
PostPosted: Sun, 26th Sep 2010 04:47    Post subject:
Sertorius wrote:
when will we see ME3 ?


Let me check...

*elaborating*



...

Too difficult, I'm sorry. Sad
Back to top
xDBS




Posts: 1937
Location: USA / Japan
PostPosted: Sun, 26th Sep 2010 05:58    Post subject:
They'll be releasing ME3 at the end of the year. The last 7 chapters of ME3 will be released in single chapters, first chapter of ME3 will be 49.99$ out by the end of December, and each month they will be releasing each chapter as DLC for 34.99$
Back to top
ThomasCro




Posts: 119

PostPosted: Sun, 26th Sep 2010 06:18    Post subject:
xDBS wrote:
They'll be releasing ME3 at the end of the year. The last 7 chapters of ME3 will be released in single chapters, first chapter of ME3 will be 49.99$ out by the end of December, and each month they will be releasing each chapter as DLC for 34.99$


you must be the mass effect god
Back to top
Sertorius




Posts: 1652

PostPosted: Sun, 26th Sep 2010 09:35    Post subject:
it would be truly good, indeed.
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Sun, 26th Sep 2010 10:01    Post subject:
i bet you theres atleast someone in ea who really is thinking hard about something like that, wondering if they could actually get away with it and if he should bring it up *again* at the next meeting..


Back to top
xDBS




Posts: 1937
Location: USA / Japan
PostPosted: Sun, 26th Sep 2010 10:37    Post subject:
I wasn't even trying to be funny, it's just how I feel, seeing gaming turn out like this.

Hell, I was banned from gametrailers for calling Microsoft faggots, and how I wish they never got into the console market.
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Sun, 26th Sep 2010 10:52    Post subject:
actually from a business point, microsoft did everything right with their entry into the console market.

besides, its the console gamers and their tolerance of the shit theyre being asked to pay money for, that i find is the real problem...


Back to top
(Nexus)




Posts: 2807
Location: 192.168.1.72
PostPosted: Sun, 26th Sep 2010 12:06    Post subject:
chiv wrote:
actually from a business point, microsoft did everything right with their entry into the console market.

besides, its the console gamers and their tolerance of the shit theyre being asked to pay money for, that i find is the real problem...


Yep....and now they push those crappy dlc's payments shit to pc.....but i refuse to pay for it. Evil or Very Mad

Companies are still wondering why people pirate ?

This is why. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
xDBS




Posts: 1937
Location: USA / Japan
PostPosted: Sun, 26th Sep 2010 21:42    Post subject:
Twinny wrote:
chiv wrote:
actually from a business point, microsoft did everything right with their entry into the console market.

besides, its the console gamers and their tolerance of the shit theyre being asked to pay money for, that i find is the real problem...


Yep....and now they push those crappy dlc's payments shit to pc.....but i refuse to pay for it. Evil or Very Mad

Companies are still wondering why people pirate ?

This is why. Rolling Eyes


Well, I'm sick of their excuse of "pc gaming is dying becuase of pirates"

My cousin texted me the other day asking if I wanted to get my xbox modded. So, after I tell him no....i can do it myself.. He goes on to tell me that ALL of his friends have modded xboxs and download all their games

>
Back to top
Mortibus




Posts: 18053
Location: .NL
PostPosted: Sun, 26th Sep 2010 21:47    Post subject:
do they live in US?
coz last time i checked pc gaming was meant to be pc gaming in USA
 Spoiler:
 
Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Sun, 26th Sep 2010 22:40    Post subject:
chiv wrote:
actually from a business point, microsoft did everything right with their entry into the console market.


What they did wrong was that they chose to abandon PC gaming in favor of their console instead of letting them co-exist and advertise them equally.

They've lost countless millions of dollars letting the "unknown" Valve become the #1 DD service provider.

Given how well known the Microsoft brand is and their unlimited resources if they had put serious effort in PC DD, nowadays they would have both the most successful "HD" console of this gen in the west AND the leadership in DD PC sales.

This was their biggest mistake this gen, bigger than the Vista fiasco.
With Vista's failure they didn't lose nearly as much as marketshare (they lost less than 5%) as they lost by abandoning their efforts in PC gaming.

It was like burning free money.
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Sun, 26th Sep 2010 23:07    Post subject:
eh.. sure we might 'wish' we were getting more attention, but that doesnt change the fact that diving in to the console market was WAY smarter than chosing to focus on pc gaming instead.

sure you could argue that they could have done both, but i guess they didnt see the need... at the moment, gaming is definately console orientated, and thats where they, wisely, chose to focus all their energy.


Back to top
Predator_Soul




Posts: 680

PostPosted: Sun, 26th Sep 2010 23:13    Post subject:
xDBS wrote:
They'll be releasing ME3 at the end of the year. The last 7 chapters of ME3 will be released in single chapters, first chapter of ME3 will be 49.99$ out by the end of December, and each month they will be releasing each chapter as DLC for 34.99$


Don't fucking give them any ideas!!
Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Sun, 26th Sep 2010 23:23    Post subject:
chiv wrote:
eh.. sure we might 'wish' we were getting more attention, but that doesnt change the fact that diving in to the console market was WAY smarter than chosing to focus on pc gaming instead.


I'm not saying this..

Quote:
sure you could argue that they could have done both


This, I'm saying Razz

Quote:
but i guess they didnt see the need... at the moment, gaming is definately console orientated, and thats where they, wisely, chose to focus all their energy.


I strongly disagree. They lost more than they gained. People were already switching to consoles, no matter what Microsoft did. They didn't switch to consoles because MS failed to deliver a competitive service to the PC (if that was their plan). All they managed to do was create the chance for Valve to fill the void.

What they did is similar to noticing how successful iphone games are and then suddenly deciding to release a mobile phone and produce AAA games for it, and create cheap ports of them for the 360 and then a couple of years later completely abandoning the 360 because mobile games are the new trend. Laughing

It's never wise to completely abandon a market that your brand is associated with just because you want to expand on others.
Back to top
xDBS




Posts: 1937
Location: USA / Japan
PostPosted: Sun, 26th Sep 2010 23:30    Post subject:
In my opinion, the problem only lies with MONEY.

When we played games during the early era games weren't pop culture, they weren't popular, and amongst all you most likely needed an imagination of some sort to play it.

Now gaming is finally "pretty" so the moronic sheep finally enjoy it because it's "pretty". Gaming is dying becuase it became popular.

Now, don't get me wrong, I can understand someone not liking a D&D Dice roll RPG. But I just can't understand why any of these people enjoy any of these games. 5 hour single player games today.

And I don't even know what's going on the east market either. JRPGs used to be GOOD back in the "day", came up with new concepts, and ideas, now their terrible. FF13 was garbage, fucking terrible game.

Oh, I know, game developers who had new ideas got pushed aside to do paper work. aka Yu Suzuki.
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Sun, 26th Sep 2010 23:33    Post subject:
microsoft still HAS the pc market for OS's, which IS what their market is.

microsoft never really was (as in it never actually gave a shit about) the pc gaming market - yeah they had a game division and their games for windows failbrand, but they never abandoned the pc gaming market because, in my opinion, they were never here. they had a token presence, nothing more - they never pushed pc gaming.

the console was their first solid attempt at getting into gaming, and theyve made a huge success of it.


and in your words 'people were already switching to consoles'... well yeah.. thats why it made perfectly logical sense to focus in that direction.

ultimately, what im saying is why bother with dollars and cents when you could go for the big money? the amount of money they potentially lost in pc gaming is drops of water in the river theyre making from consoles.


Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Sun, 26th Sep 2010 23:56    Post subject:
Lost money is lost money.

And they are hardly dollars and cents.

There are about 40M 360 customers in total (actually less, that's just the amount of 360s that have been sold but I'd say that at least 1/5 of them has RRoD' and doesn't work anymore), and Valve has 25M ACTIVE customers (keyword is ACTIVE). Not bad at all.

Valve has spent almost nothing in marketing Steam (no TV ads, no website ads "install Steam!"), and their R&D costs for the Steam platform must be like 1/100 the R&D cost of the 360. Not to mention the R&D and marketing costs of Kinect, which is another huge risk MS is taking.


TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"

~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Mon, 27th Sep 2010 00:18    Post subject:
40ishm exclusively 360 customers -established

25ish m STEAM USERS - how many of those would microsoft have seen? this doesnt take into account users who are only users because they grabbed free games, or are only users because they bought one game in a SHOP that needed steam..... take me for example.. im an 'active' valve customer... never bought a game off steam - you can be sure there are millions like me that never bought a game through steam (or at most bought ONE - most likely a valve game anyway, which is a customer microsoft would never have seen)

i dont quite see your argument here... that is to say i dont see your angle. you arent arguing that valves business would be interchangeable with microsofts (as in that 25m 'active' customers would have become microsofts') - so what are you saying? exactly how many millions of dollars per year are you saying microsoft would have made if they focused on doing... what... competing against steam as a digital delivery system?

do you think theyd be making as much as they do through all the income they make through the xbox? half? a quarter? a tenth?

im not saying theyd make 'nothing'... im just saying that in relation to what theyre earning in the console market, what they could have earned in the pc market wouldnt have been anywhere near as impressive.


Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Mon, 27th Sep 2010 01:08    Post subject:
chiv wrote:
40ishm exclusively 360 customers -established

25ish m STEAM USERS - how many of those would microsoft have seen? this doesnt take into account users who are only users because they grabbed free games, or are only users because they bought one game in a SHOP that needed steam..... take me for example.. im an 'active' valve customer... never bought a game off steam - you can be sure there are millions like me that never bought a game through steam (or at most bought ONE - most likely a valve game anyway, which is a customer microsoft would never have seen)


Surely you understand that this happens on consoles well. Customers that have bought only a couple of games. Haven't you read on forums "yeah I have a <insert console here> but I only bought it for <insert blockbuster game here>. I use <insert rival console here> for the rest of my gaming"?

Not to mention that Steam has the advantage of spamming you with ads everytime you start the client, which makes the possibility to consider buying games very high.

Quote:
you arent arguing that valves business would be interchangeable with microsofts (as in that 25m 'active' customers would have become microsofts') - so what are you saying?


MS is better known in the software business and has more resources compared to Valve. If they put some serious efforts in publishing PC games and running a DD store like Valve does, these 25M customers would be theirs.

Quote:
exactly how many millions of dollars per year are you saying microsoft would have made if they focused on doing... what... competing against steam as a digital delivery system? do you think theyd be making as much as they do through all the income they make through the xbox? half? a quarter? a tenth?


Oh gee. Idk. 1/4? I don't really know. Who cares? It's additional money to their Xbox business, I'm not suggesting focusing on PC games only.

As an example: Microsoft is launching Windows Phone 7 OS and bringing XBL to it to sell games and stuff.

It's obvious that Windows Phone 7 as an OS won't bring them the revenue Windows 7 for the PC does, and mobile phone games won't bring them the revenue Xbox games do. Does this mean they should abandon this effort? Because their other OS and their other games bring more money? Why not focus on both?


Quote:
im not saying theyd make 'nothing'... im just saying that in relation to what theyre earning in the console market, what they could have earned in the pc market wouldnt have been anywhere near as impressive.


It's still lost money. Wink
Back to top
lolozaur




Posts: 26310

PostPosted: Wed, 29th Sep 2010 23:12    Post subject:
http://wrzut.net/ppdt1vu308cw/ME2_AuthPatch.rar.html

this not working Twinny Sad

also anyone know if more dlcs will appear?
Back to top
Page 157 of 181 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 156, 157, 158 ... 179, 180, 181  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group