|
|
| Page 81 of 179 |
|
|
 Posted: Mon, 26th Jul 2010 12:58 Post subject: |
|
 |
When wil Europe be unlocked on the servers. I wanna play the Demokey I got from my friend on saturday!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 26th Jul 2010 12:58 Post subject: |
|
|
Well as starcraft 2 is more like starcraft 1,5 and stacking was in starcraft 1 I'm not suprised it made its way to the sequel. Maybe it 's (was?) kind of a bug, but a one that made some extra tactics available and added some variaty so I really do not understand all the whining about it. And It's one of that hardcore PC games bugfeatures that are not gamebreaking but add to the experiance (like rocket(ups I meant STRAFE)] jumping in Quake! - its started as a "bug" too)
Last edited by Lukxxx on Mon, 26th Jul 2010 13:17; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 26th Jul 2010 13:07 Post subject: |
|
|
some people just like to whine even if they didnt play sc1/2 and never will. the very nature of the internet.
here you have an example:
|
|
|
v
Last edited by remyleblau on Mon, 26th Jul 2010 13:14; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 26th Jul 2010 13:11 Post subject: |
|
|
whats next ... wait didn't they say all air craft units stack... and now you can move buildings by turning them into air units...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 26th Jul 2010 13:13 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 26th Jul 2010 13:13 Post subject: |
|
|
And some people are willing to accept any shovelled shit just as long as it has the name of their favourite company stamped on it, even though there are vastly superior products elsewhere. It's the very nature of fanboyism.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 26th Jul 2010 13:20 Post subject: |
|
|
I bought MW2 for £20 and I've had over 420hrs of fun out of it, with no extra cost. How is that an "ass fucking"? I didn't buy it because it had the Activision stamp on it, I bought it because it was part of the CoD series -- and as for innovation? At least MW2 changed things up a bit from MW1 or any previous CoD title. StarCack 2 is fucking identical to StarCack 1, right down to the bugs!, the only difference is SC2 is "3D" compared to SC1's sprites.
Nice. Take the same game from 12 years ago, make it 3D, the Blizztards will snap it up like a thirsty man in a desert. Innovation my hairless arse. You muppets keep crying about how SC2 is the most innovative RTS "evah!!" and yet the rest of us non-blinded fanboys are sat here, scratching our heads, and thinking "QUE!? WTF?"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 26th Jul 2010 13:21 Post subject: |
|
|
| sabin1981 wrote: | | And some people are willing to accept any shovelled shit just as long as it has the name of their favourite company stamped on it, even though there are vastly superior products elsewhere. It's the very nature of fanboyism. |
Yes, it's good we're not fanboys then, but simply understand the game and why it is a feature and not a bug.
As we also mentioned Blizzard initially chose to have collision so you couldn't bunch them up like that, but it was only due to player request that they made it possible, so obviously it wasn't Blizzard shoveling shit, as they did originally not want, but infact their fanbase shovelling shit.
So you can't argue your case without resorting to personal attacks, and even then you can't argue the case.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 26th Jul 2010 13:23 Post subject: |
|
|
| sabin1981 wrote: | I bought MW2 for £20 and I've had over 420hrs of fun out of it, with no extra cost. How is that an "ass fucking"? I didn't buy it because it had the Activision stamp on it, I bought it because it was part of the CoD series -- and as for innovation? At least MW2 changed things up a bit from MW1 or any previous CoD title. StarCack 2 is fucking identical to StarCack 1, right down to the bugs!, the only difference is SC2 is "3D" compared to SC1's sprites.
Nice. Take the same game from 12 years ago, make it 3D, the Blizztards will snap it up like a thirsty man in a desert. Innovation my hairless arse. You muppets keep crying about how SC2 is the most innovative RTS "evah!!" and yet the rest of us non-blinded fanboys are sat here, scratching our heads, and thinking "QUE!? WTF?" |
ITT: Anyone with a different opinion than yours = fanboy.
No, we simply invested more time in learning about the game than you did, and we saw what could potentially make this the most innovative RTS, it's still not known yet whether or not that will be the case, but i'm quite certain that it will be.
But i guess those reviewers will be called fanboys too, right?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 26th Jul 2010 13:25 Post subject: |
|
|
| sabin1981 wrote: | I bought MW2 for £20 and I've had over 420hrs of fun out of it, with no extra cost. How is that an "ass fucking"? I didn't buy it because it had the Activision stamp on it, I bought it because it was part of the CoD series -- and as for innovation? At least MW2 changed things up a bit from MW1 or any previous CoD title. StarCack 2 is fucking identical to StarCack 1, right down to the bugs!, the only difference is SC2 is "3D" compared to SC1's sprites.
Nice. Take the same game from 12 years ago, make it 3D, the Blizztards will snap it up like a thirsty man in a desert. Innovation my hairless arse. You muppets keep crying about how SC2 is the most innovative RTS "evah!!" and yet the rest of us non-blinded fanboys are sat here, scratching our heads, and thinking "QUE!? WTF?" |
dude, youre so full of crap. whats your problem with sc/blizzard? mw2 is the same shit as mw1 with few new perks, crap host migration and no dedicated servers. hows that fucking in the ass? it is, simply as that.
anyone is arguing that sc2 is super innovative? no. but if you dont see what new mechanics are in sc2 comparing to sc1 simply means that you have no idea micro/macro mechanics in sc2.
i cant believe how full of shit and rage you are posting this kind of bullshit on internet lol, i remember your posts from different topics and never seen anything like that, fuck, its amazing. cant believe that you are 1981 and post shit like that, time to fucking grow up, seriously.
Last edited by remyleblau on Mon, 26th Jul 2010 13:29; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 26th Jul 2010 13:29 Post subject: |
|
|
| FISKER_Q wrote: | [
Yes, it's good we're not fanboys then, but simply understand the game and why it is a feature and not a bug.
|
Ok Jesus Shot, whatever you say.... it's a "feature".
| Quote: |
As we also mentioned Blizzard initially chose to have collision so you couldn't bunch them up like that, but it was only due to player request that they made it possible, so obviously it wasn't Blizzard shoveling shit, as they did originally not want, but infact their fanbase shovelling shit.
|
Weeee! So the derp brigade are the reason? Sounds fun. However that doesn't negate the fact that the game is fucking IDENTICAL to the previous one, just with "polygons" instead of "sprites" -- oh and you have to buy the game three times if you want to play it properly. WOOHOO. No wonder Blizzard are part of Activision now  (did you stop to realise THAT, Remy? No?)
| Quote: |
So you can't argue your case without resorting to personal attacks, and even then you can't argue the case. |
My only "personal attacks" are against muppets calling a bug a "feature" and claiming that SC2 is the best ever, without providing a shred of proof except for text slathered with fanboy drool. It brings nothing to the table that hasn't been done a hundred times before, and better, by competing titles. Of course I'm going to insult people like that, because - IMO - they're retards.
| remyleblau wrote: |
anyone is arguing that sc2 is super innovative? no. but if you dont see what new mechanics are in sc2 comparing to sc1 then go fuck yourself in your hairless arse. geez, i cant believe that you are 1981 and post shit like that, time to fucking grow up, seriously. |
| FISKER_Q wrote: | | and we saw what could potentially make this the most innovative RTS, it's still not known yet whether or not that will be the case, but i'm quite certain that it will be |
DERP. Tards haven't even played it yet and they're "quite certain that it will be the most innovative" I rest my case and hereby leave the thread, because I'm afraid I'm getting soaked to the skin in fanboy bukkake. It's kinda gross.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Mon, 26th Jul 2010 13:29 Post subject: |
|
|
@FISKER_Q
@remyleblau
You see, we finally found some common grounds. MW2 is indeed rape in the ass by Activision.  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 26th Jul 2010 13:34 Post subject: |
|
|
| sabin1981 wrote: |
Weeee! So the derp brigade are the reason? Sounds fun. However that doesn't negate the fact that the game is fucking IDENTICAL to the previous one, just with "polygons" instead of "sprites" -- oh and you have to buy the game three times if you want to play it properly. WOOHOO. No wonder Blizzard are part of Activision now (did you stop to realise THAT, Remy? No?) |
It simply isn't, the whole singleplayer experience is different, the map publishing (which i've previously said didn't work out well in the beta) is different, even multiplayer itself is different, beyond replacing polygons with sprites.
If you're seriously trying to argue that the game is identical then you're just a moron, plain and simple.
| Quote: |
My only "personal attacks" are against muppets calling a bug a "feature" and claiming that SC2 is the best ever, without providing a shred of proof except for text slathered with fanboy drool. It brings nothing to the table that hasn't been done a hundred times before, and better, by competing titles. Of course I'm going to insult people like that, because - IMO - they're retards. |
I provided proof more than once in this thread, but i'm guessing that your definition of "fanboy drool" prohibits that material from being used, despite being the official website and even 3rd party journalistic gaming sites?
| Quote: | | DERP. Tards haven't even played it yet and they're "quite certain that it will be the most innovative" I rest my case and hereby leave the thread, because I'm afraid I'm getting soaked to the skin in fanboy bukkake. It's kinda gross. |
My opinion is my opinion, from the information i've gathered i believe my opinion to be fair, i do not present it as fact, but i'm quite certain that it will end up being fact.
When it does, i'll be happy to return so you can get some more bukkake.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Mon, 26th Jul 2010 13:36 Post subject: |
|
|
I think it's safe to say that the "map builder" is the best feature of SC2. Hopefully, a portion of the community will make something creative out of it. 
| remyleblau wrote: | | nor do i waste my time making dumb gifs of sabin sucking bobbys cock. |
Why not? 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 26th Jul 2010 13:40 Post subject: |
|
|
| iNatan wrote: | | I think it's safe to say that the "map builder" is the best feature of SC2. Hopefully, a portion of the community will make something creative out of it. |
That depends on whether or not they'll fix all of the feedback gathered during the beta, in the beta it was like this, which, in my opinion, was pretty terrible:
10MB max size per map (Basically room for no extra resources)
20MB of max storage (That's only 2 fullsized maps in total)
5 Maps total.
Maps are only available in the region they're published. (Games like DotA either won't be available to other regions or they would somehow have to publish it in other regions (buying several copies of the game)
No real custom map support, i.e. you can't make a map and then share it, and then play over battle.net without all kinds of weird trickery.
So as you can see, there are some pretty dealbreaking issues there, but i don't know for sure if they fixed them or not.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Mon, 26th Jul 2010 13:43 Post subject: |
|
|
Aha, all excitement dead now. This is truly Apple. Lockdown to the tiniest thing.
And you people are excited over this shit? Oh dear...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 26th Jul 2010 13:46 Post subject: |
|
|
Whoa that map restrictions suck
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 26th Jul 2010 13:49 Post subject: |
|
|
there a lot of issues connected with maps.
its possible to embed music/video content in map file - obviously copyrights issues involved.
its also possible to make almost every game you could imagine - the same.
(check dota sc2 on youtube)
anyway you should have an option to play custom map file from your harddrive without publishing it on bnet.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 26th Jul 2010 13:53 Post subject: |
|
|
Ok , whose the nerds that are queuing up for this at midnight?
Seriously, own up?
Ryzen 5 3600 cpu@3.60 Mhz.
hyper x 32 gb ddr 4 memory.
Msi Carbon gaming pro ac motherboard.
Evga 600 psu.
Msi Armour rx 8 gb 5700 Graphic card.
Ps4 Standard 500gb.
Lg 4k 42 inch tv.
Oculus Quest 2.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ashmolly
Posts: 1075
Location: Trump's Merica
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 26th Jul 2010 13:57 Post subject: |
|
|
Gonna be interesting to see who wins King of the beta, who are you guys rooting for?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 26th Jul 2010 14:09 Post subject: |
|
|
what is the final pair, tlo vs ??
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 26th Jul 2010 14:13 Post subject: |
|
|
| FISKER_Q wrote: | | iNatan wrote: | | I think it's safe to say that the "map builder" is the best feature of SC2. Hopefully, a portion of the community will make something creative out of it. |
That depends on whether or not they'll fix all of the feedback gathered during the beta, in the beta it was like this, which, in my opinion, was pretty terrible:
10MB max size per map (Basically room for no extra resources)
20MB of max storage (That's only 2 fullsized maps in total)
5 Maps total.
Maps are only available in the region they're published. (Games like DotA either won't be available to other regions or they would somehow have to publish it in other regions (buying several copies of the game)
No real custom map support, i.e. you can't make a map and then share it, and then play over battle.net without all kinds of weird trickery.
So as you can see, there are some pretty dealbreaking issues there, but i don't know for sure if they fixed them or not. |
That just killed every little bit of excitement I had for this game. They make this great editor, and then they put extreme limits on it? No thanks.
Also, region-locking is just bullshit. Don't understand how you can support that.
Oh well, glad I didn't waste money on this.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 26th Jul 2010 14:13 Post subject: |
|
|
Can't believe all the hate here. Really pathetic complaining about things that people actually wanted in the game. Then again I presume none of the complainers has ever played Starcraft 1 or any other competetive MP game.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 81 of 179 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|
|
 |
|
