Page 35 of 63 |
Werelds
Special Little Man
Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
|
Posted: Sat, 29th May 2010 19:22 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
Posted: Sat, 29th May 2010 19:27 Post subject: |
|
 |
Yeah, 30 fps + 360 controller, and it feels just like the console experience 
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sausje
Banned
Posts: 17716
Location: Limboland, Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat, 29th May 2010 19:28 Post subject: |
|
 |
iNatan wrote: |
You know you are full of shit when even the silly Steam statistics prove you are wrong.  |
Sorry to bring this up again, but who the fuck uses steam still? 
Proud member of Frustrated Association of International Losers Failing Against the Gifted and Superior (F.A.I.L.F.A.G.S)

|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 29th May 2010 19:31 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 29th May 2010 19:32 Post subject: |
|
 |
Just started a game and i'm loving this. Sure , it's far from perfect but i'm still having a blast despite all the flaws. Believe it or not , i think i'm liking this more than Red Dead Redemption who i think is great but a bit overhyped.
The only thing that really annoy me is the goddamn ugly crosshair. Goddammit , why why why ? They could at least gave us the option to remove or chance it. Hopefully some mod will come for it in the future.
Back to the game now. Good stuff
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Frant
King's Bounty
Posts: 24636
Location: Your Mom
|
Posted: Sat, 29th May 2010 19:36 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 29th May 2010 19:41 Post subject: |
|
 |
sabin1981 wrote: | RainyDay wrote: |
and - does killing the security guys (or secret service.. or whatever they are.. - the swat like guys) at the taiwan subway changes something ? Its supposed to be a stealth mission .. but...
|
Yes, it adversely affects Mina's relationship to you. Every innocent (and non government agents, like the street cops just doing their job) you kill; the more she hates you. As to how that could affect the game itself? I don't know, since I never did it  | i play this game like the new panther Sam with mark and execute and kill all that moves 
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sausje
Banned
Posts: 17716
Location: Limboland, Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat, 29th May 2010 19:41 Post subject: |
|
 |
Frant wrote: | iNatan wrote: |
You know you are full of shit when even the silly Steam statistics prove you are wrong.  |
Just to clarify:
XP used by ~38%
Vista/Win7 used by ~62%
Exactly HOW are "most people" using XP these days? Unless the rest of us are living dead.
And these numbers come from steam where a lot of old-school CS-players etc. are still stuck on XP. |
Just look at mosed used resolution and its 1280x1024, second in line 1024x786... 
Proud member of Frustrated Association of International Losers Failing Against the Gifted and Superior (F.A.I.L.F.A.G.S)

|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 29th May 2010 20:05 Post subject: |
|
 |
game runs fine etc... but whats up with that "hacking" mini game... you dont have any time and the number just keep changing. When they stop you have short time to select it (takes some time with the gamepad). Worst mini game ever
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 29th May 2010 20:14 Post subject: |
|
 |
djaoni wrote: | Yuri, decide for yourself?
And yeah the minigames just take 3-4 times and you'll get through them really easy. |
Damn it... I want to do the right thing!! 
1 and 2 are still amazing.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 29th May 2010 20:17 Post subject: |
|
 |
dont know... the hacking mini game timer is to short i think.. the screen is full of random nr moving and shit... dam... who the F made up this crap.
Unreal 3 engine shows its "good" sides to... some times, like always in U3 engine, you get this low texture - high texture loading. Haven't seen any u3 engine game without this problem. Why do developers use this crap
at least it runs fine... i give you that but thats about it...
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 29th May 2010 20:20 Post subject: |
|
 |
discworld wrote: | dont know... the hacking mini game timer is to short i think.. the screen is full of random nr moving and shit... dam... who the F made up this crap.
|
I never had any problems with those, and I had no points in the skill that added more time to the minigams. Easy way is if you just look for the non-moving letters - best spotted if you try to look beyond the screen, just like when looking at stereograms http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereogram
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 29th May 2010 20:26 Post subject: |
|
 |
I know but sometimes it seems that all the number are moving. And when I find a still number it takes some time to get to it. Using Xbox360 pad to play because it feels like its made for the Xbox in mind. The game sure has some potential... but looking at the review's some one messed things up on the way.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
Posted: Sat, 29th May 2010 20:44 Post subject: |
|
 |
discworld wrote: | Unreal 3 engine shows its "good" sides to... some times, like always in U3 engine, you get this low texture - high texture loading. Haven't seen any u3 engine game without this problem. Why do developers use this crap  |
This is a lot less apparent on newer builds of the engine, even in consoles (like for example, Mass Effect 2). This game uses a very old very old build, that is why you see the crazy texture loading.
H4wkeye wrote: | XP is fuckin' 6 years old and crappy. |
6 year old? XP was released in September 2001.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 29th May 2010 20:46 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
Posted: Sat, 29th May 2010 20:52 Post subject: |
|
 |
And if you take into account that XP is just prettier Windows 2000, and that one was released in 1999 (disregarding betas, which were out in 98 as "NT 5"), and you have a pretty good idea how old XP really is. 
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
Posted: Sat, 29th May 2010 20:58 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 29th May 2010 21:03 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 29th May 2010 21:12 Post subject: |
|
 |
Having started the game on normal (recruit) after having beat it on hard (field agent), I must say the game plays radically different on the easier difficulty setting.
On hard, the enemies really do have insanely good aim, along with the fact that you pretty much die in one assault rifle burst. All out combat isn't really an option and you're pretty much forced to be stealthy, at least until there's only one or two enemies left. Also, on the hard difficulty setting aborting a mini-game counts as a failure. Therefore, every hack you choose to undertake really means something - and it makes rationing out your EMP charges to skip the mini-game fairly important if you want to remain undetected.
On the flip side of things, the boss fights (and enemies in general) are INSANELY frustrating on hard. They soak bullets like sponges. Given that it favors stealth (and by extension pistols) the boss fights turn into massive trial and error. You can't stealth kill a boss (with the exception of one), and the pistols only really damage them when you critical hit. However, given that the bosses always know where you are, and quite a few of them use melee attacks that you simply can't block or run away from, lining up the critical hits means having to bug the AI.
Basically, normal with run and gun feels much too easy, while hard really kept the adrenaline pumping, but had bullshit cheating boss fights. Tough call, but I still think I prefer hard.
I can never be free, because the shackles I wear can't be touched or be seen.
i9-9900k, MSI MPG-Z390 Gaming Pro Carbon, 32GB DDR4 @ 3000, eVGA GTX 1080 DT, Samsung 970 EVO Plus nVME 1TB
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Werelds
Special Little Man
Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
|
Posted: Sat, 29th May 2010 21:15 Post subject: |
|
 |
iNatan wrote: | And if you take into account that XP is just prettier Windows 2000, and that one was released in 1999 (disregarding betas, which were out in 98 as "NT 5"), and you have a pretty good idea how old XP really is.  |
Actually, if we're going down that road..XP is based on NT Kernel 5.1; Win2K was 5.0 - should've been a better version, but anyone who has actually experienced XP before SP2 knows that it was far from an improvement. I don't know how, but they fucked up the awesomeness that was Win2K
XP being 6 years old is quite accurate, that's when it came out of beta really: SP2 was released in August 2004, that's almost 6 years ago
sausje wrote: | Sorry to bring this up again, but who the fuck uses steam still?  |
Who the fuck still plays WoW?
@ ixigia: didn't fix it for me yet, gonna play more with the INI files to figure this out, because it is fairly annoying 
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sat, 29th May 2010 21:15 Post subject: |
|
 |
Good impressions Immunity. I started my game on Normal and had a bit of the same experience as you. The missions themselves are too easy and I had all the plans in the world to do a playthrough on Hard after that. But when I was about to start up my Hard playthrough I sat at the difficulty screen for a while and thought about how fucking crazy some of the bosses would be. So I decided against it.
Maybe for my third playthrough.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Page 35 of 63 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |