Blizzard: DRM a 'losing battle'
Page 2 of 4 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
dodger2020




Posts: 3537

PostPosted: Wed, 26th May 2010 21:35    Post subject:
zipfero wrote:
man, LAN is dying...you cant really gather up anymore without a powerhouse connection available


Exactly. And that sucks IMO.
Back to top
xDBS




Posts: 1937
Location: USA / Japan
PostPosted: Wed, 26th May 2010 21:35    Post subject:
Valve, Blizzard, and Bioware have no issues selling millions of copies of their games on the so called dead "PC" platform.


PC Specs: A Maganavox' Odyssey
Tweaked to play Frogger, Lemmings & GTA4

----------------------------------------------------------
Back to top
Smikis.




Posts: 1994

PostPosted: Wed, 26th May 2010 21:58    Post subject:
dodger2020 wrote:
Smikis. wrote:


just 3 years ago, 90% of games had this wonderfull thing .. it says " please enter your cd key to continue installation " its basically the same

i cant believe how you making simple things into some nonsensical "blizzard is new ubisoft devil " you guys should look at what you write , all blizzard games had basically no protection , there was disc check.. and cd key check.. same for sc2..

noone uses lan to play anymore, so dont go bsing that lan was biggest feature.. it was smallest one.. if you wanna play with friends, buy the game..



There you go spouting shit and speaking for others, as usual. CD keys were simple. I didn't mind them. I don't mind having to register the game initially like with battlenet. Doesn't bother me.

Lots of people still use lan play. Not everyone has a broadband connection or at least a reliable one. Out here in the boonies we've got a 1.5mbps connection. We're lucky if we get that. And if someone else checks their email, watches a youtube video, downloads a song, etc it makes any online game more or less unplayable.

But them, much like you, saying that lan was irrelevant is bullshit. Just because YOU and your vast army of "friends" might not use it, there are a lot that still do.

Starcraft I could not care less about as I never liked it anyway. But once Diablo comes around, no lan play will probably be my deciding factor on buying it or not as I did for the first two games.

Quote:
if you wanna play with friends, buy the game.... if not.. shut your mouth as you getting single player for free anyway , just like in every other pirated game


Oh, and fuck you for making assumptions. Not everyone complaining about lan play is doing it because they want to play multi without buying it. When we play valve games we host local games or use a local dedicated server (for the ones that support it obviously). That way we avoid having to worry about the shit internet connection here mucking things up.

The no LAN play option has nothing to do with piracy. It has to do with control. If people want to play it multiplayer, they'll find a way.



wow so you saying, you live in some desert ( phun intended )

i dont rly have clue what boonies means, so i googled..
Quote:
American, colloquial word for wilderness or places in the middle of nowhere, far from any civilisation


any way, i was pretty much correct with my desert theory , so in any case you live in country side, without high speed connection, yet you claim to have huge lan in your area? you gotta be shitting me..

and for the fact, very few games uses more than 8kb/s which = 64kbs connection , which is almost same as dialup.. which is 56 kbs, and i just played sc2 custom game, with lots of units , and only once my dl speed went over 1.20 kb/s was 0.8 kb/s untill very end..

so fuck me but 1.5 mbs connection which equals to 192 kb/s , will never be too slow to play sc2 , maybe you ment the ping problem, well every connection is different, but im running torrent with upload 24/7 and not once game felt laggy ..

so unless you actually playing beta, which i doubt, dont go yaping about random shit gonna screw your gaming experience cuz there is no lan, for someone who got noone to lan with ..

how god damn stupid..

And unless its local lan, aka your flat or house, ( in generally made by you, not your provider ) it will be effected by ping.. so running lan when you got 900 ping cuz your provider lane is full, wont fix that issue..
Back to top
locke_digitalus




Posts: 337
Location: The TARDIS
PostPosted: Wed, 26th May 2010 22:03    Post subject:
Calm down Smikis.

And yes, losing LAN is horrible.


Sertorius wrote:
Just be careful to your ass while surfing on the net and NOTHING will happen to you.
Back to top
Racecar101




Posts: 258
Location: somewhere in miami
PostPosted: Wed, 26th May 2010 22:38    Post subject:
Doggie2k wrote:
and thats why I buy blizzard Smile


Name a game other than warcraft 3 worth playing by blizzard then ?

couldn't care less about blizzard tbh and starcraft 2 still isn't even half as good as company of heroes.All blizzard have is WOW nice to have but hey I don't consider them a great pc game maker since warcraft 3.Times have changed.
Back to top
mexeyz




Posts: 239

PostPosted: Wed, 26th May 2010 22:46    Post subject:
Racecar101 wrote:


Name a game other than warcraft 3 worth playing by blizzard then ?

couldn't care less about blizzard tbh and starcraft 2 still isn't even half as good as company of heroes.All blizzard have is WOW nice to have but hey I don't consider them a great pc game maker since warcraft 3.Times have changed.


If you think Diablo franchise is not worth playing i feel safe to say you have some serious issues. No offense.
Back to top
Smikis.




Posts: 1994

PostPosted: Wed, 26th May 2010 22:57    Post subject:
Racecar101 wrote:
Doggie2k wrote:
and thats why I buy blizzard Smile


Name a game other than warcraft 3 worth playing by blizzard then ?

couldn't care less about blizzard tbh and starcraft 2 still isn't even half as good as company of heroes.All blizzard have is WOW nice to have but hey I don't consider them a great pc game maker since warcraft 3.Times have changed.



sc and coh are 2 totally different games

map making > coh or any non blizzard rts for that matter.. when wc3 mods became more popular than yours coh.. i dunno how you can say coh is better than sc2 when sc2 map editor is 5 times more powerful compared to wc3 editor
Back to top
Racecar101




Posts: 258
Location: somewhere in miami
PostPosted: Thu, 27th May 2010 00:05    Post subject:
mexeyz wrote:
Racecar101 wrote:


Name a game other than warcraft 3 worth playing by blizzard then ?

couldn't care less about blizzard tbh and starcraft 2 still isn't even half as good as company of heroes.All blizzard have is WOW nice to have but hey I don't consider them a great pc game maker since warcraft 3.Times have changed.


If you think Diablo franchise is not worth playing i feel safe to say you have some serious issues. No offense.


Like I said it's PAST glory times have changed all they care about is WOW which is why diablo 3 starcraft 2 have taken so long for them to get round to.
Back to top
mexeyz




Posts: 239

PostPosted: Thu, 27th May 2010 00:23    Post subject:
Blizzard ALWAYS took their time before releasing a game, thats why every game they release is a huge success. They want to be sure they have a good product before they release it , thats why it takes so long to release it, and not because of WoW.
Back to top
-=Cartoon=-
VIP Member



Posts: 8823
Location: South Pacific Ocean
PostPosted: Thu, 27th May 2010 03:38    Post subject:
Racecar101 wrote:
mexeyz wrote:
Racecar101 wrote:


Name a game other than warcraft 3 worth playing by blizzard then ?

couldn't care less about blizzard tbh and starcraft 2 still isn't even half as good as company of heroes.All blizzard have is WOW nice to have but hey I don't consider them a great pc game maker since warcraft 3.Times have changed.


If you think Diablo franchise is not worth playing i feel safe to say you have some serious issues. No offense.


Like I said it's PAST glory times have changed all they care about is WOW which is why diablo 3 starcraft 2 have taken so long for them to get round to.


TBH ... Blizzard have ALLLLWAYS taken.. fkn ages to release/dev things.. wow took 5-6 years to make.

Btw i think starcraft 2 is overrated like you.. i much prefer something like COH .. but its not a bad game by any means.. infact for what its trying to be its almost perfect..

+ i play wow still Razz
Back to top
Smikis.




Posts: 1994

PostPosted: Thu, 27th May 2010 03:56    Post subject:
Racecar101 wrote:
mexeyz wrote:
Racecar101 wrote:


Name a game other than warcraft 3 worth playing by blizzard then ?

couldn't care less about blizzard tbh and starcraft 2 still isn't even half as good as company of heroes.All blizzard have is WOW nice to have but hey I don't consider them a great pc game maker since warcraft 3.Times have changed.


If you think Diablo franchise is not worth playing i feel safe to say you have some serious issues. No offense.


Like I said it's PAST glory times have changed all they care about is WOW which is why diablo 3 starcraft 2 have taken so long for them to get round to.



they started developing sc2 right after wc3 frozen throne shipped, which was way before wow release..

diablo 3 was started between 2005-2006 too.. dont have exact time..

and you know they have at least 4 dev teams, wow , sc2, d3, unannounced mmo
Back to top
tiedie




Posts: 680
Location: Florida
PostPosted: Thu, 27th May 2010 04:07    Post subject:
Making users register an account has been around for 10 years or more, It is the best DRM possible...Games I played back then that did this did have single player which if pirated could be played but no one cared about SP, just MP, The games only had cd checks and with a simple crack you didn't need the cd and could play online fine

CD key+ make users register an account, attach CD key to account or you cant play online, done, no need for all this bullshit DRM now days
Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Thu, 27th May 2010 10:10    Post subject:
they started developping d3 right after LOD, almost finished it and then scraped it, because they deemed it not worthy of being released.

Thats what dedication to games means
Back to top
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere



Posts: 65100
Location: Italy
PostPosted: Thu, 27th May 2010 13:19    Post subject:
Ubisoft DRM is 'a good strategy' - Namco

Quote:
Ubisoft's controversial DRM system is "a good strategy" - but only because there is not better alternative, says Namco Bandai Partners VP, Olivier Comte.

Speaking to CVG in Barcelona this month, the Namco man argued that until something better is invented, the Ubisoft system - which requires a constant internet connection - is what the industry has to run with.

"I will be very honest. I think it's a good [approach] for one reason: I have no alternative today," he said. "Is the best one? Certainly not but as of today if I can make something else I'll do it, but it's better to do something than not do something.

"At the moment they are doing a good strategy," he said.

However, Comte - who's company is set to release Test Drive Unlimited 2 and The Witcher 2 on PC - digresses to add that the industry has "to put another system in place".

"We are analysing all of the situations. We have seen what Ubi and EA are doing, we've seen what Sony have announced for PS3 and it's clear that we need to make some choices," he said.

"I'm convinced that whatever system you put in place you can be sure that two hours before putting it out it'll be cracked in Russia. I think that the combat against piracy is very complicated because it's very complicated to explain to a 12-year-old that drag and dropping a file on a PC is piracy - he was born with this."


I'm still surprised at the whopping amount of rubbish a man could emit in a few lines. Laughing


http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=248555
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Thu, 27th May 2010 13:27    Post subject:
Well seeing as how Namco doesn't even MAKE PC games these days, I'd say they're talking a load of shite about a subject they really have no clue about. What was Namco's last PC game? Dead To Rights 2? Kill.Switch? Rolling Eyes

Sod off back to Tekken and/ior Soul Calibur, you one trick ponies and leave PC development and copy protection to the professionals.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73259
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 27th May 2010 13:28    Post subject:
Indeed, making a better games is not an alternative strategy to DRM.
Ah wait, my bad, they only make console crap. >_<


My IMDb Ratings | Fix NFOHump Cookies | Hide Users / Threads | Embedded Content (Videos/GIFs/Twitter/Reddit) | The Derps Collection

Death smiles at us all; all we can do is smile back.


Last edited by LeoNatan on Thu, 27th May 2010 13:30; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Epsilon
Dr. Strangelove



Posts: 9240
Location: War Room
PostPosted: Thu, 27th May 2010 13:29    Post subject:
ixigia wrote:
Ubisoft DRM is 'a good strategy' - Namco

Quote:
Ubisoft's controversial DRM system is "a good strategy" - but only because there is not better alternative, says Namco Bandai Partners VP, Olivier Comte.

Speaking to CVG in Barcelona this month, the Namco man argued that until something better is invented, the Ubisoft system - which requires a constant internet connection - is what the industry has to run with.

"I will be very honest. I think it's a good [approach] for one reason: I have no alternative today," he said. "Is the best one? Certainly not but as of today if I can make something else I'll do it, but it's better to do something than not do something.

"At the moment they are doing a good strategy," he said.

However, Comte - who's company is set to release Test Drive Unlimited 2 and The Witcher 2 on PC - digresses to add that the industry has "to put another system in place".

"We are analysing all of the situations. We have seen what Ubi and EA are doing, we've seen what Sony have announced for PS3 and it's clear that we need to make some choices," he said.

"I'm convinced that whatever system you put in place you can be sure that two hours before putting it out it'll be cracked in Russia. I think that the combat against piracy is very complicated because it's very complicated to explain to a 12-year-old that drag and dropping a file on a PC is piracy - he was born with this."


I'm still surprised at the whopping amount of rubbish a man could emit in a few lines. Laughing


http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=248555

He's also french, like Ubisoft.
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Thu, 27th May 2010 13:33    Post subject:
Besides, the days of Namco making great games died as soon as they let themselves get gobbled up by a fucking TOY COMPANY! You can practically smell the capitalism from them now, just like Ubicunts.
Back to top
Neon
VIP Member



Posts: 18935
Location: Poland
PostPosted: Thu, 27th May 2010 15:00    Post subject:
sabin1981 wrote:
Well seeing as how Namco doesn't even MAKE PC games these days, I'd say they're talking a load of shite about a subject they really have no clue about. What was Namco's last PC game? Dead To Rights 2? Kill.Switch? Rolling Eyes


Well, Namco as the publisher has some influence on protection chosen for the game ( I think) and the biggest title they're publishing right now is The Witcher 2 Sad
Back to top
peter980




Posts: 1977

PostPosted: Thu, 27th May 2010 15:44    Post subject:
Deals with Namco are also a reason why Hasbro is suing Atari for misuse of their D&D license.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73259
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 27th May 2010 16:02    Post subject:
Neon25 wrote:
Well, Namco as the publisher has some influence on protection chosen for the game ( I think) and the biggest title they're publishing right now is The Witcher 2 Sad

Don't worry, I'm sure the Russian version of Witcher 2 will be protected with condom, ehh I mean Starfarce, so it will be cracked fast. Very Happy
Back to top
skytzu




Posts: 195

PostPosted: Thu, 27th May 2010 16:43    Post subject:
well, they should think diferntly. ofcourse good games have a crucial inpact on sales, but, one big reason to people dwnload is that they cant\dont want to pay ridicolous prices for a game

EA new policy to sell online play for 10€ is a nice move and i guess if the games are good it will have big sucess
Back to top
Racecar101




Posts: 258
Location: somewhere in miami
PostPosted: Thu, 27th May 2010 21:10    Post subject:
Sin317 wrote:
they started developping d3 right after LOD, almost finished it and then scraped it, because they deemed it not worthy of being released.

Thats what dedication to games means


Starting making can mean outlining story or even much less than that.

Believe you me the amount they are making out of wow puts everything else on the back burner of course they don't care when they are raking it in from wow.
My hard drive shall remain blizzard product free until they release a good game last one was warcraft 3 I just feel their stuff doesn't belong in this day and age even starcraft 2 feels like warcraft 3 especially in terms of gameplay and fov.


At least 50 of the best pc games of say the last 5 years a blizzard game isn't even anywhere on that top 50 for me.
Back to top
soldat37




Posts: 153

PostPosted: Thu, 27th May 2010 22:08    Post subject:
Real tired of hearing about over hyped PC piracy.Piracy on consoles is just as rampant with mod chips and flashing.This is just a campaign of propaganda,a lame excuse to leave the PC market.
Back to top
todd72173




Posts: 2403

PostPosted: Thu, 27th May 2010 22:39    Post subject:
LAN = obsolete. Maybe LAN was cool in 1990's, but not now. If you dont have access high speed internet, its time for you to move.


RYZEN 5 2600|RADEON 570| |ASRock X370 Killer|DDR4@2800Mhz||Corsair SPEC-05 Case|AOC G2590FX 24.5''144hz 1ms|
Back to top
paketep




Posts: 29

PostPosted: Thu, 27th May 2010 23:31    Post subject:
todd72173 wrote:
LAN = obsolete. Maybe LAN was cool in 1990's, but not now. If you dont have access high speed internet, its time for you to move.


No, it's not. There's more world than New York, New York, you know?. Even in the US, a lot of places are still connecting via Dial-Up.

Everybody saying "hey, I have 100 Mb SDSL, who needs LAN anymore?" should STFU. A lot of people still lack decent Internet and need LAN. Not to mention troops in Iraq, students behind university firewalls and many, many more.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73259
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 27th May 2010 23:34    Post subject:
... Or people who like to have a small tournament in their homes. I know several people who host these "events" where a few friends bring their PCs and they plan on LAN. Seems kind of retarded to have to connect to a remote server in order to play a game locally.
Back to top
Taffelost




Posts: 798

PostPosted: Fri, 28th May 2010 00:52    Post subject:
paketep wrote:
todd72173 wrote:
LAN = obsolete. Maybe LAN was cool in 1990's, but not now. If you dont have access high speed internet, its time for you to move.


No, it's not. There's more world than New York, New York, you know?. Even in the US, a lot of places are still connecting via Dial-Up.

Everybody saying "hey, I have 100 Mb SDSL, who needs LAN anymore?" should STFU. A lot of people still lack decent Internet and need LAN. Not to mention troops in Iraq, students behind university firewalls and many, many more.


Troops in iraq? If that's a viable market segment these days USA needs to chill the fuck down on the occupation business. When you sign up for military duty you give up some civillian liberties other people take for granted. Just saying..
Back to top
-=Cartoon=-
VIP Member



Posts: 8823
Location: South Pacific Ocean
PostPosted: Fri, 28th May 2010 02:15    Post subject:
Racecar101 wrote:
My hard drive shall remain blizzard product free until they release a good game last one was warcraft 3 I


ummm.. they have only released one game since warcraft 3.... (World Of Warcraft)

+ The same people dont work on all the games
Back to top
-=Cartoon=-
VIP Member



Posts: 8823
Location: South Pacific Ocean
PostPosted: Fri, 28th May 2010 02:18    Post subject:
And for the record i think blizzard is one of the most greedy gaming companys there is..

But they make good games Razz
Back to top
Page 2 of 4 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group