Bioware: "JRPGs have a lack of evolution"
Page 3 of 3 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
djaoni




Posts: 8061

PostPosted: Tue, 5th Jan 2010 04:24    Post subject:
It's way too obvious it's a joke in the video, don't take it too seriously. Laughing
Back to top
S.S.S




Posts: 1489

PostPosted: Tue, 5th Jan 2010 04:29    Post subject:
Just remake SHADOWRUN already

That is all Cool

Btw , as much as i love them and think they are a great company , Bioware need to STFU or bring the evolution themselves. Their latest children , Dragon Age , while a good game is still a total cliche and ripoff of what has been done before. No evolution there at all. It has the gameplay mechanic of NWN combined with the lore of LOTR or close bto.

I'll give them that KOTOR , Jade Empire and Mass Effect were innovative but now let's see if they fall into the same redundancy that they accuse the JRPGs of. Because after all , Final Fantasy was once an innovative game as well/
Back to top
-=Cartoon=-
VIP Member



Posts: 8823
Location: South Pacific Ocean
PostPosted: Tue, 5th Jan 2010 05:54    Post subject:
djaoni wrote:
It's way too obvious it's a joke in the video, don't take it too seriously. Laughing


Of course it is.

But he comes across as a complete twat and not very funny Very Happy
Back to top
LuckyStrike




Posts: 1753
Location: Somewhere in the Portuguese Colonial Empire
PostPosted: Mon, 25th Jan 2010 23:16    Post subject:
Even by publicity and marketing stunts standards (trying to be controversial to get some attention), this gay is a total complete, moron fail.

No im not defending jrps, wich some of then are icons of gaming, anyway, Im just shocked to this amazing new level of stupidity, wow. And some ppl actually agreed with him, amazing. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
DraySpittle




Posts: 1104

PostPosted: Mon, 25th Jan 2010 23:54    Post subject:
Sorry but Bioware does have room to talk.


They're doing series now where what you do in one game impacts the next even before you've played a single mission. They may keep the fundamentals of their games the same, (I don't think he was saying JRPGs need a complete facelift) but that's still pretty revolutionary.
Back to top
Spiderman
Banned



Posts: 5877

PostPosted: Tue, 26th Jan 2010 01:57    Post subject:
DraySpittle wrote:
Sorry but Bioware does have room to talk.


They're doing series now where what you do in one game impacts the next even before you've played a single mission. They may keep the fundamentals of their games the same, (I don't think he was saying JRPGs need a complete facelift) but that's still pretty revolutionary.
orly then what about Quest of Glory , Wizardy and Ishar... made the story continuation evolution WAY before bioware knew how to do it
Back to top
DraySpittle




Posts: 1104

PostPosted: Tue, 26th Jan 2010 02:09    Post subject:
Yes but comparing a game like Ishar and Quest of Glory to a game like Mass Effect is like comparing a supercomputer to a basic calculator.

Hell, you might as well argue that "choose your own adventure" novels have Bioware beat.


NO LINKS TO ILLEGAL STUFF IN SIGS - DLC IS ILLEGAL TOO
Back to top
EwarWoo1




Posts: 868

PostPosted: Tue, 26th Jan 2010 02:33    Post subject:
DraySpittle wrote:
Yes but comparing a game like Ishar and Quest of Glory to a game like Mass Effect is like comparing a supercomputer to a basic calculator.

Hell, you might as well argue that "choose your own adventure" novels have Bioware beat.

But he's not comparing them. He's saying the feature isn't revolutionary it's already in some games.
Back to top
Spiderman
Banned



Posts: 5877

PostPosted: Tue, 26th Jan 2010 11:18    Post subject:
DraySpittle why are not complaining here about graphics, story presentation nor comparing them . Like it was said story continuation isn't revolutionary and it was allready implemented in the best 3 RPGs ever made... but Bioware thinks different they say they made IT and blames Jrpgs for not having this feature , thats why they say Jrpg lack evolution ..... LULZ
Back to top
DraySpittle




Posts: 1104

PostPosted: Tue, 26th Jan 2010 22:51    Post subject:
Perhaps both of us have misunderstood one another. I never said that what Bioware is doing is unprecedented.. But Mass Effect 2 is the first modern, major title that incorporates what you did in the previous game and changes your experience based on those decisions.

Even if you want to argue semantics with me the fact still stands that for the past 10 years Bioware didn't incorporate your choices from one game to another (take Baldur's Gate and Baldur's Gate 2 for example) and now that's changing. So they're evolving whether what they're doing has precedent or not.
Back to top
DrHobo




Posts: 140

PostPosted: Tue, 26th Jan 2010 23:35    Post subject:
DraySpittle wrote:
Perhaps both of us have misunderstood one another. I never said that what Bioware is doing is unprecedented.. But Mass Effect 2 is the first modern, major title that incorporates what you did in the previous game and changes your experience based on those decisions.

Even if you want to argue semantics with me the fact still stands that for the past 10 years Bioware didn't incorporate your choices from one game to another (take Baldur's Gate and Baldur's Gate 2 for example) and now that's changing. So they're evolving whether what they're doing has precedent or not.


Even though that's true, this thing is only a very recent trend from them. Up to this point, their games didn't really evolve much. And if all that'd have made them successful was evolution, I don't think they'd be around to incorporate these kind of changes into their newer games. Hence the hypocrisy.
As I said I still love their games, but I sure as hell didn't hold them in high esteem because of their revolutioary game designs, but instead, the "same old, but reliable and entertaining" kind of storytelling and game system they provided.

Another, somewhat unrelated point: with all this "streamlining" (aka. dumbing down), can one really consider Mass Effect 2 an "evolutionary step" so to speak?
Back to top
djaoni




Posts: 8061

PostPosted: Tue, 26th Jan 2010 23:47    Post subject:
DrHobo wrote:
Another, somewhat unrelated point: with all this "streamlining" (aka. dumbing down), can one really consider Mass Effect 2 an "evolutionary step" so to speak?


For shooters you could.. RPGs not really.
Back to top
Page 3 of 3 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group