Command & Conquer 4
Page 3 of 14 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 12, 13, 14  Next
Stinky244




Posts: 623
Location: Estonia
PostPosted: Fri, 24th Jul 2009 09:22    Post subject:
dezztroy wrote:
P90s.. Couldn't the come up with anything different than old chinese smgs?


OT: P90s arent chinese SMGs. Their Belgium made and also why change something that works? They are one of the best SMGs and the game isnt set in the too far future for those weapons to have no effect. Take for example the M16 rifle. It was made in the year 1964 and it is still being used to this day. P90 was made in the year 1994 so 70 years in the service isnt that bad Smile
Back to top
dezztroy




Posts: 6590
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Fri, 24th Jul 2009 09:30    Post subject:
Must've been thinking of another gun when I said chinese. Yeah, it's not too far in the future, but if they have functional rail-guns, don't you think they'd be using something heavier for their soldiers? A p90, even though it is a pretty good SMG, can't be too effective against NODs cyborgs and such.
Back to top
Devi-Lee




Posts: 659
Location: Slovenia
PostPosted: Fri, 24th Jul 2009 09:48    Post subject:
To me it looks like they couldn't bother to come up with some original prop and just used fake P90s. This probably means the game will have a slightly upgraded C&C 3 engine and will be just more of the same.
Back to top
madmax17




Posts: 19348
Location: Croatia
PostPosted: Fri, 24th Jul 2009 10:22    Post subject:
I predicted the downfall of many games but they are making it to easy for me on this one Laughing my god it's gonna suck spider balls..
Back to top
Karmeck




Posts: 3348
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Fri, 24th Jul 2009 12:35    Post subject:
Back to top
dezztroy




Posts: 6590
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Fri, 24th Jul 2009 13:47    Post subject:
Last page bro.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Mon, 3rd Aug 2009 11:21    Post subject:
Back to top
madmax17




Posts: 19348
Location: Croatia
PostPosted: Mon, 3rd Aug 2009 13:14    Post subject:
What's new about them more frickin' laser-fest







Laughing
stupid lasers
Back to top
JBeckman
VIP Member



Posts: 34978
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Fri, 21st Aug 2009 18:53    Post subject:
http://worthplaying.com/article.php?sid=65484

Now called "Command & Conquer 4: Tiberian Twilight"
Back to top
dezztroy




Posts: 6590
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Fri, 21st Aug 2009 18:54    Post subject:
Wasn't CnC3 supposed to be called that?
Back to top
$n@ke




Posts: 917
Location: the Netherlands
PostPosted: Fri, 21st Aug 2009 19:25    Post subject:
JBeckman wrote:
http://worthplaying.com/article.php?sid=65484

Now called "Command & Conquer 4: Tiberian Twilight"


Wow, original Rolling Eyes

dezztroy wrote:
Wasn't CnC3 supposed to be called that?


Yes, the never made Westwood version.
Back to top
clragon




Posts: 470

PostPosted: Fri, 21st Aug 2009 20:30    Post subject:
JBeckman wrote:
http://worthplaying.com/article.php?sid=65484

Now called "Command & Conquer 4: Tiberian Twilight"


are they trying to get more fan girls for the C&C series?
Back to top
Aeon




Posts: 8700
Location: Netherlands
PostPosted: Sat, 22nd Aug 2009 01:11    Post subject:
C&C 4 is gonna be awesome. I played it today on the GamesCom.


Intel i7 6700K, RTX470 Super, Kingston HyperX Fury 32GB
Back to top
dezztroy




Posts: 6590
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Sat, 22nd Aug 2009 01:21    Post subject:
How long did you play for?
Back to top
Aeon




Posts: 8700
Location: Netherlands
PostPosted: Sat, 22nd Aug 2009 12:48    Post subject:
Uhm about an hour, played two mission. Introduction mission and another one. The were like 40 pc s in the Lounge room to play C&C 4 Very Happy


Intel i7 6700K, RTX470 Super, Kingston HyperX Fury 32GB
Back to top
JBeckman
VIP Member



Posts: 34978
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Sat, 22nd Aug 2009 15:16    Post subject:
http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,693277/Command-und-Conquer-4-without-LAN-support/News/

It hasn't been decided yet but LAN might end up being unsupported in this title as well.
Back to top
vinniec7




Posts: 223
Location: USA
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Aug 2009 21:47    Post subject:
Charge more and get less , nothing new with EA..
EA MAY RETIRE ONLINE FEATURES AFTER 30 DAYS NOTICE POSTED ON www.ea.com.
luv seeing that with BF1943, considering its an online only game.....atleast buy me a beer first....


ASUS M3A32-MVP Deluxe- AMD 64x2 6000 windsor 125w- 4 gig OCZ gold ddr 800- nvidia MSI 8800gt 512 OC- Audigy 2zs platinum- WD 250g sata 3 16mb -1 liteon dvd r/w non combo- Vista ultimate x64 -Antec 900 gamer -Coolmaster pro 650 psu
Back to top
dezztroy




Posts: 6590
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Mon, 24th Aug 2009 21:54    Post subject:
Wait.. What?
Back to top
Glottis
Banned



Posts: 6313

PostPosted: Mon, 24th Aug 2009 21:56    Post subject:
vinniec7 wrote:
Charge more and get less , nothing new with EA..
EA MAY RETIRE ONLINE FEATURES AFTER 30 DAYS NOTICE POSTED ON www.ea.com.
luv seeing that with BF1943, considering its an online only game.....atleast buy me a beer first....

Drugs are bad Crying or Very sad


C2D E6750 @ 3.2Ghz, 4GB 800MHz DDR2 4-4-4-12, GeForce GTX 260 c216 OC 896MB, 3.2TB, Windows 7 Ultimate x64

Xbox 360 Elite, PS2 Slim, Xbox
Back to top
JBeckman
VIP Member



Posts: 34978
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Thu, 12th Nov 2009 17:17    Post subject:
Back to top
xyzg




Posts: 1835

PostPosted: Thu, 12th Nov 2009 17:51    Post subject:
JBeckman wrote:
March 2010.
http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/61218


looking forward to it even though this franchaise lost it's sparkle some time ago.
Back to top
_ULTiMA_




Posts: 74

PostPosted: Fri, 13th Nov 2009 11:22    Post subject:
Back to top
ShadowB




Posts: 894

PostPosted: Fri, 13th Nov 2009 14:34    Post subject:
Is there any innovation compared to C&C3? It looks like the exact same game.
Back to top
madmax17




Posts: 19348
Location: Croatia
PostPosted: Fri, 13th Nov 2009 14:47    Post subject:
Laughing that looks so bad it actually hurt my eyes, a very rare achievement unlocked by EA!
Back to top
Glottis
Banned



Posts: 6313

PostPosted: Sun, 13th Dec 2009 04:46    Post subject:
Beta keys for everyone http://www.gamespot.com/test/command-conquer-4/index.php?tag=topslot;title;1


C2D E6750 @ 3.2Ghz, 4GB 800MHz DDR2 4-4-4-12, GeForce GTX 260 c216 OC 896MB, 3.2TB, Windows 7 Ultimate x64

Xbox 360 Elite, PS2 Slim, Xbox
Back to top
dezztroy




Posts: 6590
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Sun, 13th Dec 2009 04:48    Post subject:
Yeah, found that today too. It's amazing how they've managed to ruin CnC this much.
Back to top
SpykeZ




Posts: 23710

PostPosted: Sun, 13th Dec 2009 05:22    Post subject:
_ULTiMA_ wrote:
http://www.gametrailers.com/video/exclusive-mechanics-command/58968
... Mad


.....what the fuck was that... lol

They apparently got rid of infantry...probably couldn't stand up to the 2390472 lasers being shot everywhere.

lol oh well, not like I had any hopes for CnC after generals was made


Back to top
JBeckman
VIP Member



Posts: 34978
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Sun, 13th Dec 2009 07:15    Post subject:
Cool, managed to get a key, will be interesting to see how it performs and plays.
Back to top
Epsilon
Dr. Strangelove



Posts: 9240
Location: War Room
PostPosted: Sun, 13th Dec 2009 07:44    Post subject:
Haha it looks like utter shit, from the animations which seem jerky, to the lack of persistant damage on the earth, eventhough units dig right through it and deploy(dig) into it.

Not to mention that they still seem to be in 1996, it's just not that original or interesting to watch 12 tanks battle it out on the screen anymore. It seems to be a restriction they willfully accept to develop the game for people who are 'new' at the strategy genre.
Back to top
JBeckman
VIP Member



Posts: 34978
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Sun, 13th Dec 2009 07:50    Post subject:
Well from reading the beta forums there's quite a bit of complaining about the various game elements such as only having the single "Crawler" being your entire base and that you can just respawn it if it were to die plus that you don't need to manage resources aside from a population capacity, seems to be more focused on "action" or battles than strategy this time, quicker more direct skirmishes instead of longer matches or how to describe it.
Back to top
Page 3 of 14 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 12, 13, 14  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group