Page 1 of 1 |
CaptainCox
VIP Member
Posts: 6823
Location: A Swede in Germany (FaM)
|
Posted: Mon, 27th Oct 2008 08:51 Post subject: Skipping 1st gen 1366 Nehalem What to get? |
|
 |
Decided to skip the first gen of Nehalem "1366" and stick with my Rampage Formula board "775".
Have a E8500 at the mo @4GHz. But i am thinking to get a Quad. Hoping they will drop a bit in price when the new Nehalem's comes out in a few weeks.
Question is which one to get that can OC well?.
I would not go for a Extreme but.
But thinking one of these maybe
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 4x2.83GHz
or
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 4x3.0GHz
Anyone have experience OCing those, and where would one hit the ceiling with them.
Just checked the price on
Intel Core i7 940 4x2.93GHz 699,99 €
WOW
Not out for another four weeks but (on the German site i checked)
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Epsilon
Dr. Strangelove
Posts: 9240
Location: War Room
|
Posted: Mon, 27th Oct 2008 13:42 Post subject: |
|
 |
Yeah I'm doing the same thing, got a Q9450
It's also best to wait for later revisions of the new motherboards.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 27th Oct 2008 19:54 Post subject: |
|
 |
My bro has his 9550 at 3.6Ghz with the vcore bumped to 1.275 but it was putting out a ton of heat so he opted to go with another cooling solution. Most people seem to be able to hit at least 3.4-3.6Ghz on air easily.
I don't see the need to push them any farther than that though.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 27th Oct 2008 19:57 Post subject: |
|
 |
I'd say wait. The E8500 is still perfectly fine. Nothing uses quad core anyways. So basically, wait until the current LGA775 quad-cores become shit cheap like a half year from now.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CaptainCox
VIP Member
Posts: 6823
Location: A Swede in Germany (FaM)
|
Posted: Mon, 27th Oct 2008 20:19 Post subject: |
|
 |
Hm, by then I will probably go for what ever comes after i7...i8 maybe . I will at least update my rig like late next year...i guess.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 29th Oct 2008 00:32 Post subject: |
|
 |
As Mchart already said, your dual core cpu @ 4000 Mhz outperforms a quadcore (which is nearly impossible to oc to 4 Ghz on air) in 99% of all things you most likely do.
It`s simple: When you don`t have an idea why you`d need a quadcore - you don`t need a quadcore.
I bet your rig is even way faster than the nehalems when they hit the market.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CaptainCox
VIP Member
Posts: 6823
Location: A Swede in Germany (FaM)
|
Posted: Wed, 29th Oct 2008 08:14 Post subject: |
|
 |
Cheers AwE. Your comments are always taken with gratitude here. I feel a bit calmer now . I guess I will save my money and go for that 30" Dell instead.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Tue, 4th Nov 2008 14:34 Post subject: |
|
 |
Would be sad if their would be NO huge difference.
But for Games it`s useless.
I`m impatiently waiting for first user benchmarks. I bet a Nehalem at stock won`t beat any core2duo@4GHz.
If you look at the realworld benchmarks that doesn`t highly profit from multicore support even a 8400@stock comes close.
At least it`s absolutely not cost efficient if you don`t use your rig mainly for multicore optimized tasks.
And look at their game benchmarks:
1680x1050 - I mean cmon.... pffffff....
and: I7 at 3.84 Ghz but no overclocked core2duo benchmarks?!
But what would you expect from Toms Hardware...
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fwb73
Posts: 293
Location: sheffield, england
|
Posted: Tue, 4th Nov 2008 20:30 Post subject: |
|
 |
check the reviews on guru3d, makes some interesting reading
http://www.guru3d.com/article/core-i7-multigpu-sli-crossfire-game-performance-review/
intel i7 3770k @4.4, ASRock Z77 Extreme 4, 16GB Corsiar Vengance 1600 ram, ATI 5850 BE, Antec 1 Case, Antec 1 550W PSU, emu0404, 120gb agility3 ssd OS, 2x60gbvertex2raid0 Games, 3 TB total sata2 Data. win7 x64.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Tue, 4th Nov 2008 22:35 Post subject: |
|
 |
very interesting, thx for the link.
Looks like the i7 will stomp the core2duo IF gpu is not bottlenecking.
Now make that benchmarks with a core2duo @ 4 Ghz and I am happy.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CaptainCox
VIP Member
Posts: 6823
Location: A Swede in Germany (FaM)
|
Posted: Tue, 4th Nov 2008 22:38 Post subject: |
|
 |
AwE wrote: | very interesting, thx for the link.
Looks like the i7 will stomp the core2duo IF gpu is not bottlenecking.
Now make that benchmarks with a core2duo @ 4 Ghz and I am happy. | +1
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CaptainCox
VIP Member
Posts: 6823
Location: A Swede in Germany (FaM)
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Page 1 of 1 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |