Star Control: Origins (Stardock)
Page 4 of 4 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
qqq




Posts: 1518

PostPosted: Thu, 3rd Jan 2019 09:38    Post subject:
So reading that forum, basically Wardell just aquired the name Star Control and absolutely nothing else. Then procedeed to make a game thinking he would get a license. I mean, he lost in court.

Anyway, Wardell is an idiot of monstrous proportions. I've had interactions with him on their own forum during the Ashes of the Singularity developent. He is so breathtakingly stupid ive wanted in more than one instance to somehow reach through the monitor and bitchslap him upside the head. He just seems like and all around cretin, in every way possible. I cant say i'm sad hes getting ownd
Back to top
AmpegV4




Posts: 6248

PostPosted: Thu, 3rd Jan 2019 09:46    Post subject:
Not at all relevant but I can't believe how successful the guy is i.e he hasn't somehow destroyed himself and company after all this time. At times you need to back yourself and double-down on tough decisions but this guy just goes so much further, he proper embodies total asshole. Far from incompitant, idiot / stupid though.. his posts hint some closet genius for sure.



Was going to say he's probably an Audi driver but quick google shows he owns a black Tesla and Porsche 911 turbo Laughing

Another sad thing about companies and the wealthy.. he will stay a rich fat cat regardless if his company folds. Only employees wind up shit outta luck


Last edited by AmpegV4 on Thu, 3rd Jan 2019 10:02; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
prudislav
VIP Member



Posts: 29148
Location: The land of beer and porn
PostPosted: Thu, 3rd Jan 2019 09:47    Post subject:
they got IP and Assets from Atari which now owns Accolade whohired the two guys to created it as contractors. See Star Control 3 which was created by someone else because they were not interested.
Its definitely not that simple .... in the end its all about pride, egos and spitegame on both sides for the marketing wordings and messy treadmarks/copyrights


http://i.imgur.com/SYIa3w4.png
http://i.imgur.com/PtROKGv.gif
Sometimes i just want to see NFOHUMP burn \o/
Back to top
red_avatar




Posts: 4567

PostPosted: Thu, 3rd Jan 2019 09:54    Post subject:
AmpegV4 wrote:

So far Pro-Stardock Argument list:
- P&F should have kickstarted their own game and given all their IP and royalties up. Both stupid & Irrelevant.
- P&F should have made a sequel in the last 20 yrs, I didn't get my game so they are cunts.


Nor stupid nor irrelevant - it shows they have no intention to make a game of their own despite their empty promises. It shows ill will towards their fans when they just lie to their faces. Their "announcement" of a sequel was just being spiteful.

And they're not being cunts for not having made a sequel, they're cunts for constantly over the past 20 years saying they WANT to make a sequel but never doing so even when the opportunity turns up - crowdfunding clearly was a viable option but they prefer to use it to fight legal battles which is another slap in the face of fans. Only an utter moron would not see the issue here. Frankly, I'm tired of them crying wolf and going "Well we WANT to make a sequel, but no-one wants to fund us" when that's utterly bullshit.

AmpegV4 wrote:

- They didn't create the original games. lmfao let's see how that argument holds up in court.

That certainly wasn't said by me - but they didn't create Star Control 3 which DID use all the same races and names. Funny thing is: TfB kept bitching afterwards how they had wished they had made it and were not happy with the result. Sounds like SC:O to me except Stardock wanted them on-board and they were the ones to refuse.

AmpegV4 wrote:

- DMCA takedown of a game currently tied into a multi-million dollar copyright lawsuit which has also been reviewed through the judicial system and recognized as a valid request, DMCA is evil no matter what P&F are cunts.


DMCA is a tool for companies who only discover copyright infringements AFTER they have appeared on the market. It's NOT for cunts like TfB who got asked to join the project, refused, then waited for it to go on sale and THEN slap it with DMCA. That's DMCA abuse and again only a moron would not see that.

AmpegV4 wrote:

- Ignore Stardock hostile attempt to trademark IP names they know they have no right to.
- Ignore Stardock attempt trick UQM administrators to hand over full control of their site.
- Ignore Stardock attempt to bury community /r/starcontrol with /r/starcontrolofficial.
- Ignore Stardock deleting any opinion in any forum they have control of that doesn't fit with their narrative.

Yeah, both were being cunts here. Stardock tried to approach them to work together, they repeatedly refused so Stardock tried to take the IP by a dickish way as well. But TfB still don't get off scott free here - once again they had a chance to make a sequel and they didn't.

But, most of this is Stardock trying to establish a kind of control over the IP -

AmpegV4 wrote:

- Ignore Arilou & Chenjesu DLC + other, infringement on the level of putting Star Wars, Jedi and the Enterprise in the game.

Ignore DLC that has been cancelled and never heard of again - what a hard task to do *rolls eyes* They retracted it for a reason so it's not an infringement. And for the Star Wars and Star Trek thing: proof please since this is the first I heard about it. Unless you're being so daft to include user-made Workshop stuff but that would be ridiculous.
Back to top
AmpegV4




Posts: 6248

PostPosted: Thu, 3rd Jan 2019 09:54    Post subject:
Quote:

==1995==

May 8
Accolade and Paul Reiche agree to another addendum to the license agreement allowing Accolade to create Star Control III, licensing some characters and content from Star Control & Star Control II, owned by Reiche in exchange for an advance and royalties. (2)

==1996==

August 31
Accolade releases Star Control III, developed by Legend Entertainment.


As in they had to meet with P&F to ask for a license for some IP to spruce up a game that was poorly recieved. Also pay them royalties for the new work.

Quote:

all these 2 ever was remastered and remixed soundtrack and wallpaper , all licensed/recreated by OG artist ands its not happening anyway, but shure this on level of Jedi in Star Trek


Either way shows intent, its a far cry from Brad "states that Stardock wouldn’t use any of the lore or races from Star Control & Star Control II without their permission".

Quote:

Nor stupid nor irrelevant - it shows they have no intention to make a game of their own despite their empty promises.


ya dude that's irrelevant, how is your need for them to make you a game have anything to do with the legal merits of this case? Anyway we starting to super-derail now. However please do post any official news as it comes out for interest.
Back to top
AnarchoS




Posts: 2142
Location: An Archos
PostPosted: Thu, 3rd Jan 2019 10:53    Post subject:
I read through a little bit:

So they are designers and not, the creators because the product was not crated only by them, but a team of people, the artwork, the alien races and ship designs. And the game production was commissioned and payed for by Acollade.

Stardock has the trademark on the games, so only they can sell anything Star control related including alien races, designers were offered many times to buy the tm but refused, and then announced new game, they don't have tm for, just to damage the sale of Origins.

The law suit is only about tm rights, which designers never had but want for free.


A.F.A.
Back to top
0wen




Posts: 3566

PostPosted: Thu, 3rd Jan 2019 17:23    Post subject:
If anyone really feels like they are missing out you can still buy the Steam version from Stardock directly. It is $20 currently on sale.

https://www.stardock.com/games/starcontrol/store#purchase
Back to top
AmpegV4




Posts: 6248

PostPosted: Thu, 3rd Jan 2019 21:54    Post subject:
Back to top
prudislav
VIP Member



Posts: 29148
Location: The land of beer and porn
PostPosted: Thu, 3rd Jan 2019 22:07    Post subject:
lol autopilot and radar


http://i.imgur.com/SYIa3w4.png
http://i.imgur.com/PtROKGv.gif
Sometimes i just want to see NFOHUMP burn \o/
Back to top
blackdochia




Posts: 4377
Location: 9th Circle of Hell
PostPosted: Fri, 4th Jan 2019 11:19    Post subject:
This is getting more retarded by the day...
Back to top
red_avatar




Posts: 4567

PostPosted: Fri, 4th Jan 2019 11:49    Post subject:
prudislav wrote:
lol autopilot and radar


Westwood could have sued MANY developers back in the day by this attitude. Several lawsuits have already proven that you can almost completely copy a game and it's OK as long as you just use the mechanics and not the actual IP like names and such. They mention a few uses of words like that but their case even there is pretty weak:

Hyperspace = invented long before SC2

Truespace = another name for Real Space, a very old concept in scifi but this has some merit at least. Stardock added a space but it's still very similar although the concept is not original.

Vindicator = Vindicator is an English word from the dictionary and past lawsuits have proven this has no strength in court.

All the other stuff is perfectly legal. There's been thousands of games made that are very close copies of old games and early lawsuits have created enough precedents that this is allowed. Think of the hundreds of XCOM, Command & Conquer, Doom, etc. clones!

I'll say it again: these two cunts are really massive assholes who had decades to make a sequel, kept lying to their fans about wanting to just to get some extra attention and when another company finally makes a spiritual successor (a project they refused to join despite being invited), they try to ruin it for everyone. Seriously, they can go fuck off.
Back to top
djaoni




Posts: 8061

PostPosted: Fri, 4th Jan 2019 12:53    Post subject:
You're next, Epic!
Back to top
red_avatar




Posts: 4567

PostPosted: Fri, 4th Jan 2019 13:38    Post subject:
Laughing

But yeah, this is how easy it is to make these lists. TfB seem completely lost in what is allowed and what isn't by making a list like that - there's been tons of spiritual successors to all sorts of classics over the years that are near identical to the original games:

https://store.steampowered.com/app/534290/Cursed_Castilla_Maldita_Castilla_EX/
Ghost Goblins

https://store.steampowered.com/app/223830/Xenonauts/
XCOM

https://store.steampowered.com/app/692850/Bloodstained__Ritual_of_the_Night/
Castlevania

https://store.steampowered.com/app/535930/Two_Point_Hospital/
Theme Hospital

https://store.steampowered.com/app/230190/War_for_the_Overworld/
Dungeon Keeper

https://store.steampowered.com/app/268870/Satellite_Reign/
Syndicate

Note how the last 3 are IPs owned by EA. If EA won't stoop so low to DMCA these games, then what does this say about Toys for Bob? Going more evil than EA ... dear fucking lord.
Back to top
Frant
King's Bounty



Posts: 24687
Location: Your Mom
PostPosted: Sat, 5th Jan 2019 01:04    Post subject:
red_avatar wrote:
Laughing


https://store.steampowered.com/app/268870/Satellite_Reign/
Syndicate



Holy frog, that looks like a Syndicate-based sequel/prequel if I've ever seen one. Reviews are mixed (but a lot of the complaints are about the point-and-click system which the originals had so...). Might check it out since I loved Syndicate on the Amiga and Syndicate 2 on the PC (never finished either of them, they were simply too hard at times for me).


Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!

"The sky was the color of a TV tuned to a dead station" - Neuromancer
Back to top
Frant
King's Bounty



Posts: 24687
Location: Your Mom
PostPosted: Sat, 5th Jan 2019 01:08    Post subject:
red_avatar wrote:
https://store.steampowered.com/app/534290/Cursed_Castilla_Maldita_Castilla_EX/
Ghost Goblins


If that isn't a total ripoff of Ghosts'n'Goblins my nick isn't Frant. It's even using the same sounds for the music as the original arcade from 1985. Looks somewhat dull and boring in comparison to the original arcade (which I loved and finished once (not on the arcade but in MAME, otherwise it would've cost me a fortune as a kid)). One if not my biggest favorite arcade game that I spent a lot of coins on (Gauntlet, Bomb Jack etc. also stole a lot of my sparse money in those days).


Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!

"The sky was the color of a TV tuned to a dead station" - Neuromancer


Last edited by Frant on Sat, 5th Jan 2019 01:29; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Frant
King's Bounty



Posts: 24687
Location: Your Mom
PostPosted: Sat, 5th Jan 2019 01:19    Post subject:
Regarding Star Control: Origins, is it a good/fun game?


Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!

"The sky was the color of a TV tuned to a dead station" - Neuromancer
Back to top
VGAdeadcafe




Posts: 22230
Location: ★ ಠ_ಠ ★
PostPosted: Sat, 5th Jan 2019 01:41    Post subject:
Frant wrote:
Regarding Star Control: Origins, is it a good/fun game?

The general consensus is Yes.
Back to top
Frant
King's Bounty



Posts: 24687
Location: Your Mom
PostPosted: Sat, 5th Jan 2019 01:43    Post subject:
Thanks. Then I'll check out the Iso-demo and wait for a sale or similar if I like it. Smile


Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!

"The sky was the color of a TV tuned to a dead station" - Neuromancer
Back to top
Page 4 of 4 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group