| Page 3 of 4 |
JBeckman
VIP Member
Posts: 34998
Location: Sweden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JBeckman
VIP Member
Posts: 34998
Location: Sweden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thudo
Posts: 6309
Location: Mellonville North, Canada
|
 Posted: Fri, 2nd Jun 2017 04:12 Post subject: |
|
|
Guess one's word stands for d*ck when you are outed for your r*tard protection guarantee only to be shown what a nard they were to make one. 
MSI GT72S 6QF Dominator Pro S 29th Anniversary Intel i7 6820HK @ 4.0Ghz, 32GB DDR4-2133 RAM, 2x256GB Raid0 Toshiba NVMe 2.5 inch PCIe SSD, Nvidia Geforce GTX 980 OC'ed 200+ Core / 200+ Mem, 17.3 inch LG IPS HD Display @ 75Hz, Intel 7265AC Wifi, Windows 10 Pro BIOS version: .112 EC Firmware version: .105
Current Broadband speed record: 329.1 Mb/sec down // 21.73 Mb/sec up
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/3933292.png
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Jun 2017 06:33 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Jun 2017 08:18 Post subject: |
|
|
Well it runs okay for me. 1080p with DSR, everything maxed. 60 fps (rivatuner, not "eye measure")
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Jun 2017 08:24 Post subject: |
|
|
It drops lower than 60 fps on my rig when maxed out at 1920x1200 which is unacceptable for this kind of graphics. I had to set shadows to medium.
1) Lenovo Legion 7 (AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, RTX 3080 16Gb, 32Gb DDR4, SSD 1TB +2TB
2) SFFPC (streaming via Moonlight+ Sunshine)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Jun 2017 09:23 Post subject: |
|
|
Yes but a 1080Ti not running this game with solid 60fps is not acceptable, we are talking here now the best gaming card you can get. If the devs are so incompetent these days, so they cannot code their shit that it runs on best hardware 60fps, maybe they should start thinking leave the business and go work to mcdonalds or something.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JackQ
Non-expret in Derps lagunge
Posts: 14186
Location: Kibbutznik, Israel
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Jun 2017 09:40 Post subject: |
|
|
| tet666 wrote: | | prudislav wrote: | | Rime.v1.0.Crack.V3.by.BALDMAN |
!
| BALDMAN wrote: | "In Rime that ugly creature went out of control - how do you like three fucking hundreds of THOUSANDS calls to "triggers"
during initial game launch and savegame loading? Did you wonder why game loading times are so long - here is the answer 
In previous games like Sgw3, Nier, Prey there were only about 1000 "triggers" called, so we have x300 here.
Next - 300,000 called "triggers" were just warmup for Denuvo, after 30 minutes of gameplay it became 2 fucking MILLIONS of
called "triggers". Protection now calls about 10-30 triggers every second during actual gameplay, slowing game down.
In previous games like Sgw3, Nier, Prey there were only about 1-2 "triggers" called every several minutes during gameplay, so do the math.
Don't forget that triggers is under VM and heavily obfuscated, which obviously does not improve perfomance" |
Yeah so much for Denuvo not affecting legit users...
|
Speaking of Which,that's also pretty much a huge blow to "Denuvo not hurting performances" crap arguments we heard for years now From Denuvo and other people, And huge blow to Denuvo's reputation.
We just need more and more games getting cracked and people comparing performances.
Thank 100x times Baldman  , For confirming that truth by straightly telling it.
What would you expect? The fucking protection heavily using the VM,It would be
NECESSARY slow down things at some degree, Also they are the same guys who made
"SecuR"OM.
"Fuck Denuvo"
Your personal opinions != the rest of the forum
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Jun 2017 10:29 Post subject: |
|
|
Get the CODEX version or wait for the developers to release the denuvo-less version?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
prudislav
VIP Member
Posts: 29148
Location: The land of beer and porn
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Jun 2017 10:33 Post subject: |
|
|
ˆCodex version is already the version where devs patched denuvo out
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Jun 2017 10:57 Post subject: |
|
|
http://kotaku.com/pirates-say-rimes-drm-slows-down-the-game-but-denuvo-d-1795738625
| Quote: |
Denuvo, for its part, deny that DRM causes any issues at all.
“Prior to release, we performed benchmark testing on the protected vs. unprotected versions of Rime,” a representative of Denuvo told Kotaku. “There was no performance impact on the version that is protected with Denuvo anti tamper vs. the unprotected version.” |
1) Lenovo Legion 7 (AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, RTX 3080 16Gb, 32Gb DDR4, SSD 1TB +2TB
2) SFFPC (streaming via Moonlight+ Sunshine)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Jun 2017 11:22 Post subject: |
|
|
| prudislav wrote: | | ˆCodex version is already the version where devs patched denuvo out |
Ohh cool, thanks!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JackQ
Non-expret in Derps lagunge
Posts: 14186
Location: Kibbutznik, Israel
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
StEFaN7
Posts: 5908
Location: them swamps
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Jun 2017 11:58 Post subject: |
|
|
im surprised they removed the drm since baldman isnt scene
I can see your soul at the edges of your eyes..
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JackQ
Non-expret in Derps lagunge
Posts: 14186
Location: Kibbutznik, Israel
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Jun 2017 12:15 Post subject: |
|
|
So did anyone actually do benchmarks (other than Denuvo) or we are just supposed to believe anything this baldman guy says?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaLexy
Posts: 3042
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Jun 2017 12:22 Post subject: |
|
|
 Spoiler: | RiME v1.01 update
Hi everybody,
We wanted to give you an update regarding the use of Denuvo anti-tamper software in RiME. Today, we got word that there was a crack which would bypass Denuvo. Upon receiving this news, we worked to test this and verify that it was, in fact, the case. We have now confirmed that it is. As such, we at Team Grey Box are following through on our promise from earlier this week that we will be replacing the current build of RiME with one that does not contain Denuvo. Please make sure your PC version of RiME has been updated, if it has not done so automatically.
Team Grey Box is also committed both to supporting the games we publish and to our player base, so this is definitely not the final update you will see with RiME. We are currently working on our first traditional patch, which we are aiming to release next week. This patch will provide a fix for the VR initialization bug, and will also provide a fix to some specific instances of hardware-related crashes, among other updates which will be detailed at the time. We sincerely thank players who have reported issues, and a special thanks to those who have worked with us to provide additional details, DxDiag files, and the like. We want to continue giving you the best product we possibly can.
Please feel free to reach out to us with any additional questions or concerns you may have. Thanks again for your continued support! |
They should definetly getting a cookie for the fast response.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Jun 2017 12:32 Post subject: |
|
|
| madness wrote: | | So did anyone actually do benchmarks (other than Denuvo) or we are just supposed to believe anything this baldman guy says? |
I was thinking the same. Is there any data, other than what Baldman has show, that supports his findings?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JackQ
Non-expret in Derps lagunge
Posts: 14186
Location: Kibbutznik, Israel
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Jun 2017 12:41 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Jun 2017 13:33 Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe it's due to the fact that 1.01 does improve performances because of other fixes and not because of Denuvo removal though.
I'm not sure what Baldman did (didn't check), but if he did remove Denuvo, you can do a proper benchmark using his crack I guess.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JackQ
Non-expret in Derps lagunge
Posts: 14186
Location: Kibbutznik, Israel
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Jun 2017 13:47 Post subject: |
|
|
The update changelog mainly statement about Denuvo's removal and other fixes need to take sometime..
Its been confirmed by the devs themselves that update been applied becuase of Denuvo being cracked and more updates to fix more things will come soon.
"Fuck Denuvo"
Your personal opinions != the rest of the forum
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Jun 2017 14:56 Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah I did indeed try the first release with denuvo. Hence my comments about abysmal performance.
I have to admit that I didn't try bringing down a notch the AA options before actually doing it on the non-denuvo version.
Maybe performance would of been the same.
Anyone tried bringing down an notch AA option to TXAA on denuvo version ?
Lian-Li XL Dynamic ROG Black - EVGA 1000w - Lian-li Galahad 360 AIO - MSI X570 Meg Ace - Rysen 5950x - G.Skill 4x16GB CL14 3600@3800(14-15-15-34) - Samsung 960 Pro 512 - Samsung 960 Pro 1TB - Kingston HyperX SSD 120gb SATA 3 (6gb/s) - WD Black Caviar 2x 2TB SATA 3 (6gb/s) Raid 0 - WD Black Caviar 2 TB SATA 3 (6gb/s) - EVGA 3090 FTW3 - LG C1 48" 4k120hrz
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JBeckman
VIP Member
Posts: 34998
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Jun 2017 16:43 Post subject: |
|
|
After TXAA is SSAA so if that's what you were using that would likely explain the performance problems a bit although the game still runs poorly even without it.
So SSAA? Super sampling anti-aliasing which here I believe it's a 2x2 (4x) increase of your select screen resolution so if you're playing the game at 1920x1080 it's effectively 3840x2160 and if you're at 2560x1440 it's effectively 5120x2880 and so on.
TXAA I'm not too sure what that is, the .dll library for Nvidia Gameworks only has HBAO(+) so I'm assuming it's just incorrectly labeled UE4 temporal AA.
And FXAA is just the shader fast approximate anti aliasing, I prefer SMAA myself but FXAA isn't too bad though a bit softer.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Jun 2017 17:37 Post subject: |
|
|
I still had drops below 60 fps with TXAA.
The game is uninstalled though.If you make a walking simulator then at the very least it should look fantastic graphics-wise.
This game? It looks pretty mediocre and runs poorly.
1) Lenovo Legion 7 (AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, RTX 3080 16Gb, 32Gb DDR4, SSD 1TB +2TB
2) SFFPC (streaming via Moonlight+ Sunshine)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Jun 2017 18:01 Post subject: |
|
|
I like the game so far, but it runs like shit. I'm having sub-30 framerates @ 1080p on a gtx 1060 and I didn't even set everything to max. Terrible port.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 2nd Jun 2017 18:04 Post subject: |
|
|
The fact the game is gonna be ported to the Nintendo Switch makes this even more of a shame...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 3 of 4 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
Absolutely unacceptable performance from this shit port
