Leftists about Trump attack: "That attack shouldn't have happened, we don't condone violence. But we understand that he had legitimate reasons to do it. It is actually Trump's fault."
Couleur moderator on a user going apeshit on another user: "That's no way to conduct a conversation, it's against the rules but I understand why you said those things. It is actually VGA's fault, shut the fuck up now VGA before I ban you."
Leftist logic
Too bad you didn't get a ban though.
You'd like that, huh? Keep counting on your radical fellow to ban me
Leftists about Trump attack: "That attack shouldn't have happened, we don't condone violence. But we understand that he had legitimate reasons to do it. It is actually Trump's fault."
Couleur moderator on a user going apeshit on another user: "That's no way to conduct a conversation, it's against the rules but I understand why you said those things. It is actually VGA's fault, shut the fuck up now VGA before I ban you."
Leftist logic
Too bad you didn't get a ban though.
Is that one of your guilty pleasures? Seeing someone get punished?
"Music washes away from the soul the dust of everyday life." ~Berthold Auerbach
Yeah, I'd like to see people getting temp bans for shit they deserve getting banned for. But alas the hump tried to bully one of the mods into submission (and partially succeeded) and the bans stopped.
Yeah, I'd like to see people getting temp bans for shit they deserve getting banned for. But alas the hump tried to bully one of the mods into submission (and partially succeeded) and the bans stopped.
Because banning people just because the mod has a hard on for doing that makes sense? Or someone has a different opinion to him?
Yeah, I'd like to see people getting temp bans for shit they deserve getting banned for. But alas the hump tried to bully one of the mods into submission (and partially succeeded) and the bans stopped.
Would you like to be part of the people that get to choose who's in and who's out?
I'm might be mistaken, but would you like to be the one pushing people into "submission"?
You tend to want to see people deserve punishment for percieved infractions, would you care to tell us what should those be?
"Music washes away from the soul the dust of everyday life." ~Berthold Auerbach
Last edited by HubU on Sun, 20th Mar 2016 01:12; edited 2 times in total
Yeah, I'd like to see people getting temp bans for shit they deserve getting banned for. But alas the hump tried to bully one of the mods into submission (and partially succeeded) and the bans stopped.
Because banning people just because the mod has a hard on for doing that makes sense? Or someone has a different opinion to him?
Most people who got hit by the bans broke the forum rules. So just because you didn't like the verdict doesn't mean it wasn't warranted. Because then I'd argue that all of my bans were 'unfair'.
HubU wrote:
Mr.Tinkles wrote:
Yeah, I'd like to see people getting temp bans for shit they deserve getting banned for. But alas the hump tried to bully one of the mods into submission (and partially succeeded) and the bans stopped.
Would you like to be part of the peopke that get to choose who's in and who's out?
I'm might be mistaken, but would you like to be the one pushing people into "submission"?
You tend to want to see people deserve punishment for percieved infractions, would you care to tell us what should those be?
Yeah, I'd like to see people getting temp bans for shit they deserve getting banned for. But alas the hump tried to bully one of the mods into submission (and partially succeeded) and the bans stopped.
Because banning people just because the mod has a hard on for doing that makes sense? Or someone has a different opinion to him?
Most people who got hit by the bans broke the forum rules. So just because you didn't like the verdict doesn't mean it wasn't warranted. Because then I'd argue that all of my bans were 'unfair'.
HubU wrote:
Mr.Tinkles wrote:
Yeah, I'd like to see people getting temp bans for shit they deserve getting banned for. But alas the hump tried to bully one of the mods into submission (and partially succeeded) and the bans stopped.
Would you like to be part of the peopke that get to choose who's in and who's out?
I'm might be mistaken, but would you like to be the one pushing people into "submission"?
You tend to want to see people deserve punishment for percieved infractions, would you care to tell us what should those be?
Where did I say any of that?
Mr.Tinkles wrote:
Yeah, I'd like to see people getting temp bans for shit they deserve getting banned for
For starters.
"Music washes away from the soul the dust of everyday life." ~Berthold Auerbach
So you don't know what a temp ban is? Because that's not someone who decides who's in and who's out.
Edit:
And in case you missed it;
Mr.Tinkles wrote:
Most people who got hit by the bans broke the forum rules. So just because you didn't like the verdict doesn't mean it wasn't warranted. Because then I'd argue that all of my bans were 'unfair'.
Last edited by Mr.Tinkles on Sun, 20th Mar 2016 01:21; edited 1 time in total
Meaning that, although you don't have the means to enforce your own justice, you'd like to find people to acknowledge yours.
I'm not judging, I'm trying to understand how..... you think.
"Music washes away from the soul the dust of everyday life." ~Berthold Auerbach
I, sadly, can't fathom your logic. That's why I tried to have a sneak-peek inside your thinking.
Don't be upset, I was just curious.
And that's why you never think you deserve a ban and you're always surprised about it, I guess.
I was banned but on one occasion, and I doubt that beside Pump Action and I, anybody knows why. So that's kind of a moot point, as far as you're concerned.
"Music washes away from the soul the dust of everyday life." ~Berthold Auerbach
"Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-imposed nonage. Nonage is the inability to use one's own understanding without another's guidance. This nonage is self-imposed if its cause lies not in lack of understanding but in indecision and lack of courage to use one's own mind without another's guidance. Dare to know! (Sapere aude.) "Have the courage to use your own understanding," is therefore the motto of the enlightenment."
I don't understand how I was baiting, I posted a video with a guy talking and showing evidence of the attack on Trump and the supposed "manhandling" of a reporter, who was obviously lying.
It was about the leftists getting violent, causing a Trump rally to be cancelled, the guy charging at him and then being legitimized as a protestor, the lying journalist. It made some points.
Then the usual brigade started attacking me because of other videos that guy had made, some Jones guy he is working for etc. While I was being called a lobotomized idiot.
I didn't even say much, just brought up the points through a video wtf
It was one the most "that escalated quickly" moments I've had online.
I don't understand how I was baiting, I posted a video with a guy talking and showing evidence of the attack on Trump and the supposed "manhandling" of a reporter, who was obviously lying.
It was about the leftists getting violent, causing a Trump rally to be cancelled, the guy charging at him and then being legitimized as a protestor, the lying journalist. It made some points.
Then the usual brigade started attacking me because of other videos that guy had made, some Jones guy he is working for etc. While I was being called a lobotomized idiot.
I didn't even say much, just brought up the points through a video wtf
Ok, you're right... you don't deserve the ban as you're part of the other group I mentioned. My apologies.
Blessed is he who, in the name of charity and good will, mods the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother’s keeper and the finder of lost trolls.
edit: removed an "l".
"Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-imposed nonage. Nonage is the inability to use one's own understanding without another's guidance. This nonage is self-imposed if its cause lies not in lack of understanding but in indecision and lack of courage to use one's own mind without another's guidance. Dare to know! (Sapere aude.) "Have the courage to use your own understanding," is therefore the motto of the enlightenment."
Could any of you guys stop being so resentful and acknowlege the fact that agreeing to disagree is OK?
We all can understand that the regressives leftists are flailing about with a cornered man's entropy. But let's make it a honourable and dignified last stand.
"Music washes away from the soul the dust of everyday life." ~Berthold Auerbach
"I'm pretty sure there's a lot more to life than being really, really, ridiculously good looking. And I plan on finding out what that is." Derek Zoolander
"Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-imposed nonage. Nonage is the inability to use one's own understanding without another's guidance. This nonage is self-imposed if its cause lies not in lack of understanding but in indecision and lack of courage to use one's own mind without another's guidance. Dare to know! (Sapere aude.) "Have the courage to use your own understanding," is therefore the motto of the enlightenment."
"Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-imposed nonage. Nonage is the inability to use one's own understanding without another's guidance. This nonage is self-imposed if its cause lies not in lack of understanding but in indecision and lack of courage to use one's own mind without another's guidance. Dare to know! (Sapere aude.) "Have the courage to use your own understanding," is therefore the motto of the enlightenment."
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Leftist logic 
